map of europe after WW1 - 1918

Craft guilds Positively affected community Life in Medieval Europe by economic boosts, cultural preservation and social support.

The three ways can be described as -

Economic advantages: Craft guilds gave their members access to materials, tools, and instruction as well as other financial advantages. They also controlled prices and made sure that workers were paid fairly for their labour. This contributed to the stabilisation of regional economies and offered some security to guild members and their families.

Cultural preservation: A lot of guilds were tightly linked to specific professions or crafts, like weaving or metalworking. As a result, they were crucial in conserving cultural and aesthetic traditions as well as traditional knowledge and methods. Over time, this aided in preserving cultural heritage and enhancing local communities.

Social support: Guilds frequently gave their members access to healthcare, education, and even help with burial expenses. They also assisted in upholding community standards and resolving member conflicts, which promoted a sense of camaraderie and support among guild members.

Read more about Craft guilds on:

https://brainly.com/question/6750239

#SPJ4

Answer:

people thought more /false

Explanation:

Answer:

1 to a and 2 to b I checked it

1    Taproot system: consists of one large main root and smaller secondary roots that grow from it

2    Fibrous root system: made up of many thin, branched roots that are all similar in size

Answer:

U.S Government and Economics

Answer:

Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration implemented a range of policies to address the problems of the Great Depression. This period is often referred to as the New Deal era, which lasted from 1933 to 1939.

One of the key initiatives of the New Deal was the establishment of government programs to create jobs, such as the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Works Progress Administration. These programs employed millions of people and helped to stimulate economic activity.

The New Deal also included a range of measures to stabilize the banking system and prevent further bank failures. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was established to insure bank deposits, and the Glass-Steagall Act separated commercial banking from investment banking.

Roosevelt also implemented policies to support farmers, including the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which paid farmers to reduce production and raise crop prices. Other New Deal programs included the National Recovery Administration, which established codes for fair competition and minimum wages, and the Social Security Act, which provided for old-age pensions and unemployment insurance.

Overall, the New Deal marked a significant shift towards greater government involvement in the economy and the welfare of citizens. While there is debate among historians about the effectiveness of specific New Deal policies, most agree that the New Deal had a significant impact on American society and helped to alleviate some of the worst effects of the Great Depression.

(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)

Areas of the northeast and midwest with coal and iron resources; once the center of american industry is the Northeast and Midwest regions  which is Rust Belt is a colloquial term used to describe the geographic region stretching from New York through the Midwest

What is the area with iron resources?

The Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States were once the center of American industry due to their abundant coal and iron resources. Some of the major areas in these regions with coal and iron resources include Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Known as the "Steel City," Pittsburgh was the center of the American steel industry due to its proximity to coal mines and access to transportation routes like rivers and railways.

Cleveland, Ohio: Cleveland was another major center of steel production, with easy access to Lake Erie for transportation and abundant deposits of iron ore and coal in the surrounding areas.

Learn more about resources at:

https://brainly.com/question/1290230

#SPJ1

Answer:

all of them

Explanation:

The English made at least two unsuccessful attempts to colonize the lands that would later be known as British Guiana in the 17th century, at a time when the Dutch had established two colonies in the area: Essequibo, administered by the Dutch West India Company, and Berbice, administered by the Berbice Association. Map of the Guianas depicting the Guiana coast, which became British, Dutch, and French Guiana after centuries of war and settlement; now sovereign Guyana and Surinam, though French Guiana remains a French overseas possession. Despite Spain's claim in 1593, the Dutch started settling along the Essequibo, Courantyne, and Cayenne rivers in 1602. They were followed by the Dutch West India Company (1621), which received what is now Guyana and subsequently Suriname.African slaves were brought in to labor on the company's tobacco, cotton, and coffee farms. The Brits re-occupied much of Dutch Guyana under the Batavian Republic. Following the Napoleonic Wars in 1814, British acquired control of the three territories west of the Courantyne River (Demerara, Berbice, and Essequibo). These three territories merged to form British Guiana.

