Morgan bought a 2021 Toyota Rav 4 for $26,150. The car will depreciate by 14% each year. What will the car be worth after Morgan has had it for 7 years? *

There were 11679 applicants this year. We can now find the number of applicants this year as follows:Number of applicants this year = Number of applicants last year + Additional applicants= 11450 + 229= 11679

The given data can be represented in the following table:Number of applicantsLast Year11450This yearIncreased by 2%Let the number of applicants this year be xTherefore, the number of applicants this year will be the sum of the previous year's number of applicants and the percentage increase in the number of applicants.Number of applicants this year = (Number of applicants last year) + (Percentage increase in the number of applicants)Let's plug in the values:Number of applicants this year = 11450 + 2% of 11450Number of applicants this year = 11450 + (2/100) × 11450Number of applicants this year = 11450 + 229Number of applicants this year = 11679Therefore, there were 11679 applicants this year.

We are given that the number of applicants to a university last year was 11450. This year, the number of applicants grew by 2%. We are required to find the number of applicants this year.Let the number of applicants this year be x.We know that the percentage increase in the number of applicants is 2%. Therefore, the number of additional applicants is 2% of the number of applicants last year. We can calculate the number of additional applicants as follows:Additional applicants = 2% of the number of applicants last year= (2/100) × 11450= 229We can now find the number of applicants this year as follows:Number of applicants this year = Number of applicants last year + Additional applicants= 11450 + 229= 11679Therefore, there were 11679 applicants this year.

To know more about percentage visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/32197511

#SPJ11

To write and evaluate an addition expression to determine Tressa's current score, we need to subtract the number of points she loses from her original score. The original score is 57.9 points and she loses 8.6 points.

So, Tressa's current score can be determined by adding the difference (which is -8.6) to her original score. Therefore, the addition expression to determine Tressa's current score can be written as:

57.9 + (-8.6)

To evaluate this expression, we simply need to add the numbers:

57.9 + (-8.6) = 49.3

Therefore, Tressa's current score is 49.3 points.

To know more about addition visit:

brainly.com/question/29464370

#SPJ11

The dimensions of a rectangular prism can be matched with the volume of the rectangular prism as follows:

To match the dimensions of the rectangular prism to the volume we need to know the formula or the volume of a rectangular prism. That is;

length * breadth * height.

So, for the dimensions given, we would simply multiply all the side lengths to arrive at the final volume of the rectangular prism. For the first one,

4 * 3 * 6 = 72 in³

6 * 3 * 2  = 36 in³

4 * 5 * 4  = 80 in³

2 * 9 * 3 = 54 in³

The results represent the final volumes of the rectangular prisms.

Learn more about rectangular prisms here:

https://brainly.com/question/24284033

#SPJ4

The digits 2, 27, and 15 in the time 2;27;15 represent different units of measurement in the race.

In the context of a running race, the first digit 2 represents the number of hours it took the runner to finish the race. This means that the runner completed the race in 2 hours.

The second digit 27 represents the number of minutes it took the runner to finish the race after the hours. In this case, the runner completed the race in 27 minutes.

The third digit 15 represents the number of seconds it took the runner to finish the race after the minutes. Therefore, the runner completed the race in 15 seconds.

By breaking down the total time into hours, minutes, and seconds, the digits provide a detailed representation of the runner's finishing time, allowing for a more precise measurement and comparison of race performances.

To know more about digits click here: brainly.com/question/30142622

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen card from a standard deck of 52 cards is red is 1/2.

To determine the probability of picking a red card, we need to understand the composition of a standard deck of playing cards. A standard deck consists of 52 cards, which are divided into four suits: hearts, diamonds, clubs, and spades. The hearts and diamonds are considered red suits, while the clubs and spades are considered black suits.

Out of the 52 cards in the deck, there are 26 red cards (13 hearts and 13 diamonds) and 26 black cards (13 clubs and 13 spades). Since each card has an equal chance of being picked when chosen randomly, the probability of selecting a red card is the ratio of the number of red cards to the total number of cards in the deck.

Therefore, the probability of picking a red card is 26 (number of red cards) divided by 52 (total number of cards), which simplifies to 1/2.

In conclusion, when picking a card at random from a standard deck, the probability of selecting a red card is 1/2.

To learn more about probability, click here: brainly.com/question/12594357

#SPJ11

There are 1 items are expected to be defective.

We have the information available from the question is:

On average that 0.026% of the items from a certain factory are defective.

Now, if 4000 items are checked, the number of defective items would be gotten by multiplying the percentage of defective items by the number of items checked.

We are required to find the number if defective items that we will find from 4000 items.

Therefore,

Number of defective items = 0.026% × 4000 = 1.04 approximately 1

Learn more about Average at:

https://brainly.com/question/27646993

#SPJ4

The final answer is that the original price of one jump rope before the sale was $8.29.

Let's start by using algebra to solve this problem.

If the original price of one jump rope is "x", then the sale price is "x - 1.90". We can set up an equation to relate the sale price and the original price:

2(x - 1.90) = 12.78

Simplifying and solving for "x", we get:

2x - 3.80 = 12.78

2x = 16.58

x = 8.29

Therefore, the original price of one jump rope was $8.29.

To check our answer, we can verify that the sale price of one jump rope is $6.39 ($8.29 - $1.90), and that two jump ropes at this price cost $12.78.

To know more about algebra, visit:
brainly.com/question/29131718
#SPJ11

To plot the equation 2x + y = -5 on a line graph, we need to convert it to slope-intercept form (y = mx + b) to determine the slope and y-intercept. This will allow us to draw a straight line that represents the equation.

To put the equation 2x + y = -5 on a line plot, we need to solve it for y in terms of x. First, subtract 2x from both sides of the equation, which gives us y = -2x - 5. Now we can see that the equation is in slope-intercept form, where the slope is -2 and the y-intercept is -5.

To plot the equation on a line graph, we can start by plotting the y-intercept, which is the point (0, -5). Then, using the slope, we can determine the direction of the line. Since the slope is negative (-2), the line will have a downward slope.

From the y-intercept, we can move one unit to the right and two units down to find the next point on the line. Connecting these points and continuing the pattern will give us a straight line that represents the equation 2x + y = -5.

Therefore, by plotting the y-intercept and using the slope to find additional points, we can draw a line on a graph that represents the equation 2x + y = -5.

To learn more about slope-intercept form, click here:

brainly.com/question/29146348

#SPJ11

The expression that represents the total amount Marissa spent is (x * 19.99 + y * 14.99) + (3 * 19.99 + 4 * 14.99).

In summary, the expression (x * 19.99 + y * 14.99) represents the cost of the initial purchase, where x is the number of shirts and y is the number of shorts. The expression (3 * 19.99 + 4 * 14.99) represents the cost of the additional purchase the next day, where 3 is the number of shirts and 4 is the number of shorts. By adding both expressions together, we get the total amount Marissa spent.

The first part of the expression, x * 19.99, calculates the cost of the x shirts at $19.99 each. Similarly, the second part, y * 14.99, calculates the cost of the y pairs of shorts at $14.99 each. These two terms represent the initial purchase.

The next part of the expression, 3 * 19.99, calculates the cost of the 3 additional shirts bought the next day. Similarly, 4 * 14.99 calculates the cost of the 4 additional pairs of shorts. These two terms represent the additional purchase.

By adding the cost of the initial purchase and the additional purchase, we obtain the total amount Marissa spent on shirts and shorts.

Learn more about algebraic expressions:

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ11

Therefore, Clausen has 32 cards.The correct answer is Clausen has 32 cards.

Juan and Clausen are playing a card game called "Magic." The number of cards they have is in a ratio of Juan: Clausen = 7:4. Juan has 56 cards. To find the number of cards Clausen has, we can use the concept of ratios and proportions.Since the ratio of Juan's cards to Clausen's cards is 7:4, we can say that Juan has 7x cards, where x is a constant.

Similarly, Clausen has 4x cards.Now, we know that Juan has 56 cards. We can use this information to find the value of x.7x = 56

Dividing both sides by 7, we get:

x = 8

Now that we know the value of x, we can find the number of cards Clausen has.4x = 4(8) = 32

To know more about arithmetic:

https://brainly.com/question/16415816

#SPJ11

To prove that AAGE and AOLD are congruent by SAS, the other information that is needed is: GE = LD.Explanation:To prove that two triangles are congruent using SAS (side-angle-side) postulate, we need to know.

Two sides and the angle between them in one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides and angle in the other triangle.So, given AG = OL, AGE = OLD, and AEG = ODL, we can conclude that two angles and a side are equal in both triangles.However, to apply the SAS postulate, we need to have another pair of equal sides in both triangles. And that is given by GE = LD. Hence, option 1) is the correct answer.Other options don't provide the necessary information to prove the congruence of the two triangles using SAS.

To know more about triangles  , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ11

To find the length of the missing base of the trapezoid, we can use the formula for the area of a trapezoid. Given that the longer base is 8 inches, the height is 3 inches, and the area is 21 square inches, we can substitute these values into the formula and solve for the missing base length.

The formula for the area of a trapezoid is A = (1/2)(b1 + b2)h, where A is the area, b1 and b2 are the lengths of the bases, and h is the height.

In this case, we know that b1 is 8 inches and h is 3 inches, and the area A is 21 square inches. We need to find the length of the missing base, which we'll denote as b2.

Substituting the known values into the formula, we have:

21 = (1/2)(8 + b2)(3)

Simplifying the equation, we get:

42 = 8 + b2

Subtracting 8 from both sides, we find:

b2 = 34

Therefore, the length of the missing base of the trapezoid is 34 inches.

To learn more about trapezoid; -brainly.com/question/31380175

#SPJ11

The sapling tree is 30 inches tall when planted and it grows 2 inches each year. Let y be the height of the tree in inches and x be the age of the tree in years.

Since the tree grows 2 inches each year, the height y of the tree in x years can be represented as:y = 30 + 2xThe function that shows the relationship between the age of the tree in years (x) and the height (y) is y = 30 + 2x.The answer is y = 30 + 2x.

To know more about inches visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9264277

#SPJ11

The factors of x^2 - 64 are (x - 8)(x + 8) because it follows the difference of squares formula, giving the correct factorization that yields x^2 - 64 when multiplied.

To factorize x^2 - 64, we can use the difference of squares formula, which states that a^2 - b^2 can be factored as (a - b)(a + b). In this case, a = x and b = 8. Applying the formula, we have (x - 8)(x + 8) as the factors of x^2 - 64. This is the correct factorization because when we multiply these factors, we get (x - 8)(x + 8) = x^2 - 64.

The other options provided (x - 4)(x + 16) and (x - 8)(x - 8) are not valid factorizations of x^2 - 64. The first option, (x - 4)(x + 16), does not yield x^2 - 64 when multiplied. The second option, (x - 8)(x - 8), is a repeated factor and does not represent the correct factorization. Therefore, the factors of x^2 - 64 are (x - 8)(x + 8).

learn more about factorization here:

https://brainly.com/question/28201305

#SPJ11

The value closest to the estimated average pet car population for European countries in 2010 is 15 million.

Given the table for pet car populations in 2002, we need to estimate the average pet car population for European countries in 2010 after each car population has doubled.

It can be observed that in 2002, Spain and Italy had the lowest pet car population while Germany and the United Kingdom had the highest.

In order to find the estimated average pet car population for European countries in 2010, we first need to find the pet car population for each country in 2010 after doubling their 2002 population.

The results are shown in the table below:

|Country|Pet car population in 2002

|Pet car population in 2010|

|-|-|-|

|France|22 million

|44 million|

|Germany|

30 million|

60 million|

|Italy|

8 million|

16 million| |Spain|6 million|12 million| |United Kingdom|28 million|56 million|

To find the estimated average pet car population for European countries in 2010, we need to sum up the pet car populations for all the countries in 2010 and then divide by the total number of countries (which is 5).

Adding all the pet car populations in 2010:

44 million + 60 million + 16 million + 12 million + 56 million = 188 million

The estimated average pet car population for European countries in 2010, closest to the calculated value, would be:

188 million/5 ≈ 38 million

Now, we need to find which of the given options is closest to this value. We can see that the option closest to 38 million is D.) 12 million.

However, this value is not the answer since it is too low compared to the estimated average.

Therefore, we can rule out option

D.) as the answer.

Now, we can look at the remaining options to determine which is closest to the average.

Option A.) 9 million is clearly too low, and

option C.) 18 million is too high.

Therefore, the answer is

option B.) 15 million,

which is the value closest to the estimated average pet car population for European countries in 2010.

To know more about  population visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/29885712

#SPJ11

The climate of the Gobi Desert has impacted the lifestyle of the people who live in the region by influencing their nomadic lifestyle (Option D).

The Gobi Desert's climate, characterized by extreme temperatures, limited water resources, and sparse vegetation, has shaped the way of life for the people residing in the region. Due to the harsh environment, settled agriculture and permanent settlements are challenging.

As a result, the people in the Gobi Desert have traditionally adopted a nomadic lifestyle (Option D). They move with their herds of livestock, such as camels, goats, and sheep, in search of grazing land and water sources. This lifestyle allows them to adapt to the desert conditions, ensuring the survival of their livestock and themselves.

Nomadic herding enables the people to make efficient use of the scarce resources available in the desert, while also fostering a deep understanding of desert survival techniques. It creates a strong connection between the people and the natural environment, as they rely on the land and its resources for their livelihood.

Therefore, the climate of the Gobi Desert has influenced the people to lead a nomadic lifestyle, allowing them to adapt and thrive in the challenging desert environment.

Learn more about the mathematics here: brainly.com/question/27235369

#SPJ11

The radical form of[tex](-3x^3)^-^2/3 is 1 / (9x^2)[/tex].

To rewrite the expression[tex](-3x^3)^-^2/3[/tex] as a radical, we can use the fact that a negative exponent indicates that the base is in the denominator. Therefore, we can rewrite the expression as:

[tex]1 / (-3x^3)^(^2^/^3^)[/tex]

Using this concept, we can rewrite the exponent -2/3 as [tex]3\sqrt(1/-3^2)[/tex], where 3√ is the cube root. We also need to take the cube root of the absolute value of -3x^3 to ensure that the result is always positive.

To find the radical form, we can simplify the expression under the radical by raising it to the power of 3/2:

[tex](-3x^3)^(^2^/^3) = [(-3)^(^2^/^3^) * (x^3)^(^2^/^3^)]^3 = [(9 * x^2)^(^1^/^3^)]^3 = 9x^2[/tex]

Substituting this back into the original expression gives:

1 / (-3x^3)^(2/3) = 1 / (9x^2).

For such more questions on radical

https://brainly.com/question/738531

#SPJ8

The length of the side /CD/ is 6√3 square units. Option A

The trigonometric function known as the sine of an angle describes the ratio between the lengths of the hypotenuse and the side opposite the angle in a right triangle. The sine function, sometimes known as "sin", is described as follows:

Sin = opp/adj

The sine function can be used to determine how a right triangle's angles and sides match up.

Let the altitude /CD/ be x

Using the sine of an angle;

Sin 60 = √3/2

√3/2 = x/12

x = √3/2 * 12

x = 6√3 square units

Learn more about sine:https://brainly.com/question/30162646

#SPJ1

Plot C serves as the control in the study, providing a baseline or reference point for comparison.

In scientific studies, a control group or condition is used to establish a baseline against which experimental results are compared. In the context of a plot, Plot C is likely subjected to the same conditions as the other plots but without any specific treatment or intervention.

This allows researchers to observe and measure the natural or expected outcome in the absence of the experimental variable. By comparing the results from the treated plots to the control plot, researchers can determine the effect of the intervention or treatment.

Plot C helps eliminate confounding factors and provides a basis for evaluating the effectiveness or impact of the experimental variables.

To learn more about variable click here:

brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ11

we can continue solving the equation correctly and find the accurate value for x. identify where Chelsea made a mistake, let's analyze the equation and her solution step by step:

Given equation: 4x - 5 = 23(x - 3)

Chelsea's solution:
Step 1: Distribute the 23 to the terms inside the parentheses:
4x - 5 = 23x - 69

Step 2: Simplify the equation by subtracting 23x from both sides:
4x - 23x - 5 = -69

Step 3: Combine like terms:
-19x - 5 = -69

Step 4: Add 5 to both sides to isolate the variable:
-19x = -64

Step 5: Divide both sides by -19 to solve for x:
x = -64 / -19
x ≈ 3.3684

Chelsea's mistake occurred in step 4. Instead of adding 5 to both sides, she subtracted it. The correct equation should be:

-19x + 5 = -69

By making this correction, we can continue solving the equation correctly and find the accurate value for x.

to learn more about equation click here:brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The fabric used on a headband and wristband for each players are 19.97 inches and 9.68 inches respectively.

He uses 698.95 inches of fabrics on headbands for 32 players and 3 Coaches.

He also use 309.76 inches of fabrics on wristbands for just players.

The fabric that was used on a headband and wristband for each player can be calculated as follows;

The total fabrics used on headbands for 32 players and 3 coaches is 698.95 inches.

Therefore, the fabric for each individual will be as follows:

698.95 / 32 + 3

= 698.95 / 35

= 19.97 inches

So, The total fabrics used on wristband for just players is 309.76 inches. Therefore, the fabric used for each player is as follows:

309.76 / 32 = 9.68 inches

Therefore, the fabric used on a headband and wristband for each players are 19.97 inches and 9.68 inches respectively.

Learn more about the equation visit:

brainly.com/question/28871326

#SPJ4

Complete question is,

Joey is making accessories for the soccer team. He uses 698.95 inches of fabric on headbands for 32 players and 3 coaches. He also uses 309.76 inches of fabric on wristbands for just the players. How much fabric was used on a headband and wristband for each player?

The elevation of the hole, relative to ground level, after placing the bush in the hole is 52 2/5 feet.

In 30 minutes, Carter digs 34 feet every 10 minutes, so in 30 minutes, he digs a total of (34/10) x 30 = 102 feet. After placing the bush, the hole is filled with 78 feet. So, the elevation of the hole after placing the bush is 102 - 78 = 24 feet below ground level. This can be expressed as a mixed number in simplest form as 52 2/5 feet above ground level.

Sure, let's break down the problem step by step:

1. Carter digs a hole at a rate of 34 feet every 10 minutes. This means that in 10 minutes, he digs 34 feet.

2. To determine how much Carter digs in 30 minutes, we can set up a proportion: 10 minutes is to 34 feet as 30 minutes is to x feet. Solving this proportion, we find that x = (34/10) * 30 = 102 feet. Therefore, Carter digs a total of 102 feet in 30 minutes.

3. After 30 minutes of digging, Carter places a bush in the hole that fills exactly 78 feet of the hole. This means that the hole is no longer empty but has been filled with 78 feet.

4. To find the elevation of the hole relative to ground level, we need to subtract the filled portion (78 feet) from the total depth of the hole that Carter dug (102 feet). This results in 102 - 78 = 24 feet.

5. The elevation of the hole, relative to ground level, is 24 feet below the ground. However, we need to express it as a mixed number in simplest form. Since each whole number is equal to 5/5, we can rewrite 24 as 23 + 1 = 23 + (5/5) = 23 + 1(5/5) = 23 5/5. Simplifying this mixed number, we get 23 1/5 feet.

Therefore, the elevation of the hole, relative to ground level, after placing the bush in the hole is 23 1/5 feet.

Learn more about elevation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29477960

#SPJ11

The explicit formula is [tex](n) = 1 * 1^{(n-1)} = 1[/tex] for all values of n and the number of cells after 10 generations will be 1.

The formula for finding the number of bacteria cells after each generation is given by

[tex]a(n) = a(1)r^{(n-1)}[/tex] where a(1) is the initial number of bacteria cells, r is the growth factor, and n is the number of generations.

The exponent n-1 indicates the number of generations.

To find the number of bacteria cells after 10 generations, we will substitute the given values in the formula.

We are given that a(n)= a(1)r"-1 where r is the growth factor and n is the number of generations.

We know that the initial number of bacteria cells is 1.

Thus, a(1) = 1.

Substituting these values in the formula, we get [tex]a(n) = 1 x r^{(n-1)}[/tex]. For 10 generations, n = 10.

Thus, the formula becomes [tex]a(10) = 1 x r^{(10-1)} = r^9[/tex].

Now, we need to find the value of r.

We are given that [tex]a(n) = a(1)r^{(-1)}[/tex], which means that a(n)/a(1) = 1/r.

Substituting [tex]a(n) = r^9[/tex] and a(1) = 1, we get: [tex]r^9/1 = 1/r[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]r^{10} = 1r = 1^{(1/10)} = 1[/tex]

Thus, the explicit formula becomes [tex]a(n) = 1 * r^{(n-1)}[/tex] = 1 for all values of n.

Therefore, the number of cells after 10 generations will be 1.

Summary: A formula that can be used to find the number of bacteria cells after each generation is [tex]a(n) = 1 * r^{(n-1)}[/tex] where a(1) is the initial number of bacteria cells, r is the growth factor, and n is the number of generations. To find the number of bacteria cells after 10 generations, we can substitute the given values in the formula. The explicit formula for the given problem is [tex]a(n) = 1 * r^{(n-1)}[/tex] where r = 1. Thus, the number of cells after 10 generations will be 1.

For more questions on explicit formula

https://brainly.com/question/30603437

#SPJ8

Using algebraic equations, the value of the number assumed to be x is 13.

Let's assume that the number in question be "x". Thus, the expression can be written as:

2x + 9 = 5 (x - 6).

Let's solve this equation and find the value of x:

Distributing the 5 across the parentheses,

2x + 9 = 5x - 30  

Subtracting 2x from both sides,

we get, 3x = 39  

Dividing both sides by 3,

x = 13    

Thus, the number is 13.

Thus, we have found the number by forming and solving an equation.

Learn more about algebraic equations visit:

brainly.com/question/29131718

#SPJ11

If the average weight of adult male bison is 1650 pounds with a standard deviation of 250 pounds. Then the weight of an adult bull whose z-score is –0.5 will be 1525 pounds.

To find the weight of an adult bull whose z-score is -0.5, we can use the formula for z-score:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Where:

- z is the z-score

- x is the value we want to find (weight of the adult bull)

- μ is the mean weight of adult male bison (1650 pounds)

- σ is the standard deviation (250 pounds)

Rearranging the formula to solve for x:

x = z * σ + μ

Substituting the given values:

x = -0.5 * 250 + 1650

x = -125 + 1650

x = 1525 pounds

Therefore, the weight of an adult bull with a z-score of -0.5 is 1525 pounds.

To know more about z-score, click here: brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ11

The call center made approximately 676 calls per hour. In 7 hours, operators at a call center make 4,732 telemarketing calls.

To represent the number of phone calls made per hour at the call center, we can use the equation:

Number of phone calls made per hour = Total number of phone calls / Number of hours

Given that in 7 hours, operators at the call center made 4,732 telemarketing calls, we can substitute the values into the equation to find the number of calls made per hour:

Number of phone calls made per hour = 4,732 / 7

Performing the division:

Number of phone calls made per hour = 676

Therefore, the call center made approximately 676 calls per hour.

Learn more about call center here

https://brainly.com/question/25974538

#SPJ11

We cannot calculate the efficiency without knowing the weight of the man and the time taken to lift him about motor.

Given that:

The input power of the motor is 6200 watts.The formula for efficiency is;Efficiency = (Output power / Input power) × 100%The motor is used to operate a lift. Therefore, the power output of the motor is used to lift the man and overcome frictional forces, etc.

A motor is a device that transforms electrical energy into mechanical energy, allowing motion to be created or machines to be operated. In myriad applications spanning numerous industries, it is fundamental. Electric motors, which are frequently used in household goods, transportation, and industrial machinery, use the electromagnetic theory to generate rotational motion.

They are made up of a rotor, which rotates in reaction to being subjected to force, and a stator, which produces a revolving magnetic field. Motors come in a variety of sizes and configurations to meet various needs, and they can be categorised according to their power source, such as AC motors or DC motors. Motors are essential to modern technology and automation, powering anything from home appliances to vehicle propulsion.

We know that the man has a weight (W) and is being lifted at a certain height (H), so the power output can be calculated using the following formula;Power Output = W × H / t, where t is the time taken to lift the man.

Substituting the given values;Power Output = W × H / tEfficiency = (Power Output / Input Power) × 100%Therefore;Efficiency = (W × H / t) / 6200 × 100%

We cannot calculate the efficiency without knowing the weight of the man and the time taken to lift him.

Learn more about motor here:

https://brainly.com/question/31214955

#SPJ11

The distance between Arcadia and Rockport is approximately 9.2 miles when rounded to the nearest tenth.

To determine the distance between Arcadia and Rockport, we can use the Pythagorean theorem, which relates the lengths of the sides of a right triangle.

Let's consider Arcadia as point A, Rockport as point R, and the airport as point O. The distance from Arcadia to the airport is 7 miles (the length of side OA), and the distance from Rockport to the airport is 6 miles (the length of side OR). We want to find the distance between Arcadia and Rockport, which is the length of side AR.

Since Arcadia and Rockport are located in different directions (north and east) from the airport, we can form a right triangle with sides AO, OR, and AR.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

AR^2 = AO^2 + OR^2.

Substituting the given lengths, we get:

AR^2 = 7^2 + 6^2,

AR^2 = 49 + 36,

AR^2 = 85.

Taking the square root of both sides, we find:

AR = √85.

Approximating the square root of 85 to the nearest tenth, we have:

AR ≈ 9.2 miles.

Therefore, the distance between Arcadia and Rockport is approximately 9.2 miles when rounded to the nearest tenth.

It's important to note that this calculation assumes a direct path between Arcadia and Rockport. If there are obstacles or detours that would affect the actual path, the distance may differ. Additionally, rounding to the nearest tenth introduces some level of approximation, so the actual distance may be slightly different.

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem at: brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ11

Dinosaur 2 is a more efficient walker in terms of having a pace angle closer to 180°.

To determine which dinosaur is a more efficient walker based on the pace angle, compare the pace angles of the two dinosaurs.

