find area and perimeter of shaded area and the perimeter is not 96

so basically after doing all the algebra, you will have to use the log function to solve. rearranging things and you will get the log expression that I obtained, then solve it using the change of base formula.

Answer:

8√3

Step-by-step explanation:

Missing side,

√(19²-13³)

= 8√3

Answered by GAUTHMATH

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

In a triangle, the sum of any two sides must be bigger than the third.

For the first one, 10+20=30 is not greater than 30, so this is not correct.

For B, 122+137 = 259 > 257, 257+137>122  , and 257 + 122 > 137. This works

For C, 8.6 + 2.7 = 11.3 < 12.2, so this does not work

For D, 1/6 + 1/5 = 5/(6*5) + 6/(6*5) = 5/30 + 6/30 = 11/30 < 1/2 = 15/30, so this does not work

Answer:

C. y = 4x, table B, graph A

Step-by-step explanation:

Charges = $4 per hour (this is the slope, m,)

m = 4

The equation can be represented in the form of y = mx

Where,

m = slope = 4

Substitute m = 4 into y = mx

Thus:

y = 4x

✔️The table that represents the equation y = 4x showing that for 1 hour, the charges is $4 is table B (x = 1, y = 4).

Table B represents the parking cost.

✔️The equation with a slope of 4 is the equation that represents the parking cost. Thus, in graph A, when x = 1 (hour), y = 4 (cost).

Therefore, graph A is the answer.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]tan^2x+\sqrt{3} tanx=0\\tanx(tanx+\sqrt{3} )=0\\either~tan~x=0=tan~n\pi \\x=n\pi \\where~n~is~an~integer.\\if~x \in[0,2\pi )\\then~x=0,\pi \\or\\tan~x+\sqrt{3} =0\\tan~x=-\sqrt{3}=tan~(\pi-\frac{\pi }{3} ),tan~(2\pi -\frac{\pi }{3} )\\tan~x=tan(\frac{2\pi}{3} ),tan(\frac{5\pi}{3} )\\x=\frac{2\pi }{3},\frac{5\pi }{3}[/tex]

Answer:

1 hr , 18 mins

Step-by-step explanation:

that is the procedure above

Answer:

B is the right statement

Answer:

add the answer choices

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

3/8 = 9

9÷3= 3

the remainder of 3/8 is 5/8 so

5x3=15

Answer:

[tex]4\sqrt{5}[/tex] units

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between any two points on the x y plane (a,b) and (c,d) has one of two formulas.  [tex]\sqrt{(a-c)^2+(b-d)^2}[/tex] or [tex]\sqrt{(c-a)^2+(d-b)^2}[/tex]  if you use c-a you have to also use d-b, and the other way around for a-c and b-d.  You can rearrange which order you add though.    So with (-1,5) and (3,3) here is the math

[tex]\sqrt{(3-(-1))^2+((-3)-5)^2} \\\sqrt{4^2+(-8)^2} \\\sqrt{16+64}\\\sqrt{80}[/tex]

You could simplify this to [tex]4\sqrt{5}[/tex]

Let me know if there was anything you didn't understand.

Answer:

The population is the population of 3521 people who made credit card purchases.

The sample is the 172 people who returned the survey form.

Step-by-step explanation:

Department mails customers satisfactions forms to those who make credit cards purchase at the store, totaling 3521 people. Thus, the population is the population of 3521 people who made credit card purchases.

Surveys are mailed to 278 of these people, chosen at random, and 172 people return the survey form.

Thus the sample, that is, those from whom the data will be taken and expanded to the rest of the population, is the 172 people who returned the survey form.

The population is all 3521 people who made credit card purchases.

The sample is the 172 people who returned the survey form.

Answer:

x=2    x=-1

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x^2 - X - 2

0= x^2 -x-2

Factor

0 =(x-2)(x+1)

Using the zero product property

x-2 =0   x+1 =0

x=2    x=-1

Answer:

x=2, -1

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

We want to find the zeros of this function: f(x)=x²-x-2

The zeros are the values of x that will make f(x)=0

So that means in order to find the zeros, set f(x) as 0

In that case,

x²-x-2=0

Now let's solve the quadratic equation

We can do it by factoring

-x is the sum of two numbers, while -2 is the product of those two same numbers

Now think: which two numbers add up to -1, but multiply to get -2?

Those numbers are -2 and 1

Now factor the polynomial by FOIL:

(x-2)(x+1)=0

Split and solve

x-2=0

x=2

x+1=0

x=-1

The zeros are x=2, -1

Hope this helps!

Answer:

10,-4

Step-by-step explanation:

not sure where the options are but if you were to solve this equation first bring everything to one side.

x^2 - 6x - 40 = 0

factor it

(x-10)(x+4) = 0

set each part to 0

x-10 = 0 and x+4 = 0

solutions are 10 and -4

Answer:

The probability that at least 7 employees were over 50 is 0.0073%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a town recently dismissed 8 employees in order to meet their new budget reductions, and the town had 9 employees over 50 years of age and 16 under 50, if the dismissed employees were selected at random, to determine what is the probability that at least 7 employees were over 50, the following calculation must be performed:

9/25 x 8/24 x 7/23 x 6/22 x 5/21 x 4/20 x 3/19 = X

0.36 x 0.33 x 0.304 x 0.272 x 0.238 x 0.2 x 0.157 = X

0.000073 = X

100X = 0.0073

Therefore, the probability that at least 7 employees were over 50 is 0.0073%.

This is because the given expression factors to (x+4)(x+4), which condenses to (x+4)^2.

To factor, think of two numbers that A) multiply to 16, and B) add to 8. Those values would be 4 and 4

4+4 = 8

4*4 = 16

So that's how we end up with (x+4)(x+4). You can use the FOIL rule to expand that out and get x^2+8x+16 again to help verify you have the correct factorization.

It doesn't change because to add fractions, you need a common denominator. To find it, they multiplied 1/3 by 2 to make 2/6, to add to the 3/6.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ten pairs of points yielded a correlation coefficient r of 0.790. If a =0.05, which of the following statements is correct if H.: P = 0? (Do not calculate a t-value.) A) Because 0.790 is greater than 0.632, the nullliy pothesis is not rejected. Because 0.790 is greater than 0.602, che null hypothesis is not rejected. Because 0.790 is greater than 0.632, che null hypothesis is rejected. OD) There is no correlation between the variables

Answer:

11

Step-by-step explanation:

3p²q+pq²=3×1/4×4+1/2×16=3+8=11

Answer:

B. 3.39 m

Step-by-step explanation:

r² = A/π

= 36/3.14

= 11.465

r = √11.465 = 3.39

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

When the same problem is repeated, I like to solve it using a spreadsheet. That way, the formulas only need to be entered once, and the arithmetic is (almost) guaranteed to be done correctly.

A "form factor" computed from side lengths can be used to determine the type of triangle. Where 'c' is the long side, that factor can be computed as ...

  f = a² +b² -c²

and interpreted as follows:

(The sign of f matches the sign of the cosine of the largest angle computed using the law of cosines.)

Of course, a right triangle can also be identified by looking at the slopes of the sides of the triangle. If any pair of slopes has a product that is -1, or if any pair is 0 and "undefined", then the triangle will be a right triangle.

__

The attached spreadsheet is designed to accommodate a number of different problem requirements. It shows both side lengths and slopes, and it shows the "form factor" as described above. The final classification is shown at far right.

The question is incomplete. The complete question is :

An automobile assembly line operation has a scheduled mean completion time, μ, of 15.5 minutes. The standard deviation of completion times is 1.7 minutes. It is claimed that, under new management, the mean completion time has decreased. To test this claim, a random sample of 90 completion times under new management was taken. The sample had a mean of 15.4 minutes. Can we support, at the 0.1 level of significance, the claim that the mean completion time has decreased under new management?

Solution :

The given data :

n = 90

μ = 15.5

σ = 1.7

[tex]$\overline x$[/tex] = 15.4

So, the null hypothesis is : [tex]$H_0: \mu = 15.5$[/tex] is been tested against

Alternate hypothesis : [tex]$H_1 : \mu < 15.5 $[/tex]   (one-tailed test)

Since, the sample size is sufficiently large and the sample deviation is known, we use the Z-test.

Under this test, the test statistic is given as :

[tex]$Z=\frac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \sim N(0,1)$[/tex]

Under [tex]H_0[/tex], we have

[tex]$Z_0=\frac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} $[/tex]

[tex]$Z_0=\frac{15.4-15.5}{1.7/\sqrt{90}} $[/tex]

[tex]$Z_0=-0.56$[/tex]

The critical value for the test is [tex]$Z_{\alpha} = Z_{0.1} = -1.28$[/tex]

We observe that (-0.56 > -1.28), and so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

No, there is no evidence to support the claim that the mean completion time has decreased.

Thus, we conclude that the mean completion time is 15.5 minutes.

Answer:

it should be 8.333333%

Step-by-step explanation:

The segment XT splits the trapezoid exactly in half. The average of RS and Q will give us XT because of the properties of a trapezoid.

We find the area of a trapezoid by averaging the bases as well.

RS + Q / 2 = XT

RS + 26 / 2 = 22

RS + 26 = 44

RS = 18

Hope this helps!

Answer:The first would taste more like oranges

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

bc i know

Answer:

Trong lý thuyết xác suất và thống kê, Phân phối Poisson (phân phối Poa-dông) là một phân phối xác suất rời rạc. Nó khác với các phân phối xác suất rời rạc khác ở chỗ thông tin cho biết không phải là xác suất để một sự kiện (event) xảy ra (thành công) trong một lần thử như trong phân phối Bernoulli, hay là số lần mà sự kiện đó xảy ra trong n lần thử như trong phân phối nhị thức, mà chính là trung bình số lần xảy ra thành công của một sự kiện trong một khoảng thời gian nhất định. Giá trị trung bình này được gọi là lamda, ký hiệu là {\displaystyle \lambda }\lambda .

Phân phối Poisson còn được dùng cho khoảng mà đơn vị khác thời gian như: khoảng cách, diện tích hay thể tích. Một ví dụ cổ điển là sự phân rã hạt nhân của các nguyên tử.

Phân phối này được tìm ra bởi nhà toán học Siméon-Denis Poisson (1781–1840) và đã được xuất bản cùng với lý thuyết xác suất của ông, vào năm 1838 với tựa đề Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matières criminelles et matière civile ("Research on the Probability of Judgments in Criminal and Civil Matters"). Theo đó, nếu xem xét một biến ngẫu nhiên N nào đó, và đếm số lần xuất hiện (rời rạc) của nó trong một khoảng thời gian cho trước. Nếu giá trị kì vọng (hay số lần trung bình mà biến ngẫu nhiên đó xảy ra trong khoảng thời gian đó là λ, thì xác suất để cũng chính sự kiện đó xảy ra k lần (k là số nguyên không âm, k = 0, 1, 2,...) sẽ được tính theo công thức

{\displaystyle f(k;\lambda )={\frac {\lambda ^{k}e^{-\lambda }}{k!}},\,\!}{\displaystyle f(k;\lambda )={\frac {\lambda ^{k}e^{-\lambda }}{k!}},\,\!}

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\frac{2}{5}^{-3}[/tex]×[tex]x=\frac{1}{2}^{4}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{2}{5} ^{3} \\[/tex]×[tex]\frac{1}{2}^{4}[/tex]

(negative in the exponent means reciprocal of the fraction)

x= [tex]\frac{1}{250}[/tex]

Brainliest please

Answer:

Hello,

Answer A (-4,0) and (0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}y&=&x^2+4x\\y+x^2&=&-4x\\\end{array} \right.\\\\\\\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}y&=&x^2+4x\\y&=&-x^2-4x\\\end{array} \right.\\\\\\\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}y&=&x^2+4x\\x^2+4x&=&-x^2-4x\\\end{array} \right.\\\\\\\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}2*x^2+8*x&=&0\\y&=&x^2+4x\\\end{array} \right.\\\\\\\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}x(x+4)&=&0\\y&=&x^2+4x\\\end{array} \right.\\\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}x&=&0 \\y&=&0\\\end{array} \right. \ or\ \left\{\begin{array}{ccc}x&=&-4 \\y&=&0\\\end{array} \right.[/tex]

Answer:  200 miles

Work Shown:

(1.25 inches)/(250 miles) = (1 inch)/(x miles)

(1.25)/(250) = 1/x

1.25x = 250*1 ..... cross multiplication

1.25x = 250

x = 250/(1.25)

x = 200 miles

Answer:

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{ln(5x)}{5x} = \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1/x}{5} = \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{5x} = 0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

L'Hopital's rule says that, if both numerator and denominator diverge, then we can look at the limit of the derivates.

Here we have:

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{ln(5x)}{5x}[/tex]

The numerator is ln(5x) and when x tends to infinity, this goes to infinity

the denominator is 5x, and when x tends to infinity, this goes to inifinity

So both numerator and denominator diverge to infinity when x tends to infinity.

Then we can use L'Hopithal's rule.

The numerator is:

f(x) = Ln(5x)

then:

f'(x) = df(x)/dx = 1/x

and the denominator is:

g(x) = 5*x

then:

g'(x) = 5

So, if we use L'Hopithal's rule we get:

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{ln(5x)}{5x} = \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1/x}{5} = \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{5x} = 0[/tex]

Answer:

✎There will be 30 Chocolate-Covered raisins in each bag.

✎ And 5 Remaining.

Step-by-step explanation:

Take 185 and divide it by 6 and you should get 30 per bag with a remainder of 5 :)