hich statement best describes the domain and range of p(x) = 6–x and q(x) = 6x? p(x) and q(x) have the same domain and the same range. p(x) and q(x) have the same domain but different ranges. p(x) and q(x) have different domains but the same range. p(x) and q(x) have different domains and different ranges.

[tex]S_n=\dfrac{n(a_1+a_n)}{2}\\a_1=200\\a_n=1998\\n=?\\\\a_n=a_1+(n-1)d\\d=2\\1998=200+(n-1)\cdot2\\2n-2=1798\\2n=1800\\n=900\\\\S_{900}=\dfrac{900\cdot(200+1998)}{2}=450\cdot 2198=989100[/tex]

The Sum is 989100.

The sum of even numbers formula is determined by using the formula to find the arithmetic progression. The sum of even numbers goes on until infinity. The sum of even numbers formula can also be evaluated using the sum of natural numbers formula. We need to obtain the formula for 2 + 4+ 6+ 8+ 10 +...... 2n.

The sum of even numbers = 2(1 + 2+ 3+ .....n). This implies 2(sum of n natural numbers) = 2[n(n+1)]/2 = n(n+1)

Given:

a1 = 200

an= 1998

So, using formula

S= n(a1 + an)/2

now,

d=2

an= a1+(n-1)d

1998= 200 + (n-1) 2

1998-200= (n-1)2

1798/2=n-1

n= 900

S900= 900( 200 + 1998)/2

        =450*2198

       = 989100

Hence, the sum is 989100.

Learn more about this concept here:

https://brainly.com/question/18837188

#SPJ2

Answer: 2 years

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given graph, we have

Account Balance ($) on y-axis

Time (years) on x-axis.

To know the time taken to get a balance of $60 , we check the point corresponding to 60 at y-axis and then join it to the line of the function and stop.

Then from there we drop a line to x-axis.

We get x=2.

That is it will take 2 years to get $60 balance in Debra's account.

So the correct answer is 2 years.

Answer:

so to get a third you divide it by 3

first convert it to fraction

so it is 26/3

so do 26/3 divided by 3

so we do keep switch flip

26/3*1/3

so answer is 26/9 or 2 8/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{\mathrm{2 \ 8/9 \ tablespoons \ of \ red \ chilies }}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

8 2/3 tablespoons of red chilies is required for a recipe.

One-third of the original recipe would mean that the quantity of red chilies will be also one-third.

8 2/3 × 1/3

Convert to an improper fraction.

26/3 × 1/3

Multiply the fractions.

26/(3 × 3) = 26/9

Convert to a mixed fraction.

26/9 = 2 8/9

Answer: At-least 89% of employees with commuting times between 54 minutes and 72 minutes .

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: Commuting times for employees of a local company have a mean of 63 minutes and a standard deviation of 3 minutes.

Now, 54 minutes = (63 - 9) minutes

= (63 -3(3)) minutes

= Mean - 3 standard deviation

72 minutes =  (63 + 9) minutes

=63 +3(3) minutes

= Mean + 3 standard deviation

According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least [tex]\dfrac{8}{9}[/tex] of the data lie within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

i.e. The percentage of employees with commuting times between 54 minutes and 72 minutes = [tex]\dfrac{8}{9}\times100\approx89\%[/tex]

Hence, at-least 89% of employees with commuting times between 54 minutes and 72 minutes .

Answer:

8)  1.962 miles

9)  (-2, -1.5)

10) 0.515 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

√(-9 - 5)² + (1 - -4)² = 14.866

14.866 x .132 = 1.962

(-9+5)/2, (1 + -4)/2

-4/2, -3/2

-2, -3/2

√(-2 - 1)² + (-3/2 - -4)² = 3.905

3.905 x .132 = 0.515 miles

Answer:

d. The graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) reflected over the x-axis.

Step-by-step explanation:

The standard transformation

g(x) = - f(x)

is a simple reflection about the x-axis.

So the answer is the last option.

Answer:

Last one

Step-by-step explanation:

The function we are interested in are g(x) and f(x).

● g(x)= (-1/x)

● f(x)= 1/x

Notice what happens when we input the same values in both functions.

● g(1) = -1/1 = -1

● f(x) = 1/1 = 1

●g(2) = -1/2 = -0.5

● f(2) = 1/2 = 0.5

Notice that we get opposite values by imputing the same number.

Wich means:

●f(x) = -g(x)

So the graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) reflected over the x axis.

Answer:

C = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

solution:

f(x) can be differentiated on (0,16)

By mean value theorem

= f(16) = 4

= f(0) = 0

= f(b) - f(a)/b - a

= f(4) - f(0)/ f(16) - f(0)

= f'(c) = 1/2√C

= 1/2√C = 4/16

= 1/2√C = 1/4

= 4 = 2√C

= √C = 4/2

we make c the subject of the formula and also eliminate the square root

= √C = 2

= C = 2²

= C = 4

Answer:

a) Means: 24 and 2; Extremes: 4 and 12

b) Means: 6 and 16; Extremes: 24 and 4

c) Means: 8 and 8; Extremes: 4 and 16

d) Means: 50 and 3; Extremes: 6 and 25

Step-by-step explanation:

The Means and Extremes in a proportion are defined based on the writing the proportion in one lie using colons the indicate the fraction, like in:

a : b = c : d The extremes values here are those that you see at the extreme left and extreme right of that expression. That is: a, and d.

The Means are the values that appear in the middle of the one line expression, that is: b and c.

Recall as well that the proportion can also be written with fractions:

a : b = c : d  is the same as:   a / b = c / d

so convert the expression to a one line with colons when the question comes in fraction form, and that way you can answer.

Answer:

Yes,

Step-by-step explananation

The quotient of two rational numbers is always rational, and the reason for this lies in the fact that the product of two integers is always an rational number.

The Quotient of two Rational Numbers is a Rational Number if and only if Numerator and Denominator are Multiples.

From Algebra, we know that a Rational Number is a Real Number of the form:

[tex]x = \frac{a}{b}[/tex], [tex]a, b\in \mathbb{N}[/tex], [tex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/tex] (1)

Where:

The Quotient can be an Integer or not. In the first case, all Quotients have their equivalent Rational Numbers.

Now, if we divide a Rational Number by another Rational Number, then we have the following expression:

[tex]x' = \frac{x_{1}}{x_{2}}[/tex]

If [tex]x'[/tex] is a Rational Number, then it must also an Integer and if [tex]x'[/tex] is an Integer, then [tex]x_{1}[/tex] and [tex]x_{2}[/tex] must be Multiples of each other.

The Quotient of two Rational Numbers is a Rational Number if and only if Numerator and Denominator are Multiples.

Please see this question related to Rational Numbers: https://brainly.com/question/24398433

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

What we do to one side of the equation we have to do to the other side.

3x - 6 = 18

Add 6 to both sides

3x = 24

Divide both sides by 3

x = 8

The answer is 8

Hope this helps!

Answer:

x=8

Step-by-step explanation:

(3x-6)=18

Add 6 to each side

(3x-6+6)=18+6

3x= 24

Divide by 3

3x/3 = 24/3

x = 8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, by definition a perfect square can be written as [tex]a^2[/tex] where a in a positive integer.

So, to answer the first question, [tex]6^2[/tex] is a perfect square.

(a,b,c) is a Pythagorean triple means the following

[tex]a^2+b^2=c^2[/tex]

Here, it means that

[tex]x^2=20^2+21^2=841=29^2 \ \ \ so\\\\x=29[/tex]

Thank you.

Answer:

Its B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

----------

( n+1)(n+2)

Step-by-step explanation:

5

----------

n ( n+1)

Replace n with n+1

5

----------

(n+1) ( n+1+1)

5

----------

( n+1)(n+2)

We replace every 'n' with n+1 and simplify

[tex]\frac{5}{(n+1)(n+1+1)} = \frac{5}{(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex]

Answer:

The P-Value is  0.07186  

Step-by-step explanation:

GIven that :

Mean = 70

standard deviation = 3.5

sample size n = 49

sample mean = 69.1

The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows;

[tex]H_o : \mu = 70 \\ \\ H_1 : \mu \neq 70[/tex]

The standard z score formula can be expressed as follows;

[tex]\mathtt{z = \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{z = \dfrac{69.1 - 70}{\dfrac{3.5}{\sqrt{49}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{z = \dfrac{-0.9}{\dfrac{3.5}{7}}}[/tex]

z = -1.8

Since the test is two tailed and using the Level of significance = 0.05

P- value = 2 × P( Z< - 1.8)

From normal tables

P- value = 2 × (0.03593)

The P-Value is  0.07186  

Answer:

Option (2)

Step-by-step explanation:

In an arithmetic progression,

[tex]a_1,a_2,a_3.........a_{n-1},a_n[/tex]

First term of the progression,

a = [tex]a_1[/tex]

Common difference 'd' = [tex](a_2-a_1)[/tex]

Recursive formula for the sequence,

a = [tex]a_1[/tex]

[tex]a_n=a_{n-1}+d[/tex]

By applying these rules in the recursive formula,

[tex]a_1=\frac{4}{5}[/tex]

[tex]a_n=a_{n-1}+\frac{3}{2}[/tex]

Common difference 'd' = [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex]

Therefore, Option (2) will be the answer.

Answer:

The answer is below

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 52 cards in a deck, 12 of these cards are face cards (4 kings, 4 queens and 4 jacks) and 40 are not face cards

a. Find the probability that the first card is a face card and the second is NOT a face card.

There are 12 first card, the probability that the first card is a face card is 12/52.

Since there are no replacement, after picking 1 face card the number of cards remaining is 51, the probability of the second card not being a face card = 40/51. Therefore:

The probability that the first card is a face card and the second is NOT a face card = P(first is face card) × P(second is not face card)  = 12/52 × 40/51 = 40/221

b) Find the probability that they are both face cards.

The probability that the first card is a face card is 12/52.

Since there are no replacement, after picking 1 face card the number of cards remaining is 51 and the number of face card remaining is 11, the probability of the second card is a face card = 11/51. Therefore:

The probability that they are both face cards = P(first is face card) × P(second is face card)  = 12/52 × 11/51 = 11/221

c) Find the probability that the second is a face card given the first is NOT a face card.

The probability that the first card is not a face card = 40/52

Since there are no replacement, after picking the first card the number of cards remaining is, the probability of the second card is a face card = 12/51. Therefore:

The probability that the second is a face card given the first is NOT a face card = P(first is not a face card) × P(second is face card)  = 40/52 × 12/51 = 40/221

Answer:c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: The answer is C.

Hope this helps you!

Answer:

m = [tex]\frac{y-6}{x}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

y = mx + 6 ( subtract 6 from both sides )

y - 6 = mx ( divide both sides by x )

[tex]\frac{y-6}{x}[/tex] = m

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, "the constant term has been written on the right side", it means that we add 18 to both sides to get.

[tex]x^2+3x-18=0\\\\x^2+3x=18\\\\\text{We can see the beginning of } (x+\dfrac{3}{2})^2 \\\\x^2+3x=(x+\dfrac{3}{2})^2-\dfrac{3^3}{2^2}=18\\\\(x+\dfrac{3}{2})^2=18+\dfrac{9}{4}=\dfrac{18*4+9}{4}=\dfrac{81}{4}[/tex]

Hope this helps.

Thank you.

Answer:

2.25.

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2 + 3x - 18 = 0

First, we need to write the constant on the right of the equation. So, we add 18 to both sides.

x^2 + 3x = 18.

Now, we find the number that will complete the square. It will be [tex](\frac{b}{2} )^2[/tex].

In this case, b = 3.

[tex](\frac{3}{2} )^2[/tex]

= (1.5)^2

= 2.25.

So, the number that will complete the square to solve the equation is 2.25, or 2 and 1/4, or 9/4.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The test statistic for testing if the proportion of high-altitude vehicles exceeding the standard is greater than the proportion of low-altitude vehicles exceeding the standard is 3.234.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a random sample of 380 cars driven at low altitudes, 42 of them exceeded a standard of 10 grams of particulate pollution per gallon of fuel consumed.

In an independent random sample of 90 cars driven at high altitudes, 24 of them exceeded the standard.

Let [tex]p_1[/tex] = population proportion of cars driven at high altitudes who exceeded a standard of 10 grams.

[tex]p_2[/tex] = population proportion of cars driven at low altitudes who exceeded a standard of 10 grams.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]p_1\leq p_2[/tex]      {means that the proportion of high-altitude vehicles exceeding the standard is smaller than or equal to the proportion of low-altitude vehicles exceeding the standard}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]p_1>p_2[/tex]      {means that the proportion of high-altitude vehicles exceeding the standard is greater than the proportion of low-altitude vehicles exceeding the standard}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample z-test statistics for proportions;

                             T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }[/tex]  ~  N(0,1)

where, [tex]\hat p_1[/tex] = sample proportion of cars driven at high altitudes who exceeded a standard of 10 grams = [tex]\frac{24}{90}[/tex] = 0.27

[tex]\hat p_2[/tex] = sample proportion of cars driven at low altitudes who exceeded a standard of 10 grams = [tex]\frac{42}{380}[/tex] = 0.11

[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of cars driven at high altitudes = 90

[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of cars driven at low altitudes = 380

So, the test statistics =  [tex]\frac{(0.27-0.11)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.27(1-0.27)}{90}+\frac{0.11(1-0.11)}{380} } }[/tex]      

                                   =  3.234

The value of z-test statistics is 3.234.

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in population means is (−26.325175  , 36.325175)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

sample size n₁ = 36

sample mean [tex]\over\ x[/tex]₁ = 83

standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex]₁ = 5

sample size n₂ = 49

sample mean [tex]\over\ x[/tex]₂= 78

standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex]₂ = 3

The objective is to construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the population means

Let the population means be [tex]\mu_1[/tex]  and  [tex]\mu_2[/tex]

The 95% confidence interval or the difference in population means can be calculated by using the formula;

[tex](\overline{x_1} - \overline{x_2}) \pm t_{\alpha /2} \ \times s_{p}[/tex]

where;

the pooled standard deviation  [tex]s_{p} = \dfrac{(n_1-1)s_1^2+(n_2-1)s^2_2}{n_1+n_2-2}[/tex]

[tex]s_{p} = \dfrac{(36-1)5^2+(49-1)3^2}{36+49-2}[/tex]

[tex]s_{p} = \dfrac{(35)25+(48)9}{83}[/tex]

[tex]s_{p} = \dfrac{875+432}{83}[/tex]

[tex]s_{p} = \dfrac{1307}{83}[/tex]

[tex]s_p[/tex] = 15.75

degree of freedom = [tex]n_1 +n_2 -2[/tex]

degree of freedom = 36+49 -2

degree of freedom = 85 - 2

degree of freedom = 83

The Critical t- value 95% CI at df = 83 is

t  critical = T.INV.2T(0.05, 83) = 1.9889

Therefore, for the population mean , we have:

= (83 - 78) ± (1.9889 × 15.75)

= 5 ± 31.325175

= 5  - 31.325175 , 5 + 31.325175

= (−26.325175  , 36.325175)

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first question, you should multiply the scale dimension by 30 to get the actual dimension. This is because the scale is 1:30 where the scale dimension is the 1 and the actual dimension is 30, so therefore, the scale dimension is 1/30th of the actual dimension, so to get the actual dimension, we can multiply the scale dimension by 30. I'm not totally sure how to attach pictures from my phone on my computer (sorry) but an example of a drawing could be two rectangles, the first (this is the scale drawing) having dimensions of 1 by 2 units and the second (this is the actual drawing) having dimensions of 30 by 60 units. I hope this helps!

Answer:

The [tex]L_{ACL}[/tex] of the player is  [tex]L_{ACL} = 56.82 \ mm[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

       The relationship between the length [tex]L_{ACL}[/tex] to the height is  

            [tex]L_{ACL} = 0.04606h - (41.29 \ mm)[/tex]

       The height of the basketball player  is  [tex]h = 2.13 \ m = 2130 \ mm[/tex]

Substituting the value of height of the basket ball player in to the model we have the [tex]L_{ACL}[/tex] of the player is

          [tex]L_{ACL} = 0.04606 (2130) - (41.29 ) \ mm[/tex]

         [tex]L_{ACL} = 56.82 \ mm[/tex]

Answer:

D. Factoring trinomials

Step-by-step explanation:

The factoring trinomials method is the best way to factor the expression, since it is in the standard trinomial form ax² + bx + c

In this method, you can factor the expression by finding 2 factors of c that add up to b.

The expression is not in the simplest form, and difference of squares cannot be used because there are no perfect squares. Prime factorization is also not used for factoring expressions with variables.

So, D is the right answer.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

A sequence is defined as a list of numbers or objects in a special order.

They may be arithmetic or geometric or neither.

For example

0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ..... ← is the sequence of square numbers.

Note it is neither arithmetic or geometric.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter of a square:

4(L)

L = Length

=> 4(L) = 48

=> 4L = 48

=> 4L/4 = 48/4

=> L = 12

The length of the square is 12 cm.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the lengths of the sides of a square are equal, divide the perimeter by 4

Answer:

[tex]IQR=Q_{3}-Q_{1}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The inter-quartile range is a measure of dispersion of a data set.

It is the difference between the third and the first quartile.

[tex]IQR=Q_{3}-Q_{1}[/tex]

The 1st quartile (Q₁) is well defined as the mid-value amid the minimum figure and the median of the data set. The 2nd quartile (Q₂) is the median of the data. The 3rd quartile (Q₃) is the mid-value amid the median and the maximum figure of the data set.

Answer:

B. j(kl)

Step-by-step explanation:

(jk)l

We can change the order we multiply and still get the same result

j(kl)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its B i did it

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\sf 10}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The additive number of any number is the number when added to the number gives a result of zero.

So, if we add 10 to -10 we get a result of zero.

=> -10+10

=> Zero

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information;

let the hypotenuse be a , the opposite which is the north direction be b and the west direction which is the adjacent be c

SO, using the Pythagoras theorem

a² = c² + 177²

By taking the differentiation of both sides with respect to time t , we have

[tex]2a \dfrac{da}{dt} = 2c \dfrac{dc}{dt} + 0[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{da}{dt} = \dfrac{c}{a} \dfrac{dc}{dt}[/tex]

At c = 71 miles,[tex]a = \sqrt{ (71)^2 +(177)^2}[/tex]

[tex]a = \sqrt{ 5041+31329}[/tex]

[tex]a = \sqrt{ 36370}[/tex]

a = 190.71

SImilarly, [tex]\dfrac{dc}{dt} = \ 31 miles \ / hr[/tex]

Thus, the rate of change of the distance between Morristown and the van when the van has been travelling for 71 miles can be calculate as:

[tex]\dfrac{da}{dt} = \dfrac{c}{a} \dfrac{dc}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{da}{dt} = \dfrac{71}{190.71} \times 31[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{da}{dt} = 0.37229 \times 31[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{\dfrac{da}{dt} = 11.54}[/tex]  to the nearest hundredth.

Answer: Yes

Explanation: Yes because, sometimes you need to do stuff to get things of your head