Answer:

A. *politics for the "common man."

The importance of Jacksonian democracy lies in all of its deep contradictions. It managed to be both democratic and anti-democratic at the same time. Which is largely why it has not been a valued governance model since the beginning of it’s end, with the Civil War. The more perduring positive legacy of it would be civic engagement in campaigns, at least; and to a lesser extent, state and local processes and policies. There were serious negative legacies it left, as well.

The high-level theory of Jacksonianism implies a government by, for and of the people. Versus and in contrast to: a government led by aristocracy, oligarchy, elitism, etc. Jackson believed less power in the hands of the latter would insure less corruption, and, more, well, ‘we the people’ -style democracy. It was much about a rejection of the one-(First) party Thomas Jefferson administration that largely limited political power to a limited cohort of East Coast elites. The Jacksonian ‘Second Party’ System sought to break the mold and intentionally engage the ‘common man.’

Most of us learn that democracy is about the fair and equal rights and inputs of all—including, ostensibly, the populist (simply: non-government employed population). The reality was (and remains) that democracies—from the Roman Empire to the British Empire (as well as to many American administrations from both parties, including the current Trump Administration)—often were anything but, in practice, solely or even primarily: ‘for the people.’

From this perspective Jackson’s iteration of democracy was radical—but, only to a point. He wasn’t an extremist. With the most unmistakable evidence he wasn’t being that Jackson—and the whole concept of Jacksonian democracy, was, in truth, a poor model for political equality and equitable power.

Blame it on the times if you like, but, the fact is that by ‘the people’ Jackson really meant only ‘white men.’ All others—Native Americans, Mexicans, blacks, women, etc., were left out in theory and ideology (though some unspoken). and especially in policy and practice—to the point that his Congress had a gag rule against discussion of slave policy.

Beyond those glaringly incongruent exceptions, Jackson was considered a ‘new federalist’ due to his straddle of the federalist system as well as some parts of the anti-federalist paradigms. He was a fan of short term limits, protective of states rights and promoted individual rights. The catch is he also managed to expand the executive/president’s office, reduce the potency of the legislature/Congress, all but failed at ‘draining the swamp’ (other than of his political foes who he hastened to remove in wide swaths and whom he replaced with supporters), endorsed slavery, and pulled in the federal reigns over states during the nullification crisis.

Beyond this all, is a theme abundantly demonstrated in the Donald J. Trump presidency. Jackson was a fan of patronage—appointing your friends and allies to political positions—and, (though it’s unknown if Trump will follow through with this part of it): rotating new ones in after four years, apparently to keep the system fresh.

Keeping this relevant background and context in mind, here are some key features of the Jacksonian doctrine, largely in theory again, not necessarily practice—-

Suffrage/Voting rights

Rhetorically Jackson elevated and espoused the concept of ‘majority’ rule. Towards that end one notable battle he took on was an attempt at the abolishment of the Electoral College, part of representative democracy, with their party-appointed representatives (elector(s)) for each state serving as proxies of sort for ‘the people’s’ presidential vote. Jackson felt the electors and Electoral College process was incongruent with the ‘one (white) man, one vote,’ process of the popular vote/majority rule system.

Manifest Destiny

Jackson wanted to ‘expand freedom’ geographically. This was related to both his agrarian ideals—which he boosted with supporting the distribution of land to individual citizens—and, also to the destruction of first nation Native American tribes, an anti-freedom (for non-whites) policy which led to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, both under his watch.

In the spirit of the entitlement ethos known as American exceptionalism (or, more literally: ‘Romantic’ nationalism), Jackson was a proponent of both (white) citizens and the government exploring and taking control of the of the American frontier, beyond the colonized East. The ‘destiny’ part comes from the belief that this was settlers’ God-given right. As though God Him/Herself gave white (male) citizens of the U.S. more favor than the land’s indigenous citizens to the North, West and South.

There were no desks or chairs when the orphanage look like before sister Blandina arrived .

Option b is correct .

The young Sister was sent alone across the Santa Fe Trail to Trinidad in the Colorado Territory in 1872 after spending several years working as a teacher in Ohio. She was introduced to the hazards and adventures of life on the frontier here. She was hired to teach in a public school and also ran into "frontier justice" and Billy the Kid.

There are numerous accounts of how she prevented armed crowds from taking the law into their own hands, assisted criminals in asking their victims for forgiveness, and even prevented a man from being hanged by arranging for him to make amends with the man he shot and killed. The exploits of Sister have been chronicled in books, TV shows, biographies, and a comic book.

Hence , Option b is correct .

To know more about orphanage visit :

https://brainly.com/question/24608040

#SPJ4

Based on the discussions regarding the mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, the following statement most accurately describes these situations: Both of these incidents were due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks.

The mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, occurred due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks. Both of these incidents were a result of the same geological phenomenon, which is the movement of soil and rocks downhill due to gravity.

La Conchita in California is particularly prone to landslides because of the region's steep slopes and unstable soil. In March of 2014, a large landslide occurred in Oso, Washington, killing over 40 people.

Mass wasting refers to the downslope movement of soil and rock due to gravity. Mass wasting events are generally caused by water, wind, or geological forces, and they are particularly prevalent in regions with steep slopes, unstable soil, or a combination of the two. Landslides, rockslides, and mudslides are examples of mass wasting events.

To know more about  mass wasting refer here

https://brainly.com/question/17071531#

#SPJ11

The Greensboro protest, which was organised by African American college students, was aimed at challenging racial segregation in the United States.

The Greensboro protest of 1960 was a civil rights demonstration in Greensboro, North Carolina, United States. The peaceful protest was organized by four African-American college students, Ezell Blair Jr., Franklin McCain, Joseph McNeil, and David Richmond.

The four young men, who became known as the “Greensboro Four,” entered a Woolworth’s store and sat at the segregated lunch counter, where they asked to be served. The store refused to serve them, but the four protesters remained in their seats, engaging in peaceful protest.

The demonstration received national media attention and inspired a series of similar protests in other parts of the South. The Greensboro Four’s action catalyzed the Civil Rights Movement in North Carolina and throughout the United States, and their protest is remembered for its significance in American history.

Learn more about Greensboro protest here:

brainly.com/question/12878753

#SPJ11

Answer:

If it were me in that situation, suffering and in pain with no hope of recovery, I would want the option to end my suffering with dignity. I think it's important to have that choice and to not have to suffer needlessly.

I believe that every person has the right to choose how they want to live their life, and that includes how they want to die. If someone is in unbearable pain and wants to end their suffering, they should be able to do so with the help of a medical professional. It's a humane and compassionate choice that should be available to those who need it.

Of course, there are many ethical and legal considerations to take into account, and it's not a decision that should be taken lightly. But ultimately, I believe that the right to die with dignity should be a basic human right.

Explanation:

After the end of World War I, the German sphere of influence in China was given to Japan.

The German sphere of influence in China was made up of the Shandong Province and other territories in northern China. Japan fought on the side of the Allies during World War I and was given the right to manage these territories in northern China at the Treaty of Versailles. This infuriated the Chinese, and there were protests all over the country. They were already angry because they had been promised at the Treaty of Versailles that they would regain control of their own country, but Japan's occupation of northern China was seen as an infringement of their sovereignty.

This statement is backed up by answer B

learn more about  World War I here:

https://brainly.com/question/25049423

#SPJ11

The main outcome of the Yalta Conference was the agreement to divide Germany into four zones controlled by the Allies.The Yalta Conference's primary objective was to discuss the division of post-World War II Europe.

The Yalta Conference was held between February 4 and 11, 1945, and it was a meeting between leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom.The leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union attended the conference. The leaders agreed to divide Germany into four occupation zones after the defeat of Nazi Germany. They further agreed to temporarily divide Berlin into four separate zones of occupation before Germany's re-unification in the future.

USSR and United States would hold on to their own systems of government, while Great Britain would retain the current parliamentary democracy that had been in place. It was agreed that Poland would be given a "provisional" government of national unity until it could hold free and fair elections to establish its permanent government. Stalin also agreed to join the fight against Japan within two or three months after the defeat of Germany. In exchange for his cooperation, he was promised territories in the Pacific.

For such more questions on Yalta Conference:

brainly.com/question/20090485

#SPJ11

From 1949 to 1990, East Berlin served as East Germany's (GDR) de facto capital. Originally, it was the 1945-established Soviet section of Berlin. West Berlin was the term used to describe the American, British, and French sectors.

What are culture difference in east berlin and west berlin?

The two Germanys under their occupying administrations took quite different directions. West Germany developed into a market economy, western capitalist nation, and ally of the U.S., U.K., and France. East Germany, on the other hand, came under the communist regime and was linked with the Soviet Union.

The Berlin Wall separated the city from 1961 until 1989, entirely enclosing its western portion. As a result, a city with a unique governmental standing and a highly distinctive way of life emerged as a historical anomaly.

Berlin is regarded as a global hub for the arts and creative sectors. Many cultural institutions, many of which are well-known internationally, are showcasing the city's rich legacy. a large number of youth, cultural entrepreneurs

Learn more about berlin:

https://brainly.com/question/19520457

#SPJ1

France. The country of France was made weaker by the Congress of Vienna's work.

Answer:

France

Explanation:

The answer above is correct.

The following are things that Massachusetts as well as Pennsylvania have in common. Both states saw the signing of the US constitution.

In Massachusetts, Bartholomew Gosnold founded the first bazaar in 1602. In 1620, the first Pilgrims arrive in Provincetown. Plymouth saw the construction of the first religious main hall in 1620. Plymouth hosted the first Thanksgiving in 1621.

With approximately 70% of the population being Christian Massachusetts is still a fairly religious state thanks to the history of the first Pilgrims and Puritans. Massachusetts is now a pleasantly progressive and diverse destination thanks to the progressivism that has offset this state's conservatism.

To know more about Massachusetts visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7148546

#SPJ1

The invention of the cotton gin had a significant impact on the south.

Eli Whitney, an American inventor, patented the cotton gin in 1794, revolutionizing the cotton industry by increasing its production speed and profitability.The cotton gin made it easier to extract cotton fibers from its seed. Prior to the invention of the cotton gin, cotton processing was done manually, which was a labor-intensive process. With the cotton gin, it became easier to extract cotton fibers, which made cotton production much more profitable.

As a result, cotton became the South's leading crop, as the production of cotton boomed. Slave trade in the southern states also became more profitable because of this reason.However, the invention of the cotton gin also had negative consequences. It led to an increase in the demand for slaves. Because of this, the slave trade, which was already thriving in the South, expanded. More slaves were needed to keep up with the increased demand for cotton production.

For such more questions on  cotton gin impact:

brainly.com/question/366747

#SPJ11

Needle and thread tools needed If you wanted to make artwork inspired by abibas .  

Option c is correct .

The handcraft of embroidering involves using yarn or a needle to decorate fabric or other materials. Other materials, such metal strips, pearls, beads, quills, and sequins, can also be incorporated into embroidery. Materials like thin yarn, embroidery floss, crochet thread, and sewing thread are all acceptable. All of these possibilities are good choices, but the one you select will depend on the required completed product thickness.

A free motion sewing method called thread painting (or threadpainting) is used to machine-sew lines, areas of colour and texture, or embroidered designs and motifs. On top of a foundation fabric, stitches are made using threads of various colors and weights.

Hence , Option c is correct .

To know more about Thread Painting visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29855051

#SPJ4

Agricultural revolution helped England industrialize because they led England to become more efficient in the planting and harvesting of crops. The harvests became more successful and easy to manage. Because of this, cities grew around what were once small farming communities. Since it was easier to harvest as well, more people went to work in factories.

A farming revolution occurs when farming methods significantly advance in a relatively short amount of time. As a result, more food is produced. In the history of humanity, there have been three agricultural revolutions. Around 10,000 B.C., the Neolithic Revolution, also known as the First Agricultural Revolution, started. Humans transitioned from being hunter-gatherers to being herders and subsistence farmers. Around 300 years ago, in the 18th century, the British Agricultural Revolution, also known as the Second Agricultural Revolution, got its start.

The systematic crop rotation and selective breeding of livestock were two significant changes to farming methods. Between the mid-17th and late 19th centuries, there was an unprecedented rise in agricultural production in Britain known as the British Agricultural Revolution, or Second Agricultural Revolution.

Learn more about Agricultural Revolution at:

brainly.com/question/30584359

#SPJ4

Advantages of the North at the start of the Civil War: Better transportation, More population, Industrial power

Disadvantages of the North at the start of the Civil War: Unfamiliar terrain, Lower morale, Lack of motivation

Advantages of the South at the start of the Civil War: Defensive position, Military leadership, Lower population

Disadvantages of the South at the start of the Civil War: Limited resources, Lower morale, Limited transportation

EXPLANATION

Better transportation: The North had better transportation than the South. They had a more extensive railroad system, which allowed them to move supplies and troops quickly across the country.

More population: The North had a greater population than the South, giving them a larger pool of soldiers to draw from to fight in the war.

Industrial power: The North had a more significant industrial base than the South. They could produce weapons and ammunition in large quantities due to the presence of many factories.

Disadvantages of the North at the start of the Civil War:

Unfamiliar terrain: The North was fighting on unfamiliar terrain in the South. The geography of the South was not suited for their style of warfare.

Lower morale: The North had lower morale than the South. They were not used to losing battles, and they were experiencing many losses at the beginning of the war.

Lack of motivation:The North was not as motivated to fight the war as the South. The South was fighting for their way of life and independence, while the North was fighting to preserve the Union

Advantages of the South at the start of the Civil War:

Defensive position: The South was fighting on their home turf, which gave them a defensive advantage. They knew the terrain and had the support of the local population.

Military leadership: The South had better military leaders at the beginning of the war. Robert E. Lee was a brilliant tactician and strategist who won many battles against the North, and Stonewall Jackson was an excellent field commander.

Lower population: The South had a smaller population than the North, which meant that they had fewer soldiers to fight in the war. However, they were fighting on their home turf, which gave them an advantage in terms of knowledge of the terrain.

Disadvantages of the South at the start of the Civil War:

Limited resources: The South had limited resources, including food, supplies, and ammunition. They were not as industrialized as the North, so they could not produce as many weapons and ammunition.

Lower morale: The South had lower morale than the North. They were fighting a war that was not in their favor, and they were experiencing many losses. However, they were fighting for their way of life, which gave them motivation to continue the fight.

Limited transportation: The South had limited transportation, which made it difficult for them to move troops and supplies across the country. They had fewer railroads than the North, which made it challenging to transport goods.

For more such questions on Civil war

https://brainly.com/question/24992590

#SPJ11

Argentina once had an economy with GDP per capita larger than japan, south Korea, and Spain .The correct answer is "not always constant".

The case of Argentina's economy illustrates that economic growth is not always constant over time, and can instead occur in fits and starts. While Argentina was once a prosperous and growing economy, it has since struggled to maintain that level of growth due to a variety of factors, including political instability, economic mismanagement, and external shocks such as commodity price fluctuations and global financial crises. This highlights the fact that economic growth is a complex and multifaceted process that is influenced by a wide range of internal and external factors, and is not always predictable or constant over time.

To know more about economic growth , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11679822

#SPJ1

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was significant because it gave President Johnson the power to use military force in Vietnam.

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was a joint resolution of the United States Congress passed in August 1964 that authorized the president to take all necessary measures to defend against attacks on American forces in Vietnam.

This gave President Johnson the power to use military force in Vietnam. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution allowed Johnson to escalate the United States’ military involvement in the Vietnam War without seeking a formal declaration of war from Congress.

The resolution was repealed in 1970, but the Vietnam War continued for several more years before coming to an end.

For such more question on Vietnam:

https://brainly.com/question/15331252

#SPJ11

An atlatl is a spear thrower that acts as an extension of the human arm. The correct option is a.

An atlatl is a tool that dates back to the Paleolithic period and was used by ancient hunter-gatherers. It is composed of a handle, shaft, and a cup or hook on the end that helps hold the spear in place. This extension of the human arm allows the user to throw the spear with greater force and accuracy. Atlatls can be made of wood, bone, stone, and other materials, and so can be found archaeologically. Men and women could use atlatls, as strength is not a factor in using the tool.

It was first used by early humans in the Paleolithic era, long before the advent of the bow and arrow. Although the atlatl fell out of favor as technology advanced and other weapons were created, it was used in some regions of the world up until the 20th century. The atlatl's use is now mostly confined to sports or cultural festivals in various parts of the world.

Learn more about an atlatl here:

brainly.com/question/11258606

#SPJ11

Among African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century, Booker T. Washington's ideas were more popular than they had been at the end of the nineteenth century.

Booker T. Washington was an educator, speaker, and writer who founded Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute, which is now Tuskegee University, in Tuskegee, Alabama.

Washington was a significant figure in the African American community during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and he was well-known for his advocacy for racial uplift and educational development.

In his speech, he proposed that Southern whites and African Americans should work together to build a self-sufficient Southern economy in which blacks and whites would be equal but separate.

This meant that African Americans should concentrate on acquiring practical skills, especially in agriculture and industrial trades, rather than fighting for full civil rights and social equality.

So, Among African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century, Booker T. Washington's ideas were more popular than they had been at the end of the nineteenth century.

To know more about T. Washington's ideas refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30689306#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation: i don’t know

During World War II, the United States government did claim the authority to restrict individual rights in favor of public safety, and this was upheld by the Supreme Court in several landmark cases. However, the Constitution itself does not explicitly grant this authority.

Instead, the government relied on the doctrine of "emergency powers," which are powers that are implied by the Constitution but not specifically enumerated. The Supreme Court has recognized that in times of war or national emergency, the government may have broader powers to protect national security and public safety, even if this involves some restriction of individual rights.

For example, in the case of Korematsu v. United States (1944), the Supreme Court upheld the forced relocation and internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, even though this violated their constitutional rights. The Court reasoned that the government's interest in national security outweighed the individual rights of Japanese Americans.

However, it is worth noting that these decisions have been widely criticized as violations of civil liberties and human rights, and the government's use of emergency powers has been controversial throughout American history. Ultimately, the question of when and how the government can restrict individual rights in the name of public safety remains a subject of ongoing debate and interpretation.

The white elites at St. Domingue were angered when the National Assembly in France granted political rights to free people of color in 1791.

St. Domingue was a French colony situated on the western side of the Hispaniola Island from 1659 to 1804. It is now known as Haiti. The colony was the wealthiest colony of France, and it was the home to white elites who owned numerous plantations and slaves.

The slaves who were a large part of the St. Domingue society demanded freedom, and they got their first chance in August 1791 when they rebelled against their slave owners. The St. Domingue slaves formed a revolutionary force that was opposed to the French colonizers.

The white elites at St. Domingue reacted angrily to the National Assembly of France granting political rights to free people of color in 1791. The political rights were the right to vote, and the white elites did not want the free people of color to have them. They were opposed to any efforts to change the St. Domingue society's social classes.

In conclusion, the white elites at St. Domingue were angered when the National Assembly in France granted political rights to free people of color in 1791. The white elites did not want the free people of color to have the right to vote, and they were opposed to any changes in the social classes of St. Domingue society.

Learn more about St. Domingue: https://brainly.com/question/20555054

#SPJ11

Answer:

Germany is an example of militarism in WWI because Germany began competing with the British for having the largest navy in the world, as well as developing new weapons like poison gas and submarines, the latter being a great tool in surprise attacks.

Explanation:

The dissolution of East Germany and the formal reunification of the German state following the democratic lines of the West German Basic Law took place on 3 October 1990, 339 days after the collapse of the Berlin Wall, and was the first significant step toward German reunification.

To learn more about German reunification, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/3110733