Answer: Individual right
Explanation:
The rights and liberties that can be claimed by individuals by virtue of being human are refered to as the individual rights, natural rights or human rights.
Individual right refers to a right of a person's freedom without any sort of interference from the government. Some examples of these rights are the right to vote, right to travel, right to own property, etc.
. Which of the following is NOT a legal duty of an American citizen?
A)Get an education.
b)Vote in all elections.
c)Pay taxes.
D)Serve on juries
Answer:
D. Serve on juries.
Explanation:
I am guessing this, though.
Answer:
Explanation:
b
can someone help me?
Make a friendly appealing message on impact of tourism
Answer:
hope help you stay happy
participate in the decision-making process animal testing
ways of showing respect to costituted authority
Answer:
do not steal or destroy government property.
Explanation:
I looked it up it TvT.
What war prompted the U.S. to deal with emergency situations and learn effective measures that had implications for
the future?
Vietnam war
Civil war
American revolution
Mexican American war
The war that prompted the U.S. to deal with emergency situations and learn effective measures that had implications for the future is A. Vietnam War.
What was the Vietnam War?The Vietnam War was a long, costly and divisive conflict. The war pitted the communist government of North Vietnam against South Vietnam.
The war was sponsored by Communist North Korea as a way of unifying North and South Vietnam to become Communist Vietnam. But the United States wanted to prevent this from happening.
Thus, the Vietnam war more than the Civil War, the American Revolution, or the Mexican American War, prompted the U.S. to deal with emergency situations and learn effective measures that had implications for the future.
Learn more about the Vietnam War at https://brainly.com/question/182779
Read this statement.
In legal reasoning, the facts of a case suggest that there is an issue. This issue may already be governed by a rule of law. When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a _[blank]_ can be made as to whether or not the _[blank]_ applies to the _[blank]_.
Which three words, in order, accurately complete the statement?
A-rule; conclusion; issue
B-conclusion; rule; facts
Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis
Explanation:
Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.
When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).
The plaintiff is suing the defendant for personal injuries suffered when she was struck by the defendant's car. The plaintiff testified regarding the extent of her injuries. The defendant seeks to testify that when she visited the plaintiff in the hospital, the plaintiff said that if the defendant paid all of her medical bills and gave her $25,000, she would not institute legal proceedings. The plaintiff's attorney objects to the offered testimony. How should the judge rule on the admissibility of the testimony
Answer:
Explanation:
The judge should allow it and overrule it. But regarding the evidence that they have of the plaintiff and dependent, maybe ask to see the medical bills and/or anything to prove that that actually happened
Alex Attorney is representing Carol Client is a case involving a car accident. Walter Witness is the only person who both saw the wreck and was not directly involved in it. Long before the trial, Alex has Walter placed under oath, questions him in person, and takes testimony from him. Walter has participated in a(n) ______________. These events have happened during the ____________ stage of the trial.
Answer: interrogatory; discovery
Explanation:
Walter has participated in an interrogatory. This refers to the list of questions that is sent to a party by another party which is used for the discovery process. In this case, Walter must answer the questions under oath.
Furthermore, since Alex has Walter placed under oath, questions him in person, and takes testimony from him, then Walter has participated in an interrogatory and this occured during the duscovery stage of the trial.
Look at the second part of the figure showing electrons being sprayed at two slits. Describe the pattern that they form.
The wave effectively splits into two new waves as it travels through both holes, each of which spreads out from a different slit. Then, there is interference between these two waves. A peak and a trough may occasionally cross paths where they cancel one another out.
What do you mean by Slit?A slit is an extremely small opening or cut in something.
Diffraction causes light to bend and spread across the screen as it passes through a slit, creating a recognizable banded pattern. Light passes through two slits, creating new dark areas. The interference of the light traveling through the slits results in the dark and light zones.
Therefore, The wave effectively splits into two new waves as it travels through both holes, each of which spreads out from a different slit. Then, there is interference between these two waves. A peak and a trough may occasionally cross paths where they cancel one another out.
Learn more about Slit, here;
https://brainly.com/question/24305019
#SPJ2
How do you think you as an Individual can Impact public policy, now that you have an opinion on
such a topic about animal testing
Right-of-way is
A. the immediate use of a certain part of the roadway
B. the permission to disobey a traffic control device
DC. taken, not given to you
different in each US state
Answer: A. the immediate use of a certain part of the roadway
Explanation:
Right of way is a law in which a special privilege is given to the person or class of people to go through or pass over land occupied by another person via a particular path or line. For example, immediate utilization of the certain path of the roadway or land, canal, pubic footpath, well, temple, river, pond, park, garden or any other private property.
On a city street you should be looking ahead as far ahead as the car in front of you.
Answer:
When you drive in city traffic, you should look at least one block ahead. On the highway, 10 to 15 seconds is about a quarter of a mile. Take In the Whole Scene: Looking 10 to 15 seconds ahead does not mean looking only at the middle of the road. It means looking at the side of the road as well.
Explanation:
Actually, this statement here is not right, on a city road one must look at least ahead of one block as per traffic rules for our safety.
How must we drive on a city road?A city road which is often crowded and packed so to drive on a city road, by looking as far as a car ahead might cause for an accident so to avoid such circumstance one must consider looking at least half or quarter miles ahead of them and not just the center of the road, driver must look at the side streets as well in case some vehicle is arriving from there.
What are traffic rules?Traffic rules are a set of guidelines provided by the state to its subject to be followed when driving or walking on streets. The traffic rules are must to be followed as these rules are made to keep the residents of the state secure and protected when they are out on the streets. The traffic rules play an important role in avoiding the chaos of all the vehicles as traffic rules provide guidelines which vehicle move in what lane and when is there a time for pedestrian to cross the road.
How to ensure safety on road?By following the traffic rules, we must ensure our safety on a city road. As following such guidelines will ensure that there must not be any unruly vehicle moving towards us to collide or cause any accident.
Hence, properly following the traffic rules guarantee one’s safety on the city roads.
To learn more about traffic rules here,
https://brainly.com/question/3000878
#SPJ2
