Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such, because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of
Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other. I doubt too whether any to have the advantage other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution. For when you assemble a number of men to have their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views. From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected? It therefore astonishes me, Sir, to find this system approaching so near to perfection as it does; and I think it will astonish our enemies Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because expect host The inanay no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good. I have never whispered a syllable of them abroad. Within these walls they were born, and here they shall die. If every one of us in returning to our Constituents were to report the objections he has had to it, and endeavor to gain partisans in support of them, we might prevent its being generally received, and thereby lose all the salutary effects and great advantages resulting naturally in our favor among foreign Nations as well as among ourselves, from our real or apparent unanimity. Much of the strength and efficiency of any Government in procuring and securing happiness to the people, depends, on opinion, on the general opinion of the goodness of the Government, as well as of the wisdom and integrity


How does Franklin link his claim that an assembly of men includes their character imperfections with the idea that the Constitution is nearly perfect?

OA. by supporting his claim with evidence

OB. by asking a rhetorical question

OC. by relying on emotional appeals

OD. by providing proofs about perfection

Answer:

a person or thing that is the direct opposite of someone or something else

Explanation:

Antithesis is a literary device where opposite or contrasting words or ideas are placed together in a sentence to create a balanced effect. In this excerpt, the contrasting words are "freedom" and "government.

Antithesis is a rhetorical device that involves the use of contrasting concepts, words, or sentences within parallel grammatical structures to create a contrast between two ideas. It is often used to emphasize the differences between two opposing ideas or to create a more dramatic or memorable effect.

The two concepts are opposites, with freedom representing the ideal that the nation is striving for and government representing the means by which that ideal can be achieved.

By using antithesis, the writer creates a balanced and memorable sentence that emphasizes the importance of both concepts. Hence, freedom/government is correct.

Find more on antithesis:

https://brainly.com/question/17963317

#SPJ7

Answer:

1.I will not watch or i have not watched

2 are you prepared

3.i helped

4my mom cooked

5, the poet wrote

Explanation:

sorry if this is not right haven't done this in a while

Answer:

Are you trying to find the symbolization from " Under The Mesquite " ??

Explanation:

is so its "the strength and fortitude of the mesquite tree is a key symbol in Under the Mesquite"

Hope you have a great day , and take care !! :)

Answer:

.........

Explanation:

There is no link .

No, its work and I'm lazy and I don't like doing physical work.

Answer:

Yes, I do. Orchids, cacti, succulents, carnivorous plants, and a banana tree. Also, anything that catches my interest. Such as a spicy Szechuan button plant, which I have six of, and no such plans for getting rid of five of them because I didn’t expect that many to survive. If you like surprises and plants, you can’t go wrong because with enough plants one of them is always doing something interesting. It’s also challenging to give each type their own special conditions so they’re all happy. Also, it doesn’t take much time or it doesn’t seem so. It also doesn’t cost a lot of money. So I don't think there's anything not to like about it?

Explanation:  There you go

                  please mark as the brainliest

Answer:

can u take a picture?

Explanation:

Answer:

I think I would've really enjoyed this one when I was a kid. It's kind of a fiction/non-fiction hybrid. It's the story of Ryan O'Brian and his inability to stop composing poetry. It continues all day, and the reader is introduced to a variety of poetic forms. The story comes to a conclusion when Ryan's teacher gives the class a poetry-writing assignment... and Ryan finds that he's finally drawing a blank!

Explanation:

Answer:

B) The Great Wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing about the same as a double helping of noodles. Since mass quantities could be produced and still look exquisite, it became highly profitable to sell.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

every is the correct answer happy

Answer:

every

Explanation:

grammar.

pls pls pls pls mark brainliest

ty

Answer:

Harriet Beecher Stowe believed that slavery ought to be abolished.

Explanation:

Stowe was the author of the novel Uncle Tom's Cabin, which was a major turning point for the abolitionist movement. Just by the fact that she wrote a book concerning that slavery was a sin and the evils about it, one can infer that she believed slavery should be abolished.

Answer:

Explanation:

The main idea is the central point or thought the author wants to communicate to readers. ... In paragraphs, a stated main idea is called the topic sentence. In an article, the stated main idea is called the thesis statement. When the author does not state the main idea directly, it is called an implied main idea.

Answer:

is never the same for every individual that comes across trying to answer this sociological question. What may work in one society, may not work in another. But I am guessing you already new that. Depending on the type of culture, location and era; a good society can be anything. If you were to have been raised in the western side of the world, your good society is one of a democracy. Where the people have power and we have checks and balances in our government. But what if you were raised in the east, were people live in a socialist-communistic society. Where the government has the power and people are treated equally. Who is to say which type of society is “good”? Depending on which sociological…show more content…

Marx thought of a society that would create equality and bring power to the people. He didn 't expect society to be totally equal but a society with distributed justice. According to Marx, a good society is when there is no exploitation. To get rid of exploitation, we have to get rid of surplus values and make everyone equal. But Marx also knows that no good society can exist as long as exploitation is allowed. That is why some societies will want a Marx type of living and some will not. A society that has used and embodied the Marxist tradition is Russia. They have used Marx ideas and lived by the communist manifesto. This way of life worked for many years and to the people of Russia, it made a good society. But to people outside of Russia, people who lived in a democratic state or country, they looked at it as a failed society. A type of society that should not be allowed to exist in the world of democracy. But like Marx said, some societies will be able to live in a Marxist environment and some won’t. Marx also states, “ In a communist society, the working class will be more important than the capital class”(M 10-25-2016). By having everyone equal, this allows for class conflict to be no more and exploitation not exist. Marx knows there can be no good society but a Marxist society will do its best to form a ideal…show more content…

Weber wanted to study the meaning of social action. He wanted to understand what is going on in our inner life and try to understand how do we make our life meaningful. Weber describes a society is good when free will is allowed. The term normative self determination is used many times when talking about an individual free will. Normative self-determination is having our own morals and standards that we set for ourselves to regulate our actions. According to Weber, we can make a society good if we allow free will and normative self-determination to take place in the lives of each individual in that society.

Explanation:

Answer: C And isn't there supposed to be a part B I have the same quiz {I can answer the part B btw 3>}

Explanation: KInda obvious just read the passage

Answer:

d is for part b so enjoy i took the test so i hope this hleps

Explanation:

Answer:

It must be irony, not all humans are bad.

Explanation:

let me say it with a cote ( nobody is good nobody is bad just is all right)

"The writer seems to be blaming humans for the destruction of the world's bee population" make up a because it is a possibility of irony. Hence, option A is correct.

To hold someone responsible for something is to assign them the blame. In other terms, to blame someone is to assert or assume that they are to blame for the event, whether it was caused by them or not. When someone is held accountable for committing a crime, they are also held responsible for it.

These words and phrases imply that someone did something wrong or is to blame for a bad occurrence that happened. Blame is the phrase used most frequently.

A person who is usually held responsible for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or flaws of others out of expediency. From this phrase comes the term "scapegoater," which means "one who makes something or someone the scapegoat."

Thus, option A is correct.

For more information about blaming humans, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8156030

#SPJ2

Force is the pressure that is exerted by an object on an area or surface. The force that is exerted by the individuals in the given scenarios are;

As seen in the above cases, a force is applied when two objects come in contact with each other.

For example, in the last example, when the friends play football, the force exerted by the players on the ball is drawn from their muscles.

Therefore, miuscular force is exerted there.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/24113835

Answer:

The answer is A.

the attitude toward the subject that writers convey to readers

Explanation:

Answer:

S

Explanation:

Answer:

S

Explanation:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Answer:

we were taught that a gibe can cause someone to be deeply hurt

Answer:

a complex sentence

conjunctions

Explanation:

Answer:

Everyone should follow a daily routine. As a student, I follow a very simple and easy routine for myself. I have made this routine with the help of my brother and one of my teachers. My day starts very early in the morning.

I get up at 5 o’clock and go for a morning walk. I am very aware of my health. I try my best to keep myself fit and fine. After the morning walk, I bath with cold water and then take a rest for 10 minutes.

After the rest, I eat my breakfast. And then I go to my reading room. I love to read science and English in the morning time. It’s the best time to concentrate on study. Then I prepare myself for school.

Exactly at 9.30 o’clock, my father takes me to school. I come back from school at 3 PM in the afternoon. I eat my lunch in the school break time, I keep my food with me. Then I take a rest in my home and go out for playing cricket.

Then I come back home before getting dark outside. I start reading at 6 PM and read till 9 PM. Then I eat my dinner. Before going to sleep, I watch television for 30 minutes. That’s all my daily routine.