7. The General Society Survey asked a sample of 1200 people how much time they spent watching TV each day. The mean number of hours was 3.0 with a standard deviation of 2.87. A sociologist claims that people watch a mean of 4 hours of TV per day. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to disprove the claim? Use α = .05 to test the hypothesis. a. What are your null and alternative hypotheses? b. What test is appropriate here? Why? c. What is your test statistic? d. What is your critical value? e. What is your final decision: do you reject the null or fail to reject the null?

Answer:

approximately 19 matches for single player contest and 9 matches for double player contest

Step-by-step explanation:

However, it is important to note that a tennis match is usually between two players (one player to one) or two teams of players (two players to two players),

So, there may be approximately 19 matches for single player

([tex]\frac{37 players}{2}[/tex]) and approximately 9 matches ([tex]\frac{18.5}{2}[/tex]) for double player contest.

Answer:

1= 65 degrees

2=115 degrees

3=115 degrees

Step-by-step explanation: supplementary angles where 115 + x = 180 so go backwards by 180 - 115=65 to find corresponding angles. Angle 3 is also corresponding with the given angle of 115. Angle 2 is opposite the 115 so they have to be equal

Answer:

117 cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the volume of a rectangular prism, we can simply multiply the length, width and height so the answer is 13 * 3 * 3 = 117 cm³.

Answer:

117 cubic centimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that the stick of butter is a perfect rectangular prism, we can calculate the volume by simply multiplying the length, width, and the height as modeled by the volume equation:

V = LWH

For this, the L = 13cm, W = 3cm, and H = 3cm

So our volume in cubic centimeters will be:

V = LWH

V = (13cm) * (3cm) * (3cm)

V = (13cm) * (9cm^2)

V = 117 cm^3

So the volume of the stick of butter is 117 cubic centimeters.

Cheers.

Answer:

See Attachment for graph

Charges = $200 when number of she works for 3 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Charges = $25 per hour + $125 (c = 25n + 125)

Required

Graph the equation.

From the graph, determine c when n = 3

To plot the graph; first, we have to determine the points to use;

When n = 1

[tex]c = 25 * 1 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 25 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 150[/tex]

When n = 2

[tex]c = 25 * 2 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 50 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 175[/tex]

When n = 3

[tex]c = 25 * 3 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 75 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 200[/tex]

When n = 4

[tex]c = 25 * 4 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 100 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 225[/tex]

Plotting n on the x axis and c on the y axis; we have

c   ||   n

1    ||   150

2   ||   175

3   ||    200

4   ||    225

(See attachment)

From the attachment;

When she works for 3 hour; This implies that n = 3

And c = $200 when n = 3

See Proof

[tex]c = 25n + 125[/tex]

Substitute 3 for n

[tex]c = 25 * 3 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 75 + 125[/tex]

[tex]c = 200[/tex]

Answer:

a) What is the cost of a chicken shawarma wrap?

$10.99

b) What is the cost of one order of spiced potatoes?

$4.99

c) If x denotes the cost of a chicken shawarma wrap and y denotes the cost of an order of spiced potatoes, what are the equations needed to solve this problem?

3x + 2y = $42.95 .............Equation 1

5x + 4y = $74.91 ................Equation 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x denotes the cost of a chicken shawarma wrap and y denotes the cost of an order of spiced potatoes,

Cost of a chicken sharwarma wrap = x

Cost of an order of spiced potatoes = y

Ms. Ironperson ordered 3 chicken shawarma wraps and 2 orders of spiced potatoes for a total bill of $42.95.

3x + 2y = $42.95 .............Equation 1

Mr. Thoro ordered 5 chicken shawarma wraps and 4 orders of spiced potatoes for a total bill of $74.91.

5x + 4y = $74.91 ................Equation 2

Hence, the Equations needed to solve the question is:

3x + 2y = $42.95 .............Equation 1

5x + 4y = $74.91 ................Equation 2

We use Elimination method to solve for this.

Multiply Equation 1 by coefficient of x in Equation 2

Equation 2 by coefficient of x in Equation 1

3x + 2y = $42.95 .............Equation 1 × 5

5x + 4y = $74.91 ................Equation 2 × 3

15x + 10y = 214.75..............Equation 3

15x + 12y = 224.73..............Equation 4

Subtract Equation 3 from Equation 4

2y = 9.98

y = 9.98/2

y = 4.99

Therefore, y = Cost of an order of spiced potatoes = $4.99

Subtitute 4.99 for y in Equation 1

3x + 2y = $42.95 .............Equation 1

3x +2(4.99) = 42.95

3x + 9.98 = 42.95

3x = 42.95 - 9.98

3x = 32.97

x = 32.97/3

x = 10.99

x = Cost of a chicken sharwarma wrap = $10.99

Therefore,

The cost of a chicken sharwarma wrap = $10.99

The cost of an order of spiced potatoes = $4.99

Answer:

RED

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3  

1/4

1/6

1/4

4/12

3/12

2/12

3/12

#achievements

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's compare the two values of 12/16 and 3/4.

