The _____ driving of an alcohol-impaired driver can victimize other drivers or their passengers
A, slow
B. unpredictable
C. seemingly sate
Answer:
The answer is B. Unpredictable.
The unpredictable driving of an alcohol impaired driver can victimize other drivers or their passengers. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
What does it mean when a driver is impaired?Driving while intoxicated is the practice of doing so while operating a motor vehicle. In the US, it is classified as having a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of at least 0.08%. (mass of per volume of blood in the body).
Alcohol Impaired driving continues to be one of the biggest safety issues on U.S. roads. At least one motorist or motorcycle operator in a driving accident has a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 grams per deciliter or above. The number of accidents involving drinking has decreased.
Therefore, an intoxicated driver's unpredictable behavior on the road puts other drivers and their passengers at risk.
To learn more about impaired driver, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11903876
#SPJ2
Which two of the following most likely violate a right in the Bill of Rights?
A president tries to shut down newspapers that criticize his or her actions.
A group of high school students decides to pray together in the cafeteria during lunch.
A school principal censors a yearbook photo that shows a student wearing an offensive t-shirt.
A person is arrested and questioned for hours before being allowed to call a lawyer.
A state legislature passes a law banning the carrying of firearms in government buildings.
Answer:
A president tries to shut down newspapers that criticize his or her actions.
A person is arrested and questioned for hours before being allowed to call a lawyer.
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Answer: 1&4
Explanation:
Edmentum
The majority of the authorized law enforcement personnel in this country are:
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST URGENT
When it comes to protecting the constitutional rights of citizens, which element of government is MOST important?
A) No; Akbar lacked standing to bring the case to the courts.
B) No; state laws are not challengeable in federal courts.
C) No; the case is moot since the law was repealed.
D) Yes; there’s a federal interest in preventing similar cases.
Answer:
Explanation:
The choices here are for a different question:
"Akbar runs an ice cream shop. His state government passed a law raising taxes on dairy products over a hundredfold, believing that dairy products were unhealthy. Akbar sued the state for arbitrary taxation. The case was being appealed to the federal courts when the state repeals the tax before collecting any money. Would the federal courts still review the case?"
The correct answer is C) No; the case is moot since the law was repealed.
what are tones ?? name the types of tones
Answer:
formal
Explanation:
because u a not speaking to the person effectively so u need to be formal which comes with being neat n understandable as such that the person reading should read until the end
Adam Smith wrote in The Wealth of Nations, Book II, Chapter 2, In general, if any branch of trade, or any division of labour, be advantageous to the public, the freer and more general the competition, it will always be the more so.
Given this statement, Adam Smith would be most likely to oppose
encouraging trade competition
getting rid of trade tariffs
using taxes to help failing banks
removing farm subsidies
Answer: using taxes to help failing banks
Explanation:
Adam Smith believed that competition was good for the economy because it would lead to only the most efficient companies surviving as they outlast those who were not efficient and had to close up because they couldn't compete with the efficient ones.
Failing banks would fall under companies that were not efficient enough and so to Adam Smith, should not survive. Aiding these banks therefore so that they would survive, would be opposed by Adam Smith because it would mean that inefficiency was being rewarded and resources of the country were not be distributed efficiently.