PLEASE HELP ME YOU WILL BE MARKED BRAINLIEST!!!1

The correct option is (C). In nonlinear models, the expected change in the dependent variable for a change in one of the explanatory variables is given by: ΔY = f(x₁ + ΔX₁, X₂ + ΔX₂, ..., Xk + ΔXk) - f(x₁, X₂, ..., Xk)

where ΔX₁, ΔX₂, ..., ΔXk are the changes in the respective explanatory variables. This equation represents the change in Y due to a simultaneous change in all the explanatory variables by ΔX₁, ΔX₂, ..., ΔXk. Option (C) represents the same equation in a slightly different notation. Option (A) only considers one explanatory variable, and option (B) does not include the baseline value of the function. Therefore, option (C) is the correct answer.

Learn more about nonlinear models here: brainly.com/question/20364708

#SPJ4

Complete question:

In nonlinear models, the expected change in the dependent variable for a change in one of the explanatory variables is given by

A. ΔY= f(x₁ +Xq, X2, Xx) = f(Xq, X2....XK). 1 1'

B. ΔY = F(X,+ ΔX₁₁ X2, Xx) - F(X₁₁ X2, Xk). ---

C. ΔY = f(x,+ ΔX₁₁ X₂ + ΔX2, Xx+ ΔX x) - F(X₁₁ X2, Xx). 1°

D. ΔY = f(x₁ +Xq, X2, Xk).

The equation can be rearranged to the form y = -qx + r. This is the equation of a straight line, which can be graphed. The point of intersection of the two lines, ak + bl = 0 and y = -qx + r, is the solution for the two variables (k and l).

The equation ak + bl = 0 is a linear equation in two variables and is solved using the method of elimination. The equation can be written in the form ax + by = c, where a, b, c are constants. To solve this equation, both sides of the equation should be divided by the coefficient of one of the variables (a or b). This will result in a equation of the form x + qy = r, where q and r are constants. Then, the equation can be rearranged to the form y = -qx + r. This is the equation of a straight line, which can be graphed. The point of intersection of the two lines, ak + bl = 0 and y = -qx + r, is the solution for the two variables (k and l). The two variables can then be calculated using the point of intersection by substituting the x and y values into the two equations. In this way, the two variables k and l can be found such that ak + bl = 0.

Learn more about  variables here:

https://brainly.com/question/2466865

#SPJ4

What are the integers k and l such that ak + bl = 0?

Answer:

z=3.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: numbers 1,3 and 4

Step-by-step explanation:

A quadratic function in standard form that passes through the points [tex](-8,0), (-5,-3), and (-2,0)[/tex] is equals to the [tex]f(x) = (1/3)( x^{2} + 10x + 16)[/tex].

f(x) = ax2 + bx + c, in which a, b, and c are integers and an is not equal to zero, is a quadratic function. A parabola is the shape of a quadratic function's graph.

In other terms, you have a quadratic equation if a times the squares of the expression after b plus b twice that same equation not square plus c equals 0.

[tex]f(x) = ax^{2} + bx + c ----(1)[/tex]

is determined by three points and must be [tex]a[/tex] not equal [tex]0[/tex]. That is for determining the f(x) we have to determine value of three values a, b, and c. Now, we have three ordered pairs [tex](-8,0), (-5,-3)[/tex], and [tex](-2,0)[/tex] and we have to determine quadratic function passing through these points. So, firstly, plug the coordinates of point[tex]( -8,0), x = -8, y = f(x) = 0[/tex] in equation [tex](1)[/tex],

[tex]= > 0 = a(-8)^{2} + b(-8) + c[/tex]

[tex]= > 64a - 8b + c = 0 -------(2)[/tex]

Similarly, for second point [tex]( -5,-3) , f(x) = -3, x = -5[/tex]

[tex]= > - 3 = a(-5)^{2} + (-5)b + c[/tex]

[tex]= > 25a - 5b + c = -3 --(3)[/tex]

Continue for third point [tex](-2,0)[/tex]

[tex]= > 0 = a(-2)^{2} + b(-2) + c[/tex]

[tex]= > 4a -2b + c = 0 --(4)[/tex]

So, we have three equations and three values to determine.

Subtract equation [tex](4)[/tex] from [tex](2)[/tex]

[tex]= > 64 a - 8b + c - 4a + 2b -c = 0[/tex]

[tex]= > 60a - 6b = 0[/tex]

[tex]= > 10a - b = 0 --(5)[/tex]

subtract equation [tex](4)[/tex] from [tex](3)[/tex]

[tex]= > 21a - 3b = -3 --(6)[/tex]

from equation (4) and (5),

[tex]= > 3( 10a - b) - 21a + 3b = -(- 3)[/tex]

[tex]= > 30a - 3b - 21a + 3b = 3[/tex]

[tex]= > 9a = 3[/tex]

[tex]= > a = 1/3[/tex]

from [tex](5)[/tex] , [tex]b = 10a = 10/3[/tex]

from [tex](4)[/tex], [tex]c = 2b - 4a = 20/3 - 4/3 = 16/3[/tex]

So,[tex]f(x)= (1/3)( x^{2} + 10x + 16)[/tex]

Hence, required values are [tex]1/3, 10/3,[/tex] and [tex]16/3[/tex].

To know more about quadratic equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31111089

#SPJ1

Answer:

-------------------------------------

Given 3 points of a quadratic function and two of them lie on the x-axis:

These two points are representing the roots of the function. With known roots we can show the function in the factor form:

Substitute the roots into the equation and use the third point with coordinates x = - 5, f(x) = - 3, find the value of a:

This gives us the function in the factor form:

Convert this into standard form of f(x) = ax² + bx + c:

The correlation coefficient is close to zero, we can conclude that the two judges do not appear to agree in their standards.

Nevertheless, a correlation between two variables does not always imply that a change in one variable is the reason for a change in the values of the other.

There is a causal link between the two occurrences, which means that causation shows that one event is the outcome of the occurrence of the other event. This concept is also known as cause and effect.

For the given ranks for two judges the difference between their ranks is:

d: 0.0 4.0 -2.0 1.0 -0.5 1.5 -1.0 -1.0 0.5 2.0

Squaring the given distance we have:

d²: 0.0 16.0 4.0 1.0 0.25 2.25 1.0 1.0 0.25 4.0

Σd² = 29.75

The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is given as:

ρ = 1 - (6Σd²)/(n(n²-1))

ρ = 1 - (629.75)/(10(10²-1))

ρ ≈ 0.03

Since the correlation coefficient is close to zero, we can conclude that the two judges do not appear to agree in their standards.

Learn more about correlation here:

https://brainly.com/question/18498382

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

The joint probability density function for the random variables Y1 and Y2 E(Y1+Y2) and V(Y1+Y2) is 41/144.

To find E(Y1+Y2), we need to integrate the sum of Y1 and Y2 over their joint probability density function:

E(Y1+Y2) = ∫∫ (y1 + y2) f(y1,y2) dy1 dy2

= ∫∫ (y1 + y2) (2) dy1 dy2, where the limits of integration are 0 to 1 for both y1 and y2 and y1+y2 <=1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] ∫[tex]0^{(1-y1)}[/tex](y1 + y2) (2) dy2 dy1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] (2y1 + 1) (1-y1)² dy1

= 5/12

To find V(Y1+Y2), we can use the formula V(Y1+Y2) = E[(Y1+Y2)²] - [E(Y1+Y2)]².

First, we need to find E[(Y1+Y2)^2]:

E[(Y1+Y2)²] = ∫∫ (y1+y2)² f(y1,y2) dy1 dy2

= ∫∫ (y1² + y2² + 2y1y2) (2) dy1 dy2, where the limits of integration are 0 to 1 for both y1 and y2 and y1+y2 = 1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] ∫[tex]0^{(1-y1)}[/tex] (y1² + y2² + 2y1y2) (2) dy2 dy1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] (1/3)y1³ + (1/2)y1² + (1/2)y1

(1/3)y1 + (1/4) dy1

= 7/12

Next, we need to find [E(Y1+Y2)]²:

[E(Y1+Y2)]² = (5/12)² = 25/144

Therefore, V(Y1+Y2) = E[(Y1+Y2)²] - [E(Y1+Y2)]² = (7/12) - (25/144) = 41/144.

Learn more about probability density function at

https://brainly.com/question/31039386

#SPJ4

The employee will contribute 4% of the first $1000, which is $40. Then, the employee will contribute 3% of the next $1000, which is $30. Following that, the employee will contribute 2% of the next $1000, which is $20. Finally, the employee will contribute 1% of the remaining $17,000, which is $170. Therefore, the employee will contribute a total of $260 to the fund.

An employee who earned $20,000 will contribute $260 to the welfare fund.

To calculate the contribution to the welfare fund for an employee who earned $20,000, we can break down the earnings into different tiers based on the given rates.

The first $1000 will have a contribution rate of 4%.

Contribution for the first $1000 = 4% of $1000 = $40.

The next $1000 will have a contribution rate of 3%.

Contribution for the next $1000 = 3% of $1000 = $30.

The next $1000 will have a contribution rate of 2%.

Contribution for the next $1000 = 2% of $1000 = $20.

The remaining amount above $3000 ($20,000 - $3000 = $17,000) will have a contribution rate of 1%.

Contribution for the remaining amount = 1% of $17,000 = $170.

Now, let's sum up the contributions for each tier:

$40 + $30 + $20 + $170 = $260.

Therefore, an employee who earned $20,000 will contribute $260 to the welfare fund.

To learn more about welfare fund:

brainly.com/question/29851713

#SPJ2

The number οf times that Greg chοοses a yellοw pebble is 22 times.

Thus, option D is correct.

Tο find the number οf pοssible chοices, calculate the number οf chances in the tοtal number οf οutcοmes.

Since we need tο find the number οf chοices that are expecting a yellοw pebble, find the tοtal number οf yellοw pebbles in the number οf pebbles in bοth Claire and Laura's cases and find the tοtal number οf yellοw pebbles.

Here we have

A table belοw shοws the number οf painted pebbles by Claire and Laura

Frοm the table,

Number οf pebbles that Laura painted = 8 yellοw, 7 green, 10 blue

Number οf pebbles that Claire painted = 14 yellοw, 5 green, 6 blue

Tοtal number οf yellοw pebbles = 8 + 14 = 22

Given that

Greg chοοses a pebble at randοm frοm the bοx 75 times, and each time replaces the pebble  

Hence, the number οf time that Greg get yellοw pebble = number οf yellοw pebbles

Therefοre, The number οf times that Greg chοοses a yellοw pebble is 22 times.

Learn more about Number of choices at

brainly.com/question/14655459

#SPJ1

The values of x for which the series converges is x ∈ (-1/5, 1/5). The sum of the series for those values of x is (-5x)/(1 + 5x).

The series is [tex]\Sigma^{\infty}_{n=1}(-5)^nx^n[/tex].

We can write this series as [tex]\Sigma^{\infty}_{n=1}(-5x)^n[/tex].

This is a infinite geometric series with first term a = -5x and common ration r = -5x.

It is convergent when

|r| < 1

|-5x| < 1

|-5| |x| < 1

5|x| < 1

Divide by 5 on both side, we get

|x| < 1/5

The series is convergent when x ∈ (-1/5, 1/5).

Sum of the series is

Sₙ = a/1 - n

Sₙ = (-5x)/{1 - (-5x)}

Sₙ = (-5x)/(1 + 5x)

To learn more about series converges link is here

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Find the values of x for which the series converges. Find the sum of the series for those values of x.

[tex]\Sigma^{\infty}_{n=1}(-5)^nx^n[/tex]

The triangle's other leg, side B, measures 12 cm in length.

When one of the interior angles is 90 degrees, or a right angle, the triangle is said to be a right triangle. The three internal angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees in a right triangle because one angle must always be 90 degrees and the other two must always total to 90 degrees (they are complementary).

We can observe that the given triangle is a right triangle because angle A's measure is 90 degrees. The hypotenuse, which is represented by the letter "c," is the side that is opposite the right angle. The legs are the other two sides, and they are indicated by "a" and "b".

We are told that the hypotenuse (side c) is 13 cm long and that one leg (side a) is 5 cm long. The length of the other leg must be determined (side b).

The Pythagorean theorem, which asserts that in a right triangle, can be used.

a² + b² = c²

Inputting the values provided yields:

5² + b² = 13²

25 + b² = 169

b² = 144

b = 12

To know more about triangle's visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

the probability of indentifying at least 11 shirts correctly by random guessing is 0.0002

The ratio of favaourable outcomes to all possible outcomes of an event is known as the probability. The total number of positive results for an experiment with 'n' outcomes can be represented by the symbol x. The probability of an occurrence can be calculated using the following formula.

Probability(Event) = Positive Results/Total Results = x/n

Total no.of event=12

the probability that Joy will identify at least 11 shirts correctly by random guessing=

P(X≥11)=P(X=11)+P(X=12)

=¹²C₁₁(½)¹(½)¹¹+¹²C₁₂×(½)¹²(½)⁰

=12×½×(1/2)¹¹+(½)¹²

=0.00024414062≈0.0002

To know more  bout event, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12961938

#SPJ1

Answer:

To find the probability that a randomly selected person is a meat-eater, we need to add up the number of meat-eaters and divide by the total number of individuals surveyed. From the given table, we can see that there are 72 meat-eaters out of a total of 190 individuals surveyed:

Total meat-eater = 72

Total surveyed = 190

So the probability of selecting a meat-eater is:

P(meat-eater) = Total meat-eater / Total surveyed

P(meat-eater) = 72 / 190

P(meat-eater) = 0.38 (rounded to the hundredths place)

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected person is a meat-eater is 0.38 or 38%.

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

using the rule of exponents

• [tex]a^{-m}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{a^{m} }[/tex] , then

[tex]4^{-x}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{4^{x} }[/tex]

and 256 = [tex]4^{4}[/tex]

then

[tex]\frac{1}{4^{x} }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{4^{4} }[/tex]

so

[tex]4^{x}[/tex] = [tex]4^{4}[/tex]

since bases on both sides are equal, bot 4 then equate exponents

x = 4

The Davenports' medical expenses contribute to their total itemized deductions are $375 (7.5% for 2019).

The costs you incurred for state and local income or sales taxes, real estate taxes, personal property taxes, mortgage interest, and disaster losses are all included in itemised deductions. You can also count charitable donations and a portion of your out-of-pocket medical and dental costs.

Currently for the 2019 (due 2020), you can deduct medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of your AGI, but back then in 2019, the threshold was 7.5%, not 10%.

So the Davenports can only deduct

$5,250 - ($65,000 x 7.5%) = $375

if they decided to itemize their deductions.

The threshold will increase back to 10% starting 2020 (due 2021) tax returns.

Learn more about Expenses:

https://brainly.com/question/29441986

#SPJ4

The equation of the plane passing through the point (-1,0,1) and containing the lines x = 5t, y=1+t, z= -t is y + z = 1 .

We substitute , t=0 in the given line equations ,

we get; x=0 , y = 1 and z = 0 ;

So, the plane contain the line , Thus plane will also pass through (0,1,0);

Now, we have that plane passes through (-1,0,1) and (0,1,0), direction ratios of line joining these 2 points are ;

⇒ DR₁ = (-1-0 , 0-1 , 1-0) = (-1,-1,1);

So , the line can be written as x/5 = (y-1)/1 = z/-1 = t;

So, the direction ratio of this line will be :

⇒ DR₂ = (5 , 1 , -1);

The Direction Ratio of normal to the plane is = DR₁ × DR₂;

= (-1,-1,1) × (5,1,-1);

= [tex]\left|\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\-1&-1&1\\5&1&-1\end{array}\right|[/tex]

On solving ,

We get;
= 4j + 4k = (0,4,4) ;

We know that for a normal with direction ratios (a,b,c), equation of plane is written as ax + by + cz = d;

We got direction ratio for plane normal = (0,4,4);

So, equation of plane is 0x+ 4y + 4z = d;

the plane passes through the point (-1,0,1) ;

⇒ 4(0) + 4(1) = d ⇒ d = 4;

we get the equation of plane is 4y + 4z = 4;

⇒ y + z = 1.

Therefore, the equation of the required plane is  y + z = 1.

Learn more about Planes here

https://brainly.com/question/27190150

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the amount invested in the first account, which pays 14% interest. Then the amount invested in the second account, which pays 11% interest, is 6800 - x.

The interest earned on the first account is 0.14x, and the interest earned on the second account is 0.11(6800 - x). The total interest earned is the sum of these two amounts, so we have:

0.14x + 0.11(6800 - x) = 856

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

0.14x + 748 - 0.11x = 856

0.03x = 108

x = 3600

Therefore, Asaad invested $3600 in the first account and $3200 (6800 - 3600) in the second account.

Answer:

g(x) = 1/2|x - 1| + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

You were almost there, you just got the slope wrong.  

original vertex (h, k): (0, 0)

transformed vertex (h', k'): (1, 2)

original slope:  1

transformed slope: m = (3-2)/(3-1) = 1/2    pick any 2 points to find the slope

equation for the transformed function shown in the graph:

g(x) = 1/2|x - h'| + k'

g(x) = 1/2|x - 1| + 2

Part A. The probability pf drawing a purple card out of the hat is 28%.

Part B. The experimental probability is 2% greater than the theoretical probability.

The probability that a specific event will occur is known as probability. The ratio of favourable outcomes to all other possible outcomes serves as a stand-in for the likelihood that an event will occur.

In numerous disciplines, including mathematics, statistics, physics, economics, and computer science, uncertain events are described and understood using probability theory. It is used to analyse risks, make decisions, and forecast events.

Now in the given question,

Total cards in the hat = 12 + 17 + 14 + 7 = 50 cards

Total purple cards in the hat = 14

Probability of getting a purple card from the hat = 14/50

= 0.28

= 28%

Now similarly for the experiment,

Probability = 324/1080

= 0.3

= 30%

Therefore, the experimental probability is 30% - 28% = 2% greater than the theoretical probability.

To know more about probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The probability of obtaining a reading between 0.59°C and 0.88°C is 0.7224 and 0.8106.

The sum of all possible values, weighted by the chance of each value, is equal to the mean of a discrete probability distribution of the random variable X. Each possible number of X must be multiplied by its probability P(x) before being added as a whole to determine the mean. In statistics, the mean is one measure of central trend in addition to the mode and median. The mean is simply the average of the numbers in the specified collection. It suggests that values in a specific data gathering are evenly distributed. In order to find the mean, the total values given in a datasheet must be added, and the result must be divided by the total number of values.

In this question, using the formula,

z-score = (x – μ) / σ

where:

x: individual data value

μ: population mean

σ: population standard deviation

for x=0.59

μ= 0

σ= 1

z-score= 0.59

Probability=0.7224

for x=0.88

z-score= 0.88

Probability=0.8106

To know more about mean, visit

https://brainly.com/question/30112112

#SPJ1

When a shape is dilated, the size of the shape changes. The true statement is (d) The scale factor is 2.5.

Dilation:

Dilation is the process of changing the size of an object or shape by reducing or increasing its size by a specific scale factor. For example, a circle with a radius of 10 units shrinks to a circle with a radius of 5 units. Applications of this method are in photography, arts and crafts, sign making and more.

According to the Question:

How to determine the scale factor

In figure A, we have:

Length = 0.6

In figure B, we have:

Length =1.5

The scale factor is then calculated as:

K = 1.5/0.6

Dividing the equation:

k = 2.5

Hence, the true statement is (d) The scale factor is 2.5.

Complete Question:

The first figure is dilated to form the second figure. Which statement is true?

The scale factor is 0.4.

The scale factor is 0.9.

The scale factor is 2.1.

The scale factor is 2.5.

Learn more about Shape:

https://brainly.com/question/28756579

#SPJ4

B, No, they are not independent events because the probability of a student preferring logo B (0.78) is different from the overall probability of preferring logo B (0.89), which includes both students and teachers.

To determine whether being a student and preferring logo B are independent events, we need to compare the probability of a student preferring logo B (P(student logo B)) with the overall probability of preferring logo B (P(logo B)).

P(student logo B) = 0.78 (from the table)

P(logo B) = (86 + 11) / 125 = 0.89

If the two probabilities are equal, then the events are independent. However, in this case, P(student logo B) is not equal to P(logo B), indicating that being a student and preferring logo B are dependent events. Therefore, being a student and preferring logo B are dependent events.

Learn more on independent events here: https://brainly.com/question/27665211

#SPJ1

Answer: 39

39 is the only answer option greater than 17

On the 7th day after the videο was pοsted, 640 peοple will see the videο.

Statistics is the discipline that cοncerns the cοllectiοn, οrganizatiοn, analysis, interpretatiοn, and presentatiοn οf data.

1 Let's start by finding the pattern in the number οf viewers. We knοw that οn the first day, 5 peοple watched the videο. On the next day, the number οf viewers dοubled tο 5 x 2 = 10. On the third day, the number οf viewers dοubled again tο 10 x 2 = 20. We can see that the number οf viewers is dοubling each day, which means we can write the number οf viewers as:

[tex]V = 5 x 2^n[/tex]

where n is the number οf days after the videο was pοsted.

Nοw we want tο find οn which day the number οf viewers will be 640. Sο we can set V equal tο 640 and sοlve fοr n:

[tex]640 = 5 x 2^n[/tex]

[tex]2^n = 128[/tex]

n = lοg2(128) = 7

2.   Tο find the first day when mοre than 20,000 peοple will see the videο, we can set V equal tο 20,000 and sοlve fοr n:

[tex]20,000 = 5 x 2^n[/tex]

2^n = 4,000

n = lοg2(4,000) ≈ 11.29

Since n represents the number οf days after the videο was pοsted, we can rοund up tο the next whοle number tο find the first day when mοre than 20,000 peοple will see the videο. Therefοre, οn the 12th day after the videο was pοsted, mοre than 20,000 peοple will see the videο if the trend cοntinues

Learn more about statistics on:

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ1

Answer:

{y,x}={-1,1}

to leave and take

a) The first four nonzero terms of the power series for f(x) about x=0 are

e^6 - 2x^2 + (2x^4)/2! - (2x^6)/3!

The general term of the power series is (-2)^n (2x)^(2n) / (2n)!

b) The interval of convergence of the power series is (-∞, ∞).

c) To estimate the error between f(x) and its partial sum g(x) given by the sum of the first four nonzero terms of the power series, we can use the Lagrange form of the remainder

|R4(x)| = |f(x) - g(x)| ≤ M |x|^5 / 5!

a) To find the power series for f(x) about x = 0, we can use the Maclaurin series formula

f(x) = Σ[n=0 to ∞] (fⁿ(0)/n!) xⁿ

where fⁿ(0) denotes the nth derivative of f evaluated at x=0.

In this case, we have

f(x) = e^6(-2x^2)

fⁿ(x) = dⁿ/dxⁿ(e^6(-2x^2)) = (-2)^n(2x)^ne^6(-2x^2)

So, we can write the power series as

f(x) = Σ[n=0 to ∞] ((-2)^n(2x)^n e^6(0))/n!)

= Σ[n=0 to ∞] ((-2)^n (2x)^n /n!)

To find the first four nonzero terms, we substitute n = 0, 1, 2, and 3 into the above formula

f(0) = e^6

f'(0) = 0

f''(0) = 24

f'''(0) = 0

So, the first four nonzero terms of the power series are:

e^6 - 2x^2 + (2x^4)/2! - (2x^6)/3!

The general term of the power series is

(-2)^n (2x)^(2n) / (2n)!

b) To find the interval of convergence of the power series, we can use the ratio test

lim [n→∞] |((-2)^(n+1) (2x)^(2n+2) / (2n+2)! ) / ((-2)^n (2x)^(2n) / (2n)!)|

= lim [n→∞] |-4x^2/(2n+1)(2n+2)|

= lim [n→∞] 4x^2/(2n+1)(2n+2)

Since this limit depends on the value of x, we need to consider two cases

i) If x = 0, then the power series reduces to the constant term e^6, and the interval of convergence is just x=0.

ii) If x ≠ 0, then the series converges absolutely if and only if the limit is less than 1 in absolute value

|4x^2/(2n+1)(2n+2)| < 1

This is true for all values of x as long as n is sufficiently large. So, the interval of convergence is the entire real line (-∞, ∞).

c) We can use the Lagrange form of the remainder to estimate the error between f(x) and its partial sum g(x) given by the sum of the first four nonzero terms of the power series

|R4(x)| = |f(x) - g(x)| ≤ M |x|^5 / 5!

where M is an upper bound for the fifth derivative of f(x) on the interval [-0.6, 0.6].

Learn more about power series here

brainly.com/question/28158010

#SPJ4

Samir's new balance is $5,044.17.

To calculate Samir's new balance, add the previous balance, subtract the payment, add the new transaction, and multiply by the interest rate for one period. The following formula can be used to calculate the interest for a single period:

balance * APR / 12 = interest

where APR stands for annual percentage rate and 12 represents the number of months in a year.

When we apply this formula to Samir's balance and APR, we get:

5336.22 * 0.29 / 12 = 128.95 in interest

As a result, the total new balance is:

5336.22 - 607 + 186 + 128.95 = 5044.17

We get the following when we round to the nearest hundredth:

$5,044.17

As a result, Samir now has a balance of $5,044.17.

To know more similar question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30938788

#SPJ1

Given that (1, 2, 3] System{1, 4, 7,6] for a system known to be LTI, the impulse response of the system: h[n] = (1/2)*δ[n] + δ[n-1] + (3/2)*δ[n-2]

To compute the impulse response h[n] of a linear time-invariant (LTI) system given its input-output relationship, we can use the convolution sum:

y[n] = x[n] * h[n]

y[n] = (1/2)*(x[n] + 2x[n-1] + 3x[n-2])

y[n] = (1/2)*(δ[n] + 2δ[n-1] + 3δ[n-2])

y[n] = (1/2)*δ[n] + δ[n-1] + (3/2)*δ[n-2]

Thus, the impulse response of the system is:

h[n] = (1/2)*δ[n] + δ[n-1] + (3/2)*δ[n-2],where δ[n] is the impulse signal.

To learn about impulse response visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30426431

#SPJ4

Answer:

(y - 2)² = -12(x - 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

A parabola is a locus of points, which are equidistant from the focus and directrix;

Generic cartesian equation of a parabola:

y² = 4ax, where the:

Focus, S, is: (a, 0)

Directrix, d, is: x = -a

a > 0

Put simply, a is the horinzontal difference between the directrix and the vertex or between the vertex and focus;

Always a good idea to do a quick drawing of the graph;

We are the told the focus, F, is: (2, 2) and directrix, d, is: x = 8;

First thing to note, the vertex, or turning point will be in line with the focus vertically, i.e. they will share the same y-coordinate;

Horizonatally, it will be halfway between the focus and the directrix, i.e. halfway between 8 and 2;

Therefore, the vertex will be will be (5, 2);

We can also work out a:

a = 8 - 5 = 5 - 2

a = 3

Substituting this value of a into the generic cartesian equation:

y² = 4(3)x

y² = 12x

The focus and directrix will be:

S: (3, 0)

d: x = -3

Next thing to note, a parabola curves away from the directrix;

In this case, the directrix is x = 8, so the vertex will be the right-most point on the parabola, it will curve off to the left and the focus will also be to the left;

What we want to do is compare with y² = 12x;

This parabola, has a vertex (0, 0), which is the left-most point that curves off to the right and a focus also to the right;

Since we know the formula of this parabola, if we figure out how to transform it into the one in the question, we can find out it's equation;

What we should recognise first is that the parabola in the question is reflected in the y-axis, compared to y² = 12x;

So we apply the transformation that corresponds to this, i.e. use the f(-x) rule:

y² = 12(-x)

y² = -12x

Now the two graphs will have the same shape and orientation;

The focus and directrix will also be affected:

S: (-3, 0)

d: x = 3

Now, the only remaining difference would be the coordinates of the focus and directrix of the two graphs;

The focus of the graph in the question is 5 units to the right and 2 units upwards compared to the focus of y² = -12x;

The directrix is 5 units to the right of that of y² = -12x;

So we apply a translation transformation of 5 units right and 2 units up, like so:

(y - 2)² = -12(x - 5)

Replace y with (y - 2) to translate up 2 units;

Replace x with (x - 5) to translate 5 units right.

We know have a parabola with focus, (2, 2), directrix, x = 8 and vertex, (5, 2), i.e. the parabola in the question;

Hence, the equation of the parabola in the question is:

(y - 2)² = -12(x - 5)

It might seem a bit long and complicated to begin with, but can be done very quickly if you can get used to it.

The population distribution of scores has a similar average as the distribution of means.

In a sample distribution of means, the distribution will roughly resemble a normal distribution, the sampling distribution's mean will be equal to the population's mean, and the sampling distribution's standard deviation is based on the Central Limit Theorem.

The central limit theorem (CLT) of probability theory states that the distribution of a sample variable tends towards a normal distribution (i.e., a "bell curve") as the sample size increases, under the premise that all samples are of equal size and regardless of the population's actual distribution shape.

In other terms, the central limit theorem (CLT) is a statistical presumption that the mean of all sampled variables from the same population will be substantially equal to the mean of the entire population, given a large enough sample size from a population with little volatility. These samples likewise resemble a normal distribution in accordance with the law of large numbers, with their variances nearly matching the variance of the population as the sample size rises.

To know more about central limit theorem, click the below link

https://brainly.com/question/18403552

#SPJ4

the actual question is :

When comparing the size of the standard error of the mean with the size of the standard deviation of the underlying distribution of individual scores:

a. the standard error of the mean is always larger

b. the standard error of the mean is always smaller

c. the standard error of the mean is sometimes larger and sometimes smaller, depending on the sample size

d. none of these