Explanation:
Helen Frangedis is a high school teacher that always includes The Catcher in the Rye in her course syllabus for the year. Parents are always concerned about the book because of the profanity, drug and alcohol references, and “loose moral codes”. When presented with these concerns, Frangedis states that there is a deeper meaning in the book and the students have the challenge of finding it. She addresses her audience of parents with good reasons of reading and analyzing the book, while understanding their concerns.
Frangedis’s article focuses entirely on J. D. Salenger’s writing style. Salenger greatly exaggerates Holden, his issues, and society throughout the book and that leads to all of the profanity and drug/alcohol references. With his writing style, people began to notice, read, and criticize “The Catcher in the Rye,” all because of one reason; Salenger’s exaggerating writing style. Society always pays attention to the bigger, more exaggerated, stunning news. For example, people will pay more attention to the semi-truck that flipped over than the car that hit a pole. The reason is simple. Watching the truck flip over is more stunning and impressive than a car hit something. The same goes for “The Catcher in the Rye”. People will read a book that is full of drugs, cursing, and drinking over the book that is nice, short, and sweet. Knowing who society is and how it works, Salenger wrote a book that not only goes against society, but separates him from all other authors.
Separate it to prefix suffix root word
hypertension
diabetes
photophobia
nausea
emesis
diagnosis
shingles
meningitis
cellulitis
erythrocyte
basal
metabolic
sedimentation
tomography
lumbar
cerebrospinal fluid
afebrile
respiratory
oxemetry
atraumatic
normocephalic
palpation
cervical
extraocular
deformities
symmetric
auscultation
rhythm
abdomen
extremities
neurologic
interpreter
cervical collar
Answer:
hyper tension
Neuro logic
Lum bar
abd Omen
Nights and Dragons— From the memoir of author Abigail Prynne
1 I sit at my desk listening to thunder growl outside my window. Flashes of light burst through the darkness, and wind races past my window. The thrilling combination of sight and sound conjures up visions of dragons roaring proudly, breathing fire, and soaring across the midnight sky. Dragons first fascinated me when I was a little girl. They have followed me ever since. The magnificent creatures appeared in storybooks I read in the library, paintings I saw in museums, movies I watched in the theater, and the dreams I had in my sleep. By the time I was thirteen, one question consumed me. I wanted to know if dragons ever existed, so I set out on a quest for facts.
2 As I started my research, I discovered many skeptics. Scientists presented evidence to show why dragons could not—and did not—exist. They explained that it would be impossible for dragons to fly because they would be too big. They laughed at the idea of dragons breathing fire. They pointed out that no other animal has ever done this. They said that if dragons had lived, someone would have found remains somewhere in the world. No bones about it, there were plenty of logical explanations. It would have been easy for me to accept that the only place dragons ever existed was in the imaginations of those who believed.
3 I could have given up, but I thought about my grandmother. She always told me that "people who believe that science is the answer to everything are missing out on everything else." With her words in mind, I searched some more. There were many facts that hinted that dragons may not be fictional. I noticed that cultures across the world all described dragons in similar ways. This was odd because they had no way to communicate with each other. I found dragons mentioned in more than just stories. They appeared in old legal papers, in the travel logs of Marco Polo, and in the Bible. I saw that the Chinese calendar uses a different animal each year. Dragons are included along with eleven real animals. I began to believe it was a real possibility that all of these people were talking about a creature that actually existed.
4 With renewed hope that there was some truth to the legends, I looked for new research. I found that some experts disagreed with popular arguments against dragons. They suggested that a dragon could have four stomachs like a cow. If it created stomach gases like birds, it might create enough to lift itself off the ground. This would give it the ability to fly. If it forced out air when diving toward the earth, it might release gases which could ignite into flame. When the animal died, the stomachs would release strong acids that would dissolve its dead body over time. Biologists backed up these ideas with sketches and models based on known animals. Not everyone agreed with these ideas, but many of the things we accept about dinosaurs and other extinct species started the same way.
5 I doubt we will ever truly know whether dragons existed. There may always be two sides to the fiery debate. Some will say the stories come from active imaginations. Some will believe with all their hearts that the legendary creatures roamed our ancient world. I don't know for certain which side to believe, but the sound and fury of a night like this makes me smile. It rekindles my childhood dreams and keeps the exciting possibility alive.
Which sentence from paragraph 4 makes an explicit statement without offering any implicit suggestions?
With renewed hope that there was some truth to the legends, I looked for new research.
If it created stomach gases like birds, it might create enough to lift itself off the ground.
Biologists backed up these ideas with sketches and models based on known animals.
Answer and Dragons-from the memoir of author Abigail Prynne. 1. I sit at my desk listening to thunder growl outside my window. Flashes of light burst through the darkness, and wind races past my window. The thrilling combination of sight and sound conjures up visions of dragons roaring proudly, breathing fire, and soaring across the midnight sky
In an English or Shakespearean sonnet, a speaker presents a problem in what section
of the sonnet?
The speaker does not present a problem, only a solution
In the first three quatrains
In the second quatrain
In the final verse
Which preposition should be added to connect the sentence below? He could not tell the new chairs _______ the old ones. Question 8 options: a) by means of b) apart from c) according to d) This sentence does not need a preposition
Answer:
b apart from
Explanation:
The correct answer would be apart because the sentence states he could not tell the chairs ___ the old ones. It's the only answer that makes sense. If you read the sentence and add in each answer, the answer that is clear about the sentence. It wouldn't be "He could not tell the new chairs (according to) the old ones.
Answer:
b) apart from
Explanation:
it is the only one that makes sense
Your school has been shut down because of corona pandemic. The government has ordered strict lock down to maintain social distancing. Because of this, your school has started online classes. Write a diary entry on your experiences during the e learning sessions.
Answer:
Well it isn't like being in a classroom but it's ok
“Those were the Rommely women ...They were all slender, frail creatures with wondering eyes and soft fluttery voices. But they were made out of thin visible steel.” Explain the truth/falsity of this passage.
Answer:
The women all looked brave but inside they could be hurt very easy
Explanation:
hopes this helps!
“The world on a turtles back”
Answer the following questions properly (complete sentences and direct citations/quotations where necessary)
1. Find a part of the text that is similar to a Biblical story or message.
Answer:
is this a book?
Explanation:
“The world on a turtles back”
Answer the following questions properly (complete sentences and direct citations/quotations where necessary)
6. Explain a specific symbol in the story, or what a larger part of the story symbolizes.
Answer:
its the same girl from earlier. since you already turned it in im getting points. sorry if this made you upset but i needed points. hope you understand. <3
Explanation:
PLEASE HELPPP!!!!!
“The world on the turtles back” What does “the world on the turtles back suggest about the relationship between humans and animals? Be specific.
15 POINTS!
Answer:
Hey there!
First, a little background of this story. This story was written a long, long time ago by Native Americans of the Iroquois Tribe. It was passed down generation by generation, until in the 1800's a Iroquois writer wrote about it. One thing the story wants to explain is why there is land on earth, and the origins of the land.
At the beginning of the story, "The world on the turtle's back," we are told that in the beginning, there was nothing, but there was a "Sky World." Here, lived gods, who were like normal people. However, when a woman falls to the "Normal World" she is saved by birds, and placed on the turtle's back. The story goes on to tell, that a muskrat brings her soil, which she used to build the land. That is why, the land formed.
Let me know if this helps :)
From the story “the story of an hour” by Kate Chopin pick 5 phases and briefly explain why you chose each
Answer:
Based on what you have provided, I have looked up the story and provided 5 things that I think are important or interesting....
Explanation:
Kate Chopin wrote about and lived in American in the 1890s.
Story listed in question: Brenty Mallard has been killed in a railroad accident. When Louise finds out, she locks herself in her room and falls apart.
For some reason, she sees this as sad, but also as Freedom. She wants to live by herself and depend only on herself.
But did he really die? Here is the cool part - He arrives at the door while she is coming out from falling apart. He is not dead. She is so shocked....she dies. Dr. said it was heart disease. Story reveals it as a joy that she was feeling - now doomed - she dies. Chopin can relate to this and writes about it due to the fact that she wanted to take care of herself, but her husband really died in real life and she had to care for all of her children. But could she really do it on her own?
Another interesting thing about her story is that Chopin was very aware of the divide between the powerful and the oppressed in her society. She grew up during the Civil War. She understood what slavery was and how violent it was.
Chopin became known for her beauty. She had 7 kids in 9 years. UG.
Her now husband, Oscar, died of swamp fever in 1882. Chopin was now in debt and had to take care of her family on her own.
Chopin wrote to support her family. She was successful as a writer and wrote a lot of short stories and novels. She literally wrote over 100 stories, articles, and various essays.
She finally passed away from a cerebral hemorrhage in 1904 and she was only 54.
The country was in recession when she was writing. Electric lights, radios, and new jobs were now available to people. Work for women was still scarce. Back then, if she would have worked when she was pregnant, this would have been considered bad in the society that she lived in.
She believed that women should have freedom as individuals.
She writes about freedom, repression, and marriage.
When writing about repression, she wrote how she felt that women's thoughts and feelings were ignored. Women were supposed to be gentle and passive - not her!
Louise, in the story, is a victim of this repression. Please see the example I gave above in how she finally dies after her husband appears....
She did not want to live by societies rules any longer. Remember that Louise did not die from being sad, but from realizing that she would not have the opportunity to be FREE.
You also need to remember that marriage back in those days was a means to control another person - man controls wife. Marriage was supposed to keep women in line with what society thought they should be like. Stay home, get pregnant, and live domestically - take care of the man.
She really wanted to show that even though marriage had been made to control women in society, she wanted to be a part of a world where she was valued as a partner.
Hope this helps....
would someone plz help me
Answer:
The holding cell of the narrator was too dark in an emotional way. It held the thoughts back, and never let anything get to his head. When he steps up to the judges to give his verdict, he gets a glimpse of seven candles, giving him hope, yet at that moment, he felt an extreme sickening feeling. He had a feeling of an electric shock coursing through his veins. He lost the vision of hope as he looked up to see the angels hat turned into spectres, and at that moment he knew they would be no help. He had felt an extreme urgency to lay to rest, not for a moment, but for all eternity.
Use some of this kind of work, and make sure to express the feelings you get from this.
Answer:
The holding cell of the storyteller was as well dim in an enthusiastic way. It held the considerations back, and never let anything get to his head. When he steps up to the judges to provide his decision, he gets a see of seven candles, giving him trust, however at that minute, he felt an extraordinary sickening feeling. He had a feeling of an electric stun coursing through his veins. He misplaced the vision of trust as he looked up to see the blessed messengers cap turned into ghosts, and at that minute he knew they would be no offer assistance. He had felt an extraordinary direness to lay to rest, not for a minute, but for all eternity. Use a few of this kind of work, and make beyond any doubt to precise the emotions you get from this.
:
Pls help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer: In this context, the word vehemently most likely means with a lot of passion.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I believe the answer is d
Explanation:
“The world on the turtles back” Answer the following questions properly (complete sentences and direct citations/quotations where necessary) what is one universal question humans have about the world, and how does this story answer this question?
Answer:
Creation in it's self.
Explanation:
"The world on the turtles back" is a short legend that ties in with many different types of believes. This shows that the world is carried throughout a journey that can lead to many paths but has an ending that can always be explained. The turtle shared it wisdom in several ways, and lead to a path of success and failure. The ultimate choice is which one is what. The believe of a superior being can prove that people believe there is some sort of god or evolved species.
Write a letter to your principal asking for three days leave mentioning the reasons for the leave. Should be in block form. should contain all the components of formal letter. Please help me with this. I want to see difference between my letter. Will mark brainliest!!!
Answer:
Intro
Why
What would you do to make up
Ending
Explanation:You should have the intro sayin what you need about 4-5 sentences then you need to tell them why this is important because they need to know why this is a need for you
Then you need to write what would you do to make up for these days because why would the principal let you leave if you aren’t going to even put effort to make it up the just do a sweet ending to wrap it up I hope I helped you with the answer!
tell me some of the reasons that it is important to keep a positive attitude in a learning environment. (please answer it's really simple)
Answer:
it is important to be positive attitude because if you don't think you can your mind will tell you that you can't do it. being positive will give you confidence in maintaining your learning experience and also will keep you mindset on what is being taught
What is the theme of "Here in Katmandu" by Donald Justice? please explain
Modern inventions and discoveries: support Scripture and creation support the idea of evolution do not relate to Scripture falsify Scripture
Answer:
Both believe that the universe was created or made. Somehow. Either they believe that poof it was put into place in 6 days or by a process of evolution - over a period of time. Most evolutionists do not believe in a world wide flood - but creationists can see the layers that have formed over the years in places like the Grand Canyon. Can anything evolve from nothing? How did living things come to have Life? Try to remember that living things reproduce into more living things.
Explanation:
There is no scientific law that states that something evolved from nothing. How does life arise from non-life? How does one creature turn into another creature - or does he evolve into a different type of species. We have seen this in nature - how a species must adapt to his new environment. Man or animal. Maybe this will help too: Simplistic info -
Evolutionists - single cell evolves into multicelled - evolves into fish - evolves into amphibians - and then you get the reptile. Soon comes the evolution of this turning into birds, mammals, and then humans.
Creationinsts - fish are created as just that - fish, amphibians - created as just that - amphibians, etc.....birds created as birds....
Did dogs evolve from a wolf? People breed dogs all the time to try to create a new type of dog. Finches - type of bird - has shown that it has changed or evolved over time too - it's beak has changed shape. It changed shape to adapt to the environment around it.
Maybe you could point out in your writing that science needs evidence. Have we really seen something evolve in real time -
Just make sure to include that humans have intervened. They even are cloning now. Scary but true. Are they trying to be God or are they just trying to create something better than it was before???
Answer:
Both believe that the universe was created or made. Somehow. Either they believe that poof it was put into place in 6 days or by a process of evolution - over a period of time. Most evolutionists do not believe in a world wide flood - but creationists can see the layers that have formed over the years in places like the Grand Canyon. Can anything evolve from nothing? How did living things come to have Life? Try to remember that living things reproduce into more living things.
Explanation:
“United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:” Which of these inferences about voting laws is best supported by the following text? “The amendment, however, does not contain that word. It is limited to race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The legislature of the state of New York has seen fit to say, that the franchise of voting shall be limited to the male sex. In saying this, there is, in my judgment, no violation of the letter, or of the spirit, of the fourteenth or of the fifteenth amendment.” Question 46 options: a) The rules dictating who gets to vote in federal elections are completely separate from who gets to vote in state elections. b) It would have been illegal for Anthony to vote in a state assembly election as well because of her sex. c) The United States missed a big opportunity by not including women in the fifteenth amendment. d) Anthony could legally be elected to Congress even though she is not permitted to vote in a congressional election.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
i know the answer
The implication of the case "United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling" is best supported by the text stated in option (d): "Anthony could legally be elected to Congress even though she is not permitted to vote in a congressional election."
What inference supports the case?This is the assertion that is utilized to draw a conclusion about a certain thing based on the data at hand.
As a result, it is clear from the court case between Susan Anthony and the American government that Antony's defense claimed that the legalization of voting for all people was founded on the fact that women could become lawyers.
Therefore, Anthony thought that the legalization of women's suffrage in Illinois meant that everyone was now free to vote in all states. As a result, from the given options, the last option, that is option (d) is the correct answer.
Check the link to learn about United States v. Susan B. Anthony;
https://brainly.com/question/17160303
#SPJ2
Select the correct answers from the drop-down menus.
The workplace is busy with many conflicting priorities. When communicating with a coworker face-to-face,
it is important to be clear and get to the point quickly
When communicating with supervisors, it is recommended to be more formal
A good rule for communicating with anyone in the workplace is to
When communicating in writing, it is important to be focused, brief, and
DONE
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
in terms of time
you don't wanna waste peoples time because the need to do something
so what i suggest doing is to try and make it clear while getting to the point so that you don't waste time that is important to both you and the coworker you are talking too.
Please write 2 sentences. 1. Shows an example of 1st person point of view. 2. Shows an example of 3rd person point of view.
Answer:
1st Person POV: I saw the boat in the distance.
3rd Person POV: He dropped a coin in the slot of the telescope and when he looked through it he saw the boat in the distance.
Explanation:
These are narrative voices. Not necessarily dialogue or spoken voices.
1st Person's voice comes from the writer's internal POV. aka: I do this. I did that. I ran, I felt, etc.
3rd person's voice is from the other character's POV. aka: He did this, she did that. They walked across the street."
(2nd Person's voive is the POV of YOU, the reader. aka You loved me. But now you love another.
“We Choose to Go to the Moon:” Which of these inferences about the Space Race is best supported by the text? Question 42 options: a) Just like in the development of industrialization and nuclear power in the past, the United States is leading the way. b) If space falls into the wrong hands, it could lead to a violent threat toward the United States. c) The United States has all of the technology it needs to launch a mission to the moon but just hasn’t bothered to go there. d) If the United States does not make a serious push to reach the moon, no other country is likely to do it.
What is one example of real-life government control that is like the type of control in the book “Matched” by Ally Condie?
To be honest, the government control in "Matched" is pretty unrealistic and it's pretty strict. I don't really think there are any real-life examples of this government control type but...
In "Matched"; you have to die at 80, your husband/wife is chosen by the "matching machine" (I forgot what it is called), you are given three pills (which the red one you must take if instructed and you can't take if they don't say so. If you don't do what they say, you will be punished. You can't really choose your life, and the things you can decide, your not ever allowed to change.
I don't really know any real-life examples of this but I heard that some Asian parents choose who you marry and you have to act like their your queen or king. If you disobey they will probably throw you out of the house.
Yeah but the government control type in the book "Matched" is really strict, and you don't have a lot of freedom.
Answer:
Explanation:
In "Matched"; you have to die at 80, your husband/wife is chosen by the "matching machine" (I dont remember what they call it), you are given three pills (which the red one you must take if instructed and you can't take if they don't say so). If you don't do what they say, you will be punished. You can't really choose your life, and the things you can decide, your not ever allowed to change.
Also,Some Asian parents choose who you marry and you have to act like their your queen or king. If you disobey they will throw you out of the house.
And the government control type in the book "Matched" is really strict, and you don't have a lot of freedom.
The ______sentence summarizes the idea in the topic sentence
Answer:
the next sentence summarizes the idea in the topic sentences.
Answer:
The [other] sentence summarizes the idea in the topic sentence
Explanation:
any word could almost fill in that blank, is there any answer choices?
PLEASE HELPPP!!!!!
“The world on the turtles back” explain a specific symbol in the story, or what a larger part of the story symbolizes.
15 POINTS!
Answer:
Hey there!
The turtle's shell, in the story symbolises the foundation of the earth, and everything that was built after it, had the shell as a foundation.
Hope this helps :)
1-How does loneliness distort your perceptions of the people in your life and your relationships with them? 2-Describe an experience from your own life that, in hindsight, was an opportunity to apply emotional first aid and explain why it might have been useful to do so.
Answer:
Ans 1.
There are many paths to loneliness. ... Loneliness distorts our perceptions, making us believe the people around us care much less than they actually do, and it makes us view our existing relationships more negatively, such that we see them as less meaningful and important than we would if we were not lonely.
Answer:
Loneliness distorts our perceptions, making us believe the people around us care much less than they actually do, and it makes us view our existing relationships more negatively, such that we see them as less meaningful and important than we would if we were not lonely.
Explanation:
Take slow, deep breaths, and allow a little extra time to exhale.
Remind yourself that this, too, shall pass.
Allow space for all of your feelings.
Have faith in yourself. ...
Don't take anything personally.
Try to stick with your routine, even if you are feeling dazed or numb.
Read the following passage:
Forgive the interruption, dear reader, but I’ll have you know this is going to be an adventure for me, too. It’s not easy being an inanimate object worth enough American dollars to feed a family of six in Chad for over forty thousand years. (Or 4,077 families of six for a decade each. How my value is distributed is of no concern to me.)
That is no exaggeration.)
Right now, that dastardly George Washington has his ugly green face smashed against mine, and there’s a month-old Chick-fil-A receipt pressed against my behind without my consent. To top it off, the person who shoved me into this lackluster billfold truly has forgotten about me.
The indignity of it all is appalling considering my value, don’t you think?
Make an inference as to who or what the speaker in this passage might be. What details did you use to help you reach this conclusion?
Answer:
An old coin, winning lottery ticket, or an old dollar.
Explanation:
It seems that the objects setting is in a wallet because it has a receipt, George Washington's ugly green face(a dollar), and I believe the " lackluster billfold" the narrator speaks of is part of a wallet. The object saying it is worth so much money, but is stuffed into a wallet and forgotten about leads me to infer that it could be an old and rather valuable form of currency that blends in, making the person "truly forget about me". Another option is a lottery ticket, the winning one too if its worth so much money, and people often put them into wallets and such and forget about them. These things lead me to conclude that the object is either an old coin, winning lottery ticket, or an old dollar.
Answer: some worthy thing in a wallet; could be an really old dollar bill, or really old coin that's made of something really expensive.
Inanimate means; not alive
The speaker is worth a lot of money
George Washington is green and that most likely means he's a dollar bill.
Some people put receipts in their wallets right?
Billfold means; wallet
So the speaker is a forgotten, valuable (or the person who owns the wallet doesn't know the value and is too lazy to take it out), non-living thing in a wallet.
What does Levy mean in the following passage from "Back to My
Own Country," in which she describes the wave of post-World
War II immigrants to Britain?
Test
est
Their ideas, their creativity, and their ways of life have
helped turn this country into a sophisticated multi-culture.
This windfall of talent and variety is one of the great
unforeseen benefits to Britain.
А
She believes immigrants have made Britain into an economic
superpower
B
She believes immigrants have added variety, liveliness, and vigor
to Britain's culture.
Answer:
I hope this attachment will help!
Explanation:
Levy means in the following passage from "Back to My Own Country," in which she describes the wave of post-World as She believes immigrants have added variety, liveliness, and vigor to Britain's culture. Thus the correct option is B.
What is the inference?Inference in a piece of literature is the process of drawing a conclusion about a given topic using the facts and evidence that are specific to that work of literature.
She thinks that immigrants have given British culture more variety, energy, and vigor. One of the most significant and unanticipated advantages for Britain is this wealth of skill and variety.
The financial situation of Levy's parents is represented in the statement that while they were living in Jamaica, where they belonged to the middle class and they were poor in England.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about Inference, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16780102
#SPJ2
what is the definition of the word theme in literature?
Answer:
A central topic,subject or message within a narrative
Explanation:
I hope this helps you
Answer:
In contemporary literary studies, a theme is a central topic, subject, or message within a narrative.
Explanation:
Themes can be divided into two categories: a work's thematic concept is what readers "think the work is about" and its thematic statement being "what the work says about the subject".
Which sentence uses an apostrophe correctly?
Penelopes' children are staying over tonight.
Phillip's car broke down on the highway.
Papas tacos' are the best I've ever tasted.
Pams plates' have been washed and put away.
The sentence Philip's car broke down on the highway is using an apostrophe correctly. The correct option is b.
What is an apostrophe?The apostrophe was first used by Pietro Bembo in his edition of De Aetna in 1496. It was introduced into English in the 16th century in imitation of French practice.
The apostrophe is a punctuation mark, and sometimes a diacritical mark, in languages that use the Latin alphabet and some other alphabets. In English, the apostrophe is used for two basic purposes, firstly for the marking of the omission of one or more letters, e.g. the contraction of "do not" to "don't" and secondly the marking of possessive case of nouns (as in "the eagle's feathers", "in one month's time", "at your parents'.
Unicode has code points for three different forms of apostrophes For use in computer systems.
Learn more about apostrophe, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12772864
#SPJ2
Which parts of the SPJ code of ethics should be considered when deciding whether to air the interview? Check all that apply. Act independently because money is involved. Be accountable because the story seems to be untrue. Be transparent because it is not clear who made the statements. Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview. Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Hey There!!
Sorry, For the late question... Here's your answer. D) Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview. E. Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Because, The Society declares these four principles as the foundation of ethical journalism and encourages their use in its practice by all people in all media.
Hope This Helps!!~~
Answer:
D, E
Explanation:
right on edg
