identify the system by type

Answer:

1.5/2

Step-by-step explanation:

slope formula = y2-y1/ x2 - x1

point one (2,0)

point 2 (0, 1.5)

you dont really need to subtract anything because the intercepts, so the slope is 1.5/2

(slope or m = 1.5 - 0 / 2 - 0 )

x intercept = value of x when y is 0

y intercept = value of y when x is 0

Answer:

y=7x+2

Step-by-step explanation:

In this form of an equation (y=mx+b), m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept.

So, since the slope (m) is 7 and the y-intercept (b) is 2, the equation is:

y=7x+2

Answer:

should just be 4/6 or 2/3 simplified lol

Step-by-step explanation:

ratios and fractions are very similar, just pronounced differently. 4:6 is read as "four to fix" while 4/6 is read as "four sixths". only difference is the punctuation

C. The two statements agree in point of truth or falsehood in virtue of their logical structure alone, i.e. the two statement are true or false in exactly the same conditions.

For two statements to be logically equivalent, their truth values (true or false) must be the same for every variation of their constituent variables. In other words, if the truth tables of both statements are the same for every possible value of their variables, then they are logically equivalent.

For example;

The two statements P ∩ (Q U R) and (P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) are logically equivalent.

If P, Q and R are all true, then;

P ∩ (Q U R) = true

(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = true

If P, Q and R are all true, then;

P ∩ (Q U R) = false

(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = false

If P = false, Q = true and R = true, then;

P ∩ (Q U R) = false

(P ∩ Q) ∪ (P ∩ R) = false

Checking for all other possible combinations of truth values of P, Q and R will always give the same results for the two statements, therefore, they are logically equivalent.

Answer:

Part A)

2048π/3 cubic units.

Part B)

8192π/15 units.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that R is the finite region bounded by the graphs of functions:

[tex]f(x)=4\sqrt{x}\text{ and } g(x)=x[/tex]

Part A)

We want to find the volume of the solid of revolution obtained when rotating R about the x-axis.

We can use the washer method, given by:

[tex]\displaystyle \pi\int_a^b[R(x)]^2-[r(x)]^2\, dx[/tex]

Where R is the outer radius and r is the inner radius.

Find the points of intersection of the two graphs:

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} 4\sqrt{x} & = x \\ 16x&= x^2 \\ x^2-16x&= 0 \\ x(x-16) & = 0 \\ x&=0 \text{ and } x=16\end{aligned}[/tex]

Hence, our limits of integration is from x = 0 to x = 16.

Since 4√x ≥ x for all values of x between [0, 16], the outer radius R is f(x) and the inner radius r is g(x). Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle V=\pi\int_0^{16}(4\sqrt{x})^2-(x)^2\, dx[/tex]

Evaluate:

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \displaystyle V&=\pi\int_0^{16}(4\sqrt{x})^2-(x)^2\, dx \\\\ &=\pi\int_0^{16} 16x-x^2\, dx \\\\ &=\pi\left(8x^2-\frac{1}{3}x^3\Big|_{0}^{16}\right)\\\\ &=\frac{2048\pi}{3}\text{ units}^3 \end{aligned}[/tex]

The volume is 2048π/3 cubic units.

Part B)

We want to find the volume of the solid of revolution obtained when rotating R about the y-axis.

First, rewrite each function in terms of y:

[tex]\displaystyle f(y) = \frac{y^2}{16}\text{ and } g(y) = y[/tex]

Solving for the intersection yields y = 0 and y = 16. So, our limits of integration are from y = 0 to y = 16.

The washer method for revolving about the y-axis is given by:

[tex]\displaystyle V=\pi\int_{a}^{b}[R(y)]^2-[r(y)]^2\, dy[/tex]

Since g(y) ≥ f(y) for all y in the interval [0, 16], our outer radius R is g(y) and our inner radius r is f(y). Substitute and evaluate:

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \displaystyle V&=\pi\int_{a}^{b}[R(y)]^2-[r(y)]^2\, dy \\\\ &=\pi\int_{0}^{16} (y)^2- \left(\frac{y^2}{16}\right)^2\, dy\\\\ &=\pi\int_0^{16} y^2 - \frac{y^4}{256} \, dy \\\\ &=\pi\left(\frac{1}{3}y^3-\frac{1}{1280}y^5\Bigg|_{0}^{16}\right)\\\\ &=\frac{8192\pi}{15}\text{ units}^3\end{aligned}[/tex]

The volume is 8192π/15 cubic units.

Answer:

C. 17 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Surface area of rectangular prism is given as:

A = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh

A = 930 square units

l = 12 units

h = 9 units

w = ? (We're to find the width)

Plug in the value into the formula

930 = 2*12*w + 2*12*9 + 2*w*9

930 = 24w + 216 + 18w

Add like terms

930 - 216 = 42w

714 = 42w

Divide both sides by 42

714/42 = 42w/42

17 = w

w = 17 units

Answer:

It's the 4th answer: g(x) = 1/4 x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Switch x and y and solve for y

x=4y+12

-4y=-x+12

y = 1/4 x - 3

Answer:

The slope of the green line is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The lines are perpendicular, so the slopes are negative inverses

-1/(-1/3)

3

Answer:

y= -6

Step-by-step explanation:

the y-intercept is -6, which corresponds to point (0,-6)

remember that you're using the

y=mx+b format of an equation of a line where b is the y-intercept.

Also, if you make x=0, y will be -6.

Answer:

It means acidosis.

Step-by-step explanation:

When the pH level of the human blood is less than 7.35, the condition is known as acidosis.

When the pH level of the human blood is more than 7.45, the condition is known as alkalosis.

The organs which help to regulate the pH of human body is lungs.

Lungs remove the carbon di oxide through breathing or respiration.

Answer:

x =5, y = 22

Step-by-step explanation:

5y + 79 + 5y + 61 = 360

10y = 220

y = 22

2x + 7 = 4x - 3

-2x = -10

x = 5

Answer:

3,199 approximately

Step-by-step explanation:

to find how much 20% of 15,998 does we multiply 15,998 with 20 and then divide it by 100

15,998 x 20 / 100 = 3,199

Answer:

It's A

Step-by-step explanation:

On Edg

Answer:

The total for the housewife's purchase should be 60 dollars. So it should be the vender who owes her money. The vender owes her 15 dollars.

Step-by-step explanation:

$5 = 1kg (eddoes) meaning a total of 2kg eddos =$10

$10 = 1kg (chicken) meaning a total of 5kg chicken = $50

When added together, it'd be 60 dollars.

(I'm not sure if you maybe forgot a part of the question or only had this part)

Answer:

D) x = e - 1

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Algebra II

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Identify

[tex]\displaystyle ln(x + 1) = 1[/tex]

Step 2: Solve for x

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

As it could be inferred from the name, repeated measure design may be explained as experimental measures involving multiple (more than one) measures of a variable on the same observation, subject or participants which are taken at either various times or periodic intervals, different levels, different conditions. Hence, a repeated measurement taken with the same sample but under different treatment conditions. Therefore, since the measurement will be performed on a the same subjects(paired) , then the number of subjects needed will be 10. As it is this same samples that will be used for the other levels or conditions.

Answer:

16?

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure. I hope so.

Solution :

1). The cost of the formula is given as :

   $ 19,350 + $12 x

2). 95% [tex]\text{confidence interval}[/tex] for the prediction is :

    [tex]$21430 - 1.96 \times 220 < \text{Yf} < 21430+1.96 \times 220$[/tex]

     [tex]$20998.8 < \text{Yf} < 21861.2$[/tex]

     [tex]$20999 < \text{Yf} < 21861$[/tex]    (rounding off)

3). r = 0.92

Therefore, [tex]$r^2 = 0.8464$[/tex]

That is 84.64 % of the variability in the moving cost is best explained by the number of moves.

There are more compact cars (4*10 = 40) compared to trucks (2*10 = 20); however, the pictogram might make it appear that there are more trucks because the individual truck icon is larger compared to an individual compact car icon.

To anyone giving this image a quick glance, they may erroneously conclude that there are more trucks since their eye would notice the trucks first. Also, the person might think there are more trucks because bigger sizes tend to correspond to more proportion.

In real life, a truck is larger than a compact car, but the icons need to be the same size to have the figure not be misleading.

A very similar issue happens with the mid-size cars vs the compact cars as well. The three mid-size car icons span the same total width as the compact cars do, indicating that a reader might mistakenly conclude that there are the same number of mid-size cars compared to compact ones (when that's not true either).

Answer:

-192

Step-by-step explanation:

it is a geometric progression

r=-4

Answer:

48.45in

Step-by-step explanation:

To get the height of Dakota, we will use the SOH CAH TOA

Given the following

angle of elevation = 39degrees

distance from the top of Dakotas head to the tip of the shadow = 77in (Hyp)

Required

Height of Dakota (Opp)

Sin 39 = opposite/hyp

Sin39 = H/77

H = 77sin39

H = 77(0.6293)

H = 48.45in

Hence the Dakota is 48.45in

Answer:

3 units to the right and 2 units up

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is:

[tex]H_0: p=0.83\\\\H_a: p \neq 0.83[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Now, we're going to test if sociologists claim to be have visited a region of 0.83 by a person picked randomly on Time In New York City.

Therefore, null or other hypotheses are:

[tex]H_0: p=0.83\\\\H_a: p \neq 0.83[/tex]

Answer:

y = [ 4 ]

Step-by-step explanation:

5y - 10 = 10

     +10  +10

5y = 20

/5     /5

y = 4

hope this helps ! ^^

Answer:

[tex]5y-10=10[/tex]

[tex]Add ~10[/tex]

[tex]5y=10+10[/tex]

[tex]5y=20[/tex]

[tex]divide ~by ~5[/tex]

[tex]y=4[/tex]

[tex]ANSWER: y=4[/tex]

-----------------------------

HOPE IT HELPS

HAVE A GREAT DAY!!

Answer:

Joel wants to find the quotient of a number and 4, minus thirteen

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression :

n/4 - 13

The options B and D cannot be possible answers as they are referring to products and sums which is not a part of the operation used in the expression.

However, the most appropriate option would be A because,

13 is subtracted from the quotient of n/4 which is what the first option expresses.

What is meant by option C however is :

13 - n/4

Hence. Option A is the correct choice.

Answer:

Joel wants to find the quotient of a number and 4, minus thirteen

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{7} -2 -2n[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Arithmetic sequence:

In an arithmetic sequence, the difference of consecutive terms is always the same, called common difference.

The nth term of a sequence is given by:

[tex]a_{n} = a_1 + (n-1)d[/tex]

In which [tex]a_1[/tex] is the first term and d is the common difference.

Sigma notation to represent the sum of the first seven terms

Sum going from the index starting at 1 and finishing at 7, that is:

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{7} f(n)[/tex]

Now we have to fund the function, which is given by an arithmetic sequence.

−4, −6, −8,

First term -4, common difference - 6 - (-4) = -6 + 4 = -2, so [tex]a_1 = -4, d = -2[/tex]

Then

[tex]f(n) = a_{n} = a_1 + (n-1)d[/tex]

[tex]f(n) = -4 + (n-1)(-2)[/tex]

[tex]f(n) = -4 - 2n + 2 = -2 - 2n[/tex]

Sigma notation:

Replacing f(n)

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{7} -2 -2n[/tex]

Answer:

0.502

64.1666

Step-by-step explanation:

Detained explanation of the product operation and division operation is attached below.

2.51 * 0.2 = 0.502

(after multiplying) the number of decimal places of the town values is added and counted from the right in the product to place the data Comal point appropriately.

77/1.2 ; values were multiplied by 10 in other to obtain inter values for the denominator.

Answer:

Some demerits of classical probability are provided throughout the following portion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

100 lightbulbs

Step-by-step explanation:

Basically find the percentage of lightbulbs that are bad. 5/136. So about 3. 6 percent. I'm going to use a more exact form of this percent for my calculations though. Now use the decimal for of this (0.036....) and multiply it by 2720. Using my exact decimal, the answer just so happened to be exactly 100. So there will be 100 defective lightbulbs per day. (Teachers are a stickler for units, so don't forget them if it's for a teacher)

Hope this helps!