Just a little bit of math hw

Answer: 247.92 euros

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:  Varia is required pay $3,500 (in US dollars) per year to the university.

So, [tex]$3500\div 12 \approx\$291.67[/tex]

i.e. She will pay $ 291.67 per month.

Recent currency value: 1 US dollar = 0.85 euro

∴ $291.67 = ( 0.85 ×291.67) euros

= 247.92 euros  [Round to the nearest cent]

∴ She can expect 247.92 euros to pay per month to the university.

Answer:

ii. 75 steps

iii. 75 steps

iv. 106 steps, and [tex]315^{0}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Musah's starting point be A, his waiting point after taking 50 steps northward and 25 steps westward be B, and his stopping point be C.

ii. From the second attachment, Musah's distance due west from A to C (AD) can be determined as;

bearing at B = [tex]315^{0}[/tex], therefore <BCD = [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

To determine distance AB,

[tex]/AB/^{2}[/tex] = [tex]/50/^{2}[/tex]   +  [tex]/25/^{2}[/tex]

          = 25000 + 625

          = 3125

AB = [tex]\sqrt{3125}[/tex]

     = 55.90

AB ≅ 56 steps

Thus, AC = 50 steps + 56 steps

               = 106 steps

From ΔACD,

Sin [tex]45^{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{x}{106}[/tex]

⇒ x = 106 × Sin [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

      = 74.9533

     ≅ 75 steps

Musah's distance west from centre to final point is 75 steps

iii. From the secon attachment, Musah's distance north, y, can be determined by;

Cos [tex]45^{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y}{106}[/tex]

⇒ y = 106 × Cos [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

      = 74.9533

      ≅ 75 steps

Musah's distance north from centre to final point is 75 steps.

iv. Musah's distance from centre to final point is AC = AB + BC

                                     = 50 steps + 56 steps

                                     = 106 steps

From ΔACD,

Tan θ = [tex]\frac{75}{75}[/tex]

          = 1.0

θ = [tex]Tan^{-1}[/tex]  1.0

 = [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

Musah's bearing from centre to final point = [tex]45^{0}[/tex] + [tex]270^{0}[/tex]

                                                           =  [tex]315^{0}[/tex]

Answer:  19.2222

Step-by-step explanation:

given data;

no of tornadoes = 2,1,0 because it’s fewer than 3.

period = 14 years

probability of a tornado in a calendar year = 0.12

solution:

probability of exactly 2 tornadoes

= ( 0.12 )^2 * ( 0.88 )^11 * ( 14! / 2! * 11! )

= 0.0144 * 0.2451 * 1092

= 3.8541

probability of exac one tornado

= ( 0.12 )^1 * ( 0.88 )^12 * ( 14! / 1! * 12! )

= 0.12 * 0.2157 * 182

= 12.7109

probability of exactly 0 tornado

= ( 0.12 )^0 * ( 0.88 )^13 * ( 14! / 0! * 13! )

= 1 * 0.1898 * 14

= 2.6572

probability if fewer than 3 tornadoes

= 3.8541 + 12.7109 +2.6572

= 19.2222

Answer:

The sequence is 14, 19, 24, 29, 34, 39.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the common difference (the difference between two consecutive terms) as d. We see that the second term is 19 and the 5th term is 34 and since 5 - 2 = 3, we add d 3 times to 19 to get 34 so therefore:

19 + 3d = 34

3d = 15

d = 5 so the first term is 19 - 5 = 14, the third would be 19 + 5 = 24, the fourth would be 24 + 5 = 29 and the sixth would be 34 + 5 = 39.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The approximate learning percentage can be estimated by using a doubling method.

If we breakdown the repetitions into three consecutive parts, we have:

1 - 2

2 - 4

3 - 6

then

1 - 2        →         46P = 39

P =39/46

P = 0.8478

P = 84.8%

2 - 4        →       39P = 33

P = 33/39

P = 0.84615

P = 84.6%

3  -  6    →       35P = 30

P = 30/35

P = 0.8571

P = 85.7%

The average value of P = (84.8 + 84.6 + 85.7)/3 = 85.03%

[tex]\simeq[/tex] 85%

From the tables of Learning Curves coefficient

The values are likened against times derived from 85% table factors at T[tex]_1[/tex] = 46

Unit                 1                2           3                    4                5            6

Date                46            39         35                33                32          30

Computed       -              39.1       35.56          33.26        31.56       30.22

b. Using your answer from part a, estimate the average completion time per repetition assuming a total of 30 repetitions are planned. (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)

The average completion time = [tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{T_1 \times \ Total \ time\ factor}{n}}[/tex]

At the total time factor 30, from the learning curves table , n(30) = 17.091

Thus:

The average completion time = [tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{46 \times \ 17.091}{30}}[/tex]

The average completion time = [tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{786.186}{30}}[/tex]

The average completion time = [tex]\mathtt{26.2062}[/tex]

Answer:

The  mass of  amino acid present is  85 g

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  volume of the total  parenteral nutrition is  [tex]V = 2000 mL[/tex]

Generally the volume of the amino acid present is  

                [tex]V_a = 0.0425 * 2000[/tex]

                [tex]V_a = 85 mL[/tex]

Generally  

               [tex]mass \ \ \alpha \ \ volume[/tex]

So the mass of amino acid present is 85g

Answer:

[tex]x > -1[/tex] or

[tex]x > 2[/tex] or

[tex]x > 3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex](x + 1)(x - 2) (x - 3) > 0[/tex]

Required

Solve; with steps

[tex](x + 1)(x - 2) (x - 3) > 0[/tex]

Start by splitting the inequality as follows

[tex]x + 1 > 0[/tex] or [tex]x - 2 > 0[/tex] or  [tex]x - 3 > 0[/tex]

Solve the inequalities one after the other

Solving: [tex]x + 1 > 0[/tex]

Subtract 1 from both sides

[tex]x + 1 - 1 > 0 - 1[/tex]

[tex]x > -1[/tex]

Solving: [tex]x - 2 > 0[/tex]

Add 2 to both sides

[tex]x - 2 +2 > 0 +2[/tex]

[tex]x > 2[/tex]

Solving: [tex]x - 3 > 0[/tex]

Add 3 to both sides

[tex]x - 3 +3> 0+3[/tex]

[tex]x > 3[/tex]

Hence, the solution to the inequality is

[tex]x > -1[/tex] or

[tex]x > 2[/tex] or

[tex]x > 3[/tex]

Answer:

Hey there!

We can write: -2+9=7.

Let me know if this helps :)

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{{-2+9=7}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

-2 is also 0-2

The arrow goes from 0 to -2.

-2 + 9 = 7

The arrow goes from -2 to 7.

Answer: You will need 8 cup scales

Step-by-step explanation:

kg=1000 grams

2000/250=8

Answer:

(3x+11)/ (5x-9)

Step-by-step explanation:

The numerator is what is on the top of the bar in the middle

(3x+11)/ (5x-9)

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{\mathrm{Option \ B}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The numerator of a fraction is the top section of the fraction.

Answer:

13.75 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

n=4

3n+7/n =3(4) + 7/4

=12 + 1.75

=$13.75

Answer: A) 4.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

z = 83/( -c+6-t)

Step-by-step explanation:

-cz + 6z = tz + 83

Subtract tz from each side

-cz + 6z -tz= tz-tz + 83

-cz + 6z - tz = 83

Factor out z

z( -c+6-t) = 83

Divide each side by ( -c+6-t)

z( -c+6-t)/( -c+6-t)  = 83/( -c+6-t)

z = 83/( -c+6-t)

Answer:

-4.5ft per sec

Step-by-step explanation:

Assume that vertical wall has a distance of y and the horizontal floor is x (6 ft).

This forms a triangle with the ladder as the hypothenus of length 10ft

We have dy/dt = 6ft per sec

According to Pythagoras law the relationship between x and y is

(x^2) + (y^2) = (hypothenus ^2) = 10^2

When we differentiate both sides of the equation

2x(dx/dt) + 2y(dy/dt) = 0

dy/dt = (x/y) * (dx/dt)

y= √(10^2) - (6^2) = 8ft

So dy/dt = (6/8)* (6/1)= -4.5 ft per sec

It is a negative rate

Answer:

[tex]\text{Ratio as a fraction - \: \boxed{\frac{8}{18}}}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Fraction in simplest form - \boxed{\frac{4}{9}}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1: Writing a ratio as a fraction

A fraction and a ratio are the same thing - just a different name. Therefore, the colon in a ratio is the same as a divisor line in a fraction. Therefore, to write a ratio as a fraction,

Therefore, 8:18 as a fraction is 8/18.

Part 2: Fraction in simplest form

To put a fraction in simplest form, first divide the numerator by the denominator. If it contains a remainder, you cannot use this step to verify it.

8 only goes into 18 twice and leaves a 2 as a remainder, so this method does not work.

Instead, if both numbers are even, divide by 2.

8/2 = 4

18/2 = 9

Check to see if the new numerator and denominator can reduce any further.

4/9 = 4/9

The fraction in simplest form is 4/9.

Answer:

y = |x + 2| + 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Parent Graph: f(x) = a|bx + c| + k

a is vertical stretch/shrink

b is horizontal stretch/shrink

c is horizontal movement left/right

k is vertical movement up/down

Since we are given an equation and we want to move it 1 unit up (vertical movement up), we only manipulate k:

y = |x + 2| + k

k = 1

y = |x + 2| + 1

Answer:

y = |x+2| + 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation will be y = |x+2| + 1.

By translating the graph one unit up, the equation will simply change by adding +1 to the graph, outside of the absolute value part.

Answer:

Yes.

It is 1.45 x 10^-7 or 0.000000145

Hope it helps!

Answer:

It is 1.45 x 10^-7 or 0.000000145

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: A) (-2, 4), (6,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

When a point (x,y) is dilated by a scale factor of k , then the new points is given by (kx,ky).

Given: The line segment AB with endpoints A(-3, 6) and B(9, 12) is dilated with a scale factor [tex]\dfrac23[/tex] about the origin.

Let A' and B' b the endpoints of the dilated line segment.

Then, [tex]A'(\dfrac{2}{3}(-3), \dfrac23(6))=A'(-2,4)[/tex]

[tex]B'(\dfrac{2}{3}(9), \dfrac23(12))=B'(6,8)[/tex]

Hence, the correct option is A) (-2, 4), (6,8)

Answer:

15.7% of students made above an 89.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the data is normally distributed, the standard deviation is 7, and the mean is 82, then about 68.2% of students made between 75 and 89. 13.6% made between 90 and 96, and 2.1% made over 96. 13.6+2.1=15.7%

Answer:

25 CAN be written as a fraction.

=> 250/10 = 25

Square root of 14 is 3.74165738677

It is NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE THIS FULL NUMBER AS A FRACTION,  but if we simplify the decimal like: 3.74, THEN WE CAN WRITE THIS AS A FRACTION

=> 374/100

-1.25 CAN be written as a fraction.

=> -5/4 = -1.25

Square root of 16 CAN also be written as a fraction.

=> sqr root of 16 = 4.

4 can be written as a fraction.

=> 4 = 8/2

Pi = 3.14.........

It is NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE THE FULL 'PI' AS A FRACTION, but if we simplify 'pi' to just 3.14, THEN WE CAN WRITE IT AS A FRACTION

=> 314/100

.6 CAN be written as a fraction.

=> 6/10 = .6

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{\sf \bf \ \ f(x)=(x-4i)(x+4i)(x+3)(x-5) \ \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, the Conjugate Roots Theorem states that if a complex number is a zero of real polynomial its conjugate is a zero too. It means that (x-4i)(x+4i) are factors of f(x).

[tex]\text{Meaning that } (x-4i)(x+4i) =x^2-(4i)^2=x^2+16 \text{ is a factor of f(x).}[/tex]

The coefficient of the leading term is 1 and the constant term is -240 = 16 * (-15), so we a re looking for a real number such that.

[tex]f(x)=x^4-2x^3+x^2-32x-240\\\\ =(x^2+16)(x^2+ax-15)\\\\ =x^4+ax^3-15x^2+16x^2+16ax-240[/tex]

We identify the coefficients for the like terms, it comes

a = -2 and 16a = -32 (which is equivalent). So, we can write in [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex].

[tex]\\f(x)=(x^2+16)(x^2-2x-15)[/tex]

The sum of the zeroes is 2=5-3 and their product is -15=-3*5, so we can factorise by (x-5)(x+3), which gives.

[tex]f(x)=(x^2+16)(x^2-2x-15)\\\\=(x^2+16)(x^2+3x-5x-15)\\\\=(x^2+16)(x(x+3)-5(x+3))\\\\=\boxed{(x^2+16)(x+3)(x-5)}[/tex]

And we can write in [tex]\mathbb{C}[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=\boxed{(x-4i)(x+4i)(x+3)(x-5)}[/tex]

Hope this helps.

Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.

Thank you

Answer:

[tex]\theta[/tex] =2mπ + π/3 for m ∈ Z.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the equation [tex]2sin\theta - \sqrt{3} = 0[/tex], we are to find all the values of [tex]\theta[/tex] that satisfies the equation.

[tex]2sin\theta - \sqrt{3} = 0\\\\2sin\theta = \sqrt{3} \\\\sin\theta = \sqrt{3}/2 \\\\\theta = sin{-1} \sqrt{3}/2 \\\\\theta = 60^0[/tex]

General solution for sin[tex]\theta[/tex] is [tex]\theta[/tex] = nπ + (-1)ⁿ ∝, where n ∈ Z.

If n is an even number say 2m, then [tex]\theta[/tex] = (2m)π + ∝ where ∝ = 60° = π/3

Hence, the general solution to the equation will be [tex]\theta[/tex] = 2mπ + π/3 for m ∈ Z.

Answer:

1). m° = 56.1°

2). X= 91.8 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

For angle m°

Using the sine rule

15.1/sin m= 18.2/sin 90

But Sin 90= 1

15.1/sin m= 18.2

15.1= 18.2*sin m

Sin m = 15.1/18.2

Sin m=0.8297

m= sin^-1(0.8297)

m= 56.06°

m° = 56.1°

For length of side x

Using sine rule

X/sin 61= 105/sin 90

But sin 90= 1

X/sin 61= 105

X = sin61 *105

X=0.8746*105

X= 91.833 mm

X= 91.8 mm

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 4x⁴ + 4x³ - 8x² - 13x - 5

g(x) = x + 1

To find (f/g)(2) first find (f/g)(x)

To find (f/g)(x) factorize f(x) first

That's

f(x) = 4x⁴ + 4x³ - 8x² - 13x - 5

f(x) = ( x + 1)( 4x³ - 8x - 5)

So we have

[tex] (f/g)(x) = \frac{( x + 1)( 4x³ - 8x - 5)}{x + 1} [/tex]

Simplify

We have

To find (f/g)(2) substitute 2 into (f/g)(x)

That's

(f/g)(2) = 4(2)³ - 8(2) - 5

= 4(8) - 16 - 5

= 32 - 16 - 5

= 11

Hope this helps you

Answer:

f(x)= 3x-5

f(2) = 3(2)-5 = 6-5= 1

f(-1)= 3(-1)-5= -3-5= -8

Hope this helps

if u have question let me know in comments ^°^

Answer:

c + 11 = 43

Step-by-step explanation:

C = Carlos age

11 = The number added

43 = The number added plus carlos' age

c +11 = 43

c = 43 - 11

c = 32

Carlos' age is 32 years.

Answer:

C+11=43

Step-by-step explanation:

C= Carlos age

11= added number

43= Carlos age +added number

C+11=43

C=43-11

C=32

Age of Carlos 32.  :)

Answer:

$3,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the shares are $50 per share and that Kyle buys $30,000 worth of shares,

Number of shares bought = total price of shares ÷ price per share

= $30,000 ÷ $50

= 600 shares

We are also give that a year later, the shares are worth $55

Total value of shares 1 year later = Price per share one year later x number of shares

= $55 x 600

= $33,000

Hence the investment gained $33,000 - $30,000 = $3,000

Answer:

10%

Step-by-step explanation:

x - amount of shares bought

x * 50[$] = 30000[$]

x = 30000/50 = 600

if he bought 600 shares then he sold earning in total:

600 * 55[$] = 33000[$]

that means investmant gain can be calculate as:

return on investment =  (gain from investment – cost of investment) / cost of investment

return on investment = (33000 - 30000) / 30000 = 3000/30000 =0.1 = 10%

Answer:

number of successes

                 [tex]k = 235[/tex]

number of failure

                 [tex]y = 265[/tex]

The   criteria are met    

A

    The sample proportion is  [tex]\r p = 0.47[/tex]

B

    [tex]E =4.4 \%[/tex]

C

What this mean is that for N number of times the survey is carried out that the which sample proportion obtain will differ from  the true population proportion will not  more than 4.4%

Ci  

   [tex]r = 0.514 = 51.4 \%[/tex]

 [tex]v = 0.426 = 42.6 \%[/tex]

D

   This 95% confidence interval  mean that the the chance of the true    population proportion of those that are happy to be exist within the upper   and the lower limit  is  95%

E

  Given that 50% of the population proportion  lie with the 95% confidence interval  the it correct to say that it is reasonably likely that a majority of U.S. adults were happy at that time

F

 Yes our result would support the claim because

            [tex]\frac{1}{3 } \ of N < \frac{1}{2} (50\%) \ of \ N , \ Where\ N \ is \ the \ population\ size[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

     The sample size is  [tex]n = 500[/tex]

     The sample proportion is  [tex]\r p = 0.47[/tex]

Generally the number of successes is mathematical represented as

             [tex]k = n * \r p[/tex]

substituting values

             [tex]k = 500 * 0.47[/tex]

            [tex]k = 235[/tex]

Generally the number of failure  is mathematical represented as

           [tex]y = n * (1 -\r p )[/tex]

substituting values

           [tex]y = 500 * (1 - 0.47 )[/tex]

           [tex]y = 265[/tex]

for approximate normality for a confidence interval  criteria to be satisfied

          [tex]np > 5 \ and \ n(1- p ) \ >5[/tex]

Given that the above is true for this survey then we can say that the criteria are met

  Given that the confidence level is  95%  then the level of confidence is mathematically evaluated as

                       [tex]\alpha = 100 - 95[/tex]

                        [tex]\alpha = 5 \%[/tex]

                        [tex]\alpha =0.05[/tex]

Next we obtain the critical value of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table, the value is

                 [tex]Z_{\frac{ \alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as  

                [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } * \sqrt{ \frac{\r p (1- \r p}{n} }[/tex]

substituting values

                 [tex]E = 1.96 * \sqrt{ \frac{0.47 (1- 0.47}{500} }[/tex]

                 [tex]E = 0.044[/tex]

=>               [tex]E =4.4 \%[/tex]

What this mean is that for N number of times the survey is carried out that the proportion obtain will differ from  the true population proportion of those that are happy by more than 4.4%

The 95% confidence interval is mathematically represented as

          [tex]\r p - E < p < \r p + E[/tex]

substituting values

        [tex]0.47 - 0.044 < p < 0.47 + 0.044[/tex]

         [tex]0.426 < p < 0.514[/tex]

The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval is  [tex]r = 0.514 = 51.4 \%[/tex]

The lower limit of the   95% confidence interval is  [tex]v = 0.426 = 42.6 \%[/tex]

This 95% confidence interval  mean that the the chance of the true population proportion of those that are happy to be exist within the upper and the lower limit  is  95%

Given that 50% of the population proportion  lie with the 95% confidence interval  the it correct to say that it is reasonably likely that a majority of U.S. adults were happy at that time

Yes our result would support the claim because

            [tex]\frac{1}{3 } < \frac{1}{2} (50\%)[/tex]

Answer:

Quantitative

Step-by-step explanation: Quantitative or numerical variable are statistical or measured variables which involves numbers. Numerical variables allows for mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction and so on to be performed in them. Quantitative variables include height, age, weight, population and other measured variable with have numerical attributes. They can be measured on either ordinal, ratio or interval scales. Hence, since Julien is trying to determine height, the variable is a quantitative or numeric variable.