Analyze the given information:

Dinosaur 1:

Pace: 2.9 ft

Stride: 5.78 ft

Dinosaur 2:

Pace: 3.0 ft

Stride: 5.2 ft

To calculate the pace angle, use the following formula:

Pace angle = arccos(Pace/Stride)

For Dinosaur 1:

Pace angle = arccos(2.9/5.78) ≈ 59.43°

For Dinosaur 2:

Pace angle = arccos(3.0/5.2) ≈ 56.62°

Comparing the pace angles, Dinosaur 2 has a smaller pace angle (56.62°) compared to Dinosaur 1 (59.43°). Therefore, Dinosaur 2 is a more efficient walker in terms of having a pace angle closer to 180°.

Find out more on pace angle here: https://brainly.com/question/12804592

#SPJ1

the positive coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between 500 degrees and 1000 degrees is 360 degrees and the negative coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between -500 degrees and 0 degrees is 190 degrees.

To find th positive coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between 500 degrees and 1000 degrees, and the negative coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between -500 degrees and 0 degrees,

we can use the following formulas:For a positive coterminal angle, add 360 degrees repeatedly until we reach the desired range.For a negative coterminal angle, subtract 360 degrees repeatedly until we reach the desired range.

Let's start with the positive coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between 500 degrees and 1000 degrees.

To find this angle, we need to add 360 degrees repeatedly until we reach a value between 500 degrees and 1000 degrees.

So, we can write:47 + 360 = 407 (not in range)

407 + 360 = 767 (not in range)

767 + 360 = 1127 (not in range)

1127 + 360 = 1487 (not in range)

1487 + 360 = 1847 (not in range)

1847 + 360 = 2207 (not in range)

2207 + 360 = 2567 (not in range)

2567 + 360 = 2927 (not in range)

2927 + 360 = 3287 (not in range)

3287 + 360 = 3647 (not in range)

3647 + 360 = 4007 (not in range)

4007 + 360 = 4367 (not in range

4367 + 360 = 4727 (not in range)

4727 + 360 = 5087 (not in range

5087 + 360 = 5447 (not in range

)5447 + 360 = 5807 (not in range)

5807 + 360 = 6167 (not in range)

6167 + 360 = 6527 (not in range)

6527 + 360 = 6887not in range)

6887 + 360 = 7247 (not in range

)7247 + 360 = 7607 (not in range)

7607 + 360 = 7967 (not in range)

7967 + 360 = 8327 (not in range)

8327 + 360 = 8687 (not in range)

8687 + 360 = 9047 (not in range)

9047 + 360 = 9407 (not in range)

9407 + 360 = 9767 (not in range

)9767 + 360 = 10127 (not in range)

10127 + 360 = 10487 (not in range)

10487 + 360 = 10847 (not in range)

10847 + 360 = 11207 (in range)

Therefore, the positive coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between 500 degrees and 1000 degrees is 11207 - 10847 = 360 degrees.

To find the negative coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between -500 degrees and 0 degrees, we need to subtract 360 degrees repeatedly until we reach a value between -500 degrees and 0 degrees. So, we can write:

47 - 360 = -313 (not in range)

-313 - 360 = -673 (not in range)

-673 - 360 = -1033 (not in range)

-1033 - 360 = -1393 (not in range

-1393 - 360 = -1753 (not in range)

-1753 - 360 = -2113 (not in range)

-2113 - 360 = -2473 (not in range)

-2473 - 360 = -2833 (not in range

-2833 - 360 = -3193 (not in range

-3193 - 360 = -3553 (not in range)

-3553 - 360 = -3913 (not in range)

-3913 - 360 = -4273 (not in range)

-4273 - 360 = -4633 (not in range)

-4633 - 360 = -4993 (in range)

therefore, the negative coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between -500 degrees and 0 degrees is -4993 - (-5183) = 190 degrees.

Therefore, the positive coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between 500 degrees and 1000 degrees is 360 degrees and the negative coterminal angle to 47 degrees that is between -500 degrees and 0 degrees is 190 degrees.

To know more about coterminal angle visit:

brainly.com/question/23093580

##SPJ11