Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
What is your opinion regarding marriage due to financial interest, power, status or social prestige? ”. Do you think that marriages / relationships of this type still occur? help pleaseeeee
Answer:
In my opinion, I do not like the fact tht people just marry because of money or power. People still do this to this day and I do not think that it is okay. You should marry someone because you love them, not because you want power or more money.
Hope this helps! （づ￣3￣）づ╭❤～
Explanation:
Answer:Love is more important than money in my opinion.
Explanation:
describe three major philosophical theories of law
Answer:
1.Analytical jurisprudence- is a philosophical approach to law that draws on the resources of modern analytical philosophy to try to understand its nature. Since the boundaries of analytical philosophy are somewhat vague, it is difficult to say how far it extends
2.Normative Jurisprudence- aims to reinvigorate normative legal scholarship that both criticizes positive law and suggests reforms for it, on the basis of stated moral values and legalistic ideals.
3.Critical legal studies- is a school of critical theory that first emerged as a movement in the United States during the 1970s
which of the following is something that both Bentham abd Mill would endorse
Answer:
The good is best understood in terms of pleasure.
Explanation:
Answer:The good is best understood in terms of pleasure.
Explanation:
2. Why do you think mandatory minimum punishment sentencing dont have the deterrent
effect that they were created to prove?
Answer:
Minimum sentencing does not have the deterrent effect it was created to have because, it is punishing individuals on a set scale and not on the circumstances of the case.
Explanation:
The role of the United States Marshals was based on the role of _____. A. the town crier B. early colonial watches C. the sheriff D. police officers
Answer:
C the sheriff
Explanation:
What was one development in education policy during the 20th and 21st
centuries?
A. State governments ended their involvement in public education.
B. A law that made it illegal to fire teachers was repealed.
C. The federal government worked with state and local governments
to improve schools.
D. School attendance became mandatory for all children.
Answer:
C. The federal government worked with state and local governments
Explanation:
The education policy was modified in the 20th and 21st century with the federal government working more closely with the state and local governments to regulate their teaching methods and make sure that the standard of education became better and more inclusive. There was the inclusion of Standardized Testing which made all universities to use a particular standard to teach.
Answer:
C. The federal government worked with state and local governments
to improve schools.
What do California homeowners receive to protect equity when a court forces the sale of a house to pay for a judgment
Answer:
Simply, a "homestead" is your home. Although the equity in your home may be available to your creditors, many states, including California, provide for a "homestead exemption" as a way of protecting some, or all, of your equity.
Explanation:
hope this helps
2. Relatively few drivers are touched by the
traffic crash problem, either directly or
indirectly. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
F
Explanation:
Scarlett and Mark want to lease an apartment from Connor for a year. Connor first agrees, but upon finding that they have two small children, refuses to lease them his apartment. Is Connor's refusal legal?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cuz Connor is the land owner he has the right to say rather or not he wants children in his apartment.
Joe buys some watermelon seeds from a seed manufacturer's catalog. The catalog describes the seed Joe buys as "top quality." Joe strongly relies upon this statement in making the purchase. The seed turns out to be worthless, and Joe sues the manufacturer for breach of express warranty. You are the attorney representing the manufacturer. Which of the following is your best argument for escaping liability?
A. That a catalog statement cannot create an express warranty.
B. That the basis-of-the-bargain requirement was not met.
C. That the alleged warranty was merely sales talk.
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Explanation:
As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.
Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.
which article is related to Equality before law
Answer:
Article 14 guarantees to all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.
Answer:
article 14
Explanation:
According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
It would be inappropriate to refer to "criminal law," as if it were a singular entity. Why is this? Discuss all that "criminal law" really includes in the U.S.
Answer:
In simple words, Crime legislation is an offence-related area of law. It forbids behaviour that is viewed as dangerous, hazardous and sometimes jeopardising the land, health , safety and spiritual well-being of others, including one's own self.
Criminal law differs significantly by territory and varies from common law, within which there is more focus on resolving disputes and market financing than on retribution or reintegration.
Criminal process is a formalised legal action that verifies the conduct of a felony and requires the perpetrator to be convicted or rehabilitated.
Why the criminal justice system continues to fail taxepayers?
The criminal justice system in the United States serves the purpose of upholding the rule of law and ensuring the safety of citizens. It works under the notion that the country operates under certain rules, and that breaking those rules results in a punishment. However, the system is flawed and there are several reasons why it continues to fail the taxpayers who fund it.
One problem of the criminal justice system is that it relies on processes that are flawed by their very nature, such as human memories, fingerprints, DNA evidence and eyewitnesses. This can result in wrong convictions of innocent people.
Another problem of the system is that many people who work in it possess biases. Judges, lawyers, and the police can be biased towards certain races, gender, age groups or other groups of people. This makes it difficult for justice to be administered fairly to all people.
Finally, another problem of the criminal justice system is that over time, sentences have become longer, more serious, and more common. However, these sentences do not always deter crime, and often get in the way of the rehabilitation of past convicts. This defeats the purpose of the system and makes it difficult to ensure the safety of the population.
When the Constitution entitles all citizens to “due process” of law, what does this phrase mean?
It is C) Every citizen has the right to a trial
Answer:
D: all of the above
Explanation:
100 POINTS!!!!!!!! At close firing distances, gasses from a gun's muzzle can produce a star-shaped pattern around a bullet hole. true false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The star comes from the gasses and heat so it has to be close to the bullet hole.
My question was True or Flase it has to be 3 feet away and I chose false and got it right.
The statement is "The star comes from the gasses and heat, so it has to be close to the bullet hole" is true.
What is a gun's muzzle?A gun muzzle is an essential component of firearms such as small firearms, artillery pieces, and air guns. It is the straight firing tube, generally composed of rigid high-strength metal, through which a confined fast expansion of high-pressure gas is employed to drive a projectile at high velocity out of the front end.
Muzzle gases can also create a star-shaped pattern around the bullet hole. As the distance increases, a gun shot 12 to 18 inches from the target can frequently create a halo of smoke around the bullet hole. The target may still display gunpowder residue at 25 inches. Therefore, it can be concluded that the above statement is true.
Learn more about gun muzzle here:
https://brainly.com/question/30167057
#SPJ2
The fact that statutes requiring a license only requires payment of a fee indicates that the purpose of the law is to:
Answer:
"Raise money" is the right answer.
Explanation:
Trying to raise a certain amount of income to support somebody or something, whether through employment as well as a charitable organization. After that, because there's no requirement specification provision and therefore only referenced funds (to expect to be paid fee) for obtaining a license.So that the above is the correct choice.
Which of the following is a benefit of restoration justice, which the judge might have felt was valuable in Justin case?
Answer:
In simple words, Restorative justice refers to the legal strategy where one of the approaches to a case is to arrange a meeting between both the perpetrator including the complainant, often with members of the broader community.
Academic evaluation of restorative justice seems to be optimistic. Most findings indicate that it makes criminals less inclined to commit an offence. The 2007 research also indicates that it would have the greatest level of similar values and responsibility for any sort of justice.
Which government body authorized CTSOs? Through the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act, the has authorized CTSOs.
CTSO's also called as Carl D Perkins Vocational and Technical Educational Act was authorized by Federal Government i.e. The Congress in 1984.
What is CTSO?CTSO is a principal source of federal funding to states and discretionary grants for the improvement of secondary and post secondary career and technical education program across the nation.
The purpose of the act is to develop fully the academic, career and technical skills of secondary and post secondary students who elect to enroll in career and technical education program.
The act also aims to increase the quality of technical education within the United States in order to help the economy.
History:
The Smith-Hughes Act of 1917 was the first authorization for the federal funding of vocational education. Subsequent legislation for vocational education included the Vocational Act of 1973 and the Carl D Perkins Act of 1984.
Later different forms of act like Perkins II in 1990, Perkins III in 1998 and Perkins IV in 2006 were introduced.
In 2018 President Trump signed into law for the re authorization of the Act in 2018 under the name of Perkins V passed unanimously by the Congress.
The Perkins IV included three major areas of revision:
- Use of career and technical education instead of vocational education
- Maintaining the Tech Prep program as a separate federal funding stream within the legislation
- Maintaining state administrative funding at 5% of a state's allocation.
What is Federal Government?Federalism is a mixed or compound mode of government that combines a general government with regional governments in a single political system, dividing the powers between the two.
The political principles that animate federal systems emphasize the primacy of bargaining and negotiated coordination among several power centers. They stress the virtues of dispersed power centers as a means for safeguarding individual and local liberties
To learn more about CTSO here
https://brainly.com/question/8903174
#SPJ3
Which of the following statements is true about CERTs? A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood. B. CERTS often support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects in the community. C. Being a CERT volunteer requires little time because disasters do not occur frequently. D. CERTS never support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects.
Answer:
A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood.
Explanation:
CERT is an educational program that seeks to instruct volunteers who can help their communities in emergencies or disasters, in addition to teaching concepts for preventing these disasters, low-complexity rescues and even simpler medical procedures that can make all the difference in safety of the victims .. As stated before, the goal is for the volunteer to be able to help their community in the face of a need.
Define, describe, compare, and contrast common-law crimes and statutory crimes. Be sure to provide examples.
Answer:
Common law is commonly defined as jurisprudence and it is of 2 types – one in which the decisions made are existing legislation in which there are no legislation and another where the court may require the current law and establish new definitions and divisions.
The legislative regulations can be enacted by the various departments of a country. Therefore, there's many laws enacted by state and federal governments, laws enacted by cities and municipalities, all of which have the force of law.
Examine some of the difficulties in the financial system in Ghana and how it has been addressed?
Answer:
The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.
Explanation:
There have been mergers of some banks in Ghana which lead to financial system inconsistencies. There was continuous mobilization of fund which resulted in unstable deposits. The challenges have been addressed by Implementing Institution Act of 2016.
Looking at the misty rain and fog, explain at least two defensive driving techniques you would utilize to adjust your driving and lower your risk
Answer: Some of the defensive driving techniques while driving in misty rain and fog are-
Utilizing wipers and defrosters effectively.
Staying put and not jumping lanes.
Not using high beam
Explanation:
Driving during misty rain and fog can be tricky at times. It is advisable to engage in defensive driving during such events. Some of the action which can be taken during such event are-
Utilizing wipers and defrosters effectively- Frankly speaking, wipers and defrosters are driver’s best friend during such critical times. Effective use of these enhances the visibility from the windshield and driver can get insights into the condition existing on the road (regarding slippery condition, traffic movement ahead etc.)
Staying put and not jumping lanes- Normally such conditions are accompanied by slow traffic. A wise driver would never jump lanes on account of two reasons. Firstly, the road is wet and slippery and secondly low visibility.
Not using a high beam of headlights- High beam reflects the mist and fog particles thus forming a white wall and further reducing visibility. Instead, special sodium lamps can be used.
Answer:
utilizing wipers and defrosters effectively and staying put and not jumping lanes
Explanation:
Bentham and Kant agree on?
Answer:
Morality constrains individual self-interest
Explanation:
both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if is one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one shoukd maximise everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
If you drive under the influence, you
A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person.
B. Will have to pay double the fine if you’re ticketed for speeding.
C. Are less likely to be injured in a collision.
D. I’m not committing a crime unless your BAL is .08 or higher
Answer:
the answer is a.
Explanation:
cuz you still arent 100 pecent paying attwntion
Answer:
A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person
Explanation:
While under the influence, you're not fully conscious or aware of your surroundings. That being said, driving is a task that acquires the driver to be conscious and to have awareness for their safety and the other driver's safety. If the driver is intoxicated, they risk a collision and killing people if the collison is deadly.
Section 35-4-20 of the Michie's Alabama Code, published by LexisNexis in 1991.
Answer:
thats just crazy
Explanation:
One reason for the failure of SA
Answer:
visa regulations on impact SAA
Who was the first Postmaster General?
A. George Washington
B. George Washington
C. Benjamin Franklin
D. Washington Carver
It is C. Benjamin Franklin
Answer:
hi, you're answer would be
C. Benjamin Franklin
Hope it's help :)
Answer:
the guy on the $100 bill
Explanation:
According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
Answer: guilty vedect
Abel was employed as a security guard for Seep Corporation. Abel's job was to guard a fenced-in area and to use force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant. His working hours were from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. At about 11:00 P.M. one evening, Abel drove past his place of employment. He saw a teenager named Johnny climbing the outside of the fence that he guarded during the day. Angered by this violation of Seep's property rights and by the fact that Johnny had called him a "potbellied moron" only three days earlier, Abel stopped his car, ran up to the fence, pulled Johnny off of it, and beat him up. Johnny sues Seep Corporation for Abel's assault and battery (both intentional torts). Which of the following is most likely to be the court's verdict? Group of answer choices
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using "force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant". Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
