Find the inverse of the following function.

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{-40, \ 4, \ -4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]f(x)=-9x+14[/tex]

[tex]\sf Put \ x \ as \ 6.[/tex]

[tex]f(6)=-9(6)+14[/tex]

[tex]f(6)=-54+14[/tex]

[tex]f(6)=-40[/tex]

[tex]g(x)=-3x^2[/tex]

[tex]\sf Put \ g(x) \ as \ -48.[/tex]

[tex]-48=-3x^2[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{-48}{-3} =\frac{-3x^2 }{-3}[/tex]

[tex]16=x^2[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{16} =\sqrt{x^2 }[/tex]

[tex]x= \pm 4[/tex]

Answer:

F(6) = -9(6) + 14 = -54 + 14. f(6) = -40

G(x) = -48 / g(x) = -3(16) / g(4) = -48

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first one the drop answer is -40

For the second one its 4 then 16

I think because that whats im seeing but these are the right answers :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

answer is c just took test

[tex]x-1=\dfrac{6}{x}\qquad(x\not=0)\\\\x^2-x=6\\x^2-x-6=0\\x^2+2x-3x-6=0\\x(x+2)-3(x+2)=0\\(x-3)(x+2)=0\\x=3 \vee x=-2[/tex]

Answer:

P(identical colours) =  160/1771   (0.0903 to four decimals)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given 9R, 6W and 8B marbles (total = 9+6+8 = 23)

Choose three without replacement.

Need probability three identical colours.

Use the multiplication rule.

P(RRR) = 9/23 * 8*22 * 7*21 = 12 / 253

P(WWW) = 6/23 * 5/22 * 4/21 = 20/1771

P(BBB) = 8/23 * 7/22 * 6/21 = 8/153

Probability of getting identical colours

= P(RRR)+P(WWW)+P(BBB)

= 160/1771   (0.0903 to four decimals)

Using the probability concept, it is found that there is a 0.0903 = 9.03% probability all three marbles are the same color.

-----------------

-----------------

Combination formula:

[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

-----------------

The desired outcomes can be:

Thus:

[tex]D = C_{9,3} + C_{6,3} + C_{8,3} = \frac{9!}{3!6!} + \frac{6!}{3!3!} + \frac{8!}{3!5!} = 160[/tex]

-----------------

The total outcomes are 3 from a set of 9 + 6 + 8 = 23. Thus:

[tex]T = C_{23,3} = \frac{23!}{3!20!} = 1771[/tex]

The probability is:

[tex]p = \frac{D}{T} = \frac{160}{1771} = 0.0903[/tex]

0.0903 = 9.03% probability all three marbles are the same color.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/10896842

Answer:

0.44

Step-by-step explanation:

11/25 = 0.44 = 44%

Answer:

11/25

Step-by-step explanation:

since there are 25 students, there will be 25 choices, and the 25 will be the denominator

and there are 11 guys so there will be 11 choices of guys and the 11 will go on top

Answer:  19.2222

Step-by-step explanation:

given data;

no of tornadoes = 2,1,0 because it’s fewer than 3.

period = 14 years

probability of a tornado in a calendar year = 0.12

solution:

probability of exactly 2 tornadoes

= ( 0.12 )^2 * ( 0.88 )^11 * ( 14! / 2! * 11! )

= 0.0144 * 0.2451 * 1092

= 3.8541

probability of exac one tornado

= ( 0.12 )^1 * ( 0.88 )^12 * ( 14! / 1! * 12! )

= 0.12 * 0.2157 * 182

= 12.7109

probability of exactly 0 tornado

= ( 0.12 )^0 * ( 0.88 )^13 * ( 14! / 0! * 13! )

= 1 * 0.1898 * 14

= 2.6572

probability if fewer than 3 tornadoes

= 3.8541 + 12.7109 +2.6572

= 19.2222

Answer:

We conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the 190 children born to cocaine users had a mean of 7.3 and a standard deviation of 3.0 The 186 children not exposed to cocaine had a mean score of 8.2 with a standard deviation of 3.0.

Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = population mean score for children born to cocaine users.

[tex]\mu_2[/tex] = population mean score for children not exposed to cocaine.

So, Null Hypothesis, : = 490      {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is not associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

Alternate Hypothesis, : 490     {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;

                               T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean score of children born to cocaine users = 7.3

[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean score of children not exposed to cocaine = 8.2

[tex]s_1[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children born to cocaine users = 3

[tex]s_2[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children not exposed to cocaine = 3

[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of children born to cocaine users = 190

[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of children not exposed to cocaine = 186

Also, [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\times s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)\times s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex]  = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(190-1)\times 3^{2}+(186-1)\times 3^{2} }{190+186-2} }[/tex] = 3

So, the test statistics =   ~

                                     =  -2.908

The value of t-test statistics is -2.908.

Now, at a 0.05 level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -1.645 at 374 degrees of freedom for the left-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -2.908 < -1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

In the null hypothesis, a test always forecasts no effect, while the alternate theory states the research expectation impact, and calculation as follows:

Calculating the pooled estimator of [tex]\sigma^2[/tex], denoted by [tex]S^2_p[/tex], is defined by

[tex]\to \bold{S^2_p= \frac{(n_1 - 1) S^2_1+ (n_2 - 1)S^2_2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}[/tex]

Null hypothesis:

[tex]\to H_0 : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = \Delta_0\\[/tex]

Test statistic:

[tex]\to T_0=\frac{\bar{X_1}- \bar{X_2} -\Delta_0}{S_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}} \\\\[/tex]

Alternative Hypothesis:

[tex]H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 \neq \Delta_0\\\\ H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 > \Delta_0\\\\H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 < \Delta_0\\\\[/tex]

Rejection Criterion

[tex]t_0 > t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2}\ \ \ or\ \ \ t_0 < - t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > -t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2}[/tex]

Given value:

[tex]\to S_p=9\\\\\to \Delta_0=0\\\\\to t_0=-\frac{0.9}{3(\sqrt{(\frac{1}{190}+\frac{1}{186})})}=-2.9\\\\\to t_{0.05,374}=1.645\\\\[/tex]

here

[tex]\to t_0 < -t_{0.05,374}[/tex]

hence rejecting the [tex]H_0[/tex]

Since there should be enough evidence that prenatal cocaine exposure is linked to inferior item assembly scores in 4-year-olds.

Find out more about the alternative hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/18831983

Answer:

3)Maria is running a profitable business.

4)Maria’s total revenue exceeds her total profit.

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph shows variation of revenue and cost with respect to price of product and not with respect to time .

The price of the product is 2.30 . From this graph , we see  that at this price revenue exceeds total cost . So maria is running a profitable business .

Total profit can not exceed total revenue as

Total revenue - total cost = total profit .

So total profit will always be less than total revenue .

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

2,8 to 4,12 has a rise of 4 and a run of 2.

4/2 = 2

The slope is 2.

Remember rise/run!

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

We take take two points and use the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

m = (12-8)/(4-2)

   = 4/2

   = 2

Answer:

(- 1, 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

The line x + 2 = 0 can be expressed as

x + 2 = 0 ( subtract 2 from both sides )

x = - 2

This is the equation of a vertical line parallel to the y- axis and passing through all points with an x- coordinate of - 2

Thus (- 3, 4 ) is 1 unit to the left of - 2

Under a reflection in the line x = - 2

The x- coordinate will be the same distance from x = - 2 but on the other side while the y- coordinate remains unchanged.

Thus

(- 3, 4 ) → (- 1, 4 )

Answer:

It can be any two numbers that sum up to 36.

eg:18+18,30+6,15+21

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Let Benjamin's age be x and David's age y.

x+y=36

2x+2y=72

Solution:

As twice of 36=72, any two numbers that add up to 36 ,will give a sum of 72 after multiplying them with 2.Therefore ,Benjamin's and David's age can be any set of numbers that sum up to 36.

Answer:

x1 = -4

x2 = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The 2 vertical lines are "absolute values" meaning whatever they contain has to be positive

For Example

|-3| = 3

So we can ignore if the answer we get is positive or negative because it will forced to be a positive

|3 x 4| = 12

|x - 2| = 4

x1 = 6

x2 = -2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the common ratio between the terms of the sequence divide the previous term by the next term.

That's

Or

Therefore the common ratio of the sequence is - 3

Hope this helps you

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Some texts are missing from the question, I found a possible match, and here it is:

A particular country has total of 45 states. If the areas of 35 states are added and the sum is divided by 35​, the result is 135,600 square kilometres. Determine whether this result is a statistic or a parameter.

Answer:

The result is a statistic because the data involved are samples.

Step-by-step explanation:

A Parameter is a numerical representation of an entire population. That is they are numbers summarizing data for an entire population. In this case, if all the 45 states were measured, the result would have been a parameter.

On the other hand, statistics are numbers that are subsets (representative portions) of an entire population. Since 35 states were chosen out of 45 states, the average area of the 35 states is a statistic and not a parameter.

Answer:

252 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

19.99 + .80x = 221.59

,80x = 201.60

x = 252

Step-by-step explanation:

your required answer is 60°.

Hello,

Here, in the figure;

angle 1= 120°

To find : m. of angle 2.

now,

angle 1 + angle 2= 180° { being linear pair}

or, 120° +angle 2 = 180°

or, angle 2= 180°-120°

Therefore, the measure of angle 2 is 60°.

Hope it helps you.....

Answer:

17,720 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

5.4 km * (1 mile)/(1.609 km) * (5280 ft)/(1 mile) = 17,720 ft

Answer:

[tex]t \: = 3.92 \: sec[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

When (t =0)

Height of cliff = 248 feet = 75.5m

Using Newton's equations of motion:

[tex]s = ut + \frac{1}{2} a {t}^{2} [/tex]

75.5 = 0 * t + 4.9 * t^2

Solving further :

[tex]t \: = 3.92 \: sec[/tex]

Answer:

C(4,6)

Step-by-step explanation:

the x turns into its opposite when reflected across y same thing for y when reflected across x

Answer:

c. (4, 6)

Step-by-step explanation:

The rule of an reflection about the y-axis is: [tex]A(x,y)\rightarrow A'(-x,y)[/tex]

Apply the rule to  point (-4, 6):

[tex]\frac{(-4,6)\rightarrow\boxed{(4,6)}}{(x,y)\rightarrow(-x,y)}[/tex]

Option C should be the correct answer.

Answer:

( -5,-7)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)= 2x+3 g(x)=-4x-27

Set the two functions equal

2x+3 = -4x-27

Add 4x to each side

2x+3+4x = -4x-27+4x

6x+3 = -27

Subtract 3

6x+3 - 3 = -27-3

6x = -30

Divide each side by 6

6x/6 = -30/6

x =-5

Now we need to find the output

f(-5) = 2(-5) +3 = -10+3 = -7

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

big burgewr

Answer:

The answer is "[tex]\bold{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex]"

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]\ S_1 = k \\\\ S_{n+1} = \sqrt{4S_n -1}[/tex]   [tex]_{where} \ \ n \geq 1[/tex]

In the above-given value, [tex]S_n[/tex] is required for the monotone decreasing so, [tex]S_2 :[/tex]

[tex]\to \sqrt{4k-1} \leq \ k=S_1\\\\[/tex]

square the above value:

[tex]\to k^2-4k+1 \leq 0\\\\\to k \leq 2+\sqrt{3} \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ 4k+1 >0\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\bold{\boxed{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}}[/tex]

Answer:

An aluminum bar 4 feet long weighs 24 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Complete Question

What is the minimum sample size required to estimate a population mean with 90% confidence when the desired margin of error is 1.25? The standard deviation in a pre-selected sample is  7.5

Answer:

The minimum sample size is  [tex]n =97[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question  we are told that

 The margin of error is  [tex]E = 1.25[/tex]

   The  standard deviation is  [tex]s = 7.5[/tex]

Given that the confidence level is  90% then the level of significance is mathematically represented as

             [tex]\alpha = 100 - 90[/tex]  

             [tex]\alpha =10\%[/tex]  

             [tex]\alpha =0.10[/tex]

Next we obtain the critical value of [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table  

    The value is  [tex]Z_{\frac{ \alpha }{2} } = 1.645[/tex]

   The  minimum sample size is mathematically evaluated as

         [tex]n = \frac{Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} * s^2 }}{E^2 }[/tex]

=>        [tex]n = \frac{1.645^2 * 7.5^2 }{1.25^2 }[/tex]

=>        [tex]n =97[/tex]

Answer:

No the sample does not show that the average age  was different in 2010      

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The sample size is n =  50

    The  sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 38.5[/tex]

    The population mean is  [tex]\mu = 37[/tex]

     The standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 16[/tex]

     The level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 5 \% = 0.05[/tex]

 The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu = 37[/tex]

  The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : \mu \ne 37[/tex]

The critical value of the level of  significance obtained from the normal distribution table is  ([tex]Z_{\alpha } = 1.645[/tex] )

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

          [tex]t = \frac{ \= x - \mu }{ \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

substituting values

          [tex]t = \frac{ 38.5 - 37}{ \frac{16}{\sqrt{50} } }[/tex]        

         [tex]t = 0.663[/tex]

Now looking at the value  t and  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t < Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

This mean that there is no sufficient evidence to state that the sample shows that the average age was different in 2010      

Answer:

a) 5[tex]cm^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Bodies have three dimensions (width, height and depth). Measuring volume is calculating the number of cubic units that can fit inside.

When raising to 3, these dimensions are included and therefore  5[tex]cm^{3}[/tex] is a measure of volume.

Answer:

5cm^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume for a form will always be in cubic units.

Area of a shape will always be in squared units.

Length will not be in cubic or squared units.

Hence, the first option is a measure for volume.

The second option is equal to 5cm^2 which represents a measure for area, as does the fourth option.

The third option represents a measurement of length, for example the length of a line segment or the height of a figure.

Answer:

Option (D)

Step-by-step explanation:

By applying Sine rule in the right ΔABD,

Sin(A) = [tex]\frac{\text{Opposite side}}{\text{Hypotenuse}}[/tex]

Sin(60)° = [tex]\frac{\text{BD}}{\text{AB}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}=\frac{\text{BD}}{7\sqrt{3}}[/tex]

BD = [tex]7\sqrt{3}\times \frac{\sqrt{3} }{2}[/tex]

     = [tex]\frac{21}{2}[/tex]

Now by applying Cosine rule in the right ΔBDC,

Cos(45)° = [tex]\frac{\text{Adjacent side}}{\text{Hypotenuse}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{\frac{21}{2}}{x}[/tex]

x = [tex]\frac{21}{2}\times \sqrt{2}[/tex]

x = [tex]\frac{21\sqrt{2}}{2}[/tex]

Therefore, Option (D) is the correct option.

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The 98% is confidence interval its not a probability estimate. The probability will be different from the confidence interval. Confidence interval is about the population mean and is not calculated based on sample mean. Every confidence interval contains the sample mean. There is 98% confidence that the proportion of Drosophola with his mutation is between 0.34 and 0.38.

[tex]\text{Solve for x:}\\\\-3x+9-2x=-12-5x\\\\\text{Combine like terms}\\\\-5x+9=-12-5x\\\\\text{Add 5x to both sides}\\\\9=-12\\\\\text{Since that's not valid, there would be no solutions}\\\\\boxed{\text{No solutions}}[/tex]

Answer:

a. The probability x = 2 cents = 7/22

b. The probability x = 6 cents = 35/66

c. The probability x = 10 cents = 5/33

d. The probability x = 11 cents= 28/33

e. The probability x = 15 cents = 20/33

f. The probability x = 20 cents = 14/33

g. The expected value of x = 5.9

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a binomial probability distribution. The number of trials is known .

a. The probability x = 2 cents.

Probability ( X=2) P( selecting 2 dimes)= 7C2 / 12c2

                                                    = 21 / 66 = 7/22

b. The probability x = 6 cents.

Probability ( X=6) P( selecting a nickel and a dime)= 5C1 * 7C1/ 12c2

                                                    = 5*7 / 66 = 35/66

c. The probability x = 10 cents.

Probability ( X=10) P( selecting two nickels )= 5C2 / 12c2)

                                                    = 10/ 66 = 5/33

d. The probability x = 11 cents.

Probability ( X=11) P( selecting a penny and a dime)= 8C1 * 7C1/ 12c2)

                                            = 8*7 / 66 = 56/66= 28/33

e. The probability x = 15 cents.

Probability ( X=15) P( selecting a penny and a nickel)= 8C1 * 5C1/ 12c2)

                                            = 8*5 / 66 = 40/66= 20/33

f. The probability x = 20 cents.

Probability ( X=20) P( selecting 2 pennies )= 8C2 / 12c2)

                                                = 28 / 66 = 14/33

g. The expected value of x.

E(X) = np

E(X) = 2 * (8C2+ 5C2+ 7C2)/(8+5+7) = 2( 28+10+21)/20

=2(59)/20= 5.9