Answer: Trao đổi thông tin hoặc chia sẻ thông tin có nghĩa là mọi người hoặc các thực thể khác truyền thông tin từ người này sang người khác. Điều này có thể được thực hiện bằng điện tử hoặc thông qua các hệ thống nhất định. Đây là những thuật ngữ có thể đề cập đến việc truyền thông tin hai chiều trong viễn thông và khoa học máy tính hoặc truyền thông được nhìn từ quan điểm lý thuyết hệ thống hoặc lý thuyết thông tin. Như, "thông tin", trong ngữ cảnh này luôn đề cập đến dữ liệu (điện tử) mã hóa và đại diện cho thông tin có sẵn, một phương pháp xử lý rộng hơn có thể được tìm thấy trong quá trình trao đổi dữ liệu.
Explanation:
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Courtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
18. Which technique provides a smooth transition from acceleration to braking? A. Skid braking B. Cover braking C. Squeeze braking D. Gentle braking
Answer:
D
Explanation:
when the car weight transfers to the front end, the nose of the car is pointing down. easing off the brake will the nose back up making the braking smooth.
'न्यायपालिकाको महत्व,कानुन सुसासनको निम्ति' यो शिर्षकमा निबन्ध लेख।
Answer:
Judicial power is The court system that interprets and enforces the law (apply the law) on behalf of the state. The judiciary is also a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the doctrine of segregation, the judiciary often does not make laws. (Which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce the law (which is the responsibility of the administration), but interpret the law and apply the law to the facts of each case. The judiciary is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under the law. It usually consists of the supreme court of final appeal, known as the "supreme court" or "constitutional court", together with the lower courts.
Amanda and Kelly used to be friends after an argument with Amanda Kelly tell everyone at the galley middle school to me at the nearby park after school to watch her fight Amanda everyone at the school met at the park and watch Kelly fight and punched her over and over a student cause the police what do you think the consequences should be for Kelly
Answer:
Is this like a legit question
You are a prosecutor and are preparing for an upcoming trial. This is a case of arson, and the defendant is accused of setting fire to a barn, causing it to burn to the ground. You have an abundance of physical evidence that points to the defendant, but you also discover that a set of shoeprints found at the scene matches another suspect. This would be an example of what type of evidence?
Based on the information, the given case is an example of exculpatory evidence.
What is evidence?Evidence is referred to as proof or objects that provide factual information based on true events. This factual information helps to identify whether the events took place or not. it helps to validate the credibility of the sources.
In the given case, it is explained that you are a prosecutor getting ready for a trial that is coming up. There is a huge amount of physical evidence that supports the defendant, but you also learn that another suspect's shoeprints were also located at the scene.
Evidence that tends to minimize, or explain an accused's claimed wrongdoing is referred to as exculpatory evidence. In a criminal trial, any evidence that is beneficial to the defendant is regarded as exculpatory.
Learn more about Evidence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ2
will transformation in Corrections ever come to an end?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
In simple words, every law that is made or corrected is based on the current needs and aspirations of the society. And it is also a big fact that the basic societal structure of any community keeps on changing time by time. Hence, the transformations in corrections will keep on happening as the world keeps moving on.
Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
Do you think that marriage is different than merely being in love? Having a romantic relationship may help reduce crime; if so, what happens when the couple breaks up? Does that increase the likelihood of criminal involvement?
Answer:
I don't think marriage is different than being in love because you want to spend the rest of your life with that person. But I think if the couple breaks up there will be a slight chance to increase the likelihood of criminal involvement because breaking up is an intense emotion to feel
mCours
days must register their vehidets).
Question 2:
Select the best answer from the multiple choices below
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than
29
03
13
30
300
were
Posto
mpleted
answered
answered
answered
answered
answered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
unanswered
21 answered
22. Unanswered
23 Unanswered
Suhant Exam for Crossing
Time remaining to complete exam in minutes): 180
wered
Answer:
It's 90 days but u don't have that a optionExplanation:
90 days
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than 90 days must register their vehicles. If you are a new Texas resident, you are allowed to drive with your valid and unexpired licence from another U.S. state, U.S territory or a Canadian province for up to 90 days after moving here.
Answer: I don’t know how to answer this question
Explanation:
there is also no possible question, sorry
how does the criminal justice system deals with vulnerable groups such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex ( LGBTQI) community amongst others when they are victims of hate crimes
Answer:
depending on the country of justice system implementation we are talking about, some countries protect their rights as minorities while others prohibited the prevalence of such groups
Answer:by using the law
Explanation:
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she wins the prize for her academic and literary works. The award comes with a $1,000,000 cash prize that Melinda then donates to the City of Denver. Melinda is not required to take any action after receiving the cash prize. Is Melinda required to include the cash award in Gross Income?
Answer:
Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.
Explanation:
Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .
which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?
1)An employer may give an employee a bonus as exchange for him or her not exercising the right to freedom of association.
2)Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unioun.
3)The right of workers to freedom of association is only protected in terms of the constitution.
4)Close shop agreement are unconstitutional as the infringe workers right to freedom of association.
Answer:
The correct answer is 2. Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unions.
Explanation:
The freedom of association is a fundamental right for groups of people, which has been formulated in various places. This fundamental right is sometimes used in conjunction with the freedom of assembly.
With the emergence of the new, large and important class in the form of industrial workers, there was a greater awareness of the essence of freedom, which was reflected in freedom of speech, freedom of the press and thus freedom of association. At that time it was about the principle that workers and other citizens can unite in a group (trade unions, political parties) that promote the interests of this group of people. Freedom of association is a logical feature of a liberal vision because it represents the ultimate means of exerting (political) pressure on government and society. Without this right one would not have been able to participate in the governance of a country or company. That is why this right became essential for the formation of a democratic, liberal state.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to a. whatever is reasonable. b. the new terms of the acceptance. c. none of the terms. d. the terms of the original offer.
D. The terms of the original offer.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to the terms of the original offer. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is contract?
An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.
Dona is offered the to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Ema was the suggested to also add the TV set are the pay for $700. The terms according to case are the original offer. Original Offer are those type of the contract are the purchased to the all the items or asset to the other parties.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
what are the elements of access control
Answer: Identification: For access control to be effective, it must provide some way to identify an individual. ...
Authentication: Identification requires authentication. ...
Authorization: The set of actions allowed to a particular identity makes up the meat of authorization.
Explanation:
Law is always enforced by the state in the society it operates
Law is always enforced by the state in the society it operates
you are researching the effect of air pollution on human health.you find information from the following sources.which of these would likely be the LEAST biased?
Answer:
Any sources related to industries that cause air pollution such as Oil refineries, cigarette companies, thermal electricity generating firms and the like.
Explanation:
A biased source in a subject usually has some sort of interest in it which is usually financial. This is why we'd expect cigarette companies to lie about the effects of smoking on the lungs.
It is the same thing here. You included no options but the biased source should be one that stands to benefit from misleading the public on the effects of air pollution on health so that people are less enraged and they can continue benefitting from their harmful activities.
what is rule of law
Answer:
Restrictions that would enforce pepopel from wrong doings with the consequences listed.
Explanation:
is democracy a type of government? Or is it just a law/rule of government? help me out yall pls
Answer:
Democracy, meaning "rule of the people", is a system of government in which the citizens exercise power directly or elect representatives from among themselves to form a governing body, such as a parliament. Democracy is sometimes referred to as "rule of the majority".
Explanation:
Country B has a GDP of $1 trillion and a GDP per capita of $27,000. Its economy is a mix of manufacturing, high tech, services, aviation, agriculture, and mining. It has laws favorable to entrepreneurship and private sector growth. It has multinational corporations that have recently begun outsourcing jobs overseas, resulting in a rise in unemployment. Look for factors that will help you determine what type of economy exists in Country B. Which type of economy does Country B have?
Answer:
The answer is "GDP and GDP per capita are also the increased concentrations of economic growth".
Explanation:
In the developed country, growth and security are high. These are evaluated on a per meter and per person gross national savings, which would represent the whole value of all finished products and services generated for a specific time within a certain nation.
In developing countries, low infant mortality, long average lifespan, improved levels of use, great work as well as the exportation of goods are additional characteristics.
In this situation, you can see that GDP is fairly high and it gives us information that must be acknowledged as just a nation to its advanced economy.
Answer:
A. developed
Explanation:
i got it right on edge
why is the term judicial administration multifaceted
Answer:
Judicial administration
Explanation:
Judicial administration consists of the practices, procedures and offices that deal with the management of the system of the courts. Judicial administration, or administration of the courts, has traditionally been concerned with overseeing budgets, selecting juror pools, assigning judges to cases, creating court calendars of activities, and supervising non-judicial personnel. Court administrators, or clerks of the court, accept the filing of court documents, maintain a file system of cases and a record of all final judgments, and process paperwork generated by judges. Court administrators are also responsible for eliminating racial and gender bias in the courts, ensuring diversity in the court system, and providing easier access to the courts for persons representing themselves without an attorney (pro se or pro per litigants).
Can I helpfull of you
6969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969669696969696969696969696969
Answer:
what is the question
please mark me as brainlist
thanks
How soon after the conviction for driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs shall it be reported to the FAA and to which division should this be reported to?
Answer:
Within 60 days to the civil aviation security division
Explanation:
You have to report to the security and hazardous materials safety office which is under the civil aviation security division. Anybody that is holding any certificates under part 61 has to give a written report of every motor vehicle action that has to do with alcohol or drug-related, to the security personnel's in faa no later than 60 days after this action was done.
A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline company that distributed natural gas to providers throughout the country. A local gas company submitted the next highest bid, which included the commitment that it would pass along to local customers any savings if it was awarded the contract. The state awarded the contract to the local company. The interstate company sued to overturn this decision.
Should the interstate company prevail?
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
21. Who will be at fault if you hit a person getting out of a parked car? A. Nobody, because it is hard to see people getting out of cars. B. The person who wasn't careful and didn't see your car coming. C. You, which is why you should drive slowly and keep a lookout for doors opening or people getting out of cars. D. The city authorities for making city streets so difficult to drive.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The general rule is that the driver that hits the parked car is at fault for hitting a parked car. The reason the driver is usually at fault is because the car was parked and not moving, so the parked car could move out of the way to avoid the accident.
3. NEWSPAPER SAYS MAYOR IS A CROOK, LIAR, AND DRUNKARD
Explanation:
it depends on the Mayor's behaviour and attitude
and how he does his job as a mayor
Based on the three elements of the contract intended to create a legal relationship, capacity and judgment, advise Sandhu if there is a prospect for him to recover the additional commission as promised. (15 marks)
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
There is a remote prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf.
1. One can conclude that the promise of extra commission was made under undue influence when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. We were not told that Sandhu did the job based on this additional commission. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended it to be legal.
3. There is a lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? There is absolutely no consideration from Sandhu.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached, signed, and sealed. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? Certainly not.
Which of the following statement is true? a) Consideration need not be any particular value. b) Consideration should accord the deed of the person who is at the position to do it. c) Consideration may proceed the promise that the promise or promisor pass to each other. d) An act done at the desire of a third party is equal to consideration.
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
Answer:
All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.
Explanation:
This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness. HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing. This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face. The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.
Leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), but only if there are major injuries to others or private property.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice refers to the legal system which governs all the members of the military of the United States of America. It covers a number of legal issues from the apprehension and the confinement of military personnel to the regulations covering courts of the military appeals.
It defines criminal offenses under military system.
The German Law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice has strict laws against road accidents.
Incase of a accident, the drive must stay at the scene. If the driver leaves the scene, a serious criminal offense will be register against him of hit and run. The driver must stay and turn on the emergency flashers and also put up the warning triangle.
Thus the answer is TRUE.
It is A. TRUE that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
What is UCMJ?The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) applies to soldiers and other members of the armed forces when they are on active duty or on recall to active duty. It requires that these military personnel do not abandon victims of accidents at the scene.
Even the German law forbids persons from abandoning victims of accidents.
Thus, it is true that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense both under the German law and Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Learn more about the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) at https://brainly.com/question/6545593
Describe the experience of being a criminal defendant.
Answer:
eh, you face a lot of descrimination and hate especialy from people of the defendent family.
Explanation:
