IM GIVING BRAINLESIT AND ANYTHING UNDER 20$ ON ANY APPROPIATE CURRENCY IF YOU ANSWER ALL OF THIS (PLEASE LABEL WHAT YOUR ANSWERING)

Answer:

the answer is d: 310

Explanation:

d . 310 ! hope this helps

Answer:

The cherry tree myth is the most well-known and longest enduring legend about George Washington. In the original story, when Washington was six years old he received a hatchet as a gift and damaged his father’s cherry tree. When his father discovered what he had done, he became angry and confronted him. Young George bravely said, “I cannot tell a lie…I did cut it with my hatchet.” Washington’s father embraced him and rejoiced that his son’s honesty was worth more than a thousand trees.

Answer:

George Washington could of possibly not cut a cherry tree. During the time when he lived, the 1700s, stories from people's imagination were everywhere. I believe this is because many people had free time. It also could if been a rumor that he did cut down a cherry tree that people believed as at this time many were very ignorant. George Washington may not have cut down a cherry tree.

*** now all you have to do is find evidence*****

POINTS PLS! <3

Explanation:

The development of such major Sudanic kingdoms and empires as Ghana, Mali, Songhai, the Hausa states, and Kanem-Bornu along the southern fringes of the Sahara had a number of important consequences for the history of western Africa as a whole

The precise term Sacrum Romanum Imperium dates only from 1254, though the term Holy Empire reaches back to 1157, and the term Roman Empire was used from 1034 to denote the lands under Conrad II’s rule. The term “Roman emperor” is older, dating from Otto II (died 983). This title, however, was not used by Otto II’s predecessors, from Charlemagne (or Charles I) to Otto I, who simply employed the phrase imperator augustus (“august emperor”) without any territorial adjunct. The first title that Charlemagne is known to have used, immediately after his coronation in 800, is “Charles, most serene Augustus, crowned by God, great and pacific emperor, governing the Roman empire.” This clumsy formula, however, was soon discarded.

Holy Roman Empire
Holy Roman Empire
Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire, 10th century; in the treasury of Hofburg palace, Vienna.
Erich Lessing/Magnum
These questions about terms reveal some of the problems involved in the nature and early history of the empire. It can be regarded as a political institution, or approached from the point of view of political theory, or treated in the context of the history of Christendom as the secular counterpart of a world religion. The history of the empire is also not to be confused or identified with the history of its constituent kingdoms, Germany and Italy, though clearly they are interrelated. The constituent territories retained their identity; the emperors, in addition to the imperial crown, also wore the crowns of their kingdoms. Finally, whereas none of the earlier emperors from Otto I had assumed the imperial title until actually crowned by the pope in Rome, after Charles V none was emperor in this sense, though all laid claim to the imperial dignity as if they had been duly crowned as well as elected. Despite these anomalies and others, the empire, at least in the Middle Ages, was by common assent, along with the papacy, the most important institution of western Europe.


Theologians, lawyers, popes, ecclesiastics, rulers, rebels like Arnold of Brescia and Cola di Rienzo, literary figures like Dante and Petrarch, and the practical men, members of the high nobility, on whom the emperors relied for support, all saw the empire in a different light and had their own ideas of its origin, function, and justification. Among these heterogeneous and often incompatible views, three may be said to predominate: (1) the papal theory, according to which the empire was the secular arm of the church, set up by the papacy for its own purposes and therefore answerable to the pope and, in the last resort, to be disposed of by him; (2) the imperial, or Frankish, theory, which placed greater emphasis on conquest and hegemony as the source of the emperor’s power and authority and according to which he was responsible directly to God; and (3) the popular, or Roman, theory (the “people” at this stage being synonymous with the nobility and in this instance with the Roman nobility), according to which the empire, following the tradition of Roman law, was a delegation of powers by the Roman people. Of the three theories the last was the least important; it was evidently directed against the pope, whose constitutive role it implicitly denied, but it was also a specifically Italian reaction against the predominance in practice of Frankish and German elements.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.
Subscribe Now
It is also important to distinguish between the universalist and localist conceptions of the empire, which have been the source of considerable controversy among historians. According to the former, the empire was a universal monarchy, a “commonwealth of the whole world, whose sublime unity transcended every minor distinction”; and the emperor “was entitled to the obedience of Christendom.” According to the latter, the emperor had no ambition for universal dominion; his policy was limited in the same way as that of every other ruler, and when he made more far-reaching claims his object was normally to ward off the attacks either of the pope or of the Byzantine emperor. According to this view, also, the origin of the empire is to be explained by specific local circumstances rather than by far-flung theories.

Load Next Page
Hope this helps !

It is true that when my lava flows… is the correct set of underlined sentences because it shows that lava appears to be a problem but it actually creates new paths

One reason that an author may choose to relate events in memoir form is to to tell significant stories from their life.

control of all discover lands

control of land because the discovered land was reserved for spain and the rulers of england.

Answer:

Explanation:

The trail of tears impacted the cherokes. The trail of tears is a path were the cherokes were forced to move out of thier homes. Many children and elderly was lost and died on that path and many cried about thier deaths.

The trail of tears affected native populations at the time heavily due to the fact that thousands died decrease the population by a numerous amount. Native populations in the future were affected because it caused the native to have an even smaller population because not only did many die it was children that died and so the new generation was gone and its hard enough to have another kid at an old age never the less with no technology like what we have now.

Imma let you answer the last personal question

I only know one if these answers but the trail of tears impacted the Cherokee Indians. They were forced to move out of their homes. Hope it helps :)

Answer:

The fungus may be endangering non-native palm trees, but that doesnt mean it wont spread to native ones. Even though the palms arent native to that area, they could spread to the native palm trees and start killing those as well. Also, the fungus could completely kill off the non-native population, or it could spread to where those palm trees are native. If it spreads to the palm tree's actual home, it could spell the end for that species of palm tree.

I hope this helps!

This is one of the correct possibilities

Answer:

They did not want Columbus to sail for England.

hope that helps you

please follow

please mark brainliest

They did not want Columbus to sail for England

Compass is the answer

Answer:i think is compass, and astrology

Explanation:

The US was able to gain profit economically because of the gold and silver mining, cattle became a large business as well, the railroad business had just begun and created a faster form of transportation.

The U.S was able to gain profit because of the gold and silver.

Answer: B

Explanation:

Women weren’t allowed to vote until the 1900s

Answer:

B. Voters must be female.

Explanation:

Women did not have the right to vote during this time period until the 19th Amendment changed Americans' rights and granted all women the right to vote.

Answer:

Answer:D Though all citizens were equal, only the wealthy and well-born were likely to serve as jurors or council members.

Answer:

The Answer Is In

The Pic

Explanation:

Answer: C (I think)

Can I have brainliest??

C
explanation : I took this test

La ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación han cobrando creciente relevancia en los últimos años y se han transformado en un determinante fundamental de las posibilidades para crecer y competir en el mercado mundial.Como sociedad siempre estamos buscando nuevas tendencias, buscando y dirigiéndonos hacia la evolución y la búsqueda de la solución de las cosas tanto en sectores primarios como secundarios, muchas veces los cambios no son positivos e incluso pueden llegar a hacer a la gente mediocre mediante cosas muy innecesarias que son llamativas pero muchas veces llegan a entorpecer a la mente humana y llevarla hasta los límites, nosotros como nuevas generaciones debemos aprender cómo saber aprovechar de una buena manera las cosas que tenemos puesto que al mal derroche que se le viene dando de generación a generación se va perdiendo.

New inventions and new technology help our big businesses grow and develop during the Industrial Revolution. Many of the new inventions were machines that made it easier and quicker to produce products. Inventions like the spinning jenny, the sewing machine, and the refrigerated railroad car are examples It brought many changes to people. Each and every class of people were affected by social and political changes, the majority of the population was joyous because a lot of new rights were given, and more freedom was with the people.

1)They respect human rights and values
2)The entire country have the right and duties.

They uphold morals and ideals, and The entire nation has rights and obligations are two important characteristics about the Mughal Empire.

What was India called during the Mughal period?

The Mughal Empire referred to its territory as "Hindustan." The nation was never referred to as being "Mughal" in the traditional sense. "Hindustan" expanded along with the empire. In addition, Baburnama and Ain-i-Akbari use the term "Hindustan" to refer to the entire Indian subcontinent.

Even though Turkish was the Mughals' native dialect, they utilized Persian so frequently in daily life that they became fluent in it and created some of the best Persian literature, including works of poetry by Babur, Humayun, DaraShukoh, and Zaib-un-Nisha, among others.

Thus, They uphold morals and ideals, and The entire nation has rights and obligations.

For more details about India called during the Mughal period, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/883313

#SPJ5

Answer:

Hes important because he founded the state of Rhode Island

Explanation:

brainliest pls

Answer:

He's important simply because he found the state of Rhode island.

Explanation:

he's brainliest.

Answer:

0

Explanation:

because if he has 7 pills and broke 30 of them there would be 0 cuz theres not 30 pills theres only 7 so he cant break 30

0 because he only has 7 pills

Answer: B. The soil was frozen all year so there weren't many plants.

Explanation: Inuits live very close to the Arctic, where the ground rarely thaws enough to allow plants (let alone crops) to grow, so their diet consists mostly of meat.

B. The soil was frozen all year so there weren’t many plants

Answer:

John winthrop’s “city on a hill” John Winthrop’s 1630 speech not only contributed an enduring metaphor to American culture, but it also illustrated the Puritans ’ sense of mission and world view.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Winthrop warned his fellow Puritans that their new community would be "as a city upon a hill, the eyes of all people are upon us", meaning, if the Puritans failed to uphold their covenant with God, then their sins and errors would be exposed for all the world to se