Answer:
this special order will result in a $2,637 profit, so the company should accept it
Explanation:
special order for 26 gold bracelets
discounted price of $367 per unit
normal production costs:
direct materials $143direct labor $90manufacturing overhead $31total $264costs related to the special order
increase in direct materials = $7 per unit, total of $150 per unit
direct labor $90 per unit
variable overhead = $8 per unit
machine used for this project only $457
revenue generated by special order:
total revenue $9,542
- variable costs ($6,448)
direct materials $3,900direct labor $2,340variable overhead $208- special machine ($457)
profit from special order $2,637
The capital accounts of Heidi and Moss have balances of $90,000 and $65,000, respectively, on January 1, the beginning of the current fiscal year. On April 10, Heidi invested an additional $8,000. During the year, Heidi and Moss withdrew $40,000 and $32,000, respectively. Revenues were $540,000 and expenses were $420,000 for the year. The articles of partnership make no reference to the division of net income. Required: 1. Prepare a statement of partners' equity for the partnership of Heidi and Moss. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. Enter all amounts as positive numbers. Heidi and Moss Statement of Partners' Equity For the Year Ended December 31 Heidi Moss Total Capital, January 1 $ 90,000 $ 65,000 $ 155,000 Net income for the year 60,000 60,000 120,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ Withdrawals during the year Capital, December 31 $ 118,000 $ 93,000 $ 211,000 2. Journalize the entries to: Close the revenue and expenses account. Close the drawing accounts. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. a. Revenues 540,000 Heidi, Capital 540,000 Moss, Capital 420,000 Heidi, Capital 40,000 Moss, Capital Moss, Drawing b. Heidi, Capital 40,000 Moss, Capital 32,000 Heidi, Drawing 40,000 Moss, Drawing 32,000
Answer:
The statement and journal are attached
Explanation:
The Converting Department of Hopkinsville Company had 1,200 units in work in process at the beginning of the period, which were 75% complete. During the period, 25,200 units were completed and transferred to the Packing Department. There were 1,360 units in process at the end of the period, which were 25% complete. Direct materials are placed into the process at the beginning of production. Determine the number of equivalent units of production with respect to direct materials and conversion costs. If an amount is zero, enter in "0".
Answer:
Equivalent Units
Material cost = 26,560
Conversion Cost= 25,540
Explanation:
We would assume the company uses weighted average method of valuation.
Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required is done in the period under consideration. So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked.
Equivalent units = Degree of completion (%) × Number of units
Material cost
Item Unit Equivalent unit
Completed 25,200 100% ×25200 = 25,200
Closing WIP 1,360 100%× 1,360 1360
Total equivalent units 26,560
Conversion Cost
Item Unit Equivalent unit
Completed 25,200 100% ×25200 = 25,200
Closing WIP 1,360 25%× 1,360 340
Total equivalent units 25,540
HI Corporation is considering the purchase of a machine that promises to reduce operating costs by the same amount for every year of its 5-year useful life. The machine will cost $211,980 and has no salvage value. The machine has a 14% internal rate of return. (Ignore income taxes.) Click here to view Exhibit 13B-1 and Exhibit 13B-2 to determine the appropriate discount factor(s) using the tables provided. Required: What are the annual cost savings promised by the machine? (Round your intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
Answer:
Annual savings = 61,746.
Explanation:
The Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present value (PV) of cash outflows and PV of cash inflow
At the internal rate of return the PC of annual cash savings will be equal to the investment cost
Initial cost = 211980
PV = annual cash savings = A× (1- (1+r)^(-n)/ r
A=? r-internal rate of return, 14%, n-number of years- 5
211980 = A (1- (1.14)^(-5)/ 0.14
211,980 = A× 3.433080969
A= 211,980/3.43308
A= 61746.28619
Annual savings = 61,746.
Harry and Meghan have considered starting their own business but are concerned about the possibility of losing even their personal assets if the business fails. One way for BOTH Harry and Meghan to avoid this liability risk would be to :
A.
divorce as soon as possible and establish two sole proprietorships
B.
Organize a limited partnership with Harry as the general partner
C.
set up offshore accounts
D.
form a corporation
Answer:
The correct option is D,form a corporation
Explanation:
The rationale for my choice of answer is that limited liability applies to a corporation which is found in other types of businesses.
Limited liability is a concept which implies that the liability of shareholders in a limited liability company is limited to the amount contributed to the business by a way of shares held in the company.
