Tell whether the events are DEPENDENT or INDEPENDENT.

You roll number cube and select a card from a standard deck of cards.

Event A: You roll a 3.

Event B: You select a face card.

Answer:

1/10

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 10 tiles and only 1 tile numbered 4 so 1 out of 10 tiles are numbered 4

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2 is also equal to 2/4 since 2 is half of 4 so 3/4 minus 2/4 will get you 1/4

Please give brainliest :3

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 - 1/2

Get a common denominator

3/4 -1/2*2/2

3/4 - 2/4

1/4

Answer:

a. If the P-value is smaller than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

b. Pooled proportion = 0.8

c. z = 2.7

d. As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

We will use the P-value approach, so the decision rule is that if the P-value is lower than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

The claim is that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=200 has a proportion of p1=0.85.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=170/200=0.85[/tex]

The sample 2, of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.7333.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=110/150=0.7333[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.1167.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.85-0.7333=0.1167[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{170+110}{200+150}=\dfrac{280}{350}=0.8[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{200}+\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0008+0.00107}=\sqrt{0.00187}=0.0432[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.1167-0}{0.0432}=\dfrac{0.1167}{0.0432}=2.7[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=2\cdot P(z>2.7)=0.0072[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Answer:

~ Surface Area 1 = 9 * Surface Area 2 ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us look through this problem step by step;

1. The formula to determine the surface area of a sphere is 4πr^2

2. Here we can see that the difference between the two radii of the spheres is that one is 3 times greater than the other

3. So if you were to think about it, in this surface area formula if the radii is squared, the difference between the two surface areas would also be squared. That means that the difference between the surface areas is 3^2, or 9 times the other.

4. This would mean the scale factor to be that one of the spheres surface area is 9 times the other ( Surface Area 1 = 9 * Surface Area 2)

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

H0: µ2≤µ1 versus H1: µ2>µ1

(Upper tailed test)

WE will consider differences as (New – Old).

From given data, we have

Dbar = 0.70

SD = 0.70

n = 5

Degrees of freedom = df = n – 1 = 5 – 1 = 4

Test statistic = t = (Dbar - µd) /[SD/sqrt(n)]

t = (0.70 – 0)/[0.70/sqrt(5)]

t = 0.70/ 0.3130

t = 2.2361

Critical value = 2.1318

(by using t-table)

P-value = 0.0445

(by using t-table)

P-value < α = 0.05

So, we reject the null hypothesis

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the average monthly sales revenue increases after the advertising.

Kindly check the first attached image for the graphical table.

Part b

P-value = 0.0445

α = 0.01

P-value > α = 0.01

So, we do not reject the null hypothesis

There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the average monthly sales revenue increases after the advertising.

Kindly check the second attached image for the graphical table.

Answer:

z =2.76

Step-by-step explanation:

z - 2.3 = 0.46

Add 2.3 to each side

z - 2.3+2.3 = 0.46+2.3

z =2.76

Answer:

7/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Add up the amount of the marbles in total and read what color the marble they ask for the chances of. The color of marble should go first then the total of the marbles. (they could ask for more than one color so just add up both the colors given.)

Answer:

2/6 or 1/3 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

you have a 1 out of 2 chances to land tails and 1 out of 4 chance to role a 2 on the spinner. so in total there is 6 chances for rolling and flipping the coin. and there is only 1 chance for both in the odds.

therefore I believe that its is 1/3 or 2/6. I do not know if I am right exactly but that is my thought process.

Answer: It’s C just did assignment 288unitssquared

the answer is 8 because there is 4 sides on a square and 8 x 4 is 32.

Answer:

The answer of life is 42 just look it up

Answer:

It will take 12 years using simple interest

Step-by-step explanation:

2,500 x 1.7% = 42.5

42.5 x 12 + 510

2500 +510 +3010

Answer:

  bisect each other.

Step-by-step explanation:

The midpoints are the same point, so the diagonals bisect each other.

__

More elaboration on a proof

The alternate interior angles formed by diagonals and the sides of the triangle are congruent, so the (point-to-point) triangles formed by the crossing diagonals are congruent ASA. Since the sides of those triangles are congruent, the diagonals meet at their midpoints. That is, the diagonals bisect each other.

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Kindly check the attached image below to see the step by step explanation to the question above.

Answer:

100x3=100  55x3=the answer    55x3=165 students   165 6th graders have a younger sibling.

Step-by-step explanation:

i did the assignment

55 percent of 300 is equal to 165.

A percentage is a number or ratio that can be expressed as a fraction of 100. If we have to calculate percent of a number, divide the number by the whole and multiply by 100.

Given,

55% of 300

55% can be written as fraction 55/100

= (55/100) × 300

Dividing 300 by 100

= 55 × 3

Multiplying

= 165

Hence, 165 is 55 percent of 300.

Learn more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/24159063

#SPJ5

Answer:

the answer would be D &F

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

X₁: Weight of a safety helmet for racers

X₂: Price of a safety helmet for racers

Note, there is n= 17 observed values for each variable so for all calculations I'll use this number and disregard the 18 mentioned in the text.

a) Scatterplot in attachment.

b) If you look at the diagram it seems that there is a negative linear regression between the price and the weight of the helmets, meaning, the higher the helmet weights, the less it costs.

c) The estimated regression equation is ^Yi= a + bXi

n= 17; ∑Y= 6466; ∑Y²= 3063392; ∑X= 1008; ∑X²= 60294; ∑XY= 367536

Y[bar]= 380.35; X[bar]= 59.29

[tex]b= \frac{sumXY-\frac{(sumX)(sumY)}{n} }{sumX^2-\frac{(sumX)^2}{n} } = \frac{367536-\frac{1008*6466}{17} }{60294-\frac{(1008)^2}{17} } = -30.18[/tex]

[tex]a= Y[bar]- bX[bar]= 380.35-(-30.18)*59.29= 2169.77[/tex]

The estimated regression equation for the price of the helmets as a function of their weight is:

^Yi= 2169.77 -30.18Xi

I hope it helps!

Answer:

They both factored it correctly

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the one that was factored correctly, we expand the two of them and compare with [tex]45y^6[/tex].

Fernando

[tex](9y^3)(5y^3)[/tex]

= [tex]9 * 5 * y^3 * y^3[/tex]

= [tex]45y^6[/tex]

Salma

[tex](3y)(15y^5)[/tex]

= [tex]3 * 15 * y * y^5[/tex]

= [tex]45y^6[/tex]

As we can see, they both factored it correctly.

Answer:

both are correct in their factoring

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Y=x-3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

slope intercept form

(slope=x)(1x=x)

Answer: a makes the most sense

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D. Vertx: (3,-16); Intercepts: x = -1, 7

Step-by-step explanation:

I graphed the equation on the graph below.

Answer:

a. Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

If the absolute value of the z-score is 2 or larger, X is considered a surprising outcome.

In this question:

[tex]\mu = 7, \sigma = 3[/tex]

Would you be surprised if it took less than one minute to find a parking space?

We have to find the z-score when X = 1. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{1 - 7}{3}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2[/tex]

Since Z = -2, the correct answer is:

a. Yes

Answer:

The answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Edg : )

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: AC = 2.33

Step-by-step explanation:

use tangent to find the missing side

Tangent = opposite/adjacent

tan B = ?/5

tan 25 = ?/5

multiply each side by 5

? = 2.33153829.....

so

AC = 2.33

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:-53/12

Step-by-step explanation:

-7 2/3+(-5 1/2)+8 3/4

-7 2/3-5 1/2+8 3/4

-23/3 - 11/2 + 35/4

(4x-23 - 6x11 + 3x35)/12

(-92-66+105)/12=-53/12

Answer:

(0,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 5

The y intercept is when x =0

f(0) = 0 + 3*0 + 5

f(0) = 5

(0,5)

Answer:

Yes, he would take the same decision.

Step-by-step explanation:

Consequently, because the decision is taken on the test based on the use of alpha equals 0.025, the p-value of the test must have been greater than the given amount of importance that is 0.025 since the test is not applicable to us. So, p > 0.025.

If we know that p > 0.025, that would not mean p > 0.1 as well, because we do not know with the details given he had to make the same decision for 0.1 degree of meaning.

As for the 0.01 significance point, we 're sure p > 0.01 is greater than 0.025, so the test does not matter.

Question:

Data were collected over a 10-year timespan from a sample of 100 penguins that were randomly given either metal or electronic tags. One variable examined is the length of foraging trips. Longer foraging trips can jeopardize both breeding success and survival of chicks waiting for food. Mean length of 344 foraging trips was 12.70 days for metal-tagged penguins. Mean length of 512 foraging trips was 11.60 days for electronic-tagged penguins. An estimate of the standard error for this difference of means is SE=0.283.

a) We will address the question of whether foraging trips are longer on average among metal-tagged penguins than among electronic-tagged penguins. State hypotheses in terms of two means.

b. Calculate the sample statistic xM - xE

c. Calculate a t-test statistic, using the given estimate of SE.

d. What are the correct (conservative) degrees of freedom for a t-distribution for this test?

e. Use t-distribution methods to find the p-value and draw a rough curve with appropriate shaded region. You may give either a precise p-value from software or bounds on a p-value from Table A.

f. State the conclusion of the test in context, using nontechnical language.

Answer:

See explanation below

Step-by-step explanation:

a)  The null and alternative hypotheses are:

H0 : uM - uE = 0

H1 : uM - uE > 0

b) Calculating the sample statistic,

xM-xE, we have:

Given xM = 12.70 days

xE = 11.60 days

xM - xE = 12.70 - 11.60 = 1.10 days

Therefore sample statistic = 1.10

c) Calculating the test statistic, using the given estimate of SE, we have:

Given standard error, SE = 0.283

[tex] \frac{xM - xE}{SE} = \frac{12.70 - 11.60}{0.283} = 3.89 [/tex]

Therefore, t test = 3.89

d) The correct degrees of freedom.

We have:

[tex]Min(n_M-1, n_E-1 ) = Min(344-1, 512-1) = Min(343, 511)[/tex]

df = 343

e) p-value:

Pvalue = P(Z > 3.89) = 0.00000602

Since p value is less than significance level of 0.05, we reject null hypothesis H0.

f) Conclusion:

There is enough evidence to conclude that foraging trips are longer on average among metal-tagged penguins than among electronic-tagged penguins.

Answer:

if it ends in 5 then you round up but if it's less than 5 you round down

Step-by-step explanation:

You first have to locate the digit in the rounding place and this digit can be in the ones place, tens place,

hundreds place, thousands place, and so on.

After you locate the digit, look at the

digit to the right of the rounding place.

If the digit to the right of the rounding place is less than 5, we round down and if the digit is greater than or equal to 5, we round up.