Answers:
letter C. consumers are able to buy goods from all over the world.
Answer:
The true answer is C
Explanation:
just took the test
How are criminal cases different from civil cases?
A. Criminal cases use reasonable doubt as the burden of proof.
B. Criminal cases always give a judge the power to make the ruling.
C. Criminal cases include both opening and closing statements.
D. Criminal cases deal with both torts and breach of contract laws.
Answer:
d or b is answer but i am confuse
13. About how many teen drivers were killed in motor vehicle crahes in the
United States over the past decade?
Answer:
An average of nine teens ages 16-19 were killed every day from motor vehicle injuries. 2,739 drivers ages 15-20 were killed and an additional 228,000 were injured in crashes. A total of 4,054 teens between the ages of 13-19 died in car accidents
Explanation:
HELP ASAP
Offender: Johnny Theft
Crime: Burglary by breaking into 3 homes and stealing numerous items such as gaming systems, flat-screen TVs, and gold jewelry.
Create a scenario that applies 1 of the crime theories discussed in the session.
Include reasons for explaining why the crime was committed based on your theory. Provide details in 3-4 sentences.
3. V o F. Justificar.
a) El ser humano existe.
b) La verdadera libertad es hacer lo que quiero sin importar las consecuencias, soy libre!
c) Las áreas de la persona son cuerpo, mente y lo biológico. v
d) Las tres dimensiones de la persona están en constante interrelación
Answer: C
Explanation: Las áreas de la persona sin cuerpo mente y lo biológico
Can someone help me with this word search?
How a bill becomes Law in Canada?
Answer:
they go through the canadian government
Explanation:
A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who was walking down a corridor lost his balance and bumped his head on the edge of a doorway. Because of a previously existing medical condition that made him susceptible to bleeding on the brain, he suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and permanent mental impairment, despite prompt medical attention on the ship. The passenger brought suit against the cruise ship owner for his damages. At trial, the passenger presented evidence of how he was injured as he walked down the hallway, his previous medical condition, and his medical expenses and other damages. The cruise ship owner presented evidence that the cruise ship was following its approved route and that the whale could not have been detected before impact, and that the bump would not have injured someone in ordinary health. At the close of the evidence, the cruise ship owner moved for a directed verdict. How should the court rule
Answer:
A. Grant the motion, because there is no evidence that the crew operated the ship negligently.
Explanation:
The cruse ship owner's request for a directed verdict should be granted because from the evidences produced by two parties, there is no established piece of evidence that the passenger's permanent state has of health resulting from his fall while walking through the passage of the cruise ship was due to the cruise ship's negligent control or operation. The supporting evidences are so clear that the issuing a directed verdict in this case is logical as no reasonable jury presented with the evidences produced would rule otherwise.
how do Christians play the role of John the Baptist
Answer:
Just a cousin of Jesus who is a few months older,he spend his time baptizing then he baptized his cousin and then there was a dove who spoke on behalf of God.he died because some king was trying ......his head cut off.
Explanation:
Sorry just watch videos on You tube about his life
what is Employment equity act?
Employment eguity act is the act that states that each person whether male or female shall get equal opportunity to do work according to their knowledge and each individual shall get equal salary according to their job...........
A plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused by the defendant. The plaintiff sued the defendant for his injuries. In preparation for trial, the plaintiff's attorney hired a doctor to examine the plaintiff. At trial, the defense attorney attempts to call the doctor as a witness to testify about statements the plaintiff made in confidence to the doctor about his injuries, which the doctor then communicated to the plaintiff's attorney. The state recognizes only the common law privileges. Should this testimony be admitted
Answer:
Yes! The Courtroom is the only place where the "Doctor/Patient Confidentiality" does not uphold.
The term "uppers" refers to .
A. depressants
B. stimulants.
C. sedatives.
Answer:
C. sedative
Explanation:
This is also referring to something above
Which of the following is the best procedure for making a lane change to
the right?
1 point
a. Check all sides for a safe gap in traffic, signal right, recheck blind areas to the rear
in the direction you plan to move, steer into the lane when safe then cancel the signal.
b. Check inside rearview mirror, signal right, check passenger side outside mirror and
look over your left shoulder for your blind area.
O c. Signal right, check driver's outside mirror and look over your left shoulder.
d. Signal right, check driver's outside mirror and look over our right shoulder before
moving right
Answer:
d number is right answer
Which type of laws are passed by Congress and affect all states?
federal laws
or
state laws
Answer:
Federal laws are bills that have passed both houses of Congress, been signed by the president, passed over the president's veto, or allowed to become law without the president's signature. Individual laws, also called acts, are arranged by subject in the United States Code. Regulations are rules made by executive departments and agencies, and are arranged by subject in the Code of Federal Regulations.Explanation:
hope it will help you Mark Me as brilliant
"KEEP RIGHT"
17. THIS SIGN MEANS:
A. Change lanes to the right
B. Drive to the right
C. Slower traffic should move to the right
GIVING BEST ANSWER BRAINLIEST
Which statement best explains the relationship between the mediation process and the arbitration process?
O A. Both help parties reach a settlement, but an arbitrator's decision is legally binding.
O B. Both are less costly than a trial but shift the burden of proof to favor the plaintiff.
O C. Both can keep a civil case from going to trial, but mediation cannot be appealed.
O D. Both can be used during civil trials but are mostly used in criminal cases.
Answer:
C no May this help you l think
Which of these is the best reason to explain why candidates for office hire campaign staff to run their campaigns?
Campaigns are complex undertakings, and candidates must hire staff members to manage specific activities
If candidates for office lose their runs for office, they can blame staff members for what went wrong
O Candidates hire staff members because campaigns provide an opportunity to give jobs to family members and
friends
O Campaigns are run according to accepted rules, and one of those rules is that candidates for office must hire
campaign staff
Answer:
Campaigns are complex undertakings, and candidates must hire staff members to manage specific activities
If candidates for office lose their runs for office, they can blame staff members for what went wrong
this is your answer
The best reason to explain candidates for office hire campaign staff to run their campaigns are Campaigns are complex undertakings, and candidates must hire staff members to manage specific activities. Thus the correct option is A.
What are campaigns?A campaign is a concerted effort to attain a specific aim or target. Campaigns are frequently used in politics and social movements to promote a specific agenda or cause.
Since campaigns are complex endeavors requiring a wide range of talents and expertise, candidates for office frequently engage campaign personnel to conduct their campaigns.
Hiring campaign workers can also save candidates time and money by allowing them to delegate specific chores and responsibilities to people with specialized skills and experience.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the political campaign, from
brainly.com/question/25819380
#SPJ5
Aiming high means to
Answer:
Shoot for the moon, land on the stars.
Explanation:
Rarely do we shoot too high, the far worse travesty is shooting too low
Read the quote and select the correct answer.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress
may from time to time ordain and establish.
-US Constitution Article III, Section
Answer:B
Explanation:See FISA Court
It's a secret Court for investigation of information technology that it is secret is counter to public good because it takes all transparency out of the dealings of our elected officials and strips the judicial of any oversite which is the intended function of the checks and balances system set up by the constitution. Our judicial review power has been systemically legislated to have no teeth. Because of the corrupt corporations and the bought politicians who care only for money and power instead of their constituents or the United States, our precious constitution is now a meaningless hollow document. So sad
A patient properly filed a medical malpractice claim against a doctor in federal district court. The complaint simply asserted negligence as the grounds for relief without any facts supporting the claim. The doctor filed a pretrial motion for a more definite statement, which the court denied. Immediately thereafter, and without submitting an answer, the doctor filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. Will the court grant this motion to dismiss
Answer:
No. The Plaintiff should re-file with more substantiating evidence.
True or false? Shooting a vicious animal is permitted in self-defense.
mention a short description of make an observation , ask a question , do a background resaerch related to scientific learning .
Answer:
Explanation:
Israeli lawyer Moshe Strugano (Attorney - Moshe Strugano and Co Law firm), an expert in the “formation of offshore companies" says, observation refers to something, which we have learned by watching or checking out something and continuously thinking about it. When a person is making an observation, he is simply making a comment about something or someone, generally depends on someone's behaviour.
can my sister enroll me in school without custody in Florida?
Mr krabs went to the store
Answer:
yes he did
Explanation:
maybe
Answer:
and got money
Explanation:
A safe following distance for a car is?
Group of answer choices
1 car length for every 10 m.p.h
1 car length at any speed
1 second for every 10 m.p.h
two seconds under good conditions
A safe following distance for a car is 1 car length for every 10 m.p.h. Distance is the sum of an object's movements, regardless of direction. Thus, option A is correct.
Distance may be defined as the amount of space an item has covered, regardless of its beginning or finishing position. Distance is the separation of two objects. It also serves as a gauge for the distance between two objects. Any path may be used to measure it.
Therefore, even if his location has not changed, a person who circles about has moved a certain distance. While distance and displacement appear to have the same meaning, they really have quite different definitions and implications. While displacement refers to the measurement of "how far out of place an object is," distance is the term for "how much ground an object has covered during its motion."
Therefore, option A is the ideal selection.
Learn more about distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/31713805
#SPJ4
After a power outage, the stoplights at a busy intersection were blinking red for traffic going in every direction. By statute, motorists must come to a full stop at a blinking red traffic signal before proceeding through the intersection. Cars driven by the plaintiff and by the defendant arrived at the intersection at the same time. Due to inattention, neither one stopped for the signal and the cars collided in the intersection. The plaintiff sued the defendant for his injuries. The trier of fact determined that the plaintiff was more at fault than the defendant. Will the plaintiff likely recover damages
Answer:
The plaintiff still has a possibility of procure judgement that will allow him recover damages although the plaintiff was more at fault than the defendant. Through the account of the plaintiff's first impression of the defendant's negligence, he can establish a case against the defendant, and given that jurisdiction of comparative negligence does not prevent the plaintiff from seeking recovery, though the defense from defendant is that the plaintiff is a contributor to the negligence which was the cause of the incident
Whereby the damage suffered by the plaintiff is more than the damage suffered by the defendant, the plaintiff can likely recover damage although the he the plaintiff is at more fault
Explanation:
While in a department store, a man picked up a sweater and slipped it under his shirt. The man then started for the door. A woman, who also was shopping in the store, saw the man take the sweater. The woman grabbed a baseball bat from the sporting goods aisle and chased the man into the parking lot. The woman began swinging the bat at the man's head, hoping to knock him out and thus prevent the theft. The man pulled a knife from his pocket and stabbed the woman, killing her. The man was arrested and charged with murder. At trial, will the man most likely be found guilty
Answer:
D). No, because the man was acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
In the given situation, the man would not be considered guilty of murdering the woman and this is because the action took place when was defending himself from the attacks made by that woman on him. However, the man was attempting to steal the sweater at the store yet the deadly attack made by the woman on his head with the baseball bat cannot be justified in any case. Her act would be categorized under 'dangerous felony' and therefore, the use of a knife by the man was enforced on him to save himself. Hence, the action was in 'self-defense' and he will not be punished for it as it was the woman who initiated the physical violence and harm and he just reacted. Thus, option D is the correct answer.
A 15-year-old sophomore high school student became pregnant, and the school board required her to attend a special program for pregnant students instead of her regular classes. The girl did not want to attend a special program; rather, she wanted to attend her regular classes. She sued the school district in federal district court, demanding that she be allowed to attend her regular classes. Before her case came to trial, the girl gave birth to the child. Subsequently, the district reinstated her in her regular classes. When her suit comes before the federal district court, what should the court do
Answer:
No case; she gave birth and made the case moot.
A three-car accident occurred in a city in the Northern District of State A. The cars were driven by a citizen of State B who resides in the Southern District of State B, a citizen of State A who resides in the Southern District of State A, and a citizen of State C who resides in the Northern District of State C. The State B citizen filed a negligence action against the other two drivers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of State A. Although the two defendants believed that venue was improper, neither filed a pre-answer motion objecting to venue. They instead proceeded to file their answers, responding to the merits of the claim. The State C defendant, however, included in her answer a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue. How should the court rule on the State C defendant's motion to dismiss for imprope
Answer:
The motion should be granted, given that a defendant can raise objections to venue in their answer, where the Rule 12(b) pre-answer motion is not asserted by the defendant and that the venue is improper, given that the Southern District of State A is not the location of any of the events for which the claim is being made, and that one of the defendant is not a resident of State A
Explanation:
Four common types of distractions are
A. food, drink, interesting topics, and loud noises
B. teenagers, vehicles, construction, and stop lights
C. tech, personal, passenger, and emotional
D. food, tech, passenger, and emotional
Answer:
A. All these are sources of distractions. A delicious food, a tasty drink, an engrossing topics and noise pollution
tatiana tarasoff was killed by prosenjit poddar, a graduate student at the university of california. tatiant's parents sued; the case was heard by the supreme court of california. the tarasoff case is important because
Answer:
esp
Explanation:
