Reasons why Prince Louis Napoleon made the following statement on the instability of France political system "it's difficult in France to make reforms we make revolutions,not reforms"

Answer:

Explanation:

1. “Baby Love” by the Supremes is indeed a great example of the Motown sound. Here are some of the musical elements that are used to create a varied arrangement of a simple song:

Catchy Melody: The melody of “Baby Love” is very catchy and memorable, with a simple, singable hook that repeats throughout the song. The melody is supported by a lively and upbeat instrumental arrangement, which includes a driving rhythm section, horns, and strings.

Call-and-Response Vocals: The song features call-and-response vocals, with the lead singer (Diana Ross) delivering the main melody and the other Supremes (Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard) providing harmonies and backing vocals. The call-and-response format gives the song a sense of energy and interplay between the vocalists.

Harmonies and Counterpoint: In addition to the call-and-response vocals, the song also features intricate harmonies and counterpoint, with each vocalist contributing to a complex and layered vocal arrangement.

Arrangement Dynamics: The arrangement of the song is carefully crafted to build tension and release throughout the verses and choruses. The instrumental backing and vocals are gradually added and removed, creating a dynamic and engaging listening experience.

In terms of vocal delivery, Diana Ross conveys the lyrical message of “Baby Love” through a combination of vocal technique and emotional expression. Her voice is clear and powerful, with a smooth and effortless delivery that makes the song feel effortless and fun. At the same time, Ross’s performance conveys a sense of longing and vulnerability that matches the lyrical theme of unrequited love. The backing vocals and harmonies of Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard add depth and complexity to the song, supporting Ross’s lead vocals and creating a sense of unity and cohesion among the Supremes.

2. Respect” by Aretha Franklin is indeed a great cover version of an Otis Redding song. Here are some of the ways that the background vocals, Aretha’s delivery, and instrumentation create intensity and convey the song’s message:

Background Vocals: The background vocals in “Respect” play a critical role in creating intensity and building tension throughout the song. In the verses, the background singers (The Sweethearts of Soul) provide a simple “sock it to me” refrain that supports Aretha’s lead vocals and adds energy to the song. In the chorus, the background vocals become more complex and layered, with call-and-response phrases that create a sense of interplay between the lead and backing vocals. The background vocals become increasingly prominent as the song progresses, adding a sense of urgency and intensity to the final choruses.

Aretha’s Delivery: Aretha Franklin’s delivery of the lyrics in “Respect” is one of the song’s most memorable features. Her voice is powerful and soulful, with a gritty and raw quality that conveys the passion and intensity of the song’s message. Aretha’s vocal inflexions and phrasing are also notable, with her use of breaks, slides, and stutters adding depth and complexity to the song’s emotional delivery.

Instrumentation: The instrumentation in “Respect” is sparse but effective, with a simple and groovy rhythm section that drives the song forward. The horns and organ provide a soulful accompaniment to the vocals, with staccato hits and sustained chords adding texture and depth to the arrangement. The instrumental breaks in the song also provide a moment of release and tension, allowing the background vocals to shine and adding to the overall sense of energy and intensity.

Overall, the combination of background vocals, Aretha’s delivery, and instrumentation creates a powerful and memorable version of “Respect” that conveys a message of strength, empowerment, and demand for respect.

The suffrage movement used a variety of tactics to gain support, including public speeches, pamphlets, and marches.
In addition, suffragists also used lobbying and civil disobedience to pressure lawmakers into granting voting rights to women. Finally, suffragists held hunger strikes and refused to pay taxes to demonstrate their commitment to the cause.

The suffrage movement used three methods to gain support, which are mentioned below:

1) Mass meetings and rallies Organizing mass meetings and rallies was a popular method used by the suffrage movement to gain support. These events were typically held outdoors in public spaces such as parks and streets, attracting large numbers of people who were interested in the cause. By delivering speeches and other forms of public address, leaders of the suffrage movement were able to persuade many individuals to join their cause.

2) Lobbying by politicians and government officials The suffrage movement used lobbying to persuade politicians and other government officials to support their cause. They sought to educate politicians and public officials about the importance of granting voting rights to women, highlighting the fact that women made up half of the population and were just as capable of making informed political decisions as men. This method was especially effective at the local and state levels, where politicians were more likely to be accessible to grassroots organizations such as the suffrage movement.

3) Press and media campaigns The suffrage movement also utilized the press and media to gain support for their cause. They used newspapers, magazines, and other forms of mass media to publish articles and editorials in support of women's suffrage. Additionally, they produced posters, leaflets, and other printed materials to distribute to the public, which helped spread awareness of their campaign and recruit new members.

For more questions on movement

https://brainly.com/question/11793625

#SPJ11

Rulers, ordinary people, and companies are relied on banks because of financial matters to overcome their problems and pay at fair rates along with their interests. All options are correct.

Relay is a completely digital firm banking answer delivering free enterprise checking. It mainly works with no minimum balance requirements, trade limits, or overdraft costs, plus free incoming wire transfers and the capacity to open numerous accounts.

Relay is one of the picks for best business checking accounts. Rulers would borrow from banks to spread out the cost of war and ordinary people can borrow money for education or any type of loan.

To learn more about relying on banks

https://brainly.com/question/12874982

#SPJ4

Based on the discussions regarding the mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, the following statement most accurately describes these situations: Both of these incidents were due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks.

The mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, occurred due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks. Both of these incidents were a result of the same geological phenomenon, which is the movement of soil and rocks downhill due to gravity.

La Conchita in California is particularly prone to landslides because of the region's steep slopes and unstable soil. In March of 2014, a large landslide occurred in Oso, Washington, killing over 40 people.

Mass wasting refers to the downslope movement of soil and rock due to gravity. Mass wasting events are generally caused by water, wind, or geological forces, and they are particularly prevalent in regions with steep slopes, unstable soil, or a combination of the two. Landslides, rockslides, and mudslides are examples of mass wasting events.

To know more about  mass wasting refer here

https://brainly.com/question/17071531#

#SPJ11

The Pendleton Act of 1883, the first piece of federal legislation to begin breaking down the spoils system, created a bipartisan Civil Service Commission to supervise the federal job application process.

The Pendleton Act of 1883, also known as the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, was passed by the US Congress in response to public outcries over the patronage or "spoils" system that had long dominated federal appointments. It established the US Civil Service Commission to oversee federal appointments in the hope of ensuring that individuals who were employed in the federal government were qualified and deserving of their positions.

Bipartisan Civil Service Commission to supervise federal job application process. The act established a bipartisan Civil Service Commission to supervise the federal job application process. The Commission was made up of three commissioners, each of whom served a six-year term.

The Commission's responsibility was to oversee the implementation of the civil service system, which provided for the selection of qualified individuals for government jobs through competitive examinations, rather than through the spoils system.

To know more about Pendleton Act of 1883, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30418535#

#SPJ11

Answer:

b) he began the trend of deregulating big business

Answer:

Explanation: i don’t know

We can see when the author says, "And if a few thousand Nazi collaborators ended up in the US refugee potpourri, better them than Jews, who belonged in Palestine?", he is referring to the fact that US immigration policy during World War II prioritized admitting refugees who were deemed to be of "desirable" backgrounds, such as those with skills or those who had family members in the US.

An author is a person who writes a book, article, or any other form of written work. They may write fiction or non-fiction, poetry, plays, or other types of literature.

The author is responsible for creating the content of the written work and for conveying a message, telling a story, or sharing information with the reader.

The "shocking cynicism" that the author refers to in the title of the article is the way in which US refugee policy during World War II prioritized excluding Jewish refugees, even when it was clear that they were facing persecution and death in Europe. The author argues that the US government was more concerned with preserving its own interests than with helping those in need.

Learn more about author on https://brainly.com/question/28739571

#SPJ1

The urbanisation of Texas during or after World War II The development of metropolitan centres was attracted to by the war-related industry, which also attracted farmers and residents of small towns.

Farmers, residents of small towns, and others were drawn into growing urban areas by the war-related business. Many of the workers were women and non-Caucasian. With a net population increase of 33 percent, Texas quickly shifted from being predominantly rural to becoming more urban. The Great Depression was quickly forgotten.

Texas's urbanisation is mostly a product of European immigration and culture. The Indian contribution is little because there isn't much that can be linked to Indian roots in contemporary Texas cities, with the possible exception of some demographic segments' genetic makeup.

Read more about World War II at

https://brainly.com/question/30150557

#SPJ4

Advantages of the North at the start of the Civil War: Better transportation, More population, Industrial power

Disadvantages of the North at the start of the Civil War: Unfamiliar terrain, Lower morale, Lack of motivation

Advantages of the South at the start of the Civil War: Defensive position, Military leadership, Lower population

Disadvantages of the South at the start of the Civil War: Limited resources, Lower morale, Limited transportation

EXPLANATION

Better transportation: The North had better transportation than the South. They had a more extensive railroad system, which allowed them to move supplies and troops quickly across the country.

More population: The North had a greater population than the South, giving them a larger pool of soldiers to draw from to fight in the war.

Industrial power: The North had a more significant industrial base than the South. They could produce weapons and ammunition in large quantities due to the presence of many factories.

Disadvantages of the North at the start of the Civil War:

Unfamiliar terrain: The North was fighting on unfamiliar terrain in the South. The geography of the South was not suited for their style of warfare.

Lower morale: The North had lower morale than the South. They were not used to losing battles, and they were experiencing many losses at the beginning of the war.

Lack of motivation:The North was not as motivated to fight the war as the South. The South was fighting for their way of life and independence, while the North was fighting to preserve the Union

Advantages of the South at the start of the Civil War:

Defensive position: The South was fighting on their home turf, which gave them a defensive advantage. They knew the terrain and had the support of the local population.

Military leadership: The South had better military leaders at the beginning of the war. Robert E. Lee was a brilliant tactician and strategist who won many battles against the North, and Stonewall Jackson was an excellent field commander.

Lower population: The South had a smaller population than the North, which meant that they had fewer soldiers to fight in the war. However, they were fighting on their home turf, which gave them an advantage in terms of knowledge of the terrain.

Disadvantages of the South at the start of the Civil War:

Limited resources: The South had limited resources, including food, supplies, and ammunition. They were not as industrialized as the North, so they could not produce as many weapons and ammunition.

Lower morale: The South had lower morale than the North. They were fighting a war that was not in their favor, and they were experiencing many losses. However, they were fighting for their way of life, which gave them motivation to continue the fight.

Limited transportation: The South had limited transportation, which made it difficult for them to move troops and supplies across the country. They had fewer railroads than the North, which made it challenging to transport goods.

For more such questions on Civil war

https://brainly.com/question/24992590

#SPJ11

Answer:

"Most white northerners at the time [1860] viewed blacks as inferior. ...Only a few [white northerners] held strong opinions about slavery... A vocal minority of northerners were abolitionists. Some white northern bankers, mill owners, and merchants earned a lot of money on southern cotton and tobacco or by trading or transporting enslaved people. They were sympathetic to Southern plantation owners and did not want to abolish slavery."

14. How does the author of this secondary source interpret northern views of slavery in 1860?

a. Most northerners believed that slavery was morally wrong.

B. Most northerners were sympathetic to or supported slavery.

b. Most northerners wanted to abolish slavery.

d. Northerners wanted to expand the plantations in the North.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided in the quote, the author of this secondary source interprets that in 1860, most white northerners viewed blacks as inferior, but only a few held strong opinions about slavery. A vocal minority of northerners were abolitionists, but some white northern bankers, mill owners, and merchants were sympathetic to Southern plantation owners and did not want to abolish slavery. Therefore, the author does not interpret that most northerners were sympathetic to or supported slavery (option B). Instead, the author's interpretation suggests that there were a variety of opinions on slavery among white northerners, ranging from those who were abolitionists to those who were sympathetic to Southern plantation owners. However, the author does not indicate that most northerners wanted to abolish slavery (option C) or that northerners wanted to expand the plantations in the North (option D).

Answer:

If it were me in that situation, suffering and in pain with no hope of recovery, I would want the option to end my suffering with dignity. I think it's important to have that choice and to not have to suffer needlessly.

I believe that every person has the right to choose how they want to live their life, and that includes how they want to die. If someone is in unbearable pain and wants to end their suffering, they should be able to do so with the help of a medical professional. It's a humane and compassionate choice that should be available to those who need it.

Of course, there are many ethical and legal considerations to take into account, and it's not a decision that should be taken lightly. But ultimately, I believe that the right to die with dignity should be a basic human right.

Explanation:

The Federalist Party and its forerunners dominated American politics throughout the Federalist Period, which spanned the years 1788 to 1800.

Federalists dominated Congress at this time and had the backing of Presidents George Washington and John Adams.

