questions for muslium.....

Answer:

Una dieta sana es una dieta que garantice el suministro de todos los nutrientes y la energía necesarios en cantidades que coincidan exactamente con las necesidades del cuerpo. Según el conocimiento médico moderno, este tipo de dieta no se puede definir con precisión, porque la demanda de nutrientes es diferente para cada persona debido a las diferencias individuales, la edad, el sexo, el estado de salud, el estado fisiológico, el estilo de vida, el tipo de trabajo, las condiciones culturales, el lugar de residencia, temporada y disponibilidad de determinados alimentos.  

La mayoría de las instituciones científicas gubernamentales o independientes que se ocupan del tema de una dieta saludable generalmente se limitan a recomendaciones generales sobre la cantidad de nutrientes (como grasas, carbohidratos, proteínas, fibra, vitaminas y micronutrientes) que deben consumir las personas de cierta edad y con un estilo de vida determinado.

Answer: B. 20 hours

Explanation:

the first offence is a class c misdemeanor and usually is 20-40 hours of community service given

Answer:

Local

Explanation:

Taxes go straight to your local government then up to county, state, then federal. Local government is where taxes first end up and that is why local government relies on taxes the most.

Answer:

Federal

Explanation: Local governments mostly rely on the income from local properties, such as from the land they own and lease. The income tax, in contrast is the main source of the revenue of the federal government

Answer:

A. The order in which the steps of a trial take place

Explanation:

Procedural law is actual law in which procedures are followed in-order to administer it. For example, some one accused of theft, there is need to follow a procedure in-order to validate whether the person is guilty or not. At the initial time, it would be assumed that, the person is not guilty till proven otherwise.

C. Stop behind the bus and remain stopped as long as lights are flashing.

Answer:

11. Performance of existing duties can never amount to good consideration.

12. Between husband and wife.

13. It has no practical effect on the contract. The whole contract is enforceable.

14. A contract of necessities

15. frustrated mistake

16. The innocent party did or did not believe the statements to be true.

Explanation:

A contract is a binding agreement in which both the parties are liable to fulfill the duties agreed in the contract. There can be terms listed in the contract on which both parties agrees. If there is a vague term, it needs to be cleared while if there is some meaningless term it has no effect on the contract.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.

The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.

I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.

I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.

Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.

I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.

Answer:

it is based on 8 principles

consultation

service standards

redress

access

courtesy

information

transparency

value for money

Answer: gender based voilence in the sence that either a woman can be a victim of voilence or a man as well

We shouldn't only see it that only women can be victims of voilence, in the sense that there are men with women's bone in them that the can't help but fall victim of those women who could be mistaken as men in the way they treat the opposite gender

Gender based violence isn't when the opposite gender raises his or her hands on you but on small cases like a woman who cherishes to be a landlord where as the husband has nothing to his name, this woman is voilating her husband's right which may cause the man to become violent to his wife

Explanation:

Answer:

C. at any time

Explanation:

Trains are liable to have schedule changes at any time,so you should always be prepared for a train to appear at a railroad crossing

Answer:

b . shoplifting .

Explanation:

by definition of magistrate , they deal with less serious cases like minor theft .

A crime might a person need to appear in front of a Federal Magistrate is shoplifting. Option B is correct.

Shoplifting is the theft of merchandise from an open retail outlet.

Typically, the offender leaves the store without paying after concealing a store item on their person, in their pockets, under their clothing, or in a bag.

Shoplifters may put on apparel and leave the store wearing it after stealing other items. In most legal contexts, the phrases "shoplifting" and "shoplifter" are not defined. Larceny is the legal category under which shoplifting typically falls.

Further Federal magistrate in United States has the authority to order criminal arrests, civil penalties, or both, based on the retailer's policies as per state laws for shoplifting crime.

Thus Option B is correct.

Learn more about shoplifting refer:

https://brainly.com/question/580139

#SPJ2

six years of age or younger, hope this helps :/

Visual lead time refers to the duration between perceiving a visual stimulus and initiating a corresponding action or response.

It encompasses the processing time required for the brain to interpret visual information, make decisions, and initiate a motor response. This concept is crucial in various domains, including sports, driving, and everyday tasks.

A shorter visual lead time indicates faster reaction speed and can provide a competitive advantage. Factors influencing visual lead time include individual perceptual and cognitive abilities, task complexity, and environmental conditions.

By understanding and optimizing visual lead time, individuals can improve their responsiveness and decision-making, leading to enhanced performance in activities that rely heavily on visual processing.

Learn more about  visual lead time here

https://brainly.com/question/31981089

#SPJ6

Answer:

In simple words, Both companies and consumers benefit from consumer protection. Consumers must have access to reliable, unbiased information about the goods as well as services consumers buy. This allows individuals to make the best decisions for their own interests and protects them from being exploited or mislead by corporations.

The 1986 Consumer Protection Act aims to promote and defend customers' interests in the face of flaws and faults in goods as well as services.  Also it aims to protect a consumer's rights from unfair or discriminatory trade practices.

Answer:well its kina,hard ro explain my thought ands opinion on this but,as in diffrent genders could be a dif but not as well

Explanation:

The business judgment rule is a legal principle that gives executives and directors of a corporation a presumption of good faith and reasonableness in their business decisions, provided that they act in the best interests of the corporation and with a reasonable amount of care and diligence.

