Find the​ mean, median, and mode of the​ data, if possible. If any of these measures cannot be found or a measure does not represent the center of the​ data, explain why. The cholesterol levels of a sample of 10 female employees are listed below. 130130 145145 215215 170170 165165 225225 240240 185185 130130 132132 What is the mean cholesterol​ level? Select the correct choice below and fill in any answer box to complete your choice. A. The mean cholesterol level is nothing. ​(Round to one decimal place as​ needed.) B. There is no mean score.

Domain (infinity,infinity)

Range (infinity,[tex]\sqrt{7}[/tex])

Answer:

2/6 or 1/3 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

you have a 1 out of 2 chances to land tails and 1 out of 4 chance to role a 2 on the spinner. so in total there is 6 chances for rolling and flipping the coin. and there is only 1 chance for both in the odds.

therefore I believe that its is 1/3 or 2/6. I do not know if I am right exactly but that is my thought process.

Answer:

the answer would be D &F

Answer:

B; {x|x<-8}

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: AC = 2.33

Step-by-step explanation:

use tangent to find the missing side

Tangent = opposite/adjacent

tan B = ?/5

tan 25 = ?/5

multiply each side by 5

? = 2.33153829.....

so

AC = 2.33

Answer:

100x3=100  55x3=the answer    55x3=165 students   165 6th graders have a younger sibling.

Step-by-step explanation:

i did the assignment

55 percent of 300 is equal to 165.

A percentage is a number or ratio that can be expressed as a fraction of 100. If we have to calculate percent of a number, divide the number by the whole and multiply by 100.

Given,

55% of 300

55% can be written as fraction 55/100

= (55/100) × 300

Dividing 300 by 100

= 55 × 3

Multiplying

= 165

Hence, 165 is 55 percent of 300.

Learn more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/24159063

#SPJ5

Answer:

4x - 5y = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Any line parallel to 4x - 5y = 35 will have the same equation EXCEPT that the constant will be different.

Starting with 4x - 5y = 35, replace x with the given x-coordinate -5 and the given y-coordinate -6, and finally the given 35 with the constant C:

4(-5) - 5(-6) = C, or

-20 + 30 = C.  Thus, C = 10, and the equation of the new line is

4x - 5y = 10

The equation of line is 4x - 5y = 10

A straight line's general equation is y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. On the y-axis, this number c is referred to as the intercept. Key Point y = mx + c is the equation for a straight line with a gradient of m and an intercept of c on the y-axis.

Given the points (-5,-6)

and parallel to line 4x - 5y = 35...…..(1)

the equation of line is (y - y₁) = m( x - x₁)

for parallel line condition the value of m is equal to both equations

converting eq. 1 in the form of y = mx + c

4x - 5y = 35

we get y = 4/5x -7

here m = 4/5 and c = -7

substitute the value of m in  equation of line

where y₁ = -6; x₁ = -5

(y - (-6)) = 4/5(x - (-5))

y +6 = 4/5(x+5)

simplify above eq. we get

4x - 5y = 20

Hence the equation of  the line that passes through the point (- 5, - 6) is  4x - 5y = 20

Learn more about equation of line

https://brainly.com/question/29774095

#SPJ5

Answer:

a. Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

If the absolute value of the z-score is 2 or larger, X is considered a surprising outcome.

In this question:

[tex]\mu = 7, \sigma = 3[/tex]

Would you be surprised if it took less than one minute to find a parking space?

We have to find the z-score when X = 1. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{1 - 7}{3}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2[/tex]

Since Z = -2, the correct answer is:

a. Yes

Answer:

The answer of life is 42 just look it up

the answer is 8 because there is 4 sides on a square and 8 x 4 is 32.

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

H0: µ2≤µ1 versus H1: µ2>µ1

(Upper tailed test)

WE will consider differences as (New – Old).

From given data, we have

Dbar = 0.70

SD = 0.70

n = 5

Degrees of freedom = df = n – 1 = 5 – 1 = 4

Test statistic = t = (Dbar - µd) /[SD/sqrt(n)]

t = (0.70 – 0)/[0.70/sqrt(5)]

t = 0.70/ 0.3130

t = 2.2361

Critical value = 2.1318

(by using t-table)

P-value = 0.0445

(by using t-table)

P-value < α = 0.05

So, we reject the null hypothesis

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the average monthly sales revenue increases after the advertising.

Kindly check the first attached image for the graphical table.

Part b

P-value = 0.0445

α = 0.01

P-value > α = 0.01

So, we do not reject the null hypothesis

There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the average monthly sales revenue increases after the advertising.

Kindly check the second attached image for the graphical table.

Answer:

It will take 12 years using simple interest

Step-by-step explanation:

2,500 x 1.7% = 42.5

42.5 x 12 + 510

2500 +510 +3010

Answer:

z =2.76

Step-by-step explanation:

z - 2.3 = 0.46

Add 2.3 to each side

z - 2.3+2.3 = 0.46+2.3

z =2.76

Answer:

  7(5 +2)

Step-by-step explanation:

From our knowledge of times tables, we know that ...

  35 = 5·7

  14 = 2·7

so the greatest common factor of 35 and 14 is 7. Factoring that out, we have ...

  35 +14 = 7(5 +2)

Answer:

I would love to help you but all I see is dots

Answer:

D. Vertx: (3,-16); Intercepts: x = -1, 7

Step-by-step explanation:

I graphed the equation on the graph below.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

X₁: Weight of a safety helmet for racers

X₂: Price of a safety helmet for racers

Note, there is n= 17 observed values for each variable so for all calculations I'll use this number and disregard the 18 mentioned in the text.

a) Scatterplot in attachment.

b) If you look at the diagram it seems that there is a negative linear regression between the price and the weight of the helmets, meaning, the higher the helmet weights, the less it costs.

c) The estimated regression equation is ^Yi= a + bXi

n= 17; ∑Y= 6466; ∑Y²= 3063392; ∑X= 1008; ∑X²= 60294; ∑XY= 367536

Y[bar]= 380.35; X[bar]= 59.29

[tex]b= \frac{sumXY-\frac{(sumX)(sumY)}{n} }{sumX^2-\frac{(sumX)^2}{n} } = \frac{367536-\frac{1008*6466}{17} }{60294-\frac{(1008)^2}{17} } = -30.18[/tex]

[tex]a= Y[bar]- bX[bar]= 380.35-(-30.18)*59.29= 2169.77[/tex]

The estimated regression equation for the price of the helmets as a function of their weight is:

^Yi= 2169.77 -30.18Xi

I hope it helps!

Answer:

9 times

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Mathematically, 9, although reality wise, you could flip the coin and get heads every time, or the opposite.

I think you mean mathematically though, so yes, it would be 9.

The null and alternative hypothesis for the tests are:

H0: μ = 20

Ha: μ < 20

Given data:

In this situation, the null and alternative hypotheses can be formulated as follows:

Null Hypothesis (H0): The average weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill is equal to 20 pounds.

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): The average weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill is less than 20 pounds.

In symbolic notation:

H0: μ = 20

Ha: μ < 20

where μ represents the population mean weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill.

The null hypothesis assumes that the claim made by the company is accurate and that the average weight loss is indeed 20 pounds. The alternative hypothesis challenges this claim and suggests that the actual average weight loss may be less than 20 pounds, implying that the "hype" around the pill's effectiveness might be exaggerated.

To learn more about null and alternative hypothesis, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30535681

#SPJ12

Answer: pi/3

Step-by-step explanation:

correct on edge 2020

The equivalent value of trigonometric relation sin⁻¹ ( √3/2 ) = π/3

Trigonometry is the study of the relationships between the angles and the lengths of the sides of triangles

The six trigonometric functions are sin , cos , tan , cosec , sec and cot

Let the angle be θ , such that

sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse

cos θ = adjacent / hypotenuse

tan θ = opposite / adjacent

tan θ = sin θ / cos θ

cosec θ = 1/sin θ

sec θ = 1/cos θ

cot θ = 1/tan θ

Given data ,

Let the trigonometric relation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

sin⁻¹ ( √3/2 ) = θ

Now , the value of θ is calculated by

In a triangle , sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse

So , sin θ = √3/2

The value of θ = 60°

So , the measure of 60° in radians is θ = π/3

Hence , the value of θ from the trigonometric relation is π/3

To learn more about trigonometric relations click :

https://brainly.com/question/14746686

#SPJ7

Answer: a makes the most sense

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

a. 81 ÷ 9 = 9

b. 40 ÷ 5 = 8

c. 21 ÷ 3 = 7

d. 54 ÷ 6 = 9

e. 42 ÷ 7 = 6

f. 63 ÷ 9 = 7

g. 36 ÷ 4 = 4

h. 45 ÷ 9 = 5

i. 39 ÷ 3 = 12

j. 24 ÷ 6 = 4

Answer:

200; 80% of 250 is 200

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

200

Answer:

7/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Add up the amount of the marbles in total and read what color the marble they ask for the chances of. The color of marble should go first then the total of the marbles. (they could ask for more than one color so just add up both the colors given.)

Answer:

height = 140.875m

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of first pyramid= base * height /3 = 230*147/3= 11270

if the base is 240, volume is remain -> height = volume *3 /base

                                                                            = 11270*3/240 =140.875m

Answer:

173.15 yards is the distance from tee to hole.

Step-by-step explanation:

Please refer to the image attached.

Let A is the position of tee and where the golfer is standing.

C is the position of hole.

CB is the vertical distance between greens and tee.

Angle of elevation, [tex]\angle BAC = 12^\circ[/tex]

To find: side AC.

Using trigonometric functions, we know that value of sine is:

[tex]sin\theta = \dfrac{\text{Perpendicular}}{\text{Hypotenuse}}[/tex]

Here [tex]\theta = \angle BAC = 12^\circ[/tex]

Perpendicular is side CB.

Hypotenuse is side AC.

[tex]sin12^\circ = \dfrac{\text{CB}}{\text{AC}}\\\Rightarrow \text{CB} = \dfrac{36}{sin12^\circ}\\\Rightarrow \text{CB} = 173.15\ yards[/tex]

Hence, 173.15 yards is the distance from tee to hole.

Answer:

Y=x-3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

slope intercept form

(slope=x)(1x=x)

Answer:-53/12

Step-by-step explanation:

-7 2/3+(-5 1/2)+8 3/4

-7 2/3-5 1/2+8 3/4

-23/3 - 11/2 + 35/4

(4x-23 - 6x11 + 3x35)/12

(-92-66+105)/12=-53/12

Answer:

a. If the P-value is smaller than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

b. Pooled proportion = 0.8

c. z = 2.7

d. As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

We will use the P-value approach, so the decision rule is that if the P-value is lower than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

The claim is that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=200 has a proportion of p1=0.85.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=170/200=0.85[/tex]

The sample 2, of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.7333.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=110/150=0.7333[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.1167.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.85-0.7333=0.1167[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{170+110}{200+150}=\dfrac{280}{350}=0.8[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{200}+\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0008+0.00107}=\sqrt{0.00187}=0.0432[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.1167-0}{0.0432}=\dfrac{0.1167}{0.0432}=2.7[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=2\cdot P(z>2.7)=0.0072[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Answer:

1/10

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 10 tiles and only 1 tile numbered 4 so 1 out of 10 tiles are numbered 4