When a company runs into debt,the shareholders would not be required to make up such debts from their private pockets,hence Harry and Meghan personal effects are secure.
The way for Harry and Meghan to avoid liability risk is to form a corporation
Typically, a limited liability applies to a corporation which means that the owner liability is limited to the amount he owns in the business.
Limited liability implies that liability of shareholders is limited to the amount contributed to the business by a way of shares held in the company.
So, when company runs into debt, the shareholders would not be required to make up such debts from their private pockets,therefore, the investment of Harry and Meghan are secure.
Hence, the only way for Harry and Meghan to avoid liability risk is to form a corporation
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about this here
brainly.com/question/13378534
The following cost data relate to the manufacturing activities of Chang Company during the just completed year: Manufacturing overhead costs incurred: Indirect materials $ 16,000 Indirect labor 140,000 Property taxes, factory 9,000 Utilities, factory 80,000 Depreciation, factory 251,500 Insurance, factory 11,000 Total actual manufacturing overhead costs incurred $ 507,500 Other costs incurred: Purchases of raw materials (both direct and indirect) $ 410,000 Direct labor cost $ 70,000 Inventories: Raw materials, beginning $ 21,000 Raw materials, ending $ 31,000 Work in process, beginning $ 41,000 Work in process, ending $ 71,000 The company uses a predetermined overhead rate of $25 per machine-hour to apply overhead cost to jobs. A total of 20,700 machine-hours were used during the year. Required: 1. Compute the amount of underapplied or overapplied overhead cost for the year. 2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured for the year.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of given question is shown below:-
The difference between the actual accumulated manufacturing overhead and the applied overhead measured on the basis of actual activity carried out at standard cost is the overhead expense under or over applied.
When applied overheads, the overheads are considered underapplied less than the actual overhead.
When overheads are applied, the overheads are considered overapplied higher than the real overhead.
So, we need to compute the applied overhead to find out the under or over applied overhead.
Applied Manufacturing Overhead = Total Machine Hours actually recorded × Predetermined Overhead Rate
= 20,700 MHs × $25
= $517,500
As we can see that the applied overheads are greater than the actual incurred overhead, so, Overheads are overapplied.
Over-Applied Overhead Cost = Applied Overhead – Actual Overhead
= 517,500 – 507,500
= $10,000
2. The preparation of schedule of cost of goods manufactured for the year is shown below:-
Chang Company
Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
Direct materials:
Raw material, beginning $21,000
Raw material, purchases
(excluding indirect material
($410,000 - $16,000) $394,000
Raw materials available
for use $415,000
Less: Raw materials, ending ($31,000)
Raw materials use
in production $799,000
Add: Direct labor cost $70,000
Add: Applied Manufacturing
Overhead
(20,700 MHs × $25) $517,500
Total manufacturing costs $1,386,500
Add: Work in process,
beginning $41,000
Less: Work in process, ending ($71,000)
Cost of goods manufactured $1,356,500
In 2017, Cullumber Corporation incurred research and development costs as follows: Materials and equipment $111000 Personnel 131000 Indirect costs 171000 $413000 These costs relate to a product that will be marketed in 2018. It is estimated that these costs will be recouped by December 31, 2020. The equipment has no alternative future use. What is the amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017
Answer:
The amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017 is $413,000
Explanation:
In order to calculate the amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017 we would have to use the following formula:
amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017= Materials and equipment costs+ Personnel costs+Indirect costs
amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017= $111,000+ $131,000+$171,000
amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017=$413,000
The amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2017 is $413,000
The amount of research and development costs that should be expensed in 2020
$ 99000 + $ 119000 + $ 159000
$377,000
Management in Life Annabelle and Bettina share a dorm room. They like each other, but they disagree about how often to clean. Eventually, Annabelle says to Bettina, "I'm afraid that if we clean the room only once a month, we're going to get bugs. Bettina replies, "Maybe, but this physics course is killing me, so I don't have time to clean more often than that." Annabelle and Bettina are engaged in conflict, based on Which of the following outcomes are likely in this situation?
A) Annabelle and Bettina will learn from each other.
B) The roommates will come up with a creative solution.
C) The roommates will stop speaking to each other.
D) Annabelle and Bettina will be angry at each other.
Answer:
A). Annabelle and Bettina will learn from each other .
B). The roommates will come up with a creative solution."
Explanation:
Anabelle and Bettina are involved in a 'cognitive' conflict as it occurs when they both experience a mental as well as emotional discomfort when they are confronted with the information that challenges their existing ideas or beliefs. The most likely outcomes of this situation would be that they 'both would learn from each other' by accepting each other's point of view and adapting with the new information that would help them 'reach a creative solution' to resolve their conflict over the cleaning of their room. Therefore, options A and B are the correct answers.
Colil Computer Systems, Inc., manufactures printer circuit cards. All direct materials are added at the inception of the production process. During January, the accounting department noted that there was no beginning inventory. Direct materials of $ 300 comma 000 were used in production during the month. Workminusinminusprocess records revealed that 12 comma 500 card units were started in January, 6 comma 250 card units were complete, and 4 comma 000 card units were spoiled as expected. Ending workminusinminusprocess card units are complete in respect to direct materials costs. Spoilage is not detected until the process is complete. What is the direct material cost assigned to good units completed? A. $ 258 comma 621 B. $ 150 comma 000 C. $ 96 comma 000 D. $ 246 comma 000
Answer:
D. $246,000
Explanation:
As per the given question the solution of direct material cost assigned to good units completed is provided below:-
To reach Cost transferred out we need to follow some steps which is following below:-
Step 1. Cost per unit = cost of material used ÷ Units started
= $300,000 ÷ 12,500
= $24
Now,
Step 2. Goods units completed = Started units × Cost per unit
= 6,250 × $24
= $150,000
Step 3. Normal spoilage = Cards units × Cost per unit
= 4,000 × $24
= $96,000
and finally
Cost transferred out = Goods units completed + Normal spoilage
= $150,000 + $96,000
= $246,000
To reach allocation of Cost transferred out we simply put the values into formula.
Thunder Corporation's balance sheet and income statement appear below: Comparative Balance Sheet Ending Balance Beginning Balance Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 28 $ 31 Accounts receivable 60 65 Inventory 41 42 Property, plant, and equipment 454 380 Less accumulated depreciation 206 172 Total assets $ 377 $ 346 Liabilities and stockholders' equity: Accounts payable $ 43 $ 45 Bonds payable 190 260 Common stock 41 40 Retained earnings 103 1 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 377 $ 346 Income Statement Sales $ 874 Cost of goods sold 533 Gross margin 341 Selling and administrative expense 161 Net operating income 180 Income taxes 54 Net income $ 126 The company did not dispose of any property, plant, and equipment, issue any bonds payable, or repurchase any of its own common stock during the year. The company declared and paid a cash dividend of $24. Required: Prepare a statement of cash flows in good form using the indirect method.
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the cash flow statement is presented below:
Thunder Corporation's
Cash flow statement
Cash flow from operating activities
Net operating income $180
Adjustment made
Add: Depreciation expenses $34 ($206 - $172)
Add: Decrease in account receivable $5 ($60 - $65)
Add: Decrease in inventory $1 ($41 - $42)
Less: Decrease in account payable $2 ($43 - $45)
Net cash provided by operating activities $164
Cash flow from investing activities
Purchase of Property, plant, and equipment -$74 ($454 - $380)
Net cash used by investing activities -$74
Cash flow from financing activities
Repayment of bond payable -$70 ($190 - $260)
Issuance of the common stock $1 ($41 - $40)
Dividend paid -$24
Net cash used by financing activities -$93
Decrease in cash -$3
Add: Beginning cash balance $31
Ending cash balance $28
The items which displayed in a positive sign indicates the cash inflow and the items which displayed in a negative sign indicates the cash outflow
A company used straight-line depreciation for an item of equipment that cost $15,350, had a salvage value of $3,200 and a six-year useful life. After depreciating the asset for three complete years, the salvage value was reduced to $1,535 but its total useful life remained the same. Determine the amount of depreciation to be charged against the equipment during each of the remaining years of its useful life: Multiple Choice $2,880. $5,672. $1,215. $2,580. $3,200.
Answer:
The correct answer is $2,580.
Explanation:
Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (cost - residual value) / No of years = ($15,350 - $3,200) / 6 years = $2,025 yearly depreciation expense.
Accumulated depreciation at Year 3 = $2,025 x 3 = $6,075
Net book value (NBV) becomes $15,350 - $6,075 = $9,275
New depreciation is ($9,275 - $1,535) / 3 years = $2,580 yearly depreciation expenses
Hancock Medical Supply Co., earned $90,500 of revenue on account during Year 1, its first year of operation. During Year 1, Hancock collected $71,400 of cash from its receivables accounts. The company did not write-off any uncollectible accounts. It estimates that it will be unable to collect 1% of revenue on account. What is the net realizable value of receivables that will be reported on the balance sheet at December 31, Year 1
Answer:
$18,195
Explanation:
The computation of the net realizable value is shown below:
As we know that
Net Realizable Value of Receivables = Ending Accounts Receivable - Estimated Uncollectibles amount
where,
Ending balance of Accounts Receivable is
= Revenue on Account - Accounts collected
= $90,500 - $71,400
= $191,00
And,
Estimated Uncollectibles i.e Bad debt Expense is
= Revenue on Account × given percentage
= $90,500 × 1%
= $905
So, the net realizable value is
= $19,100 - $905
= $18,195
We simply applied the above formula
On January 1, 20X1, Popular Creek Corporation organized SunTime Company as a subsidiary in Switzerland with an initial investment cost of Swiss francs (SFr) 80,000. SunTime’s December 31, 20X1, trial balance in SFr is as follows:Part 1. Prepare a schedule translating (current rate method) the December 31, 20X1, trial balance from Swiss francs to dollars.
On January 1, 20X1, Popular Creek Corporation organized SunTime Company as a subsidiary in Switzerland with an initial investment cost of Swiss francs (SFr) 80,000. SunTime’s December 31, 20X1, trial balance in SFr is as follows:
Then intended files that supposed to be here are added in the attachments below:
Part 1. Prepare a schedule translating (current rate method) the December 31, 20X1, trial balance from Swiss francs to dollars.
Answer:
Explanation:
We are tasked to Prepare a schedule translating (current rate method) the December 31, 20X1, trial balance from Swiss francs to dollars.
Schedule remeasuring Swiss francs to dollars
Trial Balance Translation Schedule
December 31, 20X1
Sfr Exchange Rate U.S dollar
Cash $7,200 0.73 $5,256
Accounts $25,000 0.73 $18,250
receivable (net)
Receivable from $6,300 0.73 $4,599
Creek
Inventory $26,000 0.73 $18,980
Plant & equipment $110,000 0.73 $80,300
Cost of good sold $71,500 0.75 $53,625
Depreciation expense $10,100 0.75 $7,575
Operating expense $35,000 0.75 $26,250
Dividends paid $16,400 0.74 $12,136
Total: $307,500 $226,971
[tex]Accumulated - \ translation \\other \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ adjustment\\Comprehensive \\ loss[/tex] (233,031 - 226,971) $6060
TOTAL DEBITS $233,031
Accumulated $10,100 0.73 $7,373
Depreciation
Account $13,600 0.73 $9,928
Payable
Bond $51,000 0.73 $37,230
Payable
Common stock $78,000 0.80 $62,400
Sales $154,800 0.75 $116,100
Total: $307,500 $233,031
No entry necessary $ -
TOTAL CREDITS $233,031
Please help ASAP giving BRAINLIEST , Did I get this correct?
Answer:
No, in my opinion I would choose:
A) the properties of free-market system that determine what the outcomes will be.
Explanation:
That would be my answer because the definition of market forces is "the economic factors affecting the price of, demand for, and availability of a commodity."(off the internet) and the answer which fits that definition the most in my opinion is A.
That would be my answer at least.
Hope this helps!
A Company manufactures coffee tables. The Company has a policy of adding a 20% markup to full costs and currently has excess capacity. The following information pertains to the company's normal operations per month: Output units 30,000 tables Machine-hours 6000 hours Direct manufacturing labor-hours 10,000 hours Direct materials per unit $50 Direct manufacturing labor per hour $12.00 Variable manufacturing overhead costs $322,500 Fixed manufacturing overhead costs $1,200,000 Product and process design costs $600,000 Marketing and distribution costs $1,290,000 For long-run pricing of the coffee tables, what price will most likely be used by the Company
Answer:
$201.30
Explanation:
Direct materials = $50
Total Direct manufacturing labor = $12.00 * 10,000 = $120,000
Variable manufacturing overhead costs = $322,500
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs = $1,200,000
Product and process design costs = $600,000
Marketing and distribution costs = $1,290,000
Total cost apart from direct material = $120,000 + $322,500 + $1,200,000 + $600,000 + $1,290,000 = $3,532,500
Cost per unit apart from direct material = $3,532,500 / 30,000 = $117.75
Total cost per unit = $117.75 + $50 = $167.75
Mark up per unit = $167.75 * 20% = $33.55
Price per unit = $167.75 + $33.55 = $201.30
Answer: $201.30
Explanation:
To solve this all the expenses incurred per unit need to be included in the unit.
Direct Materials $50
Direct Manufacturing Labour Hours per unit
= (10,000/30,000 units) * 12 (direct Manufacturing Labour per hour)
= $4
Variable Manufacturing Overhead Cost
= 322,500/30,000
= $10.75
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs
= 1,200,000/30,000
= $40
Product and process design costs
= 600,000/30,000
= $20
Marketing and distribution costs
= 1,290,000/30,000
= $43
Adding everything up,
= 50 + 4 + 10.75 + 40 + 20 + 43
= $167.75
Company adds 20% to costs so,
= 167.75 * ( 1 + 20%)
= $201.30
Company will most likely sell at $201.30
The following present value factors are provided for use in this problem. Periods Present Value of $1 at 8% Present Value of an Annuity of $1 at 8% 1 0.9259 0.9259 2 0.8573 1.7833 3 0.7938 2.5771 4 0.7350 3.3121 Xavier Co. wants to purchase a machine for $36,300 with a four year life and a $1,200 salvage value. Xavier requires an 8% return on investment. The expected year-end net cash flows are $11,300 in each of the four years. What is the machine's net present value
Answer:
$2007.6
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
4th Year Cash Flow = Salvage Value + Expected End Year Net Cash Flow
= $1,200 + $11,300
= $12,500
Year Cash flow ($) PVF at 8% Present value ($)
0 36,300 1.000 -36,300
1 11,300 0.9259 10462.67
2 11,300 0.8573 9687.49
3 11,300 0.7938 8969.94
4 12,500 0.7350 9187.5
Net present value 2007.6
According to the analysis, net present value of machine is $2007.6
Bass Accounting Services expects its accountants to work a total of 26 comma 000 direct labor hours per year. The company's estimated total indirect costs are $ 390 comma 000. The company uses direct labor hours as the allocation base for indirect costs. What is the indirect cost allocation rate? A. $ 18.00 per hour B. $ 30.00 per hour C. $ 15.00 per hour D. $ 150.00 per hour
Answer:
C) $ 15.00 per hour
Explanation:
total labor hours 26,000 per year
total indirect costs $390,000
if the company allocates indirect costs according to labor hours employed, the cost allocation rate should be:
$390,000 / 26,000 = $15 per direct labor hour
This means that for every labor hour employed, $15 will be allocated as indirect costs, e.g. a client requires 50 labor hours per year and $750 (= 50 x $15) in indirect costs.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (c) $15 per hour
Explanation:
Solution
Recall that:
Expected wok for accountants = 26,000
The company estimated total indirect costs - 390,000
The next step is to find the allocation base cost for indirect cost.
Now,
The indirect labor cost is calculated as follows:
indirect cost allocation rate:
= Total indirect costs/Labor hours
= $390,000/26,000
= $15 per hours
The following costs are included in a recent summary of data for a company: advertising expense, $85,000; depreciation expense - factory building, $133,000; direct labor, $250,000; direct material used, $300,000; factory utilities, $105,000; and sales salaries expense, $150,000. Determine the dollar amount of conversion costs.
Answer:
Conversion costs= $488,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
depreciation expense - factory building, $133,000
direct labor, $250,000
factory utilities, $105,000
The conversion costs are the sum of direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
Manufacturing overhead= 133,000 + 105,000= 238,000
Direct labor= 250,000
Conversion costs= $488,000
In performing accounting services for small businesses, you encounter the following situations per taining to cash sales. 1. Poole Company enters sales and sales taxes separately in its cash register. On April 10, the register totals are sales $30,000 and sales taxes $1,500. 2. Waterman Company does not segregate sales and sales taxes. Its register total for April 15 is $25,680, which includes a 7% sales tax. Prepare the entry to record the sales transactions and related taxes for each client.
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, journal entries of the given data are as follow:-
1.Journal Entry of Poole Company
April 10
Cash A/c Dr. $31,500
To Sales A/c $30,000
To Sales tax payable A/c $1,500
(Being the sales and sales tax payable is recorded)
2. Since Register total for April $25,680 includes 7% sales tax.
So Sales of Waterman Company
= Registered Total Amount ÷ (1 + Sales Tax Rate)
= $25,680 ÷ (1 + 7%)
= $25,680 ÷ 1.07
= $24,000
Now
Sales tax = $24,000 × 7% = $1,680
Journal Entry of Waterman Company
On 15 April
Cash A/c Dr. $25,680
To Sales A/c $24,000
To Sales tax payable A/c $1,680
(Being the sales and sales tax payable is recorded)
(Ignore income taxes in this problem.) Assume you can invest money at a 14 percent rate of return. How much money must be invested now to be able to withdraw $5,000 from this investment at the end of each year for eight years, the first withdrawal occurring one year from now
Answer:
the original amount invested = $285,714.29
Explanation:
Let original amount invested be x
Amount to be withdrawn per year = $5,000
Total number of years = 8
Total amount to be withdrawn = 5,000 × 8 = $40,000
Next, we are told that 14% return on x is realized,
∴ 14% return on x = $40,000
0.14 × x = 40,000
x = 40,000 ÷ 0.14 = $285,714.29
Therefore, the original amount invested = $285,714.29
elb Company currently manufactures 50,000 units per year of a key component for its manufacturing process. Variable costs are $2.95 per unit, fixed costs related to making this component are $67,000 per year, and allocated fixed costs are $61,500 per year. The allocated fixed costs are unavoidable whether the company makes or buys this component. The company is considering buying this component from a supplier for $3.90 per unit. Calculate the total incremental cost of making 50,000 units and buying 50,000 units. Should it continue to manufacture the component, or should it buy this component from the outside supplier
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
Incremental Cost of Making Product
Variable costs are $2.95 per unit and 50,000 units are to be made. Total Variable Cost is therefore,
= 2.95 * 50,000
= $147,500
Fixed costs associated with the production are$ 67,000 so added tl the variable costs is,
= 147,500 + 67,000
= $214,500
$214,500 is the cost making the product.
Cost of Buying Product
Component can be bought for $3.90 per unit. 50,000 units to be bought gives,
= 50,000 * 3.9
= $195,000
Cost of buying is $195,000
Decision
Company should buy the component as it spends less in buying it than I making it.
Note - Allocated fixed costs were not included in calculation because they will be there regardless of the decision. Hence the term, incremental costs.
Answer:
elb Company
a) Incremental Cost of making 50,000 units:
Variable costs = $2.95 x 50,000 = $147,500
Avoidable fixed costs = $67,000
Total = $214,500
b) Incremental Cost of buying 50,000
Buy-in costs =- $3.90 x 50,000 = $195,000
c) The company should buy this component from the outside supplier.
Explanation:
In make or buy decisions, only variable and avoidable costs are taken into consideration. Unavoidable fixed costs are sunk costs which must be incurred irrespective of the choice made.
Therefore, the unavoidable allocated fixed costs of $61,500 should not be taken into consideration. Afterall, no matter the decision, it would still be incurred and allocated.
he income statement of Sarasota Company is shown below. SARASOTA COMPANY INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 Sales revenue $6,890,000 Cost of goods sold Beginning inventory $1,910,000 Purchases 4,410,000 Goods available for sale 6,320,000 Ending inventory 1,620,000 Cost of goods sold 4,700,000 Gross profit 2,190,000 Operating expenses Selling expenses 460,000 Administrative expenses 700,000 1,160,000 Net income $1,030,000 Additional information: 1. Accounts receivable decreased $350,000 during the year. 2. Prepaid expenses increased $160,000 during the year. 3. Accounts payable to suppliers of merchandise decreased $300,000 during the year. 4. Accrued expenses payable decreased $90,000 during the year. 5. Administrative expenses include depreciation expense of $50,000. Prepare the operating activities section of the statement of cash flows using the direct method.
Answer:
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash Receipts from Customers $7,240,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees ($6,460,000)
Net Cash from Operating Activities $780,000
Explanation:
Prepare a statement of cash flows` operating activities section as follows :
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash Receipts from Customers $7,240,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees ($6,460,000)
Net Cash from Operating Activities $780,000
Cash Receipts from Customers Calculations
Sales revenue $6,890,000
Add Decrease in Accounts Receivables $350,000
Cash Receipts from Customers $7,240,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees Calculations
Cost of goods sold $4,700,000
Add
Selling expenses $460,000
Administrative expenses $700,000
Less depreciation expense of $50,000
Decrease in Accounts Payable $300,000
Decrease in Accrued Expenses $90,000
Increase in Prepaid expenses $160,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees $6,460,000
Assume that at the end of 2019, Clampett, Inc. (an S corporation) distributes property (fair market value of $40,000, basis of $5,000) to each of its four equal shareholders (aggregate distribution of $160,000). At the time of the distribution, Clampett, Inc., has no corporate earnings and profits and J.D. has a basis of $50,000 in his Clampett, Inc., stock. What is J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution
Answer:
J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution is $85,000
Explanation:
In order to calculate the J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution we would have to use the following formula:
J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution=original basis +increase/decrease in basis from gain from property distribution
original basis=$50,000
basis from gain from property distribution=$40,000-$5,000
basis from gain from property distribution=$35,000
Therefore, J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution=$50,000+$35,000
J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution=$85,000
Who has the comparative advantageLOADING... in producing oil? A. Norway has a comparative advantage producing oil because its opportunity cost of producing oil is lower. B. Neither country has a comparative advantage producing oil because their opportunity costs of producing oil are equal. C. The United Kingdom has a comparative advantage producing oil because its opportunity cost of producing oil is lower. D. Norway has a comparative advantage producing oil because it can produce more oil. E. The United Kingdom has a comparative advantage producing oil because it can produce more oil.
Answer:
The answer is option D) Norway has a comparative advantage producing oil because it can produce more oil.
Explanation:
Norway currently produces 1,398 thousand barrels of crude oil per day. At this capacity, it can produce more oil in comparison to United Kingdom that produces 1000 thousand barrels per day.
This statistics gives Norway a comparative advantage over United Kingdom.
Also comparing the consumption rate for both countries with Norway having a population of 5,421,241 which is far less than 66, 650,000 of the United Kingdom, shows that Norway will have enough to cater for her citizens as well as for exports.
Suppose that you are the international treasurer of Apple with an extra U.S. $10 million to invest for 9 months. You are considering the purchase of U.S. T-bills that yield 1.50% annual rate. The spot exchange rate is $1.00 = ¥100, and the 9 month forward rate is $1.00 = ¥110. What must the interest rate in Japan be before you are willing to consider investing there for 9 months? A. 14.5515 B. <8.8975 C. >13.4983 D. 12.5050
Answer:
Japan Interest Rate = 0.15%
Explanation:
As per Interest Rate Parity Theory
Spot Rate : 1$ = 100
Forward Rate : 1 $ = 110
r = 9/12
As per interest rate parity, forward rate = Spot rate(1+Interest rate Japan)/(1+Interest rate US)
Forward rate = Spot rate *(1+ iD)/(1+iF)
110 / 100 = (1 + Japan Interest Rate * 9 /12) / 1.01125
1.1 * 1.01125 = 1 + Japan Interest Rate * 0.75
1.112375 = 1 + Japan Interest Rate * 0.75
Japan Interest Rate * 0.75 = 1.112375 - 1
Japan Interest Rate * 0.75 = 0.112375
Japan Interest Rate = 0.112375 / 0.75
Japan Interest Rate = 0.15%
The focused differentiation strategy differs from the differentiation strategy in that Group of answer choices a. the focused differentiators have a broader competitive scope b. the value-creating activities of focused differentiators are more constrained. c. focused differentiators target a narrower customer market d. there are fewer risks with the focused differentiation strategy.
Answer:
The answer is option C) The focused differentiation strategy differs from the differentiation strategy in that focused differentiators target a narrower customer market.
Explanation:
Product differentiation is a marketing strategy that creates competitive advantage with designing a product superior to that of rivals, priced higher and sometimes created for exclusive users.
However, the focused differentiation strategy takes it a step further by targeting a small group of customers with ostensible goods.
The bourgeoisie are the main target for focused differentiators. They have the economic power to foot the bill and they enjoy the exclusivity of being the few to consume such products. A good example of such products is the Bugatti and Ferrari.
Option A has an expected value of $2,000, a minimum payoff of -$4,000, and a maximum payoff of $18,000. Option B has an expected value of $2,200, a minimum payoff of -$1,000, and a maximum payoff of $6,000. Option C has an expected value of $1,900, a minimum payoff of $100, and a maximum payoff of $2,000. In this situation, a risk-averse decision maker would pay __________ for his risk aversion, and a risk-seeking decision maker would pay __________ for his risk seeking.
Answer:
Option A is the answer
Explanation:
A risk-averse decision maker will go for the option with the least chance of loss incurred (the highest minimum payoff of $100) and settle for an expected value of 1900. He'll pay for his risk avoidance in this way (2200-1900 = 300) while a risk-seeking decision maker will go for the option with the highest payoff chances ($18,000), regardless of the possibility of failure. This would make the risk-seeking decision maker go for option A.
Matt and Joel are equal partners in the MJ Partnership. For the current year ended December 31, the partnership has book income of $80,000, which includes the following deductions: (1) guaranteed payments (salaries) to partners: Matt, $35,000; and Joel, $25,000; and (2) charitable contributions, $6,000. The book income amount does not include any sales of capital assets or Sec. 1231 assets or any taxminusexempt income. Based on the above information, what amount should be reported as ordinary income on the partnership return?
Answer:
$86,000
Explanation:
A partnership is a pass through entity that is not taxed directly, but instead its partners are taxed. Even the partners' salaries are recorded as drawings, not salary expense.
The partnership's total ordinary income = book income + any donations or contributions to charities = $80,000 + $6,000 = $86,000
Now suppose country A imposes a tax on A's production of to curb emissions. Country B, however, is not taxed. A's cost function is now , while B's cost function is . World demand is . The amount of greenhouse gas emissions per unit is still , such that total world emissions are given by . What are total world emissions after country A enacts a carbon tax?
Answer:
286.5
Explanation:
P=99-qa-qb
MRa=99-2qb-qb
MCa=48
99-2qa-qb=48
Qa=25.5-0.5qb{ best response function of firm A)
MRb=99-qa-2qb
MCb=4
99-qa-2qb=4
Qb=47.5-0.5qa{ best response function of form b}
Qb=47.5-0.5(25.5-0.5qb)
Qb=34.75/0.75=46.33
Qa=25.5-0.5*46.33=2.33
Total world output=46.33+2.33=48.66
Total world emission=0.5*48.66=24.33
p=1146-qa-qb-qc
MRa=1146-2qa-qb-qc
MCa=0
1146-2qa-qb-qc=0
Qa=573-0.5(qb+qc) best response function of firm a)
By symmetry,
Qb=573-0.5(qa+qc)
Qc=573-0.5(qa+qb)
Qb+qc=1146-qa-0.5(qb+qc)
Qb+qc=764-qa/1.5
Qa=573-0.5(764-qa/1.5)=191+qa/3
Qa=191*3/2=286.5
Qa=Qb=Qc=286.5
Total output=3*286.5=859.5( cournot equilibrium market output)
Cartel output=573
Lower QUANTITY in cartel equilibrium compare to cournot equilibrium
=859.5-573
=286.5
Pharoah Corporation had the following activities in 2020. 1. Payment of accounts payable $843,000 4. Collection of note receivable $104,000 2. Issuance of common stock $256,000 5. Issuance of bonds payable $466,000 3. Payment of dividends $333,000 6. Purchase of treasury stock $45,000 Compute the amount Pharoah should report as net cash provided (used) by financing activities in its 2020 statement of cash flows. (Show amounts that decrease cash flow with either a - sign e.g. -15,000 or in parenthesis e.g. (15,000).)
Answer:
The amount Pharoah should report as net cash provided (used) by financing activities in its 2020 statement of cash flows is $344,000.
Explanation:
Pharoah Corporation
Statement of cash flows (extract)
Proceeds from common stock $256,000
Proceed from bond payable $466,000
Dividend paid ($333,000)
Purchase of treasury stock ($45,000)
Net cash flows from financing activities $344,000
Note that the payment of accounts payable and collection of notes receivable only affect the operating activities section of the cash flows.
Pharoah Company has had 4 years of record earnings. Due to this success, the market price of its 500,000 shares of $4 par value common stock has increased from $15 per share to $55. During this period, paid-in capital remained the same at $6,000,000. Retained earnings increased from $4,500,000 to $30,000,000. CEO Don Ames is considering either (1) a 15% stock dividend or (2) a 2-for-1 stock split. He asks you to show the before-and-after effects of each option on (a) retained earnings, (b) total stockholders’ equity, and (c) par value per share.
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
1) 15% Stock Dividend-
Retained Earnings = Increase Value of Retained Earnings - (Total Shares × 15% Stock Dividend × Increase Value of Per Share)
= $30,000,000 - (500,000 × 15% × $55)
= $30,000,000 - $4,125,000
= $25,875,000
2) 2-for-1 stock split-
Retained earnings = $30,000,000
The 2-for-1 stock split will not impact retained earnings.
a and b) The before, after effects of each option are shown in the attachment below
c) Par value per share
Par value per share of stock dividend = $4
Par value per share of 2-for-1 stock split = $4 ÷ 2 = $2
According to the analysis, stock dividend will not make any impact.