The business judgment rule states that if a director's actions can be proven to have been taken logically, a court will not pursue them. with good intentions. knowing they were acting in a way that was advantageous to the company.

The rule recognizes that business decisions often involve risks and uncertainties and that decision-makers should be allowed to exercise their judgment without undue interference or second-guessing.

In the case of Target's decision to allow individuals to use the restroom of the gender they identify with, it can be argued that the decision was made in the best interests of the corporation, as it reflects the company's commitment to inclusivity and diversity.

While the decision did result in a drop in stock prices, it is important to note that stock prices can be affected by a variety of factors beyond the control of the executives, such as market conditions, competition, and global events. Moreover, the long-term effects of the decision on the company's reputation and customer loyalty may offset the short-term drop in stock prices.

Learn more about the business Judgement rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/31194690

#SPJ2

Answer:

Withholding evidence especially from the state is crime; On the calls of Perjury. And the Judge will get to ask for evidence, and the evidence may be leaked publicly over time.

Answer:

No, I do not. Ghana does have laws.

Explanation:

Ghana has a very operational legal system. Its judicial universe is patterned after that of Britain's Common Law system.

Besides having a functional and healthy legal complex, Ghana is known for the adroitness of its judges, the independence of its legal system from the politics or the influence of the political class, and the ability to dispense justice fairly.

The republic of Ghana's legal system rests on the foundation of its constitution. Her constitution which exists as the supreme law of the Republic was approved by 92 percent of the electorate through a national referendum on the 28th day of April nineteen-ninety-two.

Cheers

Answer: (B ) Members of Congress using earmarks to direct federal money to local projects

Explanation:

James Madison believed in a strong federal government that would yet be balanced by the members of Congress being both loyal to the nation as a whole and to their states.

He believed that state governments should not worry too much about the federal government taking power from them because members of Congress were from various states and would work to advance the interests of those states at a federal level.

Supporters of this view would point to members of Congress using earmarks to direct federal funding. A process which allowed Members of Congress to fund projects in their home states directly from federal funds which showed that the members of Congress were advancing state interests at a federal level.

Answer:

raises a federal question; concurrent

Explanation:

A plaintiff is a party or an individual who files a case against another party in the court of law.

The [tex]\text{First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America }[/tex]prevents the Government or the Congress to make any law that regulates the establishment of any religion or it prevents the free exercise of any religion or abridge the freedom of press or of speech and he right of people for peaceful assembly.

Concurrent jurisdiction exits where more than one court is involved and where the hearing is done in two or more courts together and simultaneously over the specific case.

In the context, a person files a case against a campaign-financing law of North Carolina stating that the law violates the plaintiffs First Amendment freedom of speech rights.

Thus his lawsuit raises a federal question and the case falls under a concurrent jurisdiction where more than one court will have jurisdiction over the case.

Answer:

both parties

Explanation:

looked up the definition

Answer:

I believe the answer is circumstantial evidence

Explanation:

It is true that Increasing line of sight and path of travel is a good idea when driving at higher speeds because it helps a driver to remain prepared. Thus, the correct answer is option (a).

The fictitious line that connects the observer and the target is called the line of sight (LOS). Line of sight in communications refers to both the straight path between a transmitter and a receiver and any potential obstacles in that path.

Line of Sight, also known as Sight Distance, is the length of the road surface that a driver can see while maintaining a reasonable reaction time.

The series of consecutive positions your vehicle takes as it moves toward your destination is known as the path of travel. Unless other circumstances modify the location of your car and cause you to change your direction of travel, you will typically stay in the middle of a driving lane when travelling straight ahead.

Therefore, the statement is true.

To learn more about line of sight, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28150749

#SPJ2

Answer:

The South African Law of Unjustified Enrichment provides a comprehensive, systematic exposition of the principles of the law of unjustified enrichment. It sets out the general requirements for enrichment liability, differentiates between the main types of situations in

Explanation:

hope this helps...

Answer:

George Floyd's death occurred on May 25, 2020, when Derek Chauvin - a white police officer - arrested Floyd and knelt on his neck for approximately 9 minutes and 30 seconds after he was handcuffed and lay face down on the floor.

The incident was filmed by several attendees who asked Chauvin to remove his knee from Floyd's neck. Likewise, the police officers were wearing body cameras, which also recorded the entire interaction with Floyd. Although the footage from operated body cameras was eventually also released, this did not happen until months after the incident itself and the publication of the private video footage. The day after the arrest - after several eyewitnesses had released their video footage of the incident - all four police officers were fired. Two autopsy reports subsequently found that Floyd had been killed, although the conclusions of the two reports as to the cause of death are not conclusive.

The incident, including in particular various video recordings, created a great deal of attention worldwide. In the United States, the incident led to large-scale demonstrations organized by Black Lives Matter around various American cities. Several of the demonstrations in the United States were accompanied by various forms of swelling, violence, street fighting and other forms of crime. President Donald Trump in several cases ended up approving the deployment of extra police officers to reduce the violence that ensued following the demonstrations. The case was a wake-up call to American society regarding institutional racism, especially in police agencies, as well as a sign of their brutality.