Answer:
How much control do you think you have over your fate?
Explanation:
We like to think that we have control over our destinies. But what if our fate was determined by our ancestors hundreds of years ago?
In “Your Ancestors, Your Fate,” Gregory Clark makes the case that our lineage has more influence on our life’s trajectory than we might think — or be comfortable with:
Inequality of income and wealth has risen in America since the 1970s, yet a large-scale research study recently found that social mobility hadn’t changed much during that time. How can that be?
The study, by researchers at Harvard and Berkeley, tells only part of the story. It may be true that mobility hasn’t slowed — but, more to the point, mobility has always been slow.
When you look across centuries, and at social status broadly measured — not just income and wealth, but also occupation, education and longevity — social mobility is much slower than many of us believe, or want to believe. This is true in Sweden, a social welfare state; England, where industrial capitalism was born; the United States, one of the most heterogeneous societies in history; and India, a fairly new democracy hobbled by the legacy of caste. Capitalism has not led to pervasive, rapid mobility. Nor have democratization, mass public education, the decline of nepotism, redistributive taxation, the emancipation of women, or even, as in China, socialist revolution.
To a striking extent, your overall life chances can be predicted not just from your parents’ status but also from your great-great-great-grandparents’. The recent study suggests that 10 percent of variation in income can be predicted based on your parents’ earnings. In contrast, my colleagues and I estimate that 50 to 60 percent of variation in overall status is determined by your lineage. The fortunes of high-status families inexorably fall, and those of low-status families rise, toward the average — what social scientists call “regression to the mean” — but the process can take 10 to 15 generations (300 to 450 years), much longer than most social scientists have estimated in the past.
Short answer question:
What does the author achieve by mixing exact and approximate numbers in "A Contribution to Statistics?"
Answer :The author wants to convey that the important thing is how readers can understand the poem :)
Explanation:
Help me please / ayuda por favor
Answer:
created
went
did
made
put on
I ordered
read
fell
(MC)A student is completing a research project on recent efforts to control mosquitoes. Which of the following would provide the most reliable information?
A recent newspaper article about new control methods
A book on the history of mosquito-related illnesses
An historical novel about the discovery that mosquitoes carry disease
An encyclopedia entry on the life cycle of mosquitoes
Answer:
A recent newspaper article about new controls methods.
Answer:
A recent newspaper article about new control methods
Explanation:
Newspapers are a good source and a great way to use and have evidence.
3. Sher Singh could feel the heat of the
boys body burning
through the cotton cloth.Why was the
boy's body burning?
2)
Answer:
he is too big
Explanation:
hope this helps good luck
What's the direct object and indirect object in these sentences
Disney made the first full-length animated movie in 1937.
Critics and audiences gave Snow White rave reviews.
Animated movies won Disney many awards.
Answer:
Underlined = direct object
Bold= indirect objects
Disney made the first full-length animated movie in 1937.
Critics and audiences gave Snow White rave reviews.
Animated movies won Disney many awards.
where is here? Joyce Carol
About the father.
Answer:
could you please make the question understandable