The era witnessed the emergence of a new, more powerful federal government under the American Constitution, a strengthening of nationalism, and a decline in concerns about the tyranny of a centralized authority.

Federalism is a kind of government in which two levels of authority share control over the same territory. Local issues are often addressed by smaller subdivisions, states, and cities, while the larger geographic regions are managed more widely by an overarching national government.

Federalism encourages political involvement. Federalism promotes economic equality throughout the nation. Federalism allows for several governmental tiers. A variety of viewpoints are accommodated under federalism.

To know more about Federalism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8305583

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. *politics for the "common man."

The importance of Jacksonian democracy lies in all of its deep contradictions. It managed to be both democratic and anti-democratic at the same time. Which is largely why it has not been a valued governance model since the beginning of it’s end, with the Civil War. The more perduring positive legacy of it would be civic engagement in campaigns, at least; and to a lesser extent, state and local processes and policies. There were serious negative legacies it left, as well.

The high-level theory of Jacksonianism implies a government by, for and of the people. Versus and in contrast to: a government led by aristocracy, oligarchy, elitism, etc. Jackson believed less power in the hands of the latter would insure less corruption, and, more, well, ‘we the people’ -style democracy. It was much about a rejection of the one-(First) party Thomas Jefferson administration that largely limited political power to a limited cohort of East Coast elites. The Jacksonian ‘Second Party’ System sought to break the mold and intentionally engage the ‘common man.’

Most of us learn that democracy is about the fair and equal rights and inputs of all—including, ostensibly, the populist (simply: non-government employed population). The reality was (and remains) that democracies—from the Roman Empire to the British Empire (as well as to many American administrations from both parties, including the current Trump Administration)—often were anything but, in practice, solely or even primarily: ‘for the people.’

From this perspective Jackson’s iteration of democracy was radical—but, only to a point. He wasn’t an extremist. With the most unmistakable evidence he wasn’t being that Jackson—and the whole concept of Jacksonian democracy, was, in truth, a poor model for political equality and equitable power.

Blame it on the times if you like, but, the fact is that by ‘the people’ Jackson really meant only ‘white men.’ All others—Native Americans, Mexicans, blacks, women, etc., were left out in theory and ideology (though some unspoken). and especially in policy and practice—to the point that his Congress had a gag rule against discussion of slave policy.

Beyond those glaringly incongruent exceptions, Jackson was considered a ‘new federalist’ due to his straddle of the federalist system as well as some parts of the anti-federalist paradigms. He was a fan of short term limits, protective of states rights and promoted individual rights. The catch is he also managed to expand the executive/president’s office, reduce the potency of the legislature/Congress, all but failed at ‘draining the swamp’ (other than of his political foes who he hastened to remove in wide swaths and whom he replaced with supporters), endorsed slavery, and pulled in the federal reigns over states during the nullification crisis.

Beyond this all, is a theme abundantly demonstrated in the Donald J. Trump presidency. Jackson was a fan of patronage—appointing your friends and allies to political positions—and, (though it’s unknown if Trump will follow through with this part of it): rotating new ones in after four years, apparently to keep the system fresh.

Keeping this relevant background and context in mind, here are some key features of the Jacksonian doctrine, largely in theory again, not necessarily practice—-

Suffrage/Voting rights

Rhetorically Jackson elevated and espoused the concept of ‘majority’ rule. Towards that end one notable battle he took on was an attempt at the abolishment of the Electoral College, part of representative democracy, with their party-appointed representatives (elector(s)) for each state serving as proxies of sort for ‘the people’s’ presidential vote. Jackson felt the electors and Electoral College process was incongruent with the ‘one (white) man, one vote,’ process of the popular vote/majority rule system.

Manifest Destiny

Jackson wanted to ‘expand freedom’ geographically. This was related to both his agrarian ideals—which he boosted with supporting the distribution of land to individual citizens—and, also to the destruction of first nation Native American tribes, an anti-freedom (for non-whites) policy which led to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, both under his watch.

In the spirit of the entitlement ethos known as American exceptionalism (or, more literally: ‘Romantic’ nationalism), Jackson was a proponent of both (white) citizens and the government exploring and taking control of the of the American frontier, beyond the colonized East. The ‘destiny’ part comes from the belief that this was settlers’ God-given right. As though God Him/Herself gave white (male) citizens of the U.S. more favor than the land’s indigenous citizens to the North, West and South.

Answer:

Stalin's Five-Year Plan, implemented between 1928 and 1932, sought to rapidly industrialize the Soviet Union and increase its economic power in order to compete with the industrialized nations of the West. This had a considerable effect on the Soviet economy and the Russian people. In regards to the economy, the plan was successful in significantly escalating industrial production, with the country becoming one of the world's leading industrial powers.

However, this came at a price, as other sectors such as agriculture and consumer goods were neglected, leading to food shortages and a decrease in living standards for numerous individuals in the Soviet Union. Additionally, industrialization was attained at the expense of workers' rights and conditions of living.

Regarding the Russian people, the plan was accompanied by a huge propaganda campaign with the intention of creating a new Soviet citizen devoted to hard work and loyalty to the state, and a variety of methods were used to motivate people to work harder. Social changes were also seen, with women being inspired to enter the workforce and the government investing in new schools and hospitals. Nevertheless, repression and control were also implemented to limit freedom of expression. In conclusion, Stalin's Five-Year Plan had a considerable impact on the Soviet economy and the Russian people.

Answer:D

Explanation:

Albert Speer was a German architect, politician, and senior Nazi official who played a significant role in the Nazi regime. Speer's legacy is controversial because of his involvement in the Holocaust, and many scholars have debated whether he was truly ignorant of the genocide or was simply trying to protect himself from prosecution.

Albert Speer was born on March 19, 1905, in Mannheim, Germany, and died on September 1, 1981.He was a talented architect and urban planner who designed several buildings for the Nazi regime, including the Reich Chancellery.He was appointed as Adolf Hitler's chief architect in 1933 and was later promoted to the position of Minister of Armaments and War Production in 1942.Speer was responsible for the construction of concentration camps, and his department employed forced laborers from concentration camps for the production of war materials during World War II.After World War II, he was convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946.Speer expressed remorse for his actions during the Holocaust and apologized for his role in the Nazi regime.Speer's legacy is controversial because of his involvement in the Holocaust, and many scholars have debated whether he was truly ignorant of the genocide or was simply trying to protect himself from prosecution.

for more such questions on  Nazi regime.

https://brainly.com/question/21827785

#SPJ11

Answer:

U.S Government and Economics

The white elites at St. Domingue were angered when the National Assembly in France granted political rights to free people of color in 1791.

St. Domingue was a French colony situated on the western side of the Hispaniola Island from 1659 to 1804. It is now known as Haiti. The colony was the wealthiest colony of France, and it was the home to white elites who owned numerous plantations and slaves.

The slaves who were a large part of the St. Domingue society demanded freedom, and they got their first chance in August 1791 when they rebelled against their slave owners. The St. Domingue slaves formed a revolutionary force that was opposed to the French colonizers.

The white elites at St. Domingue reacted angrily to the National Assembly of France granting political rights to free people of color in 1791. The political rights were the right to vote, and the white elites did not want the free people of color to have them. They were opposed to any efforts to change the St. Domingue society's social classes.

In conclusion, the white elites at St. Domingue were angered when the National Assembly in France granted political rights to free people of color in 1791. The white elites did not want the free people of color to have the right to vote, and they were opposed to any changes in the social classes of St. Domingue society.

Learn more about St. Domingue: https://brainly.com/question/20555054

#SPJ11

The FSLIC exhibited a policy of leniency toward the many failing savings institutions during the 80s, leading to insolvency of the fund by 1989.e FSLIC exhibited a policy of forbearance toward the many failing savings institutions during the 80s, leading to insolvency of the fund by 1989.
The FSLIC exhibited a policy of forbearance toward the many failing savings institutions during the 80s, leading to insolvency of the fund by 1989.What is forbearance?In a real estate context, forbearance refers to the action of delaying foreclosure or other legal action against a borrower who is in arrears. The ability to demonstrate leniency by taking a delay or a payment from a borrower is a critical attribute of a lender who wants to maintain a positive working relationship with their customers during challenging times. Forbearance can be beneficial in a number of ways, including extending the amount of time a borrower has to repay their debt, reducing the size of their monthly payment, or eliminating the amount they owe altogether.The above-mentioned paragraph implies that the FSLIC exhibited a policy of forbearance toward the many failing savings institutions during the 80s, leading to insolvency of the fund by 1989.

For more such questions on Fund

https://brainly.com/question/4521829

#SPJ11

False, this statement is not true regarding argument (a) and argument (b).

Arguments can have different levels of strength based on their validity premise. Arguments with stronger premises support their conclusions more effectively. However, the statement "Argument A has greater logical force than argument B" is not always accurate.

The following explains the two arguments:

Complete the questiuon:

Consider the following two arguments, which have the same conclusions. Argument (a) has greater logical strength than argument (b).

(a) The government's banning Muslim women from wearing a burqa in public spaces is detrimental to individual liberty. Wearing a burqa is an instance of religious expression, and freedom of religion is crucial to individual liberty.

(b) The government's banning Muslim women from wearing a burqa in public spaces is detrimental to individual liberty. The ban is xenophobic in motivation, it causes tension within the Muslim community, and it makes Muslim women feel uncomfortable.

Learn more about the argument at https://brainly.com/question/25465770

#SPJ11

The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries can primarily be explained in the context of European states acquiring growing technological and military advantages over non-European societies to expand their power. This was done through advances in naval power and weapons, which allowed European powers to assert their dominance through sea and land. In addition, the Industrial Revolution brought with it new technologies and weaponry which gave European countries the upper hand in global conflicts. These advances in technology and military power allowed European countries to expand their empires by conquering non-European societies and by establishing political, economic, and cultural dominance.

The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is primarily explained in the context of European states using joint-stock companies to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies.The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is primarily explained in the context of European states using joint-stock companies to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies.What is the joint-stock company?A joint-stock company is a business structure that was created to reduce the risks and costs associated with starting a business in the 16th century. It is similar to a modern-day corporation in that it allows individuals to pool their capital resources to establish a larger, more stable business. This makes the organization more stable because it spreads the risk among multiple investors, increasing the chance that it will be able to meet its financial obligations.When it comes to European states and their expansion, joint-stock companies were used to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies. In the 16th century, European colonial powers used joint-stock companies to gain a foothold in Asia, Africa, and the Americas.The same approach was used by Russia as it expanded its empire in the late 18th and 19th centuries. Peter the Great, in particular, launched numerous companies to attract foreign investors and promote international trade, with the ultimate goal of strengthening Russia's economy and expanding its territorial control. As a result of these policies, the Russian Empire was able to expand its control over Central Asia, Siberia, and the Caucasus.

For more such questions on Russian Revolution

https://brainly.com/question/28774072

#SPJ11

In 1662, louis xiv asserted his authority over the marquis of canillac and other nobles who acted independently by trying and convicting them in courts of law.

Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, was the King of France from 1643 to 1715. During his reign, he worked to centralize power and assert his authority over the nobles, who had previously held significant power and autonomy.

In 1662, Louis XIV did indeed assert his authority over the Marquis of Canillac and other nobles who were acting independently by trying and convicting them in courts of law. This was part of Louis XIV's efforts to strengthen the power of the French monarchy and bring the nobility under his control.

Louis XIV's actions were seen as a bold move at the time, and they helped to cement his reputation as a strong and powerful ruler. However, they also generated opposition from some quarters, as many nobles resented the loss of their traditional powers and privileges. Overall, Louis XIV's efforts to centralize power and assert his authority over the nobility played a significant role in shaping the course of French history during his reign.

Learn more about  Louis XIV's assertion of his authority:https://brainly.com/question/667965

#SPJ11

Answer:

The 12th Amendment to the Constitution was passed following a deadlock between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr in the presidential election of 1800.

On foot, it takes 226 miles to get from Bucktown to Philadelphia and 306 miles to get from Philadelphia to St. Catherines, Canada. Hence, the total mileage (in miles) travelled on this trip from Bucktown to Philadelphia and from Philadelphia to St. Catharine is total (226 + 306) miles, which equals 532 miles.

In Chester County, Pennsylvania, United States, South Coventry Township contains the historic, unincorporated settlement of Bucktown. The Owen J. Roberts School District's main campus, which houses the Owen J. Roberts Middle School and the Owen J. Roberts High School, is situated at the junction of Routes 23 and 100.

To read more about St. Catherines click here

https://brainly.com/question/14471294

#SPJ4

The Greensboro protest, which was organised by African American college students, was aimed at challenging racial segregation in the United States.

The Greensboro protest of 1960 was a civil rights demonstration in Greensboro, North Carolina, United States. The peaceful protest was organized by four African-American college students, Ezell Blair Jr., Franklin McCain, Joseph McNeil, and David Richmond.

The four young men, who became known as the “Greensboro Four,” entered a Woolworth’s store and sat at the segregated lunch counter, where they asked to be served. The store refused to serve them, but the four protesters remained in their seats, engaging in peaceful protest.

The demonstration received national media attention and inspired a series of similar protests in other parts of the South. The Greensboro Four’s action catalyzed the Civil Rights Movement in North Carolina and throughout the United States, and their protest is remembered for its significance in American history.

Learn more about Greensboro protest here:

brainly.com/question/12878753

#SPJ11

One of the first national unions in the 1880s was the Knights of Labor. Fast rise was immediately followed by a quick drop. After all, the after all, the after all, the (sometimes called the AFL). In 1886, Sam Gompers founded the American Football League.

But in the late nineteenth-century American labor movement, "industrial unions" were the main player. They wanted to bring all workers in a certain industry together, regardless of skill level. Discrimination based on race or national origin was frequently prohibited.

Labor law seeks to achieve power balance between the employer and the employee by, among other things, prohibiting an employer from firing a worker without cause, creating and upholding procedures that permit workers to be acknowledged as "equal" partners in discussions about their working conditions, and other objectives.

Learn more about Labor law: https://brainly.com/question/10555177

#SPJ1

The action of Yung Su to gather a group to voice their opinions in the middle of the city square and give a speech outlining the faults of the party, the mistakes of the President, and the overall failure of the administration is constitutional under the 1st Amendment. The correct answer is option a.

The 1st Amendment of the US Constitution protects citizens' rights to assemble and speak out publicly on issues, so Yung Su's gathering and speech are protected under the 1st Amendment. Unconstitutional; 1st Amendment: Yung Su's speech is not unconstitutional under the 1st Amendment, since it is protected as a form of free speech.

Constitutional; 2nd Amendment: The 2nd Amendment does not apply to Yung Su's speech since it protects the right to bear arms and does not address public assembly or free speech. Unconstitutional; 1st Amendment: The 1st Amendment does not make Yung Su's speech unconstitutional. As stated before, the 1st Amendment protects citizens' right to free speech, so Yung Su's speech is not unconstitutional under the 1st Amendment.

The 1st Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights. It was enacted in 1791 and it grants citizens the freedom of religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. It states that the government can not pass any law that interferes with citizens' right to worship or to express themselves freely. The Amendment makes it possible for people to assemble and make public speeches.

To know more about 1st Amendment, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29534958#

#SPJ11

Here are eight words that come from indigenous languages and are commonly used in English: Alaska, Barbecue, Canoe, Hammock, Kayak, Potlatch, Squash and Totem.

The English language has borrowed a number of words from various indigenous languages spoken around the world. For example, the word "Alaska" comes from the Aleut language spoken in Alaska and eastern Russia. "Barbecue" and "Hammock" comes from the Taino language, which is indigenous to the Caribbean. "Canoe" comes from Arawak, an indigenous language spoken in South America and the Caribbean.

"Kayak" comes from Inuktitut, which is spoken in Canada and parts of Greenland. "Potlatch" comes from Chinook Jargon, a trade language that developed among indigenous peoples in the Pacific Northwest. "Squash" comes from Narragansett, an indigenous language spoken in what is now Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Lastly, "totem" comes from Ojibwe, an indigenous language spoken in Canada and parts of the United States. These loanwords not only showcase the diversity of languages around the world but also provide a glimpse into the cultural heritage of indigenous peoples.

To know more about indigenous, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/27960189

#SPJ4

Among African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century, Booker T. Washington's ideas were more popular than they had been at the end of the nineteenth century.

Booker T. Washington was an educator, speaker, and writer who founded Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute, which is now Tuskegee University, in Tuskegee, Alabama.

Washington was a significant figure in the African American community during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and he was well-known for his advocacy for racial uplift and educational development.

In his speech, he proposed that Southern whites and African Americans should work together to build a self-sufficient Southern economy in which blacks and whites would be equal but separate.

This meant that African Americans should concentrate on acquiring practical skills, especially in agriculture and industrial trades, rather than fighting for full civil rights and social equality.

So, Among African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century, Booker T. Washington's ideas were more popular than they had been at the end of the nineteenth century.

To know more about T. Washington's ideas refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30689306#

#SPJ11