What is the most likely reason that the steamboat was developed soon after the steam locomotive?
Answer:
The answer to your question is, The steamboat used the same technology as the locomotive. hope this helps. thanksPLEASE HELP!!!!!
Do you believe WWI was a Total War? Use specific details to support your answer. (15 marks)
Answer:it was a total war
Explanation:World War I was a total war that involved the governments, economies and populations of participating nations. This was different from the way all the other 'smaller' wars, like the Crimean War (1853-56) and late-19th-century colonial wars, had been fought.
Answer:
it was a total war
Explanation:It was
which was a result of the interaction between European settlers and Native Americans?
O Many European settlers died after contracting unfamiliar diseases from Native Americans.
Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming.
The Native American population in the United States declined as many groups migrated to other countries.
O Native Americans acquired mineral-rich land after defeating European settlers in various battles.
The correct answer is B) Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming.
A result of the interaction between European settlers and Native Americans was "Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming."
The relationship between Native American Indians and European settlers -mainly the English ones- always was of friction. confrontation, and fight.
White settlers wanted more and, more land to settle in and make it work in order to get a profit.
On the other hand, Native American Indians saw nature and land with so much respect. Never as a position, but a relationship with Mother Earth that provided food, water, and shelter. That is why native Indians honored the earth through chants and dances.
Time passed by and presidents like Andrew Jackson encouraged westward expansion and settlement by supporting the Indian Removal Act.
On May 28, 1830, United States President Andrew Jackson signed the famous Indian Removal Act that supported the westward expansion and invited many Americans to settle territories in the west. These were territories west of the Mississippi, and the President could grant lands in exchange for Native American Indian tribes' lands that already existed within the known US territory.
please help fast!!!!!!!!!
What did FDR accuse the “Sixty Families” of?
A. Stealing from the government
B. Sabotaging the 1938 elections
C. Being Isolationist
D. Being undemocratic
Answer:
D. Being undemocratic
Explanation:
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was an American politician and statesman who was elected as the 32nd President of the United States of America in 1933. He was born on the 30th of January, 1882 in Hyde Park, New York, United States of America.
The "Sixty Families" is a book that was authored by American journalist Ferdinand Lundberg and it was published by Vanguard Press in 1937. In this book, Ferdinand Lundberg argued about wealth and class in relation with American citizens, and how they are being leveraged upon for political and economic benefits, power or authority. He extensively talked about the tightly interlinked group of 60 families in the United States of America and tagged them as a plutocratic circle. Some of the names of the members of the “Sixty Families” included Ford, Rockefeller, Mellon, Morgan, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Guggenheim, Astor, Du Pont, and several others whose wealth was familial or acquired through dynastic properties.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) accused the “Sixty Families” of being undemocratic and were responsible for engineering the Great Depression.
The Great Depression was a period of severe economic meltdown or downturn (crisis) of the industrialized world and it started from the United States of America, typically lasting for about ten years (1929-139).
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Can anyone answer this queations:
1. What was the Revolution of 1905?
2. Who was Rasputin?
3.What is the February Revolution?
4. What was the Russian Civil War?
6. What was the impact of the Russian Revolution?
Also if you can write the question in your own words that would be so helpful. If you answer this questions I will give you Brainlist or whatever it called. Thank You.
Answer:
Read Below for answers to each question.
Explanation:
The revolution of 1905 was a wave of mass political and social unrest that spread through vast areas of the Russian Empire. It involved worker strikes, military mutinies, and peasant unrest.Rasputin was a Russian mystic and self-proclaimed holy man. He befriended the family of Nicholas II Tsar, the last emperor of Russia. He also gained considerable influence in late Imperial Russia. There was a plot to kill him, which was successful. He also had affairs with Nicholas ii Tsar's wife. The February Revolution was the first stage of the Russian Revolution of 1917, in which the monarchy was overthrown and replaced by the Provisional Government.The Russian Civil War was a fight for the new leadership of Russia. The impact of the Russian Revolution led to the end of the Tsar's ruling and the rollout of communism. Lenin as a leader developed the foundation for the Soviet Union (USSR or CCCP).why was the boston tea party a successful event?
a.slave ships were not guarded in the northern states
b.British troops were distracted by a riot at the harbor
c.it was carefully planned over many secret meetings
¿quien fue Sarmiento?
Answer:
un activista, intelectual, escritor, estadista argentino y el séptimo presidente de Argentina
Explanation:
How many years did the Yakama Wars last?
Answer:
3 years my g babahaahababhahababahaabbabaabbababaabbab
PLS HELP!! IN TIMED EXAM!!!
All of the following are correct about Pan-Africanism and the Negritude Movement except:
A. it claimed that there was a distinctive "African personality."
B. the belief that all persons of African heritage should return to their motherland.
C. it is believed to provide a common sense of destiny for all black Africans.
D. it was a defensive response rejecting Western views of racial superiority.
Answer:
C. it is believed to provide a common sense of destiny for all black Africans.
Explanation:
Pan-Africanism is a movement that has its aim to unite and strengthen the different groups of Africans in diaspora and at home. This is founded on the belief that unity is important to all spheres of life and that of the African man is no exception.
The Negritude Movement had similar views and outlook as they sought to bring the African man together.
However, one exception to their belief was the belief that it was to provide a common sense of destiny for all black Africans.
What was the Napoleonic Code?
1. Napoleon's written consent for the Catholic Church to operate freely
2. system of laws used in countries that came under French control in the 1800s
3. Napoleon's list of social reforms
4. freedom of worship for followers of other religions
Answer:
2. system of laws used in countries that came under French control in the 1800s
Explanation:
The purpose of the Napoleonic Code was to reform to french legal system. Many countries occupied during Napoleonic Wars used it, and it spread across the continent.
piano research paper
Answer:
The Piano Essay Research paper
Explanation:
The piano when invented changed the way music was written, and even created new forms of music. Its invention ushered in new eras and gave people a sense of worth. But this change did not take place overnight, it took many years of hard work and labor to achieve what the piano is today.
The History of the Piano
In 1698 a man named Bartolomeo Cristofori began to design an instrument, which would play both loudness and softness and be able to use an excellent range of dynamics unlike the popular instrument of the day the harpsichord. For years he worked on the instrument that would not only take over the harpsichord?s place in music, but also change how music was written and composed. Maybe one of the most influential instruments we will ever know. In 1709 he finally finished this instrument and named it the gravicembalo col piano e forte (harpsichord with loudness or softness), which was later know, as the pianoforte. This was the first instrument in which composers could effectively display their emotions.
Cristofori faced many problems in the creation of he piano. First he developed a system in which the player could to only hit one of the two strings for each note (una corda). He also developed an effective mechanism to use downward pressure (striking the key) and make it project the hammer towards the strings. He also had to time the hammer?s striking the key directly proportionate to when the sound should be heard, with this improvement came another which is vital to the pianos inner workings, the escapement. The escapement is a device that lets the hammer strike the string and leave the string free to vibrate. The hammer is made to fall back and let the string vibrate, when the player let go of the key a damper would then fall on the string stopping the sound. Though Cristofori?s pianos were softer than the harpsichord they still had a much wider dynamic range. Cristofori produced his earliest surviving piano in 1720, and his last in 1726, 5 years later he dies in 1731.
Once news got around that Cristofori has designed the piano many instrument makers began building pianos. The organ builder Gottfried Silbermann (who developed the prellmechanik-rebound rail) built a piano and showed it to Bach who did not like it because the high notes were poor and the keys too heavy. So Slibermann redesigned his piano and got a much more pleasing result from Bach.
As the seven-year war purged Germany of its musical minds, so the French revolution drove those in France to England, which by now was the piano production capital of the world. One French piano maker, Sebastien Erard contributed enormously to the construction of the piano. The first was his double escapement which allowed a key to be played twice in a row without fully releasing the key. Making the note quick and easy to play(Later improved by Henri Herz). This, when applied to the grand piano, helped his company (the Erard Company) to compete with other companies such as ; Cleminti( collard and collard), Tompkinson and Broadwood.
With the rise of the Romantic Movement in the 19th century the piano endured much wear and tear, composers would go through one piano each performance because the strings would snap and many other problems would arise. So a solution had to be found. It soon came from Broadwood, who developed a way for the tension to be released from the strings by putting iron spacers between the pin block and the belly rail where the high plate is attached. But that did not totally solve the problem. Overstringing, invented by Steinway and sons, also helped. This was done by running bass strings diagonally over treble strings.
How the piano is made
Strings This is the part of the piano in which controls volume and the strength of the piano. The strings are chosen wisely by the maker, either thick for strength or thin for high pitch. The main thing they must always remember is that the strings are withstanding up to 30 tons of pressure. The strings therefore are usually made of carbon steel and are thick or thin according to the level of pitched.
After all the piano has gone through people are still trying to improve it, I personally think that it is at its peak and anything electronic would only take away from the classical skill and craftsmanship which is required to build it. There will always be a demand for the traditional high quality classical style of the piano, but that is only a part of the market as sales of pianos shrink manufacturers are bound to experiment with bolder designs. Many will dismiss these as gimmicks, but if they stimulate interests and sales they are helping to secure the instruments future.
Hope this helps!! =3
which school w
as established in Ghana first
Which of the following is a reason Whitney’s railroad was not built?
Explanation:
congress could not agree the location for the rail line
As part of the Omaha Platform, the People’s Party demanded that
Answer:
People who made more money pay a higher percentage in taxes.
Explanation:
As part of the Omaha Platform, the People’s Party demanded a national currency, safe, sound, and flexible, issued by the general government only, a full legal tender for all debts, public and private, and that without the use of banking corporations, a just, equitable, and efficient means of distribution direct to the people, at a tax not to exceed 2 per cent.
What do you mean by Omaha platform?The Omaha Platform proposed a progressive income tax, a secret ballot, a direct election of senators for the United States, an eight-hour workday, and other reforms.
The primary objective of the Omaha Platform was to expand coinage at a 16:1 ratio of silver and gold. The Omaha Platform proposed a federal lending program to help farmers obtain the funding they required. Private banks were likewise to be abolished, according to the plan.
The so-called Omaha Platform, which contained suggestions for the graduated income tax, secret ballot, direct election of United States senators, the eight-hour day, and other reform initiatives, was approved by the party along with the nomination of James K. Weaver for president.
Therefore, The People’s Party demanded a national currency, safe, sound, and flexible, and issued by the general government.
Learn more about Omaha platform, here;
https://brainly.com/question/30505645
#SPJ7
John Locke's interpretation of the social contract differed from Thomas Hobbes's interpretation in that:
A. Locke claimed that social contracts originated from a need for stability and protection from violence.
B. Locke largely rejected the principles of freedom and equality that were part of liberalism. C. Locke argued that people have the right to overthrow governments that violate their rights.
D. Locke suggested that people were naturally selfish and needed to be ruled by absolute monarchs.
The social contract was interpreted differently by John Locke and Thomas Hobbes in that, Locke argued that people have the right to overthrow governments that violate their rights.
The social contract, according to Locke and Hobbes, was an agreement made by individuals to establish a government. But according to Locke, a government can only be considered legitimate if,
It upholds a person's inherent rights, such as their right to life, liberty, and property. People have the right to overturn governments that violate these rights. Hobbes, on the other hand, held the view that the people had no right to remove the government since it had total control over them.
Therefore, The primary distinction between Thomas Hobbes' and John Locke's conceptions of the social contract is that Locke thought that people had the right to overturn governments that infringed their rights, whereas Hobbes thought that the government had unrestricted authority over the populace.
Learn more about social contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18597938
#SPJ4
Many colonists were angered by the Proclamation of 1763 because it
Answer:
they lost the land that they just paid for and weren't allowed to enter it
Explanation:
it made lines accross the appalacian mountains where colonists were restricted to go because of fear of more indian intervention and not having the money to support another attack
what is better, a stronger state with a weak national government or weaker states with a strong national government. explain why?
Answer:
A stronger state with a weaker national government
Explanation:
Just look at history, when the national government has too much power things get bad. This is why there systems such as checks and balances in the U.S government so the power is shared, one branch doesn't have power over the other two. This keeps the national government in the hands of the people and not dictators.
The ideas of Daoism guided the first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huangdi.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Bible deals with basic human questions such as?
Answer:
why am i alive
Explanation:
is it for the reason to help others
What did Moon SHadow's mom write to him?
why do all states not have bicameral legislature?
