Answer:
a) Traffic court: a person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket
b) Bankruptcy court: a company declaring bankruptcy
c) US supreme court: a company that wants to appeal a case involving two different states
d) Family court: a couple getting divorce
e) Juvenile court: a crime by a 12-year-old girl
Explanation:
a) Traffic court: a person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket
A Traffic court is court used for the handling of cases regarding traffic cases.
b) Bankruptcy court: a company declaring bankruptcy
A bankruptcy court is a type of federal court that deals with matters relating to bankruptcy.
c) US supreme court: a company that wants to appeal a case involving two different states
The supreme court is the highest federal court having jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases.
d) Family court: a couple getting divorced
The family court us a court to where matters relating to family law are handled.
e) Juvenile court: a crime by a 12-year-old girl
Juvenile Court is a court that deals with under-age defendants who violate any federal, state or municipal law, and any child who is abused, neglected or dependent.
The case and the court that would most likely hold jurisdiction to hear about it
A person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket.Traffic courtA company declaring bankruptcy.Bankruptcy court A company that wants to appeal a case involving two different states.US supreme courtA couple getting divorce.Family courtA crime by a 12-year-old girl.Juvenile courtTherefore,
Traffic court deals with traffic cases.Bankruptcy court settles issues relating to bankruptcyFamily court handles family matters.Juvenile court deals with cases relating to underage childrenUS supreme Court handles issues between states.Learn more about court:
https://brainly.com/question/15818332
Suppose that during construction, Lafayette asked Carl Davidson to rent space in a warehouse that was close to the bridge so that she could work on her sculptures near the site where they would eventually be installed. Carl Davidson signed the rental contract in his own name rather than the name of the LLC. The other members of Davidson Masonry were not aware of the rental agreement. In this situation, would a court likely hold that Davidson Masonry was liable on the contract that Carl Davidson had entered
Answer: Yes, a court would likely hold that Davidson Masonry was also liable on the contract that had been entered by Carl Davidson.
Explanation:
Yes, I believe that Davidson Masonry would also be bound by the contact that has been entered into by Lafayette. Carl Davidson did so for the purpose and goal of the project that they were all working on in their joint venture.
Even though Carl Davidson entered into this separate agreement without the knowledge of Davidson Masonry’s, Carl still did so while in the joint venture with them and also for the purposes of the joint venture project. Therefore, Davidson Masonry would likely be bounded by a court to this contract.