if I bought 6 apples and 1 pair for $2.00 HOW MUCH WAS EACH ITEMS COST?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its m<2=degrees

Answer:

m∠1 = 131

m∠2 = 49

m∠2 = 112

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

so 189(from 189.66) lower box tickets are sold and 18 upper box tickets are sold

Step-by-step explanation:

lets take "x" as the # of lower box tickets

and "y" as the number of upper box tickets

so in total the number of tickets sold was 208

so  x+y=208

next, we know that each lower box ticket costs 12.50 and each upper box tickets costs 10 and the total amount of money spent was $2187.50 so:

12.5x+10y=2187.50

lets subtract "x" from both sides in first equation to find value of y

y=208-x

now substitute y in equation number 2:

12.5x-10(208-x)=2187.5

12.5x-2080+10x=2187.5

22.5x-2080=2187.5

22.5x=4267.5

x=189.666

so 189 tickets lower box tickets were purchased now, substitute 190 in equation 1 to find value of "y"

y=208-190

y=18

so 189(from 189.66) lower box tickets are sold and 18 upper box tickets are sold

Answer:

True? What are you asking

Step-by-step explanation:

But yes triangles are congruent by either of those

Answer:

you're not really asking anything, or is this a true/false statement

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  8x +6y -28

Step-by-step explanation:

The outside factor applies to each inside term, so the equivalent expression is ...

  -8(-x -3/4y +7/2) = 8x +6y -28

Applying the distributive property once again, we can also write the equivalent expression ...

  = 2(4x +3y -14)

__

There are an infinite number of other equivalent expressions. The problem statement is non-specific as to the acceptable form.

Answer:

3cm+2cm+5cm=10cm

%=100

10*10=100

2cm*10=20%

Step-by-step explanation:

the shaded area is width of 2 2/10 or 20/100

Answer:

33%

Step-by-step explanation:

for if u want to do it 4cm then

4+3+3=10

100π cm^2

49π cm^2

16π cm^2

49π - 16π = 33π

33/100 =33%

Answer:

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

add 5+1+3=9

and there is 3 cheese pizza so its 3 over 8.

Answer:

3/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:B. The regression line​ changes, but the change is small. C. There is no regression line for the second case because the data are in a pattern. D. The regression line is very similar in both cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is the garbage truck had 6 wheels

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the semitruck has 18 wheels and the semitruck had 3 times more wheels than a garbage truck all you would have to do is divide 18 by 3 and you will get 6 as your answer.

Hope this helps, its my first time answering.

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Ummmm 2 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the tax, we take the price times the tax rate

2 = 40* rate

Divide each side by 40

2/40 =rate

.05 = rate

Changing to percent form

5% = rate

Answer:

tax rate = 2 / 40  = 1 /20 = 0.05 *100 = 5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

About 68% (is that an answer choice?)

Step-by-step explanation:

In a normal distribution (a bell curve), about 68 percent of the data is in the range between one standard deviation below the mean to one standard deviation above.  If your mean is 27, and the standard deviation is 3, then one deviation below to one above would be 27 - 3  to 27 + 3, or 24 - 30.

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the numbers greater than nine are: 10,11,12

1,3,5,7,9

So that is nine numbers

9/12 can be simplified to 3/4 if you divide by 3

if you like my answer please give me the brainliest. I'm trying to boost my rank and I'm really close

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

(b/2)^2

b= -20

(-20/2)^2

(-10)^2

100

Answer:

4/45.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a total of 15 marbles in the bowl, so:

P(red) = 5/15 = 1/3

P(blue) = 4/15

Required probability = 1/3 * 4/15

= 4/45

Answer:

P(red, blue) = (5/15)*(4/15) = 4/45

Step-by-step explanation:

C

Answer:

The answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test and got it right :)

hopefully this helps you :)

pls mark brainlest ;)

Answer:

  $3840

Step-by-step explanation:

The total cost is ...

  (6 hr)(cost per hr) +(120 persons)(food cost per person)

  = 6($190) +120($15 +7.50)

  = $3840

The booking at Hotel 3 would cost $3840.

Answer:

Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_d[/tex] = 0

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]\mu_d\neq[/tex] 0    

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a local insurance agent randomly selected profiles for 10 of his clients and checked online price quotes for their policies.

Then, based on paired data on the 10 clients (the price he offered them and the corresponding online quote), he obtained t-statistic = 0.709 p-value = 0.248.

Here , we will use the concept of Paired data test statistics because the prices that the local insurance agent offered and the corresponding online quotes are from the same single data. These information has not been taken from the two independent samples.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_d[/tex] = 0    

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]\mu_d\neq[/tex] 0    

Here, null hypothesis states that there is no difference between the price he offered them and the corresponding online quote.

On the other hand, alternate hypothesis states that there is difference between the price he offered them and the corresponding online quote.

Hence, this would be the correct null and alternative hypothesis.

Did you ever figure this out. I need the answer for a test.

Answer:

AB=21 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it's a right angles triangle, we'll use Pythagoras theorem

HYPOTENUSE ²= base² + perpendicular ²

Where hyp=AB, base=16 and perp=13

AB²=16²+13²

AB²=256+169

AB²=425

Taking sq root.

AB=20.6 miles

AB≈21 miles

Answer:

Length: 9

Width: 3

Perimeter: 24

Step-by-step explanation:

First you can set up a few equations. You know that L x W is your area, or 27.

L * W = 27

Then you also know that your length is equal to three times the width.

L = 3W

So you can substitute L into the first equation to solve for W.

