If the Owen family has a child in two years, how much can they expect to spend, per year, to raise the child from its birth to when it is five years old?

Answer:

Exact Form:

C=23/24

Decimal Form:

C=0.9583

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(2,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10^2

Step-by-step explanation:

10^9/10^7 is the same as 10^9*10^-7 if you multiply two same bases you can add there exponents. So, 9+(-7)=2. So, it’s 10^2

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps

Step-by-step explanation:

sqrt(5x)×(sqrt(8x²) - 2×sqrt(x)) =

sqrt(5x × 8x²) - 2×sqrt(5x × x) =

sqrt(40x) × x - 2x × sqrt(5) =

2x×sqrt(10x) - 2x×sqrt(5)

therefore, the last option is correct.

Answer:

40%

Step-by-step explanation:

2/5 = 40/100 = 40%

Answer:

$499

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the price was reduced from an amount which is $2,498. You have to take that amount and the other amount which is $1999 and subtract them both.

2489-1999=499

(When you get your answer,make sure to add the dollar sign.)

The price was reduced by $499.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let q represent the quantity of 15% dressing used. Then the amount of 5% dressing is (390 -q). The amount of vinegar in the mix is ...

  0.15q + 0.05(390 -q) = 0.08(390)

  0.10q = 31.2 -19.5 = 11.7 . . . . . . subtract 0.05(390) and simplify

  q = 117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . multiply by 10

  390-q = 273

The chef should use 273 mL of the first brand (5% vinegar) and 117 mL of the second brand (15% vinegar).

__

Additional comment

You may have noticed that the value of q is (0.08 -0.05)/(0.10 -0.05)×390. The fraction of the mix that is the highest contributor is the ratio of the difference between the mix value and least contributor, divided by the difference between the contributors: (8-5)/(15-5) = 3/10, the fraction that is 15% vinegar. This is the generic solution to mixture problems.

Based on the investment ratio and the amount invested, the amount that Zach invested is $102,857.14.

First thing to do is to add up the numbers in the ratio:

= 1 + 2 + 0.5

= 3.5

The amount that Zach invested is:

= Zach's ration/ Sum of ratio x Amount invested

= 1 / 3.5 x 360,000

= $102,857.14

In conclusion, Zach invested $102,857.14.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/17061956.

hi i know i'm late but might as well add my answer!

here's your answer: B D E or

B.choosing 1 red marble

D.choosing 1 white marble, replacing it, and choosing another white marble

E.choosing 1 white marble    

hope i helped

Answer:

b d and e

Step-by-step explanation:

ya

Answer:

4.75 divided by 5 =0.95

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3b

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]3\sqrt{b^{2} }[/tex]

= 3b

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay so, let's turn these into decimals first (rounded to nearest 2 thousandths).

2/3 = 0.66666 (repeating), to the nearest 2 thousandths would be 0.66.

-2 1/4 = -9/4 = -2.25

-1 1/2 = -3/2 = -1.5

then we set up the problem

0.66 × -2.25 × -1.5 = 2.2275 rounded 2.22 as an improper fraction 111/50 and that cannot be simplified any smaller.

The number of years it would take the amount to triple is 25 years.

The formula that would be used to determine the number of years it would take the balance to triple is:

FV = PV  x [tex]e^{r}[/tex]N

Where:

3 = [tex]e^{0.044}[/tex]N

Take the log of both sides

log(3) / log(e) /  (0.044) = 25 years

A similar question was answered here: https://brainly.com/question/7133042

Answer:

58 seconds.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since one minute equals 60 seconds, Carlos took 63 seconds.

Orlando ran in 63 seconds - 5 seconds, which is equal to 58 seconds.

Answer:

the second train will Cath up with the first after 15 hours hence time will be at (5pm+15hours= 8:00am

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the t-distribution, it is found that since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the left tailed test, there is not enough evidence to show that the patients with schizophrenia have less TBV on average than a  patient that is considered normal.

At the null hypothesis, we test if patients with schizophrenia do not have less TBV on average than a  patient that is considered normal, that is, the subtraction is not negative, hence:

[tex]H_0: \mu_S - \mu_N \geq 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if they have less, that is, if the subtraction is negative, hence:

[tex]H_1: \mu_S - \mu_N < 0[/tex]

Regarding each sample, the mean and standard deviation are found using a calculator.

[tex]\mu_N = 1463339.2, s_N = 125458.28 , n_N = 32[/tex]

[tex]\mu_S = 1445132.3, s_S = 171355.8, n_S = 30[/tex]

We have the standard deviation for each sample, hence, the t-distribution will be used.

The standard errors are given by:

[tex]Se_N = \frac{125458.28}{\sqrt{32}} = 22178.1[/tex]

[tex]Se_S = \frac{171355.8}{\sqrt{30}} = 31285.1[/tex]

The distribution of the difference has mean and standard error given by:

[tex]\overline{x} = \mu_S - \mu_N = 1445132.3 - 1463339.2 = -18206.9 [/tex]

[tex]Se = \sqrt{Se_N^2 + Se_S^2} = \sqrt{22178.1^2 + 31285.1^2} = 38348.7[/tex]

The test statistic is given by:

[tex]t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{Se}[/tex]

In which [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the hypothesis.

Hence:

[tex]t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{Se}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{-18206.9 - 0}{38348.7}[/tex]

[tex]t = -0.47[/tex]

The critical value for a left-tailed test, as we are testing if the mean is less than a value, with a significance level of 0.1 and 32 + 30 - 2 = 60 df is [tex]t^{\ast} = 2[/tex]

Since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the left tailed test, there is not enough evidence to show that the patients with schizophrenia have less TBV on average than a  patient that is considered normal.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/13873630

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I hate you

Answer:

A: the area of the walls that are being painted

C: the cost per gallon of different paints

F: the number of square feet that can be painted per gallon of paint

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{6}{12} + \frac{1}{2} \\ = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \\ = \frac{2}{2} \\ = \frac{1}{1} \\ = 1[/tex]

Answer:

Hence , (a,0) is a zeros of a function

Step-by-step explanation:

y=-7/5x-1/5

=-7×5/5x-1

=-35/5x-1

Answer:

  a) yes, 2, 1/2

  b) b = 2t; t = 1/2b

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The number of batteries is twice the number of toys. Using the variables of part B, this relation is ...

  b = 2t

This is of the form required for a proportional relation: y = kx, with a value of k=2.

__

If we divide the above equation by 2 on both sides, we get ...

 1/2b = t

This is also a proportional relation, with a constant of proportionality of 1/2.

Toys and batteries are in a proportional relationship. The constants of proportionality are 2 or 1/2.

__

b) As we saw above, the equations can be ...

 b = 2t

  t = 1/2b

Answer:

36 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

504/14=36

Step-by-step explanation:

An example of direct variation would be the relationship of distance with time when speed is constant.

Let's assume you travel at the speed of 60 mph. The distance at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours would be 0, 30, 60, 120 miles.

This is a linear relationship and produces a graph of line.

See the graph.

--------------------

An example of inverse variation would be the time to complete the same work as number of workers increase.

Assume 5 workers complete wok in 20 days, 10 workers do same in 10 days, 20 workers do in 5 days.

This relationship produces a curved line.

See the graph.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

20=total marbles

  7/20 × 6/20=  21/400   or 5.25%

   red     white

Answer:

-4 -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

22

Step-by-step explanation: