Help pls asap!!! Make sure to answer all of them!

Answer:

(2,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Its a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

28% are green or red

Step-by-step explanation:

hi i know i'm late but might as well add my answer!

here's your answer: B D E or

B.choosing 1 red marble

D.choosing 1 white marble, replacing it, and choosing another white marble

E.choosing 1 white marble    

hope i helped

Answer:

b d and e

Step-by-step explanation:

ya

Answer:

1799 members in the art club i think but i don't have a bar graph

Step-by-step explanation:

^^

Answer:

36 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

504/14=36

The number of years it would take the amount to triple is 25 years.

The formula that would be used to determine the number of years it would take the balance to triple is:

FV = PV  x [tex]e^{r}[/tex]N

Where:

3 = [tex]e^{0.044}[/tex]N

Take the log of both sides

log(3) / log(e) /  (0.044) = 25 years

A similar question was answered here: https://brainly.com/question/7133042

Answer:

3b

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]3\sqrt{b^{2} }[/tex]

= 3b

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{6}{12} + \frac{1}{2} \\ = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \\ = \frac{2}{2} \\ = \frac{1}{1} \\ = 1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay so, let's turn these into decimals first (rounded to nearest 2 thousandths).

2/3 = 0.66666 (repeating), to the nearest 2 thousandths would be 0.66.

-2 1/4 = -9/4 = -2.25

-1 1/2 = -3/2 = -1.5

then we set up the problem

0.66 × -2.25 × -1.5 = 2.2275 rounded 2.22 as an improper fraction 111/50 and that cannot be simplified any smaller.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

20=total marbles

  7/20 × 6/20=  21/400   or 5.25%

   red     white

Answer:

40%

Step-by-step explanation:

2/5 = 40/100 = 40%

Answer:

Exact Form:

C=23/24

Decimal Form:

C=0.9583

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$499

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the price was reduced from an amount which is $2,498. You have to take that amount and the other amount which is $1999 and subtract them both.

2489-1999=499

(When you get your answer,make sure to add the dollar sign.)

The price was reduced by $499.

Based on the investment ratio and the amount invested, the amount that Zach invested is $102,857.14.

First thing to do is to add up the numbers in the ratio:

= 1 + 2 + 0.5

= 3.5

The amount that Zach invested is:

= Zach's ration/ Sum of ratio x Amount invested

= 1 / 3.5 x 360,000

= $102,857.14

In conclusion, Zach invested $102,857.14.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/17061956.

Answer:

So for Shop A 10, a pack of 10 pens is going to be 2.30. To get to 70 pens we must multiply

7x2.30

=$16.10

For Shop B you must  first divide

70 divided by 5 = 14 packs of pens in total, divide 14 by 2 because half of the packs will be half off.

so, 7x1.60

=$11.20- then divide 1.60 by 2 = $0.80,

then multiply by 7

=$5.60, then add the the two numbers for Shop B,

$11.20 + $5.60= 16.80

Step-by-step explanation:

So if you buy pens from Shop A you will spend $16.10, If your buying pens for Shop B you will spend $16.80

The difference from buying pens from Shop A and Shop B would be $0.70

Answer:

Hence , (a,0) is a zeros of a function

Step-by-step explanation:

y=-7/5x-1/5

=-7×5/5x-1

=-35/5x-1

Step-by-step explanation:

An example of direct variation would be the relationship of distance with time when speed is constant.

Let's assume you travel at the speed of 60 mph. The distance at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours would be 0, 30, 60, 120 miles.

This is a linear relationship and produces a graph of line.

See the graph.

--------------------

An example of inverse variation would be the time to complete the same work as number of workers increase.

Assume 5 workers complete wok in 20 days, 10 workers do same in 10 days, 20 workers do in 5 days.

This relationship produces a curved line.

See the graph.

Answer:

4.75 divided by 5 =0.95

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A: the area of the walls that are being painted

C: the cost per gallon of different paints

F: the number of square feet that can be painted per gallon of paint

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

22

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I hate you

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let q represent the quantity of 15% dressing used. Then the amount of 5% dressing is (390 -q). The amount of vinegar in the mix is ...

  0.15q + 0.05(390 -q) = 0.08(390)

  0.10q = 31.2 -19.5 = 11.7 . . . . . . subtract 0.05(390) and simplify

  q = 117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . multiply by 10

  390-q = 273

The chef should use 273 mL of the first brand (5% vinegar) and 117 mL of the second brand (15% vinegar).

__

Additional comment

You may have noticed that the value of q is (0.08 -0.05)/(0.10 -0.05)×390. The fraction of the mix that is the highest contributor is the ratio of the difference between the mix value and least contributor, divided by the difference between the contributors: (8-5)/(15-5) = 3/10, the fraction that is 15% vinegar. This is the generic solution to mixture problems.

Answer:

10^2

Step-by-step explanation:

10^9/10^7 is the same as 10^9*10^-7 if you multiply two same bases you can add there exponents. So, 9+(-7)=2. So, it’s 10^2

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps

Using the t-distribution, it is found that since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the left tailed test, there is not enough evidence to show that the patients with schizophrenia have less TBV on average than a  patient that is considered normal.

At the null hypothesis, we test if patients with schizophrenia do not have less TBV on average than a  patient that is considered normal, that is, the subtraction is not negative, hence:

[tex]H_0: \mu_S - \mu_N \geq 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if they have less, that is, if the subtraction is negative, hence:

[tex]H_1: \mu_S - \mu_N < 0[/tex]

Regarding each sample, the mean and standard deviation are found using a calculator.

[tex]\mu_N = 1463339.2, s_N = 125458.28 , n_N = 32[/tex]

[tex]\mu_S = 1445132.3, s_S = 171355.8, n_S = 30[/tex]

We have the standard deviation for each sample, hence, the t-distribution will be used.

The standard errors are given by:

[tex]Se_N = \frac{125458.28}{\sqrt{32}} = 22178.1[/tex]

[tex]Se_S = \frac{171355.8}{\sqrt{30}} = 31285.1[/tex]

The distribution of the difference has mean and standard error given by:

[tex]\overline{x} = \mu_S - \mu_N = 1445132.3 - 1463339.2 = -18206.9 [/tex]

[tex]Se = \sqrt{Se_N^2 + Se_S^2} = \sqrt{22178.1^2 + 31285.1^2} = 38348.7[/tex]

The test statistic is given by:

[tex]t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{Se}[/tex]

In which [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the hypothesis.

Hence:

[tex]t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{Se}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{-18206.9 - 0}{38348.7}[/tex]

[tex]t = -0.47[/tex]

The critical value for a left-tailed test, as we are testing if the mean is less than a value, with a significance level of 0.1 and 32 + 30 - 2 = 60 df is [tex]t^{\ast} = 2[/tex]

Since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the left tailed test, there is not enough evidence to show that the patients with schizophrenia have less TBV on average than a  patient that is considered normal.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/13873630