A cake shop bakes a variety of brownies. The top-selling brownies are ones with toppings of chocolate chip, walnuts, or both. A customer enters the store. The probability that the customer will pick both toppings is 0. 4. What is the probability that they will pick neither the chocolate chip nor the walnut toppings? A. 0. 5 B. 0. 3 C. 0. 45 D. 0. 8 E. 0. 2.

The time it would take for the bag to infuse at the maximum time would be the value of 1. 5 hours.

The maximum rate of infusion for an IV bag is 250 ml/hour. This means that the maximum time it would take for the bag to infuse is:

= Quantity in bag / Maximum rate of infusion

Therefore, it will take:

= 376 ml / 250 ml/hour

= 1. 5 hours to infuse the entire bag

In conclusion, the time it would take for the bag to infuse at the maximum time is 1. 5 hours.

Find out more on Blood administration at https://brainly.com/question/30748600

#SPJ4

- Plane 1 travels at a speed of 225 mph.

- Plane 2 has an airspeed of 3 times faster than Plane 1, which is 3 * 225 mph = 675 mph.

- The wind speed is 500 mph.

Let's analyze the information provided:

Plane 1:

- Distance traveled: 450 miles

- Direction: South

- Time taken: 2 hours

Plane 2:

- Distance traveled: 525 miles

- Direction: North

- Time taken: 3 hours

- Airspeed: 3 times faster than Plane 1

We can calculate the speed of Plane 1 and the wind speed by dividing the distance traveled by the time taken.

Plane 1's speed = Distance / Time = 450 miles / 2 hours = 225 miles per hour (mph)

Let's assume the speed of the wind is W mph.

For Plane 2, since it is traveling against the wind, we need to consider the effect of the wind on its speed. The effective speed of Plane 2 against the wind can be calculated as the airspeed of Plane 2 minus the wind speed.

Effective speed of Plane 2 = Airspeed of Plane 2 - Wind speed = 3 * Plane 1's speed - W

Now we can use the formula: Speed = Distance / Time to calculate the wind speed.

For Plane 2:

Effective speed of Plane 2 = Distance / Time = 525 miles / 3 hours = 175 mph

175 mph = 3 * 225 mph - W

W = 3 * 225 mph - 175 mph

W = 675 mph - 175 mph

W = 500 mph

The wind speed is calculated to be 500 mph.

Visit here to learn more about speed brainly.com/question/17661499
#SPJ11

The difference between the fastest boy's time and the slowest boy's time can be found by comparing their respective times and calculating the difference.

To determine the fastest and slowest times among James, Gilbert, Matthew, and Simon, we examine their recorded times: 2/3, 11/12, 5/6, and 7/12.

To compare these fractions, we need to find a common denominator. In this case, the least common multiple of the denominators 3, 12, 6, and 12 is 12.

Converting the fractions to have a denominator of 12, we get:

James: 2/3 = 8/12

Gilbert: 11/12 (already in terms of 12)

Matthew: 5/6 = 10/12

Simon: 7/12 (already in terms of 12)

Now, we can clearly see that the fastest time is 8/12 (James) and the slowest time is 11/12 (Gilbert).

To find the difference between these two times, we subtract the slowest time from the fastest time:

8/12 - 11/12 = -3/12 = -1/4

Therefore, the difference between the fastest boy's time and the slowest boy's time is -1/4, or in other words, the fastest boy is 1/4 of a unit of time faster than the slowest boy.

To learn more about fractions: -brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ11

The cost of a 12-minute phone call is $4.20.

The cost of a nine-minute phone call is $3.15. To find the cost of a 12-minute phone call, we must first determine the cost per minute. We can do this by dividing the cost of a nine-minute call by 9 minutes, which gives us the cost per minute.

3.15 ÷ 9 = $0.35 (cost per minute) Now that we know the cost per minute, we can find the cost of a 12-minute phone call by multiplying the cost per minute by the number of minutes. 12 × $0.35 = $4.20 Therefore, the price of a 12-minute phone call is $4.20.

To know more about cost visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/32660686

#SPJ11

9 kilograms of cashews were in the mixture the grocer sold.

To solve the given problem, let x represent the number of kilograms of cashews.

Hence, the number of kilograms of Brazil nuts would be (12 - x) as the grocer sold 12 kg of the mixture.

Therefore, the cost of the cashews at $8 per kilogram is 8(x)

and the cost of the Brazil nuts at $10 per kilogram is 10(12 - x).

Hence, the cost of the mixture at $8.50 per kilogram is:

8.5*(12) = 8(x) + 10(12 - x)

We solve this equation for x:

102 = 8(x) + 120 - 10(x)

2(x)= 18

x = 9

To know more about cashews,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32799716

#SPJ11

b is 10 times bigger than c. the ratio A:b is equivalent to the ratio a:c multiplied by 5: A:b = (a:c) * 5

To determine how many times b is bigger than c, we need to compare their respective ratios.

Given:

A:b = 1:5

a:c = 2:1

To make a comparison, we can find the relative sizes of b and c by considering the ratios they have with other variables.

From the ratio A:b = 1:5, we can rewrite it as A:b = 2:10 (multiplying both sides by 2).

Comparing the ratios A:b and a:c, we can see that the ratio A:b is equivalent to the ratio a:c multiplied by 5:

A:b = (a:c) * 5

Substituting the given ratios, we have:

2:10 = (2:1) * 5

Now, we can compare the values of b and c directly:

b = 10

c = 1

Therefore, b is 10 times bigger than c.

Learn more about equivalent here

https://brainly.com/question/24734894

#SPJ11

The statement that is true about this comparison is that they differ in the thousandths place, with 0.739 being greater than 0.7380.

The statement that is true about the comparison

0.739 > 0.7380

is that they differ in the thousandths place. The difference between the two numbers is

0.001 or 1/1000,

which is why we can say that they differ in the thousandths place. This difference is very small, but it is enough to make

0.739 greater than 0.7380.

The comparison between

0.739 and 0.7380

is true in that the former is greater than the latter by a small margin. The two numbers differ in the thousandths place, with 0.739 having a value of

0.739 and 0.7380

having a value of 0.738.

The difference between the two values is

0.001 or 1/1000,

which is very small.

However, this difference is enough to make 0.739 greater than 0.7380.

Therefore, the statement that is true about this comparison is that they differ in the thousandths place, with

0.739 being greater than 0.7380.

To know more about thousandths visit:

https://brainly.com/question/297733

#SPJ11

The correct answer is that the event you described is dependent.

When Yolanda grabs 2 red checkers and replaces them between each draw, the outcome of the first draw affects the probability of the second draw. This is because replacing the checkers means that the probability of drawing a red checker remains the same for each individual draw, but the overall probability changes after each draw.

Let's break it down:

In the first draw, Yolanda has a certain probability of drawing a red checker.

After the first draw, if Yolanda indeed drew a red checker, there is one less red checker in the pool and the total number of checkers has decreased.

In the second draw, Yolanda now has a different probability of drawing a red checker compared to the first draw because the pool of available checkers has changed.

Therefore, the outcome of the first draw affects the probability of the second draw, making the event dependent.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

option B is the correct answer.

The perimeter of a rectangle is 22 cmLet the length of the rectangle be 'l' and the breadth be 'b'As per the question, the perimeter of the rectangle is given by;Perimeter = 2(l + b) => 2(l + b) = 22 => l + b = 11.As we know that the area of a rectangle is given by;Area = l × b

Therefore, the different areas of the rectangle are; l × b1 × (11 - 1) = 10 cm²2 × (11 - 2) = 18 cm²3 × (11 - 3) = 24 cm²4 × (11 - 4) = 28 cm²5 × (11 - 5) = 30 cm²6 × (11 - 6) = 30 cm²7 × (11 - 7) = 28 cm²8 × (11 - 8) = 24 cm²9 × (11 - 9) = 18 cm²10 × (11 - 10) = 10 cm²Hence, there are only 8 different areas of the rectangle i.e., 10 cm², 18 cm², 24 cm², 28 cm², 30 cm².

To know more about Perimeter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7486523

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we can set up an equation based on the volume of lemon juice in the mixture:

Let's assume Milo needs to add x gallons of 100% lemon juice.

The total volume of the final mixture is given as 4 gallons, and it should be a 50% lemon juice and 50% lime juice mixture.

The initial mixture contains 20% lemon juice, which means it contains 20% of 4 gallons = 0.2 * 4 = 0.8 gallons of lemon juice.

So, the equation becomes:

0.8 gallons (initial lemon juice) + x gallons (additional 100% lemon juice) = 0.5 * 4 gallons (final lemon juice)

Simplifying the equation:

0.8 + x = 2

Subtracting 0.8 from both sides:

x = 2 - 0.8

x = 1.2

Therefore, Milo needs to add 1.2 gallons of 100% lemon juice to make 4 gallons of the 50% lemon/50% lime juice mixture.

#SPJ11

The wall area that needs to be painted, excluding the doorway, is 125 square feet.

The total area of the wall is obtained by multiplying its length and width:

Total area = 11 ft * 13 ft = 143 square feet.

The area of the doorway is given by multiplying its length and width:

Doorway area = 6 ft * 3 ft = 18 square feet.

To find the area of the wall that needs to be painted, we subtract the area of the doorway from the total area:

Painting area = Total area - Doorway area = 143 square feet - 18 square feet = 125 square feet.

Therefore, you will need 125 square feet of paint to cover the wall only.

Learn more about rectangles here: brainly.com/question/29123947

#SPJ11

Using 17 + 5 - 8 + 9 - 2 = 21 and 2 + 9 - 8 + 17 - 5 = 15 as two number sentences, we can form the target number of 2.
1) 2C = BF
2) B - 3E = A
3) C - A = 2D
4) F - A + B = 47
5) 3E - B + 2A = 8

In the first statement, the variable C is multiplied by 2, and the result is equal to the product of variables B and F. In the second statement, the product of variables E and 3 is subtracted from B, and the result is equal to A.

In the third statement, the difference between variables C and A is equal to twice the value of variable D. In the fourth statement, the sum of variables F and B is subtracted from A, and the result is equal to 47.

In the fifth statement, twice the value of variable A is added to 3 times the value of variable E, and this sum is subtracted from the value of variable B, which gives 8.

Learn more about variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/29696241

#SPJ11

The explicit formula for the given sequence 4, -12, 36, -108,... is D. tn = 4(-3)n. Option D

In the given sequence, each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by -3. This indicates an exponential decay pattern with a common ratio of -3.

To derive the explicit formula, we start with the initial term 4 and observe that each subsequent term can be obtained by multiplying the previous term by -3:

Term 1: 4

Term 2: -3 × 4 = -12

Term 3: -3 ×(-12) = 36

Term 4: -3 × 36 = -108

We can generalize this pattern by using the formula tn = ar^(n-1), where tn represents the nth term, a is the initial term, and r is the common ratio. In this case, a = 4 and r = -3. Thus, the explicit formula for the sequence is tn = 4(-3)n which matches option D.

learn more about explicit formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/25094536

#SPJ11

none of the provided approximations for the probabilities are accurate.To determine which statement is true, we need to calculate the probabilities of selecting each color marker.

Total number of markers = 20 green + 44 orange + 30 blue = 94 markers.

P(blue) = Number of blue markers / Total number of markers = 30 / 94 ≈ 0.319.

P(green) = Number of green markers / Total number of markers = 20 / 94 ≈ 0.213.

P(orange) = Number of orange markers / Total number of markers = 44 / 94 ≈ 0.468.

Based on the calculations, none of the given statements are true. The actual probabilities are approximately:

P(blue) ≈ 0.319,
P(green) ≈ 0.213,
P(orange) ≈ 0.468.

Therefore, none of the provided approximations for the probabilities are accurate.

 To learn more about number click here:brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

The given expression is an equation containing fractions.

Given expression is:

[tex]$$\frac{2x}{x+7} - \frac{x}{x+3} = 1 + \frac{1}{x^2+10x+21}$$[/tex]

We can rewrite the given expression as follows:

[tex]$$\frac{2x(x+3)-x(x+7)}{(x+7)(x+3)}=\frac{x^2+10x+22}{(x+3)(x+7)}$$[/tex]

Simplifying the numerator and denominator of the above expression,

we get:[tex]$$\frac{x^2-4x-21}{(x+7)(x+3)} = \frac{x^2+10x+22}{(x+7)(x+3)}$$[/tex]

On simplifying, we get the following equation:

[tex]$$x^2-4x-21=x^2+10x+22$$[/tex]

Simplifying the above equation, we get:

$$14x=-43$$

On dividing by 14 on both sides,

we get:[tex]$${x=-\frac{43}{14}}$$[/tex]

To know more about denominator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32621096

#SPJ11

The volume of the empty portion of Container B is given as follows:

34.6 ft³.

The volume of a cylinder of radius r and height h is given by the equation presented as follows:

V = πr²h.

(the radius is half the diameter).

Hence the volume of Container A is given as follows:

V = π x 7² x 13

V = 2001.2 ft³.

The volume of container B is given as follows:

V = π x 6² x 18

V = 2035.8 ft³.

Then the volume of the empty portion of Container B is given as follows:

2035.8 - 2001.2 = 34.6 ft³.

More can be learned about the volume of a cylinder at brainly.com/question/9554871

#SPJ1

To sum up, Edgar's behavior is an example of positive reinforcement as he has learned to associate finishing his work before going to bed with positive consequences.

Edgar's behavior is an example of a learning process known as operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is the concept that we learn to associate our behavior with its consequences, either positive or negative. We are motivated by rewards, such as praise, and punishments, such as criticism, that we experience as a result of our behavior.

In Edgar's case, his relief and ability to fall asleep after completing his research paper can be considered a reward. Thus, he has been conditioned to associate finishing his work before going to bed with positive consequences. This learning process is an example of positive reinforcement.

Positive reinforcement, in which a positive stimulus is used to encourage a desired behavior, is the most effective way to promote good behavior and discourage undesirable behavior. Positive reinforcement can take many forms, including praise, recognition, and tangible rewards.

By contrast, negative reinforcement, which involves removing an unpleasant stimulus, can also be used to encourage a desired behavior, but it is not as effective as positive reinforcement in the long term.

To sum up, Edgar's behavior is an example of positive reinforcement as he has learned to associate finishing his work before going to bed with positive consequences.

To know more about Positive  visit :

https://brainly.com/question/23709550

#SPJ11

The scatter plot shows a comparison between the amount of television watched by students (in hours per week) and their GPA. a reasonable correlation coefficient for these data would be close to 0, indicating a weak or negligible correlation.

Based on the scatter plot, we can observe the general trend of the data points. If the points on the plot are more closely clustered around a straight line, it indicates a stronger correlation between the two variables. Conversely, if the points are more spread out and do not follow a clear pattern, it suggests a weaker correlation. To determine the correlation coefficient, we need to assess the direction and strength of the relationship.

If the data points on the scatter plot exhibit a clear upward or downward trend, it indicates a positive or negative correlation, respectively. The correlation coefficient ranges between -1 and 1, with values closer to -1 or 1 indicating a stronger correlation. A correlation coefficient of 0 indicates no linear relationship. Given that the scatter plot does not show a clear pattern or trend, it suggests a weak or no correlation between the amount of television watched and GPA. Therefore, a reasonable correlation coefficient for these data would be close to 0, indicating a weak or negligible correlation.

Learn more about coefficient here:

https://brainly.com/question/1594145

#SPJ11

The following expressions are equivalent to 8.9 x 6.28.7: 9 x 6; 6.28.7; 8.9 x 6.2. The product of two numbers, in general, is the outcome when we multiply the numbers together.

It means, when we take two quantities and multiply them, we get the result as a product. Let us understand how the multiplication of numbers works with an example. When we multiply 3 and 4, we get:3 × 4 = 12Here, 3 and 4 are called factors, and the result, 12, is called the product. Equivalent expressions are the expressions that have the same value, but their structures may differ. The expressions can be equivalent if they have the same value, but their format is different .Let's list the expressions that are equivalent to 8.9 x 6.28.7:The product of 9 and 6 is equal to 54. The product of 8.9 and 6.2 is equal to 55.18.The expression 6.28.7 is the same as 55.18. The product of 8.9 and 6.2 is the same as 6.28.7.Therefore, the following expressions are equivalent to 8.9 x 6.28.7:9 x 66.28.78.9 x 6.2.

Learn more about equivalent here:

https://brainly.com/question/28804962

#SPJ11

The mean for Mai's data is 8.9167.

To find the mean of the data given by Mai for the past 12 school days, we need to add all the values together and then divide by the total number of values.

Here is the solution: Given data are: 9, 12, 6, 9, 10, 7, 6, 12, 9, 8, 10, 10

To find: The mean for Mai's data

To calculate the mean, we will add up all the values and then divide by the total number of values.

Mean (average) = sum of values / total number of values

Sum of values = 9 + 12 + 6 + 9 + 10 + 7 + 6 + 12 + 9 + 8 + 10 + 10= 107

Total number of values = 12

Therefore, Mean (average) = sum of values / total number of values

= 107 / 12

= 8.9167 (rounded to four decimal places)

Hence, the mean for Mai's data is 8.9167.

Know more about  mean   here:

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ8

The expression that can be used to determine the total distance in miles Natalie jogged over these 3 nights is:

The model for finding the total distanceNatalie went on a jog 3 nights in a row and jogged the same distance each night.

The model for finding the total distance that Natalie jogged during the 3 nights is shown below:

Model for finding the total distance where each column represents one mile, and the shaded parts of each column represent the fraction of a mile that Natalie jogged each night.

From the model, we can find the total distance in miles Natalie jogged by counting the number of shaded parts in each column and then adding them together.

The number of shaded parts in each column represents the fraction of a mile that Natalie jogged each night.

Therefore, the expression that can be used to determine the total distance in miles Natalie jogged over these 3 nights is:

[tex]$$3 \cdot 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{3}{4}$$ $$= 3 + \frac{2}{4} + \frac{3}{4}$$$$= 3 + \frac{5}{4}$$$$= \frac{12}{4} + \frac{5}{4}$$$$= \frac{17}{4}$$$$= \boxed{4\frac{1}{4}}\ miles$$[/tex]

Therefore, Natalie jogged a total distance of 4 and 1/4 miles over these three nights.

To know more about fraction, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8473591

#SPJ11

The estimate at a 95% confidence level that most likely comes from a small sample is 93% (±24%). The correct option is A

The range of values that is most likely to include the true population parameter is known as the margin of error. The standard error, a gauge of the sample statistic's variability, is used to determine the margin of error.

Option A in this situation has the most margin of error of the four, at 24%. In comparison to the other options, this indicates that the true population parameter is probably within 24% of the sample statistic. This implies that option A's sample size is smaller than that of the other options.

Therefore, the estimate at a 95% confidence level that most likely comes from a small sample is 93% (±24%).

Learn more about margin of error here : brainly.com/question/30760332

#SPJ1

The midpoint of the line segment connecting two points can be found by averaging their corresponding coordinates. Therefore, to obtain the midpoint of line BC, we add the coordinates of B and C and divide by 2.

Midpoint of line BC is given by:

\[\left(\frac{-1-3}{2},\frac{1-1}{2},\frac{2+0}{2}\right)=(-2,0,1)\]

The length of line AD is found by using the distance formula, which is given as:

\[d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2+(z_2-z_1)^2}\]

Thus, we need to find the coordinates of point D and A to determine the length of AD. The coordinates of D are the average of the coordinates of B and C.

\[\left(\frac{-1-3}{2},\frac{1-1}{2},\frac{2+0}{2}\right)=(-2,0,1)\]The coordinates of A are (1,2,-1).

The distance between A and D is found by substituting these values into the distance formula:

\[d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2+(z_2-z_1)^2}\] \[d=\sqrt{(1-(-2))^2+(2-0)^2+(-1-1)^2}\] \[d=\sqrt{(3)^2+(2)^2+(-2)^2}\] \[d=\sqrt{9+4+4}\] \[d=\sqrt{17}\]

Thus, the distance between points A and D is sqrt(17).Therefore, the midpoint of line BC is (-2,0,1) and the distance between points A and D is sqrt(17).

To know more about coordinates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32836021

#SPJ11

fg(x) is 2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3.To find fg(x), we need to multiply f(x) and g(x).

The given functions are f(x) = 2x - 3 and g(x) = x² + 1.

We know that (f · g)(x) = f(x) · g(x).

So, (f · g)(x) = (2x - 3)(x² + 1)

(f · g)(x) = 2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3.

Hence, the value of fg(x) is 2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3

Given f(x) = 2x - 3 and g(x) = x² + 1

We have to find fg(x) = f(x)g(x)

= (2x - 3)(x² + 1)

We will use the distributive law of multiplication to multiply the given two functions.

(2x - 3)(x² + 1)= 2x(x² + 1) - 3(x² + 1)

Expanding further, we get the following:

2x³ + 2x - 3x² - 3=2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3

Therefore,

fg(x) = 2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3.

So, we get the value of fg(x) as 2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3.

We have found that fg(x) is 2x³ - 3x² + 2x - 3 by multiplying f(x) = 2x - 3 and g(x) = x² + 1.

To know more about the functions, visit:

brainly.com/question/29120892

#SPJ11

Given the cost of the video game is $39.99, Mark gets a discount of 30%.Content loaded means there's enough information available to solve the problem. Here's how to find out the final cost of the video game. First, calculate the discount on the cost of the video game:$39.99 × 30/100 = $11.997

This gives us the discount that Mark gets on the video game. So, the cost of the video game after discount will be: Cost of the video game = $39.99 - $11.997 = $27.993Now, let's add the sales tax. The sales tax is 5%. Thus, the sales tax will be: Sales tax = $27.993 × 5/100 = $1.39965So, the final cost of the video game will be :Final cost = $27.993 + $1.39965 = $29.39265Thus, the final cost of the video game after the discount and the sales tax is $29.39.

Learn more about discount here:

https://brainly.com/question/2730006

#SPJ11

The rational number that falls between 1/13 and 2/13 is 3/13 by using average method

To find a rational number between two fractions, we can use the average method.

To find the average of two fractions a/b and c/d, we add them up and then divide them by 2.

The question is asking what rational number falls between 1/13 and 2/13.

The average of these fractions can be calculated by adding them and dividing them by 2:

1/13 + 2/13 = 3/13 Now, to check whether 3/13 is between 1/13 and 2/13, we can compare the three fractions:

1/13 < 3/13 < 2/13 Therefore, the rational number that falls between 1/13 and 2/13 is 3/13.

To know more about rational number, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17450097

#SPJ11

Blorgs have a lifespan of two hours, and after that, they die. The newborn Blorgs continue the reproductive cycle, but all Blorgs born before 3 PM would have reached their lifespan and died by 4:05 PM.

To determine the number of live Blorgs the Mad Professor has at 4:05 PM, we need to understand the pattern of Blorg reproduction and lifespan.

From the given information, we know that one hour after a Blorg is born, it gives birth to a new Blorg. Two hours after birth, it gives birth to two more new Blorgs and then immediately dies.

Let's break down the timeline:

At noon, the Professor has one newborn Blorg.

One hour later, at 1 PM, the initial Blorg gives birth to a new Blorg. So, there are two Blorgs now.

Two hours after birth, at 2 PM, the initial Blorg dies, but the newborn Blorg from 1 PM gives birth to two more Blorgs. So, there are four Blorgs now.

At 3 PM, the two newborn Blorgs from 1 PM give birth to two more Blorgs each, resulting in a total of eight Blorgs.

At 4 PM, the four Blorgs that were born at 2 PM die, while the four Blorgs born at 3 PM are still alive. The four living Blorgs are from the second generation.

Now, let's calculate the number of live Blorgs at 4:05 PM:

At 4 PM, there are four living Blorgs.

Since each Blorg lives for two hours, at 4:05 PM, it has been 5 minutes past their lifespan, and all the living Blorgs from the 3 PM generation would have died.

Therefore, at 4:05 PM, the Mad Professor would have zero live Blorgs.

It is important to note that Blorgs have a lifespan of two hours, and after that, they die. The newborn Blorgs continue the reproductive cycle, but all Blorgs born before 3 PM would have reached their lifespan and died by 4:05 PM.

Learn more about reproductive cycle here

https://brainly.com/question/729890

#SPJ11

To find the slope of the trend line in a scatterplot, we need to use the formula for slope, which is: Slope = (Change in y)/(Change in x).

The expression that can be simplified to find the slope of the trend line in the scatterplot is the formula for slope. Therefore, the expression that can be simplified to find the slope of the trend line in the scatterplot is:Slope = (Change in y)/(Change in x).

Here, "y" represents the dependent variable, and "x" represents the independent variable in the scatterplot. The slope of the trend line shows how steep the line is.

To know more about scatterplot visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32544710

#SPJ11

To calculate Elizabeth's finance charge using the previous balance method, we need to determine the average daily balance and then apply the APR (Annual Percentage Rate) to calculate the finance charge.

First, let's calculate the average daily balance:

Beginning Balance: $969.26

Days until payment: 2 (from July 1st to July 3rd)

Payment: $45.00

Days until purchase: 7 (from July 3rd to July 10th)

Purchase: $67.48

Days until payment: 2 (from July 10th to July 12th)

Payment: $20.00

Days until payment: 16 (from July 12th to July 28th)

Payment: $85.00

To calculate the average daily balance, we sum up the balances for each day and divide it by the total number of days in the billing cycle (30 days).

Average Daily Balance = (969.26 × 2 + 0 × 7 + 67.48 × 2 + 0 × 16) / 30 = $85.95

Next, we can calculate the finance charge using the APR:

Finance Charge = Average Daily Balance × (APR / 365) × Number of Days in the Billing Cycle

Finance Charge = 85.95 × (0.1461 / 365) × 30 ≈ $9.97

Therefore, Elizabeth's July finance charge will be approximately $9.97. The correct answer is option a.

Learn more about Annual Percentage Rate here -: brainly.com/question/30774234

#SPJ11

1/6 is the fraction of Marjorie's ribbons that are green. Marjorie has a total of 6 ribbons and spools of thread for art, consisting of 3 pink ribbons, 1 green ribbon, and 2 blue spools of thread.

1. To determine the fraction of Marjorie's ribbons that are green, we divide the number of green ribbons by the total number of ribbons.

2. To find the fraction of Marjorie's ribbons that are green, we need to calculate the ratio of green ribbons to the total number of ribbons. The total number of ribbons is the sum of all the ribbons and spools of thread, which is 3 pink ribbons + 1 green ribbon + 2 blue spools of thread, equaling 6 ribbons in total.

3. Since Marjorie has only 1 green ribbon, we can say that the fraction of her ribbons that are green is 1 out of the total 6 ribbons. This can be expressed as 1/6. Therefore, 1/6 is the fraction of Marjorie's ribbons that are green.

Learn more about fraction here: brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ11