I’m really not sure about this one but i need help asap

Answer:

Society and People will most likely be affected by rock music

People who listen to rock music will act more reckless or careless

Explanation:

Soe things people may do:

- Vandalizing property

- Speeding

- Driving carelessly or after drinking alcohol

- May lower self-esteem

- Can affect peoples attitude toward others or things

- People also blame rock music for violence and hostility

Hope this Helps

Rock music will probably have an impact on society and the general public.

Rock music has a detrimental impact on people who listen to it because they will act more recklessly or carelessly.

Rock music is a broad category of popular music that began as "rock and roll" in the US in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It then evolved into a variety of diverse forms in the mid-1960s and beyond, especially in the US and UK. Its origins can be traced back to the rock and roll movement of the 1940s and 1950s, a movement that took inspiration from both country music and the African-American musical genres of blues and rhythm and blues.

Incorporating elements of jazz, classical music, and other musical genres, rock also borrowed heavily from a number of other genres like electric blues and folk. Rock music's instrumentation has traditionally concentrated on the electric guitar, typically playing with an electric bass guitar, drums, and other acoustic instruments.

Learn more about rock music, from :

brainly.com/question/10830537

#SPJ3

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The answer is:

The main difference is the presence of knowledge which made Africa, Asia, and the Middle East more developed and modern during the Middle Ages as compared to Europe because in Europe no importance was given to the knowledge by the people which leads to the development of other nations as compared to dark age of the Europe. Other parts of the world experienced “golden ages” during a time when most of the Europe struggled through the Dark Ages because of knowledge which enables other nations to made better their lives.

Have a great Day/Night

Answer:

The conditions required for cultivating different cash crops largely shaped regional labor experiences and population demographics for enslaved Africans in the New World. European settlers experimented with a range of crops and export goods, often with significant influences from American Indians and Africans, but eventually market competition and environmental constraints determined which major cash crop different plantation regions primarily exported. The most lucrative cash crops to emerge from the Americas in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were sugar, tobacco, and rice. Cotton agriculture did not become a major feature of the U.S. southern economy until the early nineteenth century.

Explanation:

Answer: The Wampanoag

Answer: False.......

Answer:

Totalitarian society are society that basically allows only single political party to control the affairs therein.

The three interesting fact about the society includes:

* The practice of a totalitarian society started in the modern world. The practice seems like Authoritarian but it is quite different.

* The society leadership are often addressed as authoritarian.

* The economy of totalitarian society are control by the leader, thusm it is termed a command economy.

Explanation:

Answer:

Totalitarian regimes are often characterized by extreme political repression, to a greater extent than those of authoritarian regimes, under an undemocratic government, widespread personality cultism around the person or the group which is in power, absolute control over the economy, large-scale censorship and mass .

Explanation:

Answer:

on may 10 1933 uneversety students in 34 uneversety towns across germany burned over 25,000 books. the works of jewish authors like albert einstein and sigmund  Freud went up in flames alongside blacklisted american authors    such as Ernest hermingway and Helen Keller. While nazi gave the nazi salute.

Explanation:

Answer:

Paragraph in explanation

Explanation:

Yes, John Brown was "crazy". For one, he thought he could take down slavery by himself and a army he would slowly grow. He would start a "invasion" of the south and free slaves and use those slaves for his army. He also thought violence was the key to ending slavery. He would stop at nothing to end slavery including breaking the law and arguably committed treason.

Answer:

With the French and Indian War over, many colonists saw no need for soldiers to be stationed in the colonies. Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens

Explanation:

They also just want someone to blame

Answer: He wanted to invest huge sums of money and prestige in transforming South Vietnam into a showcase of a new “free Asia.” Spending billions of dollars

Explanation:

Answer:

To invest huge sums of money prestige in transforming South Vietnam into a showcase a new free Asia.

Answer:

I just took the test hope this helps:)

Explanation:

Answer:

Check out my pic attached. I hope this helps!

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

http://www.ucla.edu.ve/deporte/leyorganica_del_deporte.pdf

https://venezuela.justia.com/federales/constitucion-de-la-republica-bolivariana-de-venezuela/titulo-iii/capitulo-vi/

http://www.efdeportes.com/efd133/bases-legales-de-la-educacion-fisica-el-deporte-en-venezuela.htm

Answer:

Mark me as Brainliest

Explanation:

A

Answer:

Many of the tombs were raided and the mummies were stolen.

Explanation:

Answer:

Richard Hakluyt used this document to persuade Queen Elizabeth I to devote more money and energy into encouraging English colonization. In twenty-one chapters, summarized here, Hakluyt emphasized the many benefits that England would receive by creating colonies in the Americas.

It admitted Missouri as a slave state grants to derail its admittance to the union and the entire Missouri compromise.

The Missouri Compromise was a piece of federal legislation in the United States that struck a balance between northern states' aspirations to stop the spread of slavery in the nation and southern states' desires to do so.

In order to maintain the country's balance between slave and free states, this legislation accepted Maine as a non-slave state and Missouri as a slave state. In the remaining Louisiana Territory, above the 36° 30' latitude line, slavery was prohibited.

Although the Missouri Compromise succeeded in maintaining the peace for the time being, it was unable to address the crucial issue of slavery and its future in the country.

The Missouri Compromise was opposed by the South because it established a precedent for Congress to pass legislation pertaining to slavery, and by the North because it implied the spread of slavery into new areas.

To learn more about Missouri compromise

https://brainly.com/question/14020956

#SPJ2

Answer:

Washington sided with Hamilton's argument and signed the Bank Bill into law on February 25, 1791. The debate over the National Bank ultimately fractured the government into the first political parties, the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson and Madison and the Federalist led by Hamilton

Explanation:

Answer:B is correct becuase many republicans split and made the progressive party in 1912.

Explanation:

Answer: A. people who supported equal right. & C. african americans.

Explanation:

i got the answer right ✅

Answer:

The political objective of the assassination was to free Bosnia of Austria-Hungarian rule and established of a common South Slav ("Yugoslav") state.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Nile supports agriculture and fishing. The Nile also has served as an important transportation route for thousands of years.

Explanation:

Answer:

the origin of Chinese medicine emerged in the shamanistic era of the Shang dynasty period ( 1766 to 1122 BC). during this time the religious deity was called Shang Di who was believed to live in heaven in an imperial court accompanied by dead ancestors.

Answer:

The Sedition Act of 1918 curtailed the free speech rights of U.S. citizens during times of war.

Passed on May 16, 1918, as an amendment to Title I of the Espionage Act of 1917, the act provided for further and expanded limitations on speech. Ultimately, its passage came to be viewed as an instance of government overstepping the bounds of First Amendment freedoms.

President Woodrow Wilson, in conjunction with congressional leaders and the influential newspapers of the era, urged passage of the Sedition Act in the midst of U.S. involvement in World War I. Wilson was concerned about the country’s diminishing morale and looking for a way to clamp down on growing and widespread disapproval of the war and the military draft that had been instituted to fight it.

The provisions of the act prohibited certain types of speech as it related to the war or the military. Under the act, it was illegal to incite disloyalty within the military; use in speech or written form any language that was disloyal to the government, the Constitution, the military, or the flag; advocate strikes on labor production; promote principles that were in violation of the act or support countries at war with the United States.

The targets of prosecution under the Sedition Act were typically individuals who opposed the war effort, including pacifists, anarchists, and socialists. Violations of the Sedition Act could lead to as much as twenty years in prison and a fine of $10,000. More than two thousand cases were filed by the government under the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, and of these more than one thousand ended in convictions.

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of many of the individuals prosecuted. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. established the “clear and present danger” test in Schenck v. United States (1919). In upholding Socialist Charles Schenck’s conviction, Justice Holmes wrote that “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” The Court also unanimously upheld convictions in Debs v. United States (1919) and Frohwerk v. United States (1919).

In Abrams v. United States (1919), the Court reviewed the conviction under the act of Jacob Abrams, who, along with four other Russian defendants, was prosecuted for printing and distributing leaflets calling for workers to strike in an effort to end military involvement in the Soviet Union. The Court in late 1919 upheld the conviction.

However, in this instance Holmes, along with Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissented from the majority, arguing that the “clear and present danger” test was not met under the circumstances arising in the case. Specifically, Holmes felt that Abrams had not possessed the necessary intent to harm the U.S. war effort. In contrast to his majority opinion in Schenck, Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams urged that political speech be protected under the First Amendment.

The Sedition Act of 1918 was repealed in 1920, although many parts of the original Espionage Act remained in force.

Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D

Answer:

Pretty sure it's A (they live in similar climates)

Explanation:

Answer:nswer to 1. Using Context Clues - Using information from the passage, write a new sentence for each boldfaced word: monopoly: If you had a monopoly on

Explanation: