Answer:
Yes! The Courtroom is the only place where the "Doctor/Patient Confidentiality" does not uphold.
A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who was walking down a corridor lost his balance and bumped his head on the edge of a doorway. Because of a previously existing medical condition that made him susceptible to bleeding on the brain, he suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and permanent mental impairment, despite prompt medical attention on the ship. The passenger brought suit against the cruise ship owner for his damages. At trial, the passenger presented evidence of how he was injured as he walked down the hallway, his previous medical condition, and his medical expenses and other damages. The cruise ship owner presented evidence that the cruise ship was following its approved route and that the whale could not have been detected before impact, and that the bump would not have injured someone in ordinary health. At the close of the evidence, the cruise ship owner moved for a directed verdict. How should the court rule
Answer: Grant the motion, because there is no evidence that the crew operated the ship negligently.
Explanation:
The court should rule by granting the cruise ship owner's motion due to the fact that the passenger has not been able to establish a case of negligence against the ship.
It should be noted that in order to establish a prima facie case for negligence, the plaintiff in this case must be able to show a duty of care, then a breach of that duty, a proximate cause, and the damages. However, in this case, the passenger doesn't have enough evidence to back up his claim.
A drug addict gives his or her drug more importance than __________.
Answer:
Anything else
Explanation:
They will do any thing even give away family and being homeless.
Successful coping skills can be_______.
a) stress management
b) relaxation skills
c) both
d) neither
Answer:
A. & B. Both
both be a perfect answer for this blank questions
¿Qué importancia tiene la elaboración de las leyes mediante mecanismos democráticos?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Aunque no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
La importancia que tiene la elaboración de las leyes mediante mecanismos democráticos es la siguiente.
En una democracia, son los ciudadanos los que eligen libremente a sus gobernantes. Los gobernantes elegidos, juntos con los miembros del Congreso, deben comprometerse honestamente a luchas por los intereses del pueblo, y para ello, deben debatir en el Congreso las leyes que más convengan para crear paz social y desarrollo económico en el país.
Esas leyes deben ser debatidas y votadas, siempre pensando en los intereses de la gente, del ciudadano común, y no para favorecer a los intereses de las grandes empresas privadas o multinacionales, que nada más están interesadas en ganar más dinero a expensas de la gente pobre.
Si no se elaboran las leyes mediante mecanismos democráticos, entonces los intereses particulares y la corrupción serán los que dicten la forma de gobernar a un país.
19. WHICH OF THESE IS A GOOD WAY TO SPOT DRIVING HAZARDS A. Focus on the vehicle ahead B. Focus on your inside mirrors C. Scan ahead of your vehicle
lam qamariah in surah al mursalat * pls i need the anwers with in 2hours
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
What are the Bill of Rights made up of?
Answer:
Answer to the following question is as follows;
Explanation:
The Us Bill of Rights, influenced by Jefferson and authored by James Madison, was accepted, and the first 10 constitutional amendments entered law in 1791.
The first ten amendments of the United States Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. It outlines the rights of Americans in regard to their government. Individual ’s dignity rights and freedoms, such as freedom of expression, press, and religion, are guaranteed.
Effective and thorough traffic safety education involves
family, community, industry, government, and personal
factors such as motivation, and perceptive abilities.
Answer:
maturity.
Explanation:
Traffic safety education can be defined as a form of road safety education that comprises both an informal and formal education that is typically focused on teaching, enhancing and improving the attitude, skills, knowledge, understanding, values, and insight of a road user such as pedestrians, drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists, etc.
Basically, traffic safety education are necessary and essential for safe traffic procedures, participation and commitments by road users and commuters.
Hence, an effective and thorough traffic safety education involves an active participation by family, community, industry, government, and personal factors such as motivation, maturity, and perceptive abilities.
There are three friends: Joaquin, Adam and Jennifer. The three of them witness an accident. When the police questions them, each makes a statement about the accident. Later on, Tim asks the three friends about this discussion with the police. Here’s what they say: Joaquin says: Both Adam and Jennifer lied. Adam says: One of the other two lied. Jennifer says: One of the other two told the truth. Who told the truth?
Who is most at risk?
1: Drivers who have traditional work schedules.
2: Experienced drivers.
3: Drivers who are driving long distances without rest breaks..
4: Drivers who have overslept.....
Which of the following is not a basic procedure
The available options are:
A. Oil maintenance B. Self-assessment C. Seat/mirror adjustments D. Vehicle check
Hence, considering the following options, the option that is not a basic procedure is Oil maintenance.
This is because, considering the available question, it can be concluded that this is about basics procedures regarding car maintenance and basics procedures regarding car maintenance deal with things or activities like self-assessment, seat/mirror adjustments and vehicle checks.On the other hand, however, the issue of oil maintenance is more applicable, in the sense that, it needs changing only when the car reaches over 15,000km
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is : Oil maintenance
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/13775451
1 - Una persona comete un delito a 100 millas de la costa de Punta del Este, cuando estaba en viaje hacia ese balneario. ¿Dónde debe ser juzgado? Explica.
Answer:
Si una persona comete un delito a 100 millas de la costa de Punta del Este, cuando estaba en viaje hacia ese balneario, deberá ser juzgado por el juez con competencia territorial en el territorio donde se cometió el delito, sin importar hacia dónde se dirigía la persona. Esto es así pues en derecho penal, será siempre competente el juez del lugar del delito, en tanto es quien conoce las vicisitudes y particularidades de la zona, teniendo estadísticas precisas de los crímenes que allí se cometen.
A state department of education has created a fund of a specific amount to be distributed among the public and private elementary schools within the state to provide instructional programs in mathematics. The amount of funds available to a school will be based on the number of students attending the school and the number of schools that elect to receive funds. Concerned that the expenditure of funds will benefit parochial schools at the expense of public schools, parents of public-school children have filed suit against the state secretary of education in federal district court seeking an injunction to block the distribution of these funds to parochial schools as a violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as made applicable to the state via the Fourteenth Amendment. How is the court likely to rule in this suit
Answer:
Doesn't fall under the First Amendment nor the Fourteenth Amendment. Try again.
A windstorm blew down a light in the parking lot of a grocery store, hitting one of the store's customers. The customer filed a civil action against the store seeking compensatory damages, alleging that the store negligently maintained the light. After the action was filed, the store's lawyer visited the store and spoke with one of the store's clerks who saw the light fall. The lawyer asked the clerk to write out in his own words and handwriting exactly what he saw, and the clerk did so. The lawyer then asked the clerk a number of questions about the incident and wrote his own notes in the margins of the statement written by the clerk. Unfortunately, the clerk died in an unrelated car accident two weeks later. The customer's lawyer served a document request on the store seeking all documents relating in any way to the accident. In response, the store described the written statement prepared by the clerk but refused to produce it. The customer filed a motion asking the court to compel the store to produce the statement. How should the court rule
Answer: As long as the customer can show that she has no other way to obtain the information provided by the clerk, the document must be produced but with the notes written by the store's lawyer redacted
Explanation:
It should be noted that the court should order the statement to be produced by the store but the notes which are written by the lawyer of the store should be redacted.
The statement is a work product and this is discoverable as long as the opposing party can be able to show substantial need and due to the fact the clerk died in an accident, this is a substantial need.
criminologist wants to gain an in-depth understanding of the subculture of a street gang in a particular city. Which one of the following methods would be the most appropriate method for obtaining such an understanding? P.S. how down to talk....
Answer:
Undercover?
Explanation:
How better than to become one of them?
You see a green buoy. What should you do?
Answer:
pass to the right
Explanation:
Green buoy means pass to the right
Alabama permit test
Answer:
Alabama is a state located on the south of the United States. With an area of 135,765 km2, Alabama is the 30th largest state in the United States, the 24th most populous state in terms of population (4.9 million) and 27th in terms of population density of 37 inhabitants per km2.
The territory of Alabama was explored by the Spaniards in the 16th century, the first permanent European settlement was founded by the French in 1702 (near today's city of Mobile). Until 1763, this coastal area was part of their Louisiana colony, then, until 1783, part of British West Florida. At that time, the territory of Alabama was divided by the United States and Spain (as part of Florida). In 1798, Mississippi territory was created in the United States, which by 1812 had spread to the entire territory of today's Mississippi and Alabama. Five years later, its own territory was separated, which subsequently became a US state. It got its name from the river of the same name, named after the Alabama Indian culture. On December 14, 1819, Alabama became the 22nd state of the United States. During the Civil War, Alabama was part of the Confederation from 1861 to 1865, and was rejoined the Union in 1868.
The defendant is on trial for fraudulently signing a check for $10,000. The defendant has denied that she signed the check. The prosecutor calls the landlord of the apartment building in which the defendant has resided for three months before her arrest. The landlord intends to testify that it is the defendant's signature on the check, and he bases his opinion of the authenticity of her signature on the ground that he saw her sign the lease to his apartment. Should the trial court find this testimony admissible
Answer: Yes. because the landlord has previously seen the signature.
Explanation:
In this situation, the trial court should find this testimony admissible due to the fact that the landlord has previously seen the signature.
Since the landlord intends to testify based on the fact that he saw her sign thesame signature on the lease to his apartment, then this should be admissible by the court as it's an evidence to show that she was the one involved in the fraudulent signing of the check.
What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof of impending criminal activity? P.S. If anyone has information of the user playboy please contact me in the comment section please, please.
Choose two consumer protection laws and, in about 500 words, describe the benefits they provide for consumers and the costs to society.
Answer:
Answer to the following question is as follows;
Explanation:
The legislation regulates the quality of food, medicines, medical devices, and cosmetic goods manufactured and purchased by customers in the American market. The bill also included provisions for government oversight and supervision of these principles.
The Truth in Lending Act is a federal legislation that permits borrowers to make certain representations about lending conditions and pricing. TILA has laws governing open-end credit lines, shuttered personal loans, commercial lending, and private college financing.
Allison is analyzing the fracture pattern of a window. She sees that the fracture lines encircle the point of impact. What type of fracture lines are these?
Answer:
Concentric
Explanation:
Radial-
Produced first
Form on the opposite side of where force took place
Resemble spider webs
Concentric-
Formed after radial fractures
Encircle the bullet or puncture hole,
Start on the same side the act of force took place
What is the main difference between federal and confederal systems of government?
In a federal system there is no centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally
among the states.
In a federal system there is no centralized authority, while in a confederal system local offices give advice to a
centralized authority.
In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among
the states.
In a federal system power is distributed equally, while in a confederal system the states have less authority than
the central government.
Answer: In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among the states.
Explanation:
Some of the differences between a federal and a confederal include:
1. In the federal system, the main functions and power are reserved for the central government while for the confederal, main functions and power belongs to the states.
1. One of the differences between a federal and confederal is that a federation, sovereignty rests with a new state formed represented by the central government, while in a confederation, sovereignty rests with the component states.
2. The confederal system of government is less stable politically than the federal system of government.
3. In the federal system, the central government owns the police and army and.maintains them while in a confederation, each state maintains its own police and army.
4. In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among the states
5. In a confederation, citizens obey only their state government while in the federal system, the citizens obey two government which are the federal government and the state government.
Answer:
A. In a federal system there is centralized authority, while in a confederal system power is distributed equally among the states.
Explanation:
Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?
-paying the electric bill in exchange for using electricity
-viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts
-observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
-paying the water bill in exchange for taking a shower
Answer:
c. observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
Explanation:
Viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts could be considered an acceptance of the social contract. Thus, option B is correct.
What is a social contract?A social contract is an unspoken arrangement of the obligations of the populace or the governing body. The agreement's conditions can change significantly.
One could argue that consuming news channel broadcasts in return for ads signify endorsement of the social contract. People must engage with each other in this condition of affairs, therefore citizens establish an agreement between themselves to govern this contact.
The social contract hypothesis is not only the oldest but also the most well-known of the explanations for how the state came into existence. The core of this thesis is that men without prior governmental organization agreed to a deal that led to the creation of the state.
Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about the social contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18597938
#SPJ5
Which of the following is NOT considered exploitation?
Select one:
O a. Intimidating a elderly person to give them money.
O b. Deceptively convincing a senior to sell their home at below market price.
O c. Not responding quickly to a residents call button.
The following which is not considered as exploitation is Intimidating a elderly person to give them money Option(a) is correct.
What does Exploitation means?Exploitation is the demonstration of egotistically exploiting somebody or a gathering to benefit from them or in any case benefit oneself.
Exploitation is a thing type of the action word exploit, which ordinarily means to take advantage in such a manner. The modifier structure is manipulative, as in shady practices By a wide margin the most compelling hypothesis of exploitation at any point put forward is that of Karl Marx, who held that specialists in an entrepreneur society are taken advantage of to the extent that they are compelled to sell their work capacity to business people for not exactly the full worth of the products they produce with their work.
Overexploitation or overfishing is the evacuation of marine living assets to levels that are excessively low for supporting suitable populaces. At last, overexploitation can prompt asset consumption and put various compromised and imperiled species in danger of annihilation.
Therefore Option(a) is correct.
Learn more about Exploitation here:
brainly.com/question/15165384
#SPJ2
Compare and contrast a federalist system of government to a confederate system of government.
Answer:
The main comparative difference between a federal state and a confederate state lies in the role of the sub-national entities of each. Thus, in a federation, it is the federal state that has sovereignty over sub-national entities, which cannot secede or nullify federal laws, that is, they are in a clear position of inferiority with respect to the federation. For their part, in confederation, sub-national entities remain sovereign, that is, with the full capacity to make decisions on their own, including the rights of secession and nullification; with which the confederate state is rather a central point of debate between the different sovereign states that make up the confederation.
If a judge learns that a defendant was abused as a child and committed the crime while under extreme financial pressure, what is the most likely outcome?
One man leads North Korea and controls its government. He also controls its ruling political party. The ruling party chooses candidates for an Assembly, and citizens vote. The candidates do not have opponents, so citizens have no choices. North Korea has a(n) ___________________________________.
Answer:
Dictatorship or One-Party State
Explanation:
La pieza de abajo está muy arriba coherencia ejemplo
Explanation:
Coherence is defined as anything that is logical, continuous, and makes more sense world in general. An argumentation with no contradictions is an example of coherence. Congruency is the characteristic of being intellectually integrated, consistent, and understandable. His tale was disjointed.
Answer:
La pieza que se encuentra arriba esta en lo bajo
Creo que es asi, perdon.
Is modern family a funny show, i fink i like it duh no though. I like the luke. He hits thoughs. BUT IS IT funny friends not so. Thanks
Explanation:
Modern family komik bir şov mu, sanırım hoşuma gidiyor ama hayır. luke'u severim. Yine de vuruyor. AMA komik arkadaşlar öyle değil. Teşekkürler
Answer:
it was ok
Explanation:
i rate it 8/10
*and ya i also agree it was not funny*
This question right here!!!