3W * W = 27

3W^2 = 27

W^2 = 9

W = 3

Then you can plug 3 into either equation to solve for your length.

L = 3(3)

L = 9

Then your perimeter is just 2L + 2W

2(9) + 2(3) = 24

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the dimensions of the rectangle be length = L and width = W. Then P = perimeter = 2L + 2W.  A = area of rectangle = L * W.  Finally, L = 3W.

Here A = 27 units^2 = W*(3W) = (3*W^2), or 3W^2 = 27 units^2, or

W^2 = 9 units^2, or W = 3 units.  Then L = 3W = 3(3 units) = 9 units.

The length of the rectangle is 9 units.  See above.

The perimeter of the rectangle is 2(9 units) + 2(3 units) = 24 units.

Answer:

The value increases

Step-by-step explanation:

the smaller the divisor, the larger the quotient.

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Please, read the answer below.

Step-by-step explanation:

You have the following function:

[tex]f(x)=12x^4-4x^2+5[/tex]

(a) To find the intervals of increase or decrease of f(x) you first calculate the derivative of f(x):

[tex]\frac{df}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}[12x^4-4x^2+5]\\\\\frac{df}{dx}=12(4)x^3-4(2)x=48x^3-8x[/tex]   (2)

Next, you equal the derivative to zero and obtain the roots of the obtained polynomial:

[tex]48x^3-8x=0\\\\6x^3-x=0\\\\x(6x^2-1)=0[/tex]

Then, you have the following roots for x:

[tex]x_1=0\\\\x_{2,3}=\pm \sqrt{\frac{1}{6}}[/tex] =  ±0.40

Hence, there are three special points.

Next, you evaluate the derivative (expression (2)) for the x values close to the x1, x2 and x3. The values of the derivative give to us the value of the slope of a tangent line in that point, and so, if the function increases or decreases:

First interval, for a number lower than -0.40

[tex]48(-0.41)^3-8(-0.41)=-0.02<0[/tex]

The function decreases in the interval:

[tex](-\inft,-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}})[/tex]

It is necessary that after x=-0.40 the function increases until the next special point, that is x=0. Then, the interval in which the function increases is:

[tex](-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},0)[/tex]

By symmetry, from the point x=0 until x=0.40 the function decreases.

[tex](0,\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}})[/tex]

Next, you evaluate the expression (2) for a number higher than 0.40:

[tex]48(0.41)^3-8(0.41)=0.02>0[/tex]

Then, the function increases for the following interval:

[tex](\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},+\infty)[/tex]

(b) Due to the results obtained in the previous step you can conclude that the local minimum are:

[tex]x_{min}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\\\\x_{min}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}[/tex]

[tex]P_1(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},f(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}))=P_1(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},4.66)\\\\P_2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},f(\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}))=P_2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},4.66)[/tex]

[tex]P_1(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},0)\\\\P_2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}},0)[/tex]

(these are the point in which the function change of a decrease to an increase)

The same reason as before. There in one local maximum:

[tex]x_{max}=0[/tex]

[tex]P(0,f(0))=P(0,5)[/tex]

(c) The inflection points are calculated by using the second derivative:

[tex]\frac{d^2f}{dx^2}=144x^2-8=0\\\\x^2=\frac{8}{144}=\frac{1}{18}\\\\x=\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{18}}[/tex]

Then , there are two inflection points , given by:

[tex]P_1(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{18}},f(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{18}}))=P_1(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{18}},4.82)\\\\P_2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{18}},f(\frac{1}{\sqrt{18}}))=P_2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{18}},4.82)[/tex]

Answer:

Probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe  their representative possesses low ethical standards is 0.417890.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the paper claims that 43% of all constituents believe their representative possesses low ethical standards.

Suppose 20 of a representative's constituents are randomly and independently sampled.

The above situation can be represented through binomial distribution;

[tex]P(X=r) = \binom{n}{r} \times p^{r} \times (1-p)^{n-r} ; x = 0,1,2,3,.....[/tex]

where, n = number of trials (samples) taken = 20 constituents

            r = number of success = more than eight but fewer than 12

            p = probability of success which in our question is probability that

                  all constituents believe their representative possesses low

                  ethical standards, i.e; p = 43%

Let X = Number of constituents who believe their representative possesses low ethical standards

So, X ~ Binom(n = 20 , p = 0.43)

Now, Probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe  their representative possesses low ethical standards is given by = P(8 < X < 12)

P(8 < X < 12)  =  P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11)

= [tex]\binom{20}{9} \times 0.43^{9} \times (1-0.43)^{20-9}+ \binom{20}{10} \times 0.43^{10} \times (1-0.43)^{20-10}+\binom{20}{11} \times 0.43^{11} \times (1-0.43)^{20-11}[/tex]

= [tex]167960 \times 0.43^{9} \times 0.57^{11}+ 184756 \times 0.43^{10} \times 0.57^{10}+167960 \times 0.43^{11} \times 0.57^{9}[/tex]

= 0.417890

Hence, the required probability is 0.417890.

The probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe their representative possesses low ethical standards is; C. 0.417890

We are given;

proportion; p = 43% = 0.43

sample size; n = 20

P(X = x) = ⁿCₓ * pˣ * (1 - p)ⁿ ⁻ ˣ

Thus the probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe their representative possesses low ethical standards is;

P(8 < X < 12)  =  P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11)

From online binomial probability calculator, we have;

P(8 < X < 12)  =  0.17419889 + 0.14455452 + 0.09913627

P(8 < X < 12)  = 0.417890

Read more about binomial probability at; https://brainly.com/question/15246027