Notice that 12/16 isn't a simplified fraction; both the numerator and denominator are divisible by 4. So divide the top and bottom by 4:

12 / 4 = 3

16 / 4 = 4

We are left with:

12/16 = 3/4

Now, we see that Line A and Line B are equal in length, so the answer is B.

~ an aesthetics lover

Answer:

Since you did not post the the choice I'll go with out them.

Step-by-step explanation:

$12.60 ÷ 1 1/2=

12.60 ÷ 1.5= $8.40

Answer:

$8.40/lb

Step-by-step explanation:

                            $12.60                

The unit price is ------------ = $8.40/lb

                                1.5 lb

Complete Question

Pennsylvania Refining Company is studying the relationship between the pump price of gasoline and the number of gallons sold. For a sample of 14 stations last Tuesday, the correlation was 0.65.At the 0.01 significance level Can the company conclude that the correlation is positive

Answer:

Yes the company conclude that the correlation is positive

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  sample size is  n =  14

    The correlation is  r =  0.65

The  null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : r < 0[/tex]

The  alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_1 : r > 0[/tex]

Generally the standard deviation is mathematically evaluated as

       [tex]Sr = \sqrt{1- r}[/tex]

       [tex]Sr = \sqrt{1- 0.65}[/tex]

       [tex]Sr = 0.616[/tex]

The  degree of freedom for the one-tail test is

       [tex]df = n- 2[/tex]

        [tex]df = 14- 2[/tex]

        [tex]df = 12[/tex]

The standard error is evaluated as

        [tex]SE = \frac{0.616}{ \sqrt{12} }[/tex]

        [tex]SE =0.1779[/tex]

The test statistics  is evaluated as

      [tex]t = \frac{r }{SE}[/tex]

       [tex]t = \frac{0.65 }{0.1779}[/tex]

        [tex]t = 3.654[/tex]

The p-value of of  t is obtained from the z table, the value is  

        [tex]p-value = P(t < 3.654) = 0.00012909[/tex]

Given that [tex]p-value < \alpha[/tex]  then we reject the null hypothesis

           Hence the company can conclude that the correlation is positive

Answer:

197 = 10(31-1) + a

197 = 300 + a

-103 = a

Answer:

0.0618

Step-by-step explanation:

z = (x - μ)/σ, where

x is the raw score = 69

μ is the sample mean = population mean = 65

σ is the sample standard deviation

This is calculated as:

= Population standard deviation/√n

Where n = number of samples = 25

σ = 13/√25

σ = 13/5 = 2.6

Sample standard deviation = 2.6

z = (69 - 65) / 2.6

z = 4/2.6

z = 1.53846

Approximately to 2 decimal places = 1.54

Using the z score table to determine the probability,

P(x = 69) = P(z = 1.54)

= 0.93822.

The probability that the sample mean is greater than 69 is

P(x>Z) = 1 - 0.93822

P(x>Z) = 0.06178

Approximately to 4 decimal places = 0.0618

Here are a few ways 5% could be written in words:

-five percent

-five thousandths (0.05)

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

0.05

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming you mean as a decimal...

5/100 = 0.05

ALTERNATIVELY

5% = Five Percent

0.05 = Five Thousandths, Zero Point Zero Five

Answer: 55958180.97

Step-by-step explanation:

9.3 x 9.3 x 9.3 x 9.3 x 9.3 x 9.3 x 9.3 x 9.3

86.49 x 86.49 x 86.49 x 86.49

= 55958180.97

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]f(x)=9x-2 \text{ and } g(x)=-x+3\\f(g(x))=f(-x+3)\\f(-x+3)=9(-x+3)-2\\\text{Distribute and Simplify}\\-9x+27-2\\=-9x+25\\\text{Therefore, f(g(x))=-9x+25}\\\text{The answer is C}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Ellen - 115/23

Classmates and Ellen got = 5 each

Answer:

The angle [tex]\theta[/tex] at which the sun is hitting the ground is:

[tex]\theta\approx 59.74^o[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

You can use right angle trigonometry to solve this, since the man (6 ft tall) and the shadow on the ground (3.5 ft long) form a right angle triangle as shown on the attached image.

The use the tangent function to find the angle that the sun's rays make with the ground:

[tex]tan(\theta)=\frac{opposite}{adjacent} \\tan(\theta)=\frac{6}{3.5} \\\theta=arctan(\frac{6}{3.5})\\\theta\approx 59.74^o[/tex]

Answer:

The probability of raining if the number of days is more than 23 is 0.0668.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the mean number of days to observe rain in a particular city is 20 days with a standard deviation of 2 days.

Let X = Number of days of observing rain in a particular city.

The z-score probability distribution for the normal distribution is given by;

                         Z  =  [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\mu[/tex] = population mean number of days = 20 days

           [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 2 days

So, X ~ Normal([tex]\mu=20, \sigma^{2} = 2^{2}[/tex])

Now, the probability of raining if the number of days is more than 23 is given by = P(X > 23 days)

        P(X > 23 days) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] > [tex]\frac{23-20}{2}[/tex] ) = P(Z > 1.50) = 1 - P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] 1.50)

                                                              = 1 - 0.9332 = 0.0668

The above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 1.50 in the z table which has an area of 0.9332.

Answer:

the least integer for n is 2

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

f(x) = ln(1+x)

centered at x=0

Pn(0.2)

Error < 0.01

We will use the format;

[[Max(f^(n+1) (c))]/(n + 1)!] × 0.2^(n+1) < 0.01

So;

f(x) = ln(1+x)

First derivative: f'(x) = 1/(x + 1) < 0! = 1

2nd derivative: f"(x) = -1/(x + 1)² < 1! = 1

3rd derivative: f"'(x) = 2/(x + 1)³ < 2! = 2

4th derivative: f""(x) = -6/(x + 1)⁴ < 3! = 6

This follows that;

Max|f^(n+1) (c)| < n!

Thus, error is;

(n!/(n + 1)!) × 0.2^(n + 1) < 0.01

This gives;

(1/(n + 1)) × 0.2^(n + 1) < 0.01

Let's try n = 1

(1/(1 + 1)) × 0.2^(1 + 1) = 0.02

This is greater than 0.01 and so it will not work.

Let's try n = 2

(1/(2 + 1)) × 0.2^(2 + 1) = 0.00267

This is less than 0.01.

So,the least integer for n is 2

In this exercise we have to use the knowledge of Taylor Polynomial to calculate the requested function, this way we will have;

the least integer for n is 2    

The function given in this exercise corresponds to:

[tex]f(x) = ln(1+x)[/tex]

knowing that the x point will be centered on:

[tex]x=0\\Pn(0,2)\\Error < 0.01[/tex]

By rewriting the equation we have to:

[tex][[Max(f^{(n+1)} (c))]/(n + 1)!] *0.2^{(n+1)} < 0.01[/tex]

So doing the derivatives related to the first function given in the exercise we have to:

[tex]f(x) = ln(1+x)[/tex]

Following this we have to:

[tex]Max|f^{(n+1)} (c)| < n![/tex]

Thus, error is;

[tex](n!/(n + 1)!) * 0.2^{(n + 1)} < 0.01[/tex]

[tex](1/(n + 1))* 0.2^{(n + 1)} < 0.01[/tex]  

Let's try n = 1

[tex](1/(1 + 1)) *0.2^{(1 + 1)} = 0.02[/tex]

This is greater than 0.01 and so it will not work. Let's try n = 2

[tex](1/(2 + 1)) * 0.2^{(2 + 1)} = 0.00267[/tex]

This is less than 0.01. So,the least integer for n is 2.

See more about Taylor polynomial at brainly.com/question/23842376

Answer:

Kelvin did not skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family.

Step-by-step explanation:

The inequality representing the event where Kelvin skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family is:

[tex]2f<223[/tex]

Here 223 is the time for Kelvin.

[tex]2f<223[/tex]

[tex]2\times 55=110<223[/tex]

Kelvin skied without falling more than twice as long as Lori.

[tex]2f<223[/tex]

[tex]2\times 265=530>223[/tex]

Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Vanessa.

[tex]2f<223[/tex]

[tex]2\times 172=344>223[/tex]

Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Devon.

[tex]2f<223[/tex]

[tex]2\times 112=224>223[/tex]

Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Celia.

[tex]2f<223[/tex]

[tex]2\times 356=712>223[/tex]

Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Arnold.

Thus, Kelvin did not skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family.

Answer:

Yes, Kevin skied 2x as long as Lori.

Step-by-step explanation:

Kevin's time was 223 seconds; Lori's time was 110 seconds.

110^2 = 220 or 110 multiplied by 2 equals 220 or 110 x 2 = 220 or

110 * 2 = 220

Thus, Kevin indeed, skied twice as long as Lori.

Complete Question

The  complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The correct option is  C

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally the sample standard error  is mathematically represented as

           [tex]\sigma_{\= x } = \frac{\sigma }{ \sqrt{n} }[/tex]

Where  [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and  n is the sample size

  Now looking at the formula we see that

             [tex]\sigma_{\= x } \ \ \ \alpha \ \ \ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{n} }[/tex]

So  at constant [tex]\sigma[/tex] if n increases [tex]\sigma_{\= x }[/tex] decreases

So from the question if ten more urban homeowners are asked the question the samples standard error decreases

Step-by-step explanation:

A rotation about point A a reflection across the line containing AR a reflection across the line containing AQ a rotation about point R

Answer:

A rotation about point A

Step-by-step explanation:

I am taking the test if it is wrong I will add a comment

As Prime factorization is a process of writing all numbers as a product of primes then The prime factorization of number 7 is 7.

A number system is defined as a system of writing to express numbers.

Prime factorization is a process of writing all numