Answer:
With pure democracy, he means a system in which every citizen votes directly for laws (direct democracy), and, with republic, he intends a society in which citizens elect a small body of representatives who then vote for laws (representative democracy).
Explanation:
Explain why pure democracies are more vulnerable to factions than republics Pure democracy has no treatment for the mischiefs of faction due to the fact the larger faction has manipulated and could continually placed down the weaker ones.
What is direct or natural democracy?The direct democracy, additionally known as natural democracy, kinds of direct participation of residents in democratic choice-making, in comparison to oblique or consultant democracy.
In a republic, a charter or constitution of rights protects positive inalienable rights that can not be taken away through the government, even though it's been elected by a majority of voters. In a "natural democracy," the bulk isn't always constrained in this manner and may impose its will at the minority.
Read more about the democracies :
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ2
1. Ano ang Social Media?
2.Ano ang kaugnayan ng social media sa akademikong sulatin?
3.Ano ang kaugnayan nito sa mundo ng social media?
4.Ano ang epekto nito sa paglikha ng akademikong sulatin?
pasagot po please.
1)websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking.
2)More and more, however, academics are using social media not only to maintain connections, but to gain a following. They write posts that connect deeply, advocate for a cause, or inform their followers about a truly stimulating idea.
3)Social media allows individuals to keep in touch with friends and extended family. Some people will use various social media applications to network and find career opportunities, connect with people across the globe with like-minded interests, and share their own thoughts, feelings, and insights online.
4)Academic writing serves as a tool of communication that conveys acquired knowledge in a specific field of study. Writing academically will help students analyse, convey understanding, think critically and focus on technique and style.
Read the essay by Vera Tripoldi. It is a challenging text about diversity in the study of philosophy. Then, write one well-developed paragraph of analysis in which you identify and briefly discuss the overarching argument or thesis, one claim (or sub-thesis) that relates to the overarching thesis, one piece of evidence used to support the claim, and finally the commentary that Tripoldi uses with that evidence. You will submit this as assignment #2 on Monday 6/28.
Tripoldi, V. "The Value of Diversity and Inclusiveness in Philosophy. An Overview." https://journals.openedition.org/estetica/2058 [philosophical]
Answer:
Explanation:
the author name is Vera Tripodi (u got an extra l in there) n paper is "The Value of Diversity and Inclusiveness in Philosophy. An Overview." the main theme is that individuals are marginalized in study of philosophy due to the big gender gap.
philosophy is highly subjective n its study is heavily influenced by its scholars. its well known among academia that there is a gender gap - most professors and researchers are men with very few women. while that may not be significant in experiment-based subjects like science and engineering, that is not the case for many humanity studies. philosophy is particularly personal and the perspective of a male scholar can be very different from that of a female colleague. this leads to the conclusions drawn from such studies may be biased or even discriminated female population.
Answer:
Explanation:
The argument was that study of philosophy was biased and treated women different from men. The author cited one of the earliest philosopher: Aristotle. His "notions of “form” and “matter” reflect sexual differences: the former is intrinsically linked to “being male” and latter to “being feminine”. This gender association poses a problem for feminists: Aristotelian matter and form are not treated as equal and the form has priority over the matter." Her conclusion is that "the sexism of the distinction between form and matter is inherent to Aristotle’s metaphysic."
2,7,8,3,12,9 What is the next
number?
Answer:
We have to determine the pattern of numbers followed in the sequence 2, 7, 8, 3, 12, 9.
Do a grouping of the sequence into two groups. Let the first group be 2, 7, 8 and the second group be 3, 12, 9
There is a difference of 1 in the pair 2 and 3, a difference of 5 in the pair 7 and 12 and a difference of 1 in the pair 8 and 9
This means there would be a difference of 5 in the next pair.
So, adding 5 to the first number to the third pair.
Hence, the next number will be 13.
