Solve for x in the triangle.

A particular concentration of a chemical found in polluted water has been found to be lethal to 20% of the fish that are exposed to the concentration for 24 hours. Twenty fish are placed in a tank containing this concentration of chemical in water. Therefore

a) Probability that exactly 14 fish survive, Let x be the number of fish that survive. Using Binomial distribution, we have:[tex]P(X = x) = C(n,x) * p^x * (1-p)^{(n-x)}[/tex] where n is the total number of fish, p is the probability of survival and C(n,x) is the binomial coefficient. We have n = 20, p = 0.8 (since 20% die) and x = 14. [tex]C(20,14) * (0.8)^14 * (0.2)^6 = 38760 * 0.000016777216 * 0.0264241152 = 0.263[/tex] Therefore, the probability that exactly 14 fish survive is 0.263

b) Probability that at least 10 fish survive To find this probability, we can find the probability that 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 fish die, and subtract this probability from 1. Using the same formula as in (a), we have: [tex]P(X <= 9) = \sum  C(n,x) * p^x * (1-p)^{(n-x)}[/tex] where n = 20, p = 0.8 and x varies from 0 to 9. Using a calculator or software, we find:P(X <= 9) = 0.0169Therefore,P(X >= 10) = 1 - P(X <= 9) = 1 - 0.0169 = 0.983 Therefore, the probability that at least 10 fish survive is 0.983.

See more about binomial distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/29163389

#SPJ11

The height that the T-short lands on the bleachers is x = 0.65.

The quadratic equation may be solved by adding and subtracting the same number within the parenthesis to get a perfect square trinomial, which is how the quadratic formula is obtained. A version of the equation that can be solved using the square root function is the result of this method.

Given that it can be used to solve any quadratic equation regardless of the values of the variables a, b, and c, the quadratic formula is an effective tool for solving quadratic equations.

The equation of the path of T-shirt is y = -18x² + 4x and that of the height of bleachers is 3y=2x−14 or y = 2/3x - 14/3

To find the height of the T-shirt landing we find the intersection of the two equations as follows:

-18x² + 4x = (2x - 14)/3

-54x² + 12x = 2x - 14

54x² - 10x - 14 = 0

27x² - 5x - 7 = 0

Using the quadratic formula:

x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / 2a

Substitute the values;

x = (-(-5) ± √((-5)² - 4(27)(-7))) / 2(27)

x = (5 ± √(925)) / 54

x = (5 ± 5√37) / 54

x = (5 + 5√37) / 54 = 0.65 and

x = (5 - 5√37) / 54 = -0.47

Hence, the height that the T-short lands on the bleachers is x = 0.65.

Learn more about quadratic formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/2615966

#SPJ1

Answer:

Were sorry! Answer is not available right now check in later.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Proofs attached to answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Proofs attached to answer

Answer:

-----------------------------------

The y-intercept is the point where the line crosses the y-axis, which occurs when x = 0.

To find the y-intercept, substitute 0 for x in the equation y = 4x + 2:

The y-intercept is 2 and matching choice is C.

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find out the y intercept of the given equation which is y = 4x + 2 .

y intercept is a point where the graph of the equation cuts the y axis. So at y intercept x coordinate will be 0 , so plug in x = 0 , in the given equation as ;

y = 4x + 2

y = 4(0) + 2

y = 0 + 2

y = 2

Therefore the y intercept of the line is 2 . ( option C )

By using unitary method, we found that the cost of 5m cloth is Rs. 1050.

According to the unitary method, the cost of 1 meter of cloth is equal to the total cost of 7 meters of cloth divided by 7. That is,

Cost of 1m cloth = Total cost of 7m cloth/7

We know that the total cost of 7m cloth is Rs. 1470. Therefore,

Cost of 1m cloth = 1470/7

Cost of 1m cloth = Rs. 210

This means that the cost of 1 meter of cloth is Rs. 210. Now, we need to find the cost of 5m cloth. To do that, we can use the unitary method again.

Cost of 5m cloth = Cost of 1m cloth x 5

Cost of 5m cloth = Rs. 210 x 5

Cost of 5m cloth = Rs. 1050

Therefore, the cost of 5m cloth is Rs. 1050.

To know more about unitary method here

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ4

Answer: 1000 x 1.05^n

Step-by-step explanation:

1.05 is the increase experienced each year and n is the number of years.

Answer:

The population of bees is increasing by 5% each year since 2010. Let P(n) be the population of bees in the nth year since 2010.

The explicit formula for the bee population can be found using the formula for compound interest:

P(n) = P(0) * (1 + r)^n

where P(0) is the initial population in 2010, r is the annual growth rate, and n is the number of years since 2010.

Substituting the given values, we have:

P(n) = 1000 * (1 + 0.05)^n

Simplifying the expression, we get:

P(n) = 1000 * 1.05^n

Therefore, the explicit formula that models the bee population for n years since 2010 is P(n) = 1000 * 1.05^n.

The second segment on the left, which is equal to the price per bag of lemons (X) times the quantity of bags of lemons, represents the cost of the lemons (7).

A way for resolving proportionality issues is the unitary method. Finding the value of one unit and then using that value to determine the value of another unit in relation to the first is what this process entails. If we already know that three pens cost $6, for instance, we can use the unitary technique to get the price of five pens as follows: 1 pen costs $6, 3 pens cost $2. Five pens cost $10, or $5 multiplied by $2.

given

The arrow on the right in the diagram above, which is equal to $29.12, represents the total cost of the cookies and lemons.

The first segment on the left, which is $2.66, represents the price of the cookies.

The second segment on the left, which is equal to the price per bag of lemons (X) times the quantity of bags of lemons, represents the cost of the lemons (7).

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

Answer:

The second figure.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first figure's perimeter is:

70 in + 42 in + 56 in = 168 inches.

And the second figure's perimeter is:

42 in + 33 in + 33 in + 64 in = 172 inches.

Therefore, Figure 1 < Figure 2.

Normal quantile plot is a graph of points (x,y) where each x-value is from the original set of sample data, and each y-value is the corresponding Z-score that is a quantile value expected from the standard normal distribution.

What is a Normal Quantile Plot?

A normal quantile plot is a graphical tool used to determine whether a data set is normally distributed or not.

It plots sample data versus a theoretical normal distribution.

In general, the points on the plot should form a straight line if the data is normally distributed. If the data is not normally distributed, the points on the plot will not form a straight line.

A normal quantile plot can be used to evaluate the following:

The normal quantile plot of the residuals is the most important diagnostic tool for examining whether the assumptions of a linear regression model have been met.

Learn more about normal quantile plot here: https://brainly.com/question/31040800

#SPJ11

0, which is less than 0.01.

Suppose that X is a uniformly distributed random variable, scaled so that it has zero mean and unit variance. (1) What is P{|X|> ox}? (2) What is P{[X] > 30x}? (3) Is X spiky? Be sure to consider both positive and negative values of X.

For a uniformly distributed random variable with mean 0 and variance 1, P{|X|> ox} is equal to 0.5. (2) For a uniformly distributed random variable with mean 0 and variance 1, P{[X] > 30x} is equal to 0. (3) X is not spiky since P{|X| > 30x}

0.000045, which is greater than 0.01.
Suppose that Y is a Laplacian random variable with a pdf given by: fy(u) 2 e 2 -Au-hel, -  Oy}? (2) What is P{İY| > 30y}? (3) Is Y spiky? Be sure to consider both positive and negative values of Y.
Answer: (1) For a Laplacian random variable with mean 0 and variance 1, P{|Y|> oy} is equal to 0.5. (2) For a Laplacian random variable with mean 0 and variance 1, P{[Y] > 30y} is equal to 0.000045. (3) Y is spiky since P{|Y| > 30y}

Learn more about Laplacian

brainly.com/question/31043286

#SPJ11

You answer would be mate it would be x=66

Increasing lexicographic order: (0, 0), (0, 1/2), (1/4, 0), (1/4, 1/2)).Thus, the increasing lexicographic order of the critical points of the function f(x,y) = xy(1 - 4x - 2y) are (0, 0), (0, 1/2), (1/4, 0), and (1/4, 1/2).

lexicographic order: (0, 0), (0, 1/2), (1/4, 0), (1/4, 1/2)).Thus, the increasing lexicographic order of the critical points of the function f(x,y) = xy(1 - 4x - 2y) are (0, 0), (0, 1/2), (1/4, 0), and (1/4, 1/2).

Suppose that f(x,y) = xy(1 - 4x - 2y). f(x,y) has 4 critical points.

Let's discuss what are critical points and how we can determine them,A critical point is a point on the graph where the derivative changes its sign.

In other words, the derivative either changes from negative to positive or from positive to negative. A critical point is also known as a stationary point or a turning point

To determine the critical points, we need to find the derivative of the given function and set it equal to zero.The given function is[tex]f(x,y) = xy(1 - 4x - 2y).[/tex]

Let's find the partial derivative of f with respect to [tex]x:f_x(x,y) = y(1 - 4x - 2y) - 4xy = (1-2y)(1-4x)y.[/tex] (1)

Now, find the partial derivative of f with respect to y:f_y(x,y) = x(1 - 4x - 2y) - 2xy = (1-2x)(1-2y)x. (2)

To find the critical points, we need to set both partial derivatives (1) and (2) equal to zero.

(1-2y)(1-4x) = 0 and (1-2x)(1-2y) = 0.

Solving both equations separately, we have the following critical points:(1/4, 1/2), (1/4, 0), (0, 1/2), and (0, 0).

for such more questions on lexicographic order

https://brainly.com/question/22852607

#SPJ11

In this particular question, we are being asked to find the number of normal subgroups of order 7 in a group of order 14. Before we begin, let's try to understand the different types of subgroups.Subgroups can be of two types: Proper Subgroups and Improper SubgroupsProper Subgroups are defined as subgroups which have more than one element and not equal to the entire group. Improper Subgroups are the subgroups which contain every element of the group.To determine the number of normal subgroups of order 7 in a group of order 14,

we need to use the following formula: `n_p = n/H`, where `n` represents the total number of subgroups of the group, `p` is the order of the subgroup we are looking for, and `H` is the normalizer of the subgroup in question.Using this formula, we can find that the order of the group is 14, and since 7 is a prime number, any subgroup of order 7 will be cyclic. Now, let's look at the different subgroups of the group of order 14:As 7 is a prime number and 7 divides 14, there will be one unique subgroup of order 7, and it will be cyclic.Since the group of order 14 is not a cyclic group, there are no other subgroups of order 7 besides the cyclic subgroup. Thus, the number of normal subgroups of order 7 in a group of order 14 is 1.

for such more questions on  prime number

https://brainly.com/question/881160

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

C(1,2), radius=6

Equation using  [tex](x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2[/tex]:

   [tex](x-1)^2+(y-2)^2=36[/tex]

When the area is constant, the proportionality constant, 48, reflects the sum of the base and height.

When two quantities grow and shrink at the same rate, they are directly proportional. The proportionality constant k is defined as k=y/x when y and x are two numbers that are directly proportional to one another.

Using the formula for the area of a rectangle, we can determine the missing data in the table:

Area = base x height

The missing values can be located as follows using the values listed in the table:

Base (b) Height (h) Area

24 2 48

3 8 24

8 3 24

4 6 24

We can apply the inverse variation formula to find the constant of proportionality:

y = k/x

This equation can be changed in order to account for k:

k = xy

Using any pair of values from the table, we can find k as follows:

k = xy = 24(2) = 48

Hence, 48 is the proportionality constant. It is possible to verify that this value applies to all of the value pairs in the table:

For the first pair (b=24, h=2), we have xy = 24 x 2 = 48, which is the constant of proportionality.

For the second pair (b=3, h=8), we have xy = 3 x 8 = 24, which is the area.

For the third pair (b=8, h=3), we have xy = 8 x 3 = 24, which is the area.

For the fourth pair (b=4, h=6), we have xy = 4 x 6 = 24, which is the area.

To know more about proportionality visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29126727

#SPJ1

Question:

The following table shows some values ​​for the base and height of a rectangle whose area is constant. Write down the missing data.

Base (b)

Height (h)

24

2

3

8

4

4

What is the area of ​​the rectangle?

What kind of variation do you see in this table?

What is the constant of proportionality?

How did you determine the constant of proportionality?

[tex]\textit{arc's length}\\\\ s = \cfrac{\theta \pi r}{180} ~~ \begin{cases} r=radius\\ \theta =\stackrel{degrees}{angle}\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ \theta =42\\ r=2.8 \end{cases}\implies s=\cfrac{(42)\pi (2.8)}{180}\implies s=\cfrac{49\pi }{75}\implies s\approx 2.05 \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{ \textit{Perimeter of the sector} }{2.8~~ + ~~2.8~~ + ~~2.05} ~~ \approx ~~ \text{\LARGE 7.65}[/tex]

let's recall that the sector's perimeter includes the arc plust the radii.

The equation m = 12 + 2Y1 gives the slope of the line through the points P1=(-1.5, Y1) and P2=(-2, -6)

To find a point's coordinates in a coordinate system, you perform the opposite. Starting at the point, move vertically up or down until you reach the x-axis. Your x-coordinate is shown there. Afterwards, you'll be able to get a better understanding of how to use it.

It is assumed that the formula you supplied would be used to determine the slope (m) of the line connecting the two specified points, P1 and P2.

We may use the following formula to find the slope (m) of the line passing through the coordinates P1=(X1, Y1) and P2=(X2, Y2):m = (Y2 - Y1) / (X2 - X1) (X2 - X1)

Using the values provided:

P1 = (-1.5, Y1) (-1.5, Y1)

P2 = (-2, -6) (-2, -6)

These values can be used as substitutes in the formula:

m = (-6 - Y1) / (-2 - (-1.5))

Making the denominator simpler:

m = (-6 - Y1) / (-2 + 1.5)

m = (-6 - Y1) / (-0.5)

m = 12 + 2Y1

To know more about equation visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29657988

#SPJ1

Question:

Formula: m=;

X₂-X1

P₁ = (X₁, Y₁) P₂ = (X2, Y₂)

1) P₁=(-1.5) and P₂=(-2,-6)

How to solve this exercise of linear equations of two points.

Therefore, the smallest positive integer with at least 8 odd factors and at least 16 even factors is N = 1800.

In mathematics, combination is a way to count the number of possible selections of k objects from a set of n distinct objects, without regard to the order in which they are selected.

The number of combinations of k objects from a set of n objects is denoted by [tex]nCk[/tex] or [tex]C(n,k),[/tex] and is given by the formula:

[tex]nCk = n! / (k! *(n-k)!)[/tex]

where n! denotes the factorial of n, i.e., the product of all positive integers up to n.

by the question.

Now, let's consider the parity (evenness or oddness) of the factors of N. A factor of N is odd if and only if it has an odd number of factors of each odd prime factor of N. Similarly, a factor of N is even if and only if it has an even number of factors of each odd prime factor of N. Therefore, the condition that N has at least 8 odd factors and at least 16 even factors can be expressed as:

[tex](a_{1} +1) * (a_{2} +1) * ... * (an+1) = 8 * 2^{16}[/tex]

Let's consider the factor 2 separately. Since N has at least 16 even factors, it must have at least 16 factors of 2. Therefore, we have a_i >= 4 for at least one prime factor p_i=2. Let's assume without loss of generality that p[tex]1=2[/tex] and [tex]a1 > =4.[/tex]

Now, let's consider the remaining prime factors of N. Since N has at least 8 odd factors, it must have at least 8 factors that are not divisible by 2. Therefore, the product (a2+1) * ... * (an+1) must be at least 8. Let's assume without loss of generality that n>=2 (i.e., N has at least three distinct prime factors).

Since a_i >= 4 for i=1, we have:

[tex]N > = 2^4 * p2 * p3 > = 2^4 * 3 * 5 = 240[/tex]

Let's now try to find the smallest such N. To minimize N, we want to make the product (a2+1) * ... * (an+1) as small as possible. Since 8 = 2 * 2 * 2, we can try to distribute the factors 2, 2, 2 among the factors (a2+1), (a3+1), (a4+1) in such a way that their product is minimized. The only possibility is:

[tex](a2+1) = 2^2, (a3+1) = 2^1, (a4+1) = 2^1[/tex]

This gives us:

[tex]N = 2^4 * 3^2 * 5^2 = 1800[/tex]

To learn more about distribute:

https://brainly.com/question/29062095

#SPJ

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Regular price:$19

60 per cent of $19 is 11.4 dollars.

but if ypu are looking for how much did she pay then it is..

19-11.4=$7.6

Cindy will take 0.25 hours or 15 minutes to travel a distance of 2 miles at a constant speed of 8 miles per hour.

The formula for time is: time = distance / speed where "distance" is the distance traveled by an object, and "speed" is the rate at which the object is moving.This formula can be used to calculate the time taken by an object to travel a certain distance at a constant speed, or to calculate the speed or distance if the other two variables are known.

The formula for speed is: speed = distance / time where "distance" is the distance traveled by an object and "time" is the duration of travel.This formula can be used to calculate the speed of an object if the distance it has traveled and the time it took to travel that distance are known. It can also be used to calculate the distance traveled by an object if its speed and the time it traveled at that speed are known.

In the given question,

We can use the formula:

time = distance / speed

where "distance" is the distance traveled and "speed" is the speed at which Cindy is riding her bike.

Substituting the given values, we get:

time = 2 miles / 8 miles per hour

Simplifying, we get:time = 0.25 hours.

To know more about speed,distance and time , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10504780

#SPJ1

The power of the test to detect an average increase in height of 1 inch could be increased by d. giving the drug to 25 randomly selected students instead of 50.

The power of a test is the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the drug does not cause people to grow taller, and the alternative hypothesis is that the drug causes an average increase in height of 1 inch.

To increase the power of the test, we want to increase the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. One way to do this is to increase the sample size, which will reduce the standard error of the mean and increase the t-statistic, making it more likely to reject the null hypothesis.

However, in this case, we can increase the power of the test by giving the drug to a smaller sample size of 25 instead of 50. This is because the effect size of the drug is not known, and giving the drug to a larger sample size will increase the variance of the data, making it harder to detect a significant difference. By reducing the sample size, we can increase the power of the test while still maintaining a reasonable sample size.

To know more about the "null hypothesis": https://brainly.com/question/15980493

#SPJ11

The true statements regarding the plot of normal distributions A and B are B has the larger mean, and B has the larger standard deviation; options 2 and 3.

A plot of a normal distribution is a bell-shaped curve that represents the probability distribution of a continuous random variable that follows a normal distribution.

The plot shows the frequency of occurrence of values of the variable, with the most common values near the mean and the less common values near the tails of the distribution.

The normal distribution is characterized by two parameters: the mean (μ) and the standard deviation (σ). The mean determines the location of the center of the distribution, while the standard deviation determines the spread or width of the distribution.

Learn more about normal distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ1

The dilated figure has the following coordinates: A' (-15, 0), B' (-5, 10), C' (10, 10), D' (15, -5), and E' (5, -10).

In this sense, coordinates are the points where a grid system intersects. Latitude and longitude are the traditional ways to express GPS coordinates. Degrees of separation north and south from the equator, which is 0 degrees, are measured by lines of latitude coordinates.

Just multiply the coordinates of each point by 5 to construct a figure about the origin using a scale factor of 5.

A (-3, 0)

B (-1, 2)

C (2, 2)

D (3, -1)

E (1, -2)

The coordinates of each point are multiplied by 5 to enlarge the image by a scale factor of 5:

A' = (-3 * 5, 0 * 5) = (-15, 0)

B' = (-1 * 5, 2 * 5) = (-5, 10)

C' = (2 * 5, 2 * 5) = (10, 10)

D' = (3 * 5, -1 * 5) = (15, -5)

E' = (1 * 5, -2 * 5) = (5, -10)

The coordinates of the dilated figure are:

A' (-15, 0)

B' (-5, 10)

C' (10, 10)

D' (15, -5)

E' (5, -10)

To know more about coordinates visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ1

No, the statements are not equivalent as the statement "a > b" simply means that "a" is greater than "b" and there exists a number "c" such that when added to "b", it equals "a". This does not necessarily mean that "a" is greater than "b".

The statements "a>b" and "there is the number c, so that a=b+c" are not equivalent. The statement "a>b" simply means that "a" is greater than "b," while the statement "there is the number c, so that a=b+c" means that "a" can be expressed as the sum of "b" and another number "c."

These statements are not equivalent because even if "a" is greater than "b," it may not be possible to express "a" as the sum of "b" and another number "c."

Additionally, even if "a" can be expressed as the sum of "b" and another number "c," it may not necessarily be true that "a" is greater than "b."

Learn more about equivalent equation at

https://brainly.com/question/12211497

#SPJ4

The value of μV is 40 cm³.

Given,The area of bottom of cylindrical container = 10 cm²The height of container = h = Mean height = 4 cm Standard deviation of height = σ = 0.2 cm We are supposed to find the mean volume of fluid in the container.In order to calculate the mean volume, first we need to calculate the volume of fluid in the container.Volume of a cylindrical container = πr²h Where, r is the radius of the base of the container.So, we need to calculate the value of r.The area of the bottom of the container is given as 10 cm².

We know that the area of the base of a cylinder is given as:Area of base of cylinder = πr² We are given that area of the base is 10 cm². So,10 = πr²r² = 10/πr = √(10/π) We can find the volume of fluid using the values we have.Volume of fluid = πr²h = π(√(10/π))² x 4 = 40 cm³We know that mean volume, μV is given as:μV = πr²μh So, we need to calculate the value of μh. We know that standard deviation σh is given as:σh = 0.2 cm So,μh = h = 4 cm So,μV = πr²μh = π(√(10/π))² x 4 = 40 cm³

Learn more about Area

brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ11

Answer: 3/5

hope this helped you. Please brainliest! :D

Step-by-step explanation: If I am wrong tell me :D

The estimated annual income can be calculated using the equation above. If the data point is used to calculate the slope and y-intercept of the regression line, then the annual income can be estimated using the equation y = m(14) + b.

If the education level is 14 years,

To create a simple linear regression model using education level as the independent variable, you will need to input data for education level and annual income.

This data can be used to estimate the annual income for any given education level. The equation for this linear regression model is y = mx + b, where y represents the annual income, m is the slope of the line, x is the education level, and b is the y-intercept.

for such more questions on  annual income

https://brainly.com/question/28185992

#SPJ11

The minimum sample size required to get a 99% confidence interval that will specify the mean to within ±3 minutes is 597 (Rounded up to the nearest integer).

A) The 95% confidence interval for a sample of 123 hip surgeries of a certain type with an average surgery time of 136.9 minutes and a standard deviation of 24.1 minutes is (130.82, 142.98).Explanation:Given,Sample size, n = 123Average surgery time, μ = 136.9 minutesStandard deviation, σ = 24.1 minutesWe know that for a sample of size n, the 95% confidence interval is given by,  (Formula1)Where, z is the z-score, α/2 = 0.05/2 = 0.025  is the level of significance and n - 1 = 122 degrees of freedom.Now, substituting the given values in (Formula1), we get the 95% confidence interval as(130.82, 142.98)Thus, the 95% confidence interval for a sample of 123 hip surgeries of a certain type with an average surgery time of 136.9 minutes and a standard deviation of 24.1 minutes is (130.82, 142.98).B) The 99.5% confidence interval for a sample of 123 hip surgeries of a certain type with an average surgery time of 136.9 minutes and a standard deviation of 24.1 minutes is (127.93, 145.87).Explanation:We know that for a sample of size n, the 99.5% confidence interval is given by, (Formula2)Where, z is the z-score, α/2 = 0.005/2 = 0.0025 is the level of significance and n - 1 = 122 degrees of freedom.Now, substituting the given values in (Formula2), we get the 99.5% confidence interval as (127.93, 145.87).Thus, the 99.5% confidence interval for a sample of 123 hip surgeries of a certain type with an average surgery time of 136.9 minutes and a standard deviation of 24.1 minutes is (127.93, 145.87).C) The surgeon's claim that the mean surgery time is between 133.71 and 140.09 minutes is equivalent to the confidence interval (133.71, 140.09). The surgeon's claim falls inside the 95% confidence interval, (130.82, 142.98), therefore we can say that the surgeon's claim can be made with 95% confidence.D) The formula to find the minimum sample size for a 95% confidence interval that will specify the mean to within ±3 minutes is given by (Formula3)Where, n is the sample size and σ is the standard deviation.Now, substituting the given values in (Formula3), we get the minimum sample size as 424.15.The minimum sample size required to get a 95% confidence interval that will specify the mean to within ±3 minutes is 425 (Rounded up to the nearest integer).F) The formula to find the minimum sample size for a 99% confidence interval that will specify the mean to within ±3 minutes is given by (Formula4)Where, n is the sample size and σ is the standard deviation.Now, substituting the given values in (Formula4), we get the minimum sample size as 596.73.The minimum sample size required to get a 99% confidence interval that will specify the mean to within ±3 minutes is 597 (Rounded up to the nearest integer).

Learn more about Minimum

brainly.com/question/21426575

#SPJ11

Answer:

w = 28 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter is the sum of the lengths of the sides.

The sum of the lengths of the sides is w + 28 + 28.

The perimeter is 84.

w + 28 + 28 must equal 84.

w + 28 + 28 = 84

Now we solve for w.

Add 28 and 28.

w + 56 = 84

Subtract 56 from both sides.

w = 28

Answer: w = 28 miles