It is completely inappropriate for the government to choose the venue in which a trial will be conducted for the prosecutions initiated by the postal service. Therefore, the statement given above is false.
A court trial can be referred to or considered as the one wherein the hearing of a case is held. Moreover, the venue or the city is a big determinant for prosecutions under postal services. The government has to keep in mind that the trials are undertaken in the cities that have a direct connection or involvement with the case related thereto.
Learn more about trials here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545217\
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. in multiparty negotiations, research shows that parties who approached multiple issues simultaneously achieved lower quality agreements and decreased the likelihood of achieving agreement compared with groups that approached the issues one at a time, in a fixed or negotiated sequence.
A group of three or more people, each representing their own interests, engage in a multi-party negotiation in an effort to overcome apparent conflicts of interest or cooperate to accomplish a common goal.
The following are the distinctions between two-party and multiparty talks that make multiparty negotiations more complicated, demanding, and tough to manage: Parties: There are more negotiators present in multiparty discussions. Informational and computational complexity - Multiparty discussions include the introduction of more topics, viewpoints on issues, and overall information. Social complexity - The social setting shifts from an individual conversation to a group discussion. As a result, all the small-group dynamics start to influence how the negotiators act. The parties' motivational orientations toward one another may affect how the process develops. There could be social pressure for the group to behave in unison.
learn more about multiparty negotiations here:
https://brainly.com/question/29741447
#SPJ4
through which of the following theories can an employee-plaintiff prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964?
Through the following theories, an employee-plaintiff can prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964
Disparate treatmentDisparate impactDisparate equityDisparate treatment, disparate impact, and disparate equityDisparate treatment and disparate impact, but not disparate equityWhat is Disparate impact?Generally, In the context of employment and housing law in the United States, the term "disparate effect" refers to actions that negatively affect one group of persons with a protected feature more than another, despite the fact that the laws implemented by employers or landlords are legally neutral.
An example of a disproportionate effect would be the employment of more males than women in the construction industry due to physical height or strength requirements (unintentional discrimination).
Read more about employee-plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/28547296
#SPJ1
the equal employment opportunity commission (eeoc) has completed its investigation regarding jeremiah's discrimination case against his employer. if the eeoc decides not to sue his employer, it will issue jeremiah a .
The federal organisation that upholds the laws against workplace harassment and discrimination is the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. the federal law that forbids employers from paying women and men different wages for work that is substantially equivalent.
The EEOC began operations on July 2, 1965, after being established by Congress to uphold Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Its headquarters are in Washington, D.C., and as of 2021, it operated 37 additional field offices in 15 different districts across the United States.If a company has 15 or more employees, it must comply with the law (20 or more employees for age discrimination cases). All workplace practises, such as hiring, firing, promotions, harassment, training, pay, and benefits, are subject to the laws.The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for upholding federal laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of a person's race, colour, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or genetic information.In light of this, the United States is the federal entity that upholds the laws prohibiting workplace harassment and discrimination.
Learn more about EEOC here: https://brainly.com/question/14774625
#SPJ4
the purpose of the privacy function is to provide a user protection againsts discovery and misuse of identity by other user
It is completely appropriate to mention that the purpose of the privacy function is providing the users a protection against the discoveries and misuse of their identities by third parties. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.
A privacy function can be referred to or considered as the one wherein the utmost level of privacy is provided to a user depending upon the use-case of each individual user. It can also be stated that the primary intention of the privacy function is to safeguard the interests of the user identity and providing due protection from misuse related thereunder.
Learn more about the privacy function here:
https://brainly.com/question/24241874
#SPJ4
Judy owns 425 shares of stock, with a basis of $2712. The stock split 3 to 1. Judy now owns what?
Answer:
Explanation:If the stock split 3 to 1, this means that for every 1 share of stock that Judy owned, she now owns 3 shares. Since Judy owned 425 shares of stock before the split, she now owns 3 * 425 = 1275 shares of stock.
The basis of the stock, which is the original cost of the stock, does not change as a result of a stock split. Therefore, Judy's basis for the 1275 shares of stock is still $2712.
Based on the information, Judy now owns 1,275 shares and the price per share is $2.12
What is Stock?The holding certificates of any corporation are referred to as "stocks". Stocks signify ownership in a public company's business. The company's stock is made up of those little shares, and by purchasing stock in the company, you are depending on its long-term success and growth.
The quantity of outstanding shares increases by a fixed amount whenever there is a stock split. In the event of a 3 for 1 stock split, each shareholder will now own 3 shares instead of only 1.
Number of shares owned = 425 x 3 = 1,275 shares
The price of the stock decreases per share when there is a stock split.
Value per share = $2712 / 1,275 = $2.12
Hence, Judy currently owns 1,275 shares at a cost of $2.12.
learn more about stock splits, here:
brainly.com/question/25513890
#SPJ2
The threat, use, or conspiracy to use _____ within the United States or against an American citizen abroad is punishable under federal law.
The threat, use, or conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction within the United States or against an American citizen abroad is punishable under federal law.
The municipalities, states, and the federal government each tend to have their own criminal codes, which tend to define the types of conduct that constitute crimes. So, the Title 18 of the U.S. Code outlines all the federal crimes.
However, a crime is an unlawful act which is said to be punishable by a state or the other authority. Thus, the use of mass destruction is said to be punishable under the federal law.
Hence, treason is the only crime which is defined in the U.S. Constitution.
To learn more about federal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
kat is fifteen. in most states, for contractual purposes, kat would be considered a minor until she is
kat is fifteen. in most states, for contractual purposes, kat would be considered a minor until she is eighteen.
The primary purpose of a contract is to formalize a new relationship and outline the various legal obligations each party has to the other. Today, most contracts are between companies rather than between individuals.
In a contract, the intent is the decision of the parties to act or perform in a particular way. This is the state of mind in which the parties enter into their contractual obligations.
The contractual agreement is another term sometimes used instead of "contract". A contractual agreement is therefore a legally enforceable agreement made by two or more parties that they may or may not do one or more things specified in the contract.
Learn more about contractual purposes here
https://brainly.com/question/29311983
#SPJ4
