The correct answer is C. In each location, the native peoples were considered inferior to white settlers.
The annexation of Hawaii and the American acquisition of land in the western parts of North America during the 19th century shared a similarity in the perception of native peoples. In both cases, the native peoples were often regarded as inferior to the white settlers. This perception was rooted in the prevailing ideologies of the time, such as Manifest Destiny, which justified the expansion of white settlers across the continent and the displacement of indigenous populations. Native peoples were often marginalized, displaced from their lands, and subjected to discriminatory policies and practices. This common attitude of considering native peoples as inferior reflects a broader pattern of colonialism and settler colonialism in the 19th century expansion of the United States.
Learn more about white settlers here:
https://brainly.com/question/374405
#SPJ11
Briefly explain one development from the period of 1945 to 1990 that could be used to challenge the point of view you identified in Part A.
The post-World War II era saw a significant shift in the global political and economic climate. In the wake of the Second World War, nations focused on rebuilding and restoring stability to their economies. Economic expansion and Globalization is the development in post world war II.
Economic expansion was fueled by a series of factors, including the rise of new technologies, increased trade, and investment opportunities. The period of 1945-1990 saw a significant development in the form of globalization.
Globalization refers to the process by which countries, businesses, and individuals interact more frequently and on a greater scale across borders. It has been facilitated by advances in transportation and communication technologies, including air travel, satellite communications, and the Internet.
Globalization has enabled increased trade and investment between nations and has facilitated the growth of transnational corporations.
However, globalization has also generated controversy and criticism. Critics argue that globalization has had negative consequences for workers, the environment, and economic stability. For example, some have argued that globalization has led to the outsourcing of jobs from developed countries to developing countries where labor is cheaper. Others argue that globalization has contributed to environmental degradation and the depletion of natural resources.
In conclusion, the development of globalization in the period of 1945 to 1990 could be used to challenge the point of view that economic expansion is always beneficial. While economic growth is an important goal, it must be balanced against the social and environmental costs of that growth. As such, globalization represents a double-edged sword that must be approached with caution.
To know more about globalization
https://brainly.com/question/25499191
#SPJ11
Briefly describe the differences between community corrections and institutional corrections. Is one more effective than the other? Why or why not?
Both community corrections and institutional corrections have their merits, and their effectiveness depends on individual circumstances and needs.
Community corrections and institutional corrections are two different approaches to managing offenders within the criminal justice system. Community corrections refer to a range of programs and sanctions that allow individuals to serve their sentences in the community, such as probation, parole, electronic monitoring, and halfway houses. Institutional corrections, on the other hand, involve the confinement of offenders in correctional facilities like prisons and jails.One cannot definitively conclude that one approach is more effective than the other, as their effectiveness depends on various factors and the specific needs of the individual offender. Community corrections can offer advantages by promoting rehabilitation, reintegration into society, and maintaining family and community ties. It allows offenders to access treatment and support services, which can address the underlying causes of their criminal behavior. However, community corrections also require strong supervision and support systems to ensure compliance and reduce recidivism.Institutional corrections, while providing security and incapacitation of dangerous individuals, may lack the resources and programs necessary for effective rehabilitation. However, prisons can still offer structured environments for education, vocational training, and therapeutic interventions.Ultimately, a combination of both community and institutional corrections, tailored to the individual's circumstances and needs, can be the most effective approach. Emphasizing evidence-based practices, adequate resources, and collaboration between community and correctional agencies are crucial in promoting successful reentry and reducing recidivism rates.For more questions on community
https://brainly.com/question/27353210
#SPJ8
Why did the American population not like the "new" style of immigrants?they would not adopt the US culture and customsthey started moving into the cities making them more crowdedthey did not speak the same language and were difficult to understandthey looked different and practiced a different religion
During the late 19th century, the American population did not like the "new" style of immigrants for several reasons including, they did not adopt the US culture and customs, they started moving into the cities making them more crowded, they did not speak the same language and were difficult to understand, and they looked different and practiced a different religion.
Immigration was on the rise, with almost 20 million immigrants arriving in the United States between 1880 and 1920. The first significant wave of immigration to the United States began in the 1840s, and the majority of new arrivals were from Ireland and Germany. The majority of the new immigrants, on the other hand, were from Southern and Eastern Europe.
The "new" style of immigrants' arrival altered America's ethnic composition and stirred up anti-immigrant feelings. In the minds of the US population, they represented unfamiliar cultures and customs, as well as the usual stereotypes of being uneducated, criminal, and unassimilable.
As a result, Americans wanted to regulate and limit immigration, and some states passed anti-immigration laws and set up organizations to support them. Some people believed that the only way to protect American culture was to prevent further immigration.
For more information on American population visit:
brainly.com/question/28654368
#SPJ11
Who is Simón Bolívar
Answer: Simón Bolívar, was an important leader from Venezuela.
Explanation: Simón Bolívar, he was also known as El Libertador, he was an important leader from Venezuela who helped free several South American countries from Spanish rule in the early 1800s.
He was born on July 24, 1783, in Caracas, Venezuela, and dedicated his life to fighting for independence. Bolívar is considered one of the most influential figures in Latin American history.
Bolívar led military campaigns called the Bolivarian Wars between 1810 and 1826. These wars resulted in the liberation of present-day Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. He had a big dream of creating a united and independent country called Gran Colombia, which would include these countries.
Throughout his life, Bolívar believed in important values like freedom, equality, and fairness. He worked to end slavery and wanted to establish governments that allowed people to have a say in how they were ruled. Bolívar was inspired by ideas from the Enlightenment, a time when people started valuing reason and individual rights, and the French Revolution, which was a movement for equality and democracy.
Even though Bolívar had many victories, he faced challenges like disagreements within the regions he liberated, military setbacks, and political problems.
After achieving significant successes, he decided to give up his power in 1826 and spent the rest of his life in exile. Bolívar passed away on December 17, 1830, at the age of 47 in Santa Marta, Colombia.
Today, Simón Bolívar is remembered as a symbol of independence and nationalism in Latin America. His ideas and actions continue to inspire leaders and movements in the region. Bolívar is considered a visionary leader who fought for people's freedom and the right to govern themselves.
Evaluate the culture free-enterprise has created in the U.S, with its emphasis on
freedom of producers, consumers, and competition. Things you might consider
include whether the U,S, is healthy culture, what the chances are that the culture
will remain intact as opposed to evolving or disintegrating into some other kind of
culture. Another approach might be to consider the how much Americans tend to
form communities or live relatively isolated existences. Does free enterprise tend
to promote community or destroy it?
The culture created by free enterprise in the United States emphasizes the freedom of producers, consumers, and competition. While it has brought economic prosperity and individual freedoms, its impact on the overall culture and sense of community in the country is complex. There are arguments for both the promotion and potential destruction of community under free enterprise.
The culture fostered by free enterprise in the United States has been characterized by a strong emphasis on individual freedom, economic opportunity, and competition. This has led to a dynamic and innovative economy, with a wide range of choices available to consumers and opportunities for entrepreneurs and businesses to thrive. The culture of free enterprise has encouraged self-reliance, personal initiative, and the pursuit of individual goals and aspirations. It has also contributed to a strong sense of individualism, where personal success and achievement are highly valued.
However, the emphasis on individual freedom and competition can also have implications for community and social cohesion. Some argue that free enterprise promotes a more fragmented and isolated society, as individuals prioritize their own interests over collective well-being. The pursuit of profit and market competition may undermine community bonds and cooperation, as people become focused on their own economic success. Additionally, inequalities in wealth and access to resources that can arise under free enterprise can further exacerbate social divisions and weaken community ties.
The impact of free enterprise on community and culture is not straightforward and depends on various factors such as societal values, government policies, and individual choices. While free enterprise has undoubtedly contributed to economic growth and individual freedoms in the United States, its influence on community and the potential for community-building or erosion are ongoing debates. Ultimately, the future of the culture created by free enterprise in the U.S. will depend on how society navigates the tensions between individualism and community and addresses the challenges and inequalities that arise in a market-driven economy.
Learn more about individual freedoms here:
https://brainly.com/question/727635
#SPJ11