Answer:
[I]n the state context, I think there's a relatively easy way to do this—have fewer legislators! At the national level, we have a bicameral legislature because of the overall workings of the federal system. But the non-Nebraska states have bicameral legislatures for no real reason. If you simply eliminated the lower houses, you'd end up with substantially fewer state legislators. Then you could pay them more and offer them more staff. It'd also be easier for citizens to keep track of who their elected officials actually are (can you name who represents you in your state legislature?) and make the electoral competition for the seats more fearsome.
Open question: why do states have two chambers? (Seriously).
The U.S. Senate is the product of a compromise between the states. Why do states need to emulate that model? Going back even futher, do we want to follow the lead of a parliamentary system where 1/2 of the leadership was traditionally filled because of birthright? I'm a big fan of the U.S. Senate. I just don't get why there needs to be a New York Senate.
Explanation:
When did the Crusades start?
Answer: 1095
Explanation:
Describe The Yalta Conference
Answer:
The Yalta Conference
Explanation:
The Yalta Conference, also known as the Crimea Conference and codenamed Argonaut, held February 4–11, 1945, was the World War II meeting of the heads of government of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union to discuss the postwar reorganization of Germany and Europe.
What was the PRI and what was It’s impact on Mexico?
Answer:
Explanation:
Mexico was ran consistently under the PRI political party from 1929-2000. This party is known for corrupt elections, hand selecting the next president, and making deals and calling truces with drug cartel members. This last issue escalated greatly and got beyond the government’s control.
Which statement best describes the significance of the Union victory at Vicksburg to the outcome of the war?
The victory gave the Union complete control of the Mississippi River.
The victory gave the Union complete control of the Mississippi River.
The victory persuaded the French to join the Union cause.
The victory persuaded the French to join the Union cause.
The victory provided the Union with complete control of the Great Lakes.
The victory provided the Union with complete control of the Great Lakes.
The victory saw the death of Confederate General Robert E. Lee.
no links please helpppppp
Answer:
The answer is that the victory gave the Union complete control of the Mississippi River.
Explanation:
Vicksburg’s strategic location on the Mississippi River made it a critical win for both the Union and the Confederacy. The Confederate surrender there ensured Union control of the Mississippi River and cleaved the South in two.
The Siege of Vicksburg (May 18, 1863-July 4, 1863) was a decisive Union victory during the American Civil War (1861-65) that divided the confederacy and cemented the reputation of Union General Ulysses S. Grant (1822-85). Union forces waged a campaign to take the Confederate stronghold of Vicksburg, Mississippi, which lay on the east bank of the Mississippi River, halfway between Memphis to the north and New Orleans to the south. The 47-day siege gave control of the Mississippi River to the Union, a critical supply line, and was part of the Union’s Anaconda Plan to cut off outside trade to the Confederacy.
The Mississippi River was the primary conduit for supplies and communication through the south as well as a vital lifeline for goods going north. To Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Vicksburg was the "nailhead that holds the South's two halves together."
Which statement best describes the role of steel in Great Britain during the Industrial Revolution? O A. Steel farming equipment increased crop yields and pushed more workers into factories. B. Advances in steel-mining techniques made it more popular than ever. O c. The mass production of steel reduced its price and led to its use in many industries. D. New methods of manufacturing iron reduced the importance of steel.
c. The mass production of steel reduced its price and led to its use in many industries
Which statement best sums up the U.S. Government's attitude toward big business
in the 1920s?
Answer:
white rich men I mean it's the truth
The US government was not happy because the 'big industries' were making more money, which led to having more power and the government was losing control economically.
What effects did the Roaring 20s have on business?America's economy grew by 42% during the 1920s. Every household received new consumer goods as a result of mass production. The modern automobile and airline industries were created. The United States' victory in World War I provided the country with its first taste of being a global power.
The economy began to shift from being driven by large industries to being driven by consumer dollars in the 1920s. Business leaders sought to thwart worker radicalism by providing new benefits, a form of welfare capitalism that contributed to a decline in union membership.
Therefore, during the 1920s, the government helped business grow, but did not regulate them at all.
To learn more about Roaring 20s, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29867338
#SPJ2
Compare and contrast the similarities and differences of the Korean War and the Vietnam War. ( three paragraphs ) please I need help
hon you have a cute korean on your profile pic i'm sure you can find the similarities and differences ;) u are smart come on.
During reconstruction poll taxes and literacy virtually wiped out
Answer:
what is the question?
reply in comment so i can help!
