) If the half-life of 238Pu is 87.7 yr, write a function of the form =QtQ0e−kt to model the quantity Qt of 238Pu left after t years. Round the value of k to five decimal places. Do not round intermediate calculations.

Answer:

Number 1: A

Number 2:D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: $1,540,194.30 .

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula to calculate the accumulated amount earned on principal (P) at rate of interest (r)[ in decimal] compounded monthly after t years :

[tex]A=P(1+\dfrac{r}{12})^{12t}[/tex]

Given:  P= $425,000

r= 4.3% = 0.043

t= 30 years

[tex]A=425000(1+\dfrac{0.043}{12})^{12(30)}\\\\=425000(1.003583)^{360}\\\\=425000\times3.62398657958\approx1540194.30[/tex]

Hence, the payment would be $1,540,194.30 .

I used arm span as the x-axis and height as the y-axis; arm span is the independent variable because height is typically dependent on arm span. Although the opposite could be argued for.

The equation of the line of best fit is y= 12+(7/9)x. To get the slope I used the points (37,39) and (19,25). The slope is therefore 14/18=7/9. The slope represents that height increases by 7/9 inches when arm span increases by 1 inch. The y-intercept 12 represents roughly the height when arm size is very small. I tested the residuals of the points (47,49) and (58,61). The respective predictions are 48.556 and 57.111. The respective residuals are then (49-48.556)=0.444 and (61-57.111)=3.889. It seems that the line models the data well until the x values get larger, where the performance decreases. The line of best fit with its positive slope indicates that there is a positive correlation with arm span and height.

Using the model, a person with arm span 66 inches has a height of 12+(7/9)*66= 63.333 inches. A person with 74 inches height has an estimated arm span of 62*9/7= 79.714 inches.

The equation of best  fitted line is given as follows

[tex]\rm y = 0.955x+ 3.787 \\with \; R^2 = 0.951[/tex]

The y  intercept 3.787 represents the  height of that is independent of Arm span.

The height of the person whose arm span is 66 inches is 66.817 inch.

The arm span of a person whose height is 74 inches is 73.52 inch

According to the given data the arm span  and heights are given in inches

Using Microsoft excel we can draw the scatter plot of both the variables such that arm span is on X axis and Height is on Y axis

The  image for the excel work done showing calculations and scatter plot  is attached.

Now we can fit the linear tread line and  to find out the equation of fitted line just tick on the " show equation" line option of trend line fitting

The equation of best  fitted line is given as follows

[tex]\rm y = 0.955x+ 3.787 .....(1) \\with \; R^2 = 0.951[/tex]

Slope of line of best fit = 0.955

So we can conclude that height (Y) is related to Arm span according to equation (1)

Equation (1) shows the equation of line of best fit for the given data

The y  intercept 3.787 represents the  height of that is independent of Arm span.

So the height of the person whose arm span is 66 inches is given following

[tex]\rm y = 0.955 \times 66+ 3.787 \\y = 66.817 \; inch[/tex]

Similarly the arm span of a person whose height is 74 inches

[tex]\rm 74 = 0.955x +3.787 \\x = 73.52 \; inches[/tex]

For more information please refer to the link given below

https://brainly.com/question/2659237

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The constant of variation is the slope

k = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

  = (30-18)/(5-3)

   =12/2

   = 6

The value of constant of variation, k, is,

⇒ k = 6

The equation of line in point-slope form passing through the points

(x₁ , y₁) and (x₂, y₂) with slope m is defined as;

⇒ y - y₁ = m (x - x₁)

Where, m = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

Here, the constant of variation, k, of the line y = kx through (3,18) and (5,30)

Since, The constant of variation is the slope,

Hence, We get;

k = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

 = (30 - 18)/(5 - 3)

  = 12/2

  = 6

Thus, the value of constant of variation, k, is,

⇒ k = 6

Learn more about the equation of line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ7

Answer:

x=6

Step-by-step explanation:

2x+4=16

2x+4-4=16-6

2x=12

x=6

Proof:

2x+4=16

2(6)+4=16

12+4=16

16=16

Hope this helps ;) ❤❤❤

Answer:

find out what x is and it is 6 it is 6 because 2 times 6 is 12 and 12 plus 4 is 16

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Lets focus on 55^5

55^5 = 11^5 * 5^5

2. now on 65

65 = 5 * 13

3. now on 9^15

9^15=(3^2)^15 = 3^30

4. combine all three parts

11^5 * 5^5 * 5 * 13 * 3^30 = 11^5*5^6*13*3^30

so our answer is B

if. 25 miles : 1 gallon

300 miles. : ?

if more less divides

300/25×1

=12 gallons of gas will be used

Answer:

the process of combining things in a particular order, or discovering the order in which they are combined: A common sign of dyslexia is that the sequencing of letters when spelling words may be incorrect. biology specialized.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=4 and x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step to find all factors of 12

1,2,3,4,6,12

and their negative form

-1,-2,-3,-4,-6,-12

we must add two of these numbers to get -7

and the two numbers that add up to -7 are -3 and -4

we can simply plot them into the polynomial (x-3)(x-4)

since x-3=0

we add three to both sides to get x=3

and since x-4=0

add four to both sides

we get x=4

and now check out work which

we can use First out in last (foil) method

(x-3)(x-4)

first

x^2

out

-4x

in

-3x

last

12

now we simplify to get x^2-7x+12

so it x=4 x=3 works

Answer:

x² - 7x + 12 = 0

doing middle term factorization

x²-4x-3x+12=0

taking common from each two term

x(x-4)-3(x-4)=0

taking common

(x-4)(x-3)=0

either

x-4=0

:. x=4

or

x-3=0

x=3

:.x=4,3

Hence, the commutative property of addition is not used.

What is an expression?

A mathematical expression is in form of variables and constants separated by their arithmetic operation.

As we know that, there are three types of properties they are associative property which is [tex](a+b) + c = a + (b+c)[/tex],

Distributive property which is [tex]a(b+c) = ab + ac[/tex],

Commutative property which is [tex]a + b = b + a[/tex].

Here given that,

[tex]2 (x+5)+7x=(2x+10)+7x[/tex]      

[tex](2x+10)+7x=(2x+10)+7x[/tex]         ( distributive property of multiplication)

[tex](2x+7x)+10=(2x+7x)+10[/tex]        ( it is associative property of addition)

[tex](8x)+10=(8x)+10[/tex]        ( it is a commutative property)

Hence, the commutative property of addition is not used.

To know more about the distributive property

https://brainly.com/question/24242989

#SPJ5

Question options :

A. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim

u < 99.

B. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim

u < 99.

C. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim

u < 99.

D. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim

u< 99.

Answer:

B. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim

u < 99.

Step-by-step explanation:

We construct the n*ll and alternative hypotheses to support our claim

The n*ll hypothesis :H0

The alternative hypothesis : Ha

N*ll hypothesis =H0: u=99

Alternative hypothesis =Ha: u<99

So if n*ll hypothesis (H0) u=99 is rejected, then we accept the alternative hypothesis that u<99

we can therefore have sufficient evidence to support our claim that u<99

Answer:

Percentage of home team supporters =65%

Percentage of visiting team supporters =35%

Step-by-step explanation:

Total attendees=2,000 people

Home team supporters=1,300

Visiting team supporters=700

What percentage of people attending supported the home team?

Percentage of people attending who supported the home team = home team supporters / total attendees × 100

=1,300/2,000 × 100

=0.65 × 100

=65%

Visiting team supporters = visiting team supporters / total attendees

× 100

=700/2000 × 100

=0.35 × 100

=35%

Alternatively,

Visiting team supporters = percentage of total attendees - percentage of home team supporters

=100% - 65%

=35%

Answer: A. According to the line of best fit, the object would have hit the ground 0.6 seconds later than the actual time the object hit the ground.

The statement first "According to the line of best fit, the object would have hit the ground 0.6 seconds later than the actual time the object hit the ground" is correct.

A mathematical notion called the line of the best fit connects points spread throughout a graph. It's a type of linear regression that uses scatter data to figure out the best way to define the dots' relationship.

We have a line of best fit:

h = –21.962x + 114.655

As per the data given and line of best fit, we can say the object would have impacted the ground 0.6 seconds later than it did according to the line of best fit.

Thus, the statement first "According to the line of best fit, the object would have hit the ground 0.6 seconds later than the actual time the object hit the ground" is correct.

Learn more about the line of best fit here:

brainly.com/question/14279419

#SPJ2

Answer:

52 cups

Step-by-step explanation:

1 gallon = 4 quarts

1.5 gallons = 6 quarts

6 + 9 = 13 quarts of lemonade in the fridge.

1 quart = 4 cups

13 quarts = 4 × 13 = 52 cups

52 cups of lemonade are in the fridge.

I would really appreciate it if you would mark me brainliest!

Have a blessed day!

Answer:

60 cups

Step-by-step explanation:

1 gal = 16 cups

1 quart = 4 cups

               16 cups

1.5 gal x ------------- = 24 cups

                  1 gal.

                 4 cups

9 quarts x ----------- = 36 cups

                  1 quart

number of cups of lemonade in the fridge = 24 cups + 36 cups = 60 cups

Answer:

y= -4/3x+10 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

To do this, just put the equation in point slope form and then rearrange it to y=mx+b, or slope intercept form. Slope point form is arranged like this, y-y1=m(x-x1). Now, just insert in the variables (x1=x coordinate of point, y1= y coordinate of point, m=slope). So your equation is now y-20=-4/3(x-7), which simplifies to y-20=-4/3x-9 1/3. Now rearrange it so that y in by itself, and all like terms are combined, making it look like this: y=-4/3x+10 2/3. Now its in slope intercept form and you've got your answer.

I hope my explanation wasn't confusing and that my answer helped.

Answer:

The probability is  [tex]p(n ) = 3.18*10^{-5}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

     The population size is  N =  31

      The sample size  n =  4  

Generally the number of way by which the n  can be selected from N is mathematically represented as

          [tex]\left N} \atop {}} \right. C_n = \frac{N! }{(N-n)!n!}[/tex]

=>       [tex]\left 31} \atop {}} \right. C_4 = \frac{31! }{(31-4)!4!}[/tex]

=>       [tex]\left 31} \atop {}} \right. C_4 = \frac{31 * 30 * 29 * 28* 27! }{27! * 4*3 * 2 * 1 }[/tex]

=>        [tex]\left 31} \atop {}} \right. C_4 = \frac{ 755160 }{ 24}[/tex]

=>        [tex]\left 31} \atop {}} \right. C_4 = 31465[/tex]

The number of ways of selecting a particular sample size is  is   [tex]k = 1[/tex]

Therefore the probability of each simple random sample in this​ case is mathematically evaluated as  

           [tex]p(n ) = \frac{1}{31465}[/tex]  

           [tex]p(n ) = 3.18*10^{-5}[/tex]

volume of a cone

.

.

.

volume of sphere

.

.

number of spheres that can be made......

.

.

hence a hemisphere can be formed

it was all about equating some values

to bake the required number of cakes during the available 3-hour time period, 7 cooks are required.

Let's determine the number of cooks required to bake the required number of cakes during the available time.

We have the following information:

- Each cook can bake either 5 large cakes or 14 small cakes per hour.

- The kitchen is available for 3 hours.

- We need to bake 29 large cakes and 260 cakes in total.

First, let's calculate the number of large cakes that can be baked by one cook in 3 hours:

1 cook can bake 5 large cakes/hour × 3 hours = 15 large cakes.

Next, let's calculate the number of small cakes that can be baked by one cook in 3 hours:

1 cook can bake 14 small cakes/hour × 3 hours = 42 small cakes.

Now, let's calculate the number of large cakes that can be baked by all the cooks in 3 hours:

Total number of large cakes = Number of cooks × Large cakes per cook per 3 hours

We need to bake 29 large cakes, so:

29 = Number of cooks × 15

Number of cooks = 29 / 15 ≈ 1.93

Since we can't have a fraction of a cook, we need to round up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, we need at least 2 cooks to bake the required number of large cakes.

Similarly, let's calculate the number of small cakes that can be baked by all the cooks in 3 hours:

Total number of small cakes = Number of cooks × Small cakes per cook per 3 hours

We need to bake 260 small cakes, so:

260 = Number of cooks × 42

Number of cooks = 260 / 42 ≈ 6.19

Again, rounding up to the nearest whole number, we need at least 7 cooks to bake the required number of small cakes.

Since we need to satisfy both requirements for large and small cakes, we choose the larger number of cooks required, which is 7 cooks.

Therefore, to bake the required number of cakes during the available 3-hour time period, 7 cooks are required.

Learn more about work here

https://brainly.com/question/13245573

#SPJ2

Answer: $2750

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula to calculate interest : I = Prt , where P = Principal amount , r = rate of interest ( in decimal) , t= time.

Given:  I= $495

t= 3 years

r= 6% = 0.06

Then, according to the above formula:

[tex]495 = P (0.06\times3)\\\\\Rightarrow\ P=\dfrac{495}{0.18}\\\\\Rightarrow\ P=2750[/tex]

Hence, the principal invested = $2750

Answer:

  93

Step-by-step explanation:

First differences increase by 4 each time. The given numbers are a quadratic sequence that can be described by 2n² -2n +9. The 7th term would be 93.

_____

First differences are ...

  13-9 = 4, 21-13 = 8, 33-21 = 12, 49-33 = 16, 69-49 = 20

Second differences are ...

  8-4 = 4, 12-8 = 4, 16-12 = 4, 20-16 = 4

When second differences are constant, the sequence can be represented by a second-degree polynomial function. The leading coefficient is half the value of the second differences.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question.

20 applicants are interviewed for a job. The interviewer creates an ordered list (first to last) of the best 6 applicants. How many ways are there for the interviewer to create the list?

Since the question deals with selection, we will apply the combination rule. Generally, if r objects are to be selected from n pool of objects, this can be done in nCr number of ways.

nCr = n!/(n-r)!r!

According to the question, if the the interviewer is to select 6 applicants from a pool of 20 applicants that are interviewed for a job, this can be done in 20C6 number of ways.

20C6 = 20!/(20-6)!6!

20C6 = 20!/14!6!

20C6 = 20*19*18*17*16*15*14!/14!*6*5*4*3*2

20C6 =  20*19*18*1716*15/6*5*4*3*2

20C6 = 27,907,200/720

20C6 = 38,760 different ways.

Hence, the interviewer can create the list in 38,760 different ways.

When raising a power inside parentheses to another power, multiply the numbers:

(6^4)^2 = 6^(4x2) = 6^8

Simplified = 6^8

6^8 = 1679616

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \mathsf{ ( { {6}^{4}) }^{2} }[/tex]

It is the example of Power to power law of indices.

Multiply the exponents

⇒[tex] \mathsf{ {6}^{4 \times 2} }[/tex]

Multiply the numbers

⇒[tex] \mathsf{ {6}^{8} }[/tex]

-------------------------------------------------------

[tex] \mathsf{\orange{ \underline{ power \: to \: power \: law \: of \: indices}}}[/tex]

If [tex] \mathsf{ ({x}^{a} )^{b}} [/tex] is an algebraic term then [tex] \mathsf{( {x}^{a} ) ^{b} = {x}^{a \times b} }[/tex]

i.e When an algebraic term in the index form is raised to another index , the base is raised to the power of two indices.

Hope I helped!

Best regards!!

Answer:

Credit remaining after 21 minutes = $30.4

Step-by-step explanation:

Credit remaining on a phone card is a linear function of the total calling time.

When graphed, let the linear function representing the line is,

y = mx + b

Where 'm' = slope of the line

b = y-intercept

From the graph,

Slope of the line = -0.12

y = -0.12x + b

If this line passes through a point (33, 28.96),

28.96 = -0.12(33) + b

b = 28.96 + 3.96

b = 32.92

Therefore, the linear function is,

f(x) = -0.12x + 32.92

where x = calling time

Credit left in the card after 21 minutes,

f(21) = -0.12(21) + 32.92

      = -2.52 + 32.92

      = $30.4

Answer:

step 2

Step-by-step explanation:

9 = -3(e - 2)

9 = -3e + 6

9-6 = -3e

3 = -3e

divide both sides by -3

-1 = e

Answer:

Please refer to the attached graph.

Slope = -3.125

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Time is placed on x axis.

Initially, height of rock climber is 25 feet above sea level.

[tex]t_1 =0\ sec[/tex]

[tex]h_1[/tex] = 25 feet

After 8 seconds, he is at sea level.

[tex]t_2 =8\ sec[/tex]

[tex]h_2[/tex] = 0 feet

To find:

Graph of the given points and Slope of the line depicted.

Solution:

Kindly refer to the attached graph.

Here, we have been given two points to be plotted on the xy coordinate plane.

1st point is (0, 25): Time is 0 and height above sea level is 25 ft

2nd point is (8, 0): Time is 8 seconds and height above sea level is 0 ft (i.e. he comes to sea level)

First of all, mark these points and join them with a straight line.

Please refer to attached graph.

Slope of a line is given as:

[tex]m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

Here,

[tex]y_2 = 0\\y_1 = 25\\x_2 = 8\\x_1 = 0[/tex]

Using the formula:

[tex]m=\dfrac{0-25}{8-0}\\\Rightarrow m=-\dfrac{25}{8} = \bold{-3.125}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{\sf No}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 365 days in 1 year.

The average person lives for about 78 years.

Multiply 78 by 365 to find the value in days.

[tex]78 \times 365= 28470[/tex]

The average person lives for about 28470 days.

Answer:

1 year

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

Continuously compounding with an annual interest rate of 4.5% means multiplying the initial investment by (for t tears).

[tex]\displaystyle e^{(1+4.5\%)t}=e^{\left( 1.045\cdot t \right) }[/tex]

So we need to find t so that:

[tex]\displaystyle e^{\left( 1.045\cdot t \right) }=3\\\\1.0.45t=ln(3)\\\\t=\dfrac{ln(3)}{1.045}=1.051304...[/tex]

Rounding to the nearest whole number gives 1 year.

Hope this helps.

Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.

Thank you

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

Trust me

Answer:

[tex]P(Gray\ and\ Blue) = \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Sections = 10[/tex]

[tex]n(Gray) = 5[/tex]

[tex]n(Blue) = 5[/tex]

Required

Determine P(Gray and Blue)

Using probability formula;

[tex]P(Gray\ and\ Blue) = P(Gray) * P(Blue)[/tex]

Calculating P(Gray)

[tex]P(Gray) = \frac{n(Gray)}{Sections}[/tex]

[tex]P(Gray) = \frac{5}{10}[/tex]

[tex]P(Gray) = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Calculating P(Gray)

[tex]P(Blue) = \frac{n(Blue)}{Sections}[/tex]

[tex]P(Blue) = \frac{5}{10}[/tex]

[tex]P(Blue) = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Substitute these values on the given formula

[tex]P(Gray\ and\ Blue) = P(Gray) * P(Blue)[/tex]

[tex]P(Gray\ and\ Blue) = \frac{1}{2} * \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]P(Gray\ and\ Blue) = \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Answer:

So this is giving us the slope the slope is y=-7x+150

Step-by-step explanation:

It is giving us the Y intercept which is $150  because thats how much he starts out with

It is giving us the slope -7 dollars because he is spending that everyday

Answer:

The answer is

[tex]A = 4.53 \times {10}^{17} \: {m}^{2} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the Earth's moon is a sphere

Surface area of a sphere from the question is given by

A = 4πr²

where r is the radius

To find the radius using the diameter we use the formula

radius = diameter / 2

[tex]radius \: = \frac{3.8 \times {10}^{8} }{2} [/tex]

[tex]radius = 1.9 \times {10}^{8} \: m[/tex]

π = 3.14

Substitute these values into the above formula

That's

[tex]A = 4 \times 3.14 \times ({1.9 \times {10}^{8} })^{2} [/tex]

We have the final answer as

[tex]A = 4.53 \times {10}^{17} \: {m}^{2} [/tex]

Hope this helps you