i will give brainliest and 5 stars if you help ASAP​

Answer:

x = 0.09

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {3}^{x + 2} = {2}^{3} [/tex]

Taking Logarith both sides, we get :

Using the properties of Logarithms:

[tex](x + 2) log(3) = 3 log(2) [/tex]

[tex](x + 2) = 1.91[/tex]

(taking log2= 0.3 and log3= 0.47)

x = 0.09

Answer:

The answer is "[tex]\bold{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex]"

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]\ S_1 = k \\\\ S_{n+1} = \sqrt{4S_n -1}[/tex]   [tex]_{where} \ \ n \geq 1[/tex]

In the above-given value, [tex]S_n[/tex] is required for the monotone decreasing so, [tex]S_2 :[/tex]

[tex]\to \sqrt{4k-1} \leq \ k=S_1\\\\[/tex]

square the above value:

[tex]\to k^2-4k+1 \leq 0\\\\\to k \leq 2+\sqrt{3} \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ 4k+1 >0\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\bold{\boxed{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}}[/tex]

Lila will need to start the hike at 11: 55 a.m. to be back at exactly 6: 05 p.m. or at 11: 54 a.m. to be before 6: 05 p.m (6: 04 p.m.)

Explanation:

To solve this question, the first step is to calculate how much time does hiking to the lake, go fishing, and go back takes in total. This can be calculated by adding the time of the three activities. This means 1 hour 10 minutes + 3 hours 10 minutes + 1 hour 50 minutes which is equal to 6 hours 10 minutes. The detailed process is shown below.

Add the hours: 1 + 3 + 1 = 5

Add the minutes: 10+50 +10 = 70

Also, because the total of minutes is above 60 (each hour has 60 minutes) it is necessary to subtract 60 minutes and add 1 hour.

5 hours + 1 hour and 70 minutes - 60 minutes = 6 hours and 10 minutes

Now, to solve the question subtract the time of the activities to the time Lila needs to complete all the activities.

6: 05 p.m.  -  6 hours and 10 minutes = 11: 55 a.m

You can get this result by substracting first the hours and then the minutes

6: 05 p.m. - 6 hours = 12: 05 p.m.

12: 05 - 10 minutes = 11: 55 a.m.

According to this, Lila will need to start the hike at 11: 55 a.m. to be back at exactly 6: 05 p.m. or at 11: 54 a.m. to be before 6: 05 a.m because if she starts at 11: 54 a.m. she will be back at 6:04, which is a minute before 6:05 p.m.

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

2,8 to 4,12 has a rise of 4 and a run of 2.

4/2 = 2

The slope is 2.

Remember rise/run!

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

We take take two points and use the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

m = (12-8)/(4-2)

   = 4/2

   = 2

Answer:

  145 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Adjacent angles in a parallelogram are supplementary.

  d2 = 180° -d1 = 180° -35°

  d2 = 145°

[tex]x-1=\dfrac{6}{x}\qquad(x\not=0)\\\\x^2-x=6\\x^2-x-6=0\\x^2+2x-3x-6=0\\x(x+2)-3(x+2)=0\\(x-3)(x+2)=0\\x=3 \vee x=-2[/tex]

Answer:

No the sample does not show that the average age  was different in 2010      

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The sample size is n =  50

    The  sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 38.5[/tex]

    The population mean is  [tex]\mu = 37[/tex]

     The standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 16[/tex]

     The level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 5 \% = 0.05[/tex]

 The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu = 37[/tex]

  The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : \mu \ne 37[/tex]

The critical value of the level of  significance obtained from the normal distribution table is  ([tex]Z_{\alpha } = 1.645[/tex] )

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

          [tex]t = \frac{ \= x - \mu }{ \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

substituting values

          [tex]t = \frac{ 38.5 - 37}{ \frac{16}{\sqrt{50} } }[/tex]        

         [tex]t = 0.663[/tex]

Now looking at the value  t and  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t < Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

This mean that there is no sufficient evidence to state that the sample shows that the average age was different in 2010      

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The 98% is confidence interval its not a probability estimate. The probability will be different from the confidence interval. Confidence interval is about the population mean and is not calculated based on sample mean. Every confidence interval contains the sample mean. There is 98% confidence that the proportion of Drosophola with his mutation is between 0.34 and 0.38.

Answer: The answer in a is No while the answer in b is Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the explanation in the attached file.

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

36 - 20 - 32 x 1/4

=> 36 - 20 - 32/4

=> 36 - 20 - 8

=> 36 - 28

=> 6

Answer:

(2,2) (-1,-1)

Step-by-step explanation

i think this is there answer im sorry if im wrong

Answer:

63 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

If Chubby ran his wheel, which has a diameter of 20cm, we want to find its circumference - this will tell us how far Chubby has ran one one full rotation of the wheel.

The formula for the circumference of a circle is [tex]2\pi r[/tex], where r is the radius. We know the diameter is 20, which is double the radius, so the radius is [tex]20\div2=10[/tex] cm.

We can know substitute inside the formula:

[tex]2\cdot \pi \cdot10\\\\2\cdot 3.14 \cdot10\\\\ 6.28\cdot10\\\\62.8[/tex]

62.8 rounded to the nearest cm is 63.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

6280

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

No solution

Step-by-step explanation:

Given equation is,

[tex]\frac{x^{\frac{1}{2}}+x^{-\frac{1}{2}}}{1-x}+\frac{1-x^{-\frac{1}{2}}}{1+x^\frac{1}{2}}-\frac{(4+x)^\frac{1}{2}}{(1-x)^\frac{1}{2}}=0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x^{\frac{1}{2}}+x^{-\frac{1}{2}}}{1-x}+\frac{1-x^{-\frac{1}{2}}}{1+x^\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{(4+x)^\frac{1}{2}}{(1-x)^\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(x+1)}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)}+\frac{(\sqrt{x}-1)}{\sqrt{x}(1+\sqrt{x})}=(\frac{4+x}{1-x})^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(\sqrt{x}+1)(x+1)+(\sqrt{x}-1)(1-x)}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)(1+\sqrt{x})}=(\frac{4+x}{1-x})^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x\sqrt{x}+x+\sqrt{x}+1+\sqrt{x}-1-x\sqrt{x}+x}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)(1+\sqrt{x})}=(\frac{4+x}{1-x})^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2x+2\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)(1+\sqrt{x})}=(\frac{4+x}{1-x})^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2(\sqrt{x}+1)}{(1-x)(1+\sqrt{x})}=(\frac{4+x}{1-x})^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2}{1-x}=(\frac{4+x}{1-x})^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]  if x ≠ ±1

[tex](\frac{2}{1-x})^2=\frac{4+x}{1-x}[/tex]  [Squaring on both the sides of the equation]

[tex]\frac{4}{(1-x)}=(4+x)[/tex]

4 = (1 - x)(4 + x)

4 = 4 - 4x + x - x²

0 = -3x - x²

x² + 3x = 0

x(x + 3) = 0

x = 0, -3

But both the solutions x = 0 and x = -3 are extraneous solutions, given equation has no solution.

Answer:

Could you please help me Genius??????

Answer:

It can be any two numbers that sum up to 36.

eg:18+18,30+6,15+21

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Let Benjamin's age be x and David's age y.

x+y=36

2x+2y=72

Solution:

As twice of 36=72, any two numbers that add up to 36 ,will give a sum of 72 after multiplying them with 2.Therefore ,Benjamin's and David's age can be any set of numbers that sum up to 36.

Answer:

5/3

Step-by-step explanation:

on both sides we can see that the orginal length of 3 increased to five

therfore if we multiply 3 by 3/5 we get five which means the scale factor is 5/3

Answer:

We conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the 190 children born to cocaine users had a mean of 7.3 and a standard deviation of 3.0 The 186 children not exposed to cocaine had a mean score of 8.2 with a standard deviation of 3.0.

Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = population mean score for children born to cocaine users.

[tex]\mu_2[/tex] = population mean score for children not exposed to cocaine.

So, Null Hypothesis, : = 490      {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is not associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

Alternate Hypothesis, : 490     {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;

                               T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean score of children born to cocaine users = 7.3

[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean score of children not exposed to cocaine = 8.2

[tex]s_1[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children born to cocaine users = 3

[tex]s_2[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children not exposed to cocaine = 3

[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of children born to cocaine users = 190

[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of children not exposed to cocaine = 186

Also, [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\times s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)\times s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex]  = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(190-1)\times 3^{2}+(186-1)\times 3^{2} }{190+186-2} }[/tex] = 3

So, the test statistics =   ~

                                     =  -2.908

The value of t-test statistics is -2.908.

Now, at a 0.05 level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -1.645 at 374 degrees of freedom for the left-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -2.908 < -1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

In the null hypothesis, a test always forecasts no effect, while the alternate theory states the research expectation impact, and calculation as follows:

Calculating the pooled estimator of [tex]\sigma^2[/tex], denoted by [tex]S^2_p[/tex], is defined by

[tex]\to \bold{S^2_p= \frac{(n_1 - 1) S^2_1+ (n_2 - 1)S^2_2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}[/tex]

Null hypothesis:

[tex]\to H_0 : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = \Delta_0\\[/tex]

Test statistic:

[tex]\to T_0=\frac{\bar{X_1}- \bar{X_2} -\Delta_0}{S_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}} \\\\[/tex]

Alternative Hypothesis:

[tex]H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 \neq \Delta_0\\\\ H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 > \Delta_0\\\\H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 < \Delta_0\\\\[/tex]

Rejection Criterion

[tex]t_0 > t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2}\ \ \ or\ \ \ t_0 < - t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > -t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2}[/tex]

Given value:

[tex]\to S_p=9\\\\\to \Delta_0=0\\\\\to t_0=-\frac{0.9}{3(\sqrt{(\frac{1}{190}+\frac{1}{186})})}=-2.9\\\\\to t_{0.05,374}=1.645\\\\[/tex]

here

[tex]\to t_0 < -t_{0.05,374}[/tex]

hence rejecting the [tex]H_0[/tex]

Since there should be enough evidence that prenatal cocaine exposure is linked to inferior item assembly scores in 4-year-olds.

Find out more about the alternative hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/18831983

Answer:

[tex] f(x) = 4x^2 - 3x + 6 [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Quadratic function is given as [tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]

Let's find a, b and c:

Substituting (0, 6):

[tex] 6 = a(0)^2 + b(0) + c [/tex]

[tex] 6 = 0 + 0 + c [/tex]

[tex] c = 6 [/tex]

Now that we know the value of c, let's derive 2 system of equations we would use to solve for a and b simultaneously as follows.

Substituting (2, 16), and c = 6

[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]

[tex] 16 = a(2)^2 + b(2) + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 16 = 4a + 2b + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 16 - 6 = 4a + 2b + 6 - 6 [/tex]

[tex] 10 = 4a + 2b [/tex]

[tex] 10 = 2(2a + b) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{10}{2} = \frac{2(2a + b)}{2} [/tex]

[tex] 5 = 2a + b [/tex]

[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex] => (Equation 1)

Substituting (3, 33), and c = 6

[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + x [/tex]

[tex] 33 = a(3)^2 + b(3) + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 33 = 9a + 3b + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 33 - 6 = 9a + 3b + 6 - 6 [/tex]

[tex] 27 = 9a + 3b [/tex]

[tex] 27 = 3(3a + b) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{27}{3} = \frac{3(3a + b)}{3} [/tex]

[tex] 9 = 3a + b [/tex]

[tex] 3a + b = 9 [/tex] => (Equation 2)

Subtract equation 1 from equation 2 to solve simultaneously for a and b.

[tex] 3a + b = 9 [/tex]

[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] a = 4 [/tex]

Replace a with 4 in equation 2.

[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] 2(4) + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] 8 + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] 8 + b - 8 = 5 - 8 [/tex]

[tex] b = -3 [/tex]

The quadratic function that represents the given 3 points would be as follows:

[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]

[tex] f(x) = (4)x^2 + (-3)x + 6 [/tex]

[tex] f(x) = 4x^2 - 3x + 6 [/tex]

Answer:

maximum --> 62

median --> 46.5

upper quartile --> 60

lower quartile --> 37

minimum --> 32

Step-by-step explanation:

Forgive me on the explanation as I'm a bit rusty on these types of problems.

First, we need to put the set of numbers in order -->

from: 34, 37, 39, 32, 48, 45, 53, 62, 58, 61, 60, 41 -->

to: 32, 34, 37, 39, 41, 45, 48, 53, 58, 60, 61, 62

maximum = biggest number => thus, 62

median = middle number in a sense => (45+48)/2 => thus, 46.5

upper quartile = median over the median => thus, 60

lower quartile = median under the median => thus, 37

minimum = lowest number => thus, 32

And there we have our 5 answers.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

20 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

10*8*4=320 (volume of the pool)

320/16=20 hours

Answer:

20 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

10x8x4 = 320

320 / 16 = 20

it takes 20 hours to fill the empty pool

Answer:

[tex]t \: = 3.92 \: sec[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

When (t =0)

Height of cliff = 248 feet = 75.5m

Using Newton's equations of motion:

[tex]s = ut + \frac{1}{2} a {t}^{2} [/tex]

75.5 = 0 * t + 4.9 * t^2

Solving further :

[tex]t \: = 3.92 \: sec[/tex]

Answer:

10,9.75,9.5,9.25,9, 8.75 , 8.5, 8.25, 8...

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 0.25 from each to find the next number

Answer:

8.25

Step-by-step explanation:

If you substract .25 from each number until you get to a8 you will get 8.25

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Circumference of a circle = 2πr

where

r is the radius

From the above question

radius = 25 in.

Substitute this value into the above formula

That's

Circumference = 2(25)π

= 50π

= 157.079

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

( -5,-7)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)= 2x+3 g(x)=-4x-27

Set the two functions equal

2x+3 = -4x-27

Add 4x to each side

2x+3+4x = -4x-27+4x

6x+3 = -27

Subtract 3

6x+3 - 3 = -27-3

6x = -30

Divide each side by 6

6x/6 = -30/6

x =-5

Now we need to find the output

f(-5) = 2(-5) +3 = -10+3 = -7

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

big burgewr

Step-by-step explanation:

your required answer is 60°.

Hello,

Here, in the figure;

angle 1= 120°

To find : m. of angle 2.

now,

angle 1 + angle 2= 180° { being linear pair}

or, 120° +angle 2 = 180°

or, angle 2= 180°-120°

Therefore, the measure of angle 2 is 60°.

Hope it helps you.....

Answer:

a) 5[tex]cm^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Bodies have three dimensions (width, height and depth). Measuring volume is calculating the number of cubic units that can fit inside.

When raising to 3, these dimensions are included and therefore  5[tex]cm^{3}[/tex] is a measure of volume.

Answer:

5cm^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume for a form will always be in cubic units.

Area of a shape will always be in squared units.

Length will not be in cubic or squared units.

Hence, the first option is a measure for volume.

The second option is equal to 5cm^2 which represents a measure for area, as does the fourth option.

The third option represents a measurement of length, for example the length of a line segment or the height of a figure.

Answer:

A) 144 yd²

Step-by-step explanation:

Base= 8x8=64

Side = 1/2*8*5=20

64+20+20+20+20=144 yd²

Answer:

168 sq yds

Step-by-step explanation:

5x8/2x2=40

8x8/2x2=64

8x8=64

40+64+64=168

Answer:  19.2222

Step-by-step explanation:

given data;

no of tornadoes = 2,1,0 because it’s fewer than 3.

period = 14 years

probability of a tornado in a calendar year = 0.12

solution:

probability of exactly 2 tornadoes

= ( 0.12 )^2 * ( 0.88 )^11 * ( 14! / 2! * 11! )

= 0.0144 * 0.2451 * 1092

= 3.8541

probability of exac one tornado

= ( 0.12 )^1 * ( 0.88 )^12 * ( 14! / 1! * 12! )

= 0.12 * 0.2157 * 182

= 12.7109

probability of exactly 0 tornado

= ( 0.12 )^0 * ( 0.88 )^13 * ( 14! / 0! * 13! )

= 1 * 0.1898 * 14

= 2.6572

probability if fewer than 3 tornadoes

= 3.8541 + 12.7109 +2.6572

= 19.2222

Answer:

x1 = -4

x2 = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The 2 vertical lines are "absolute values" meaning whatever they contain has to be positive

For Example

|-3| = 3

So we can ignore if the answer we get is positive or negative because it will forced to be a positive

|3 x 4| = 12

|x - 2| = 4

x1 = 6

x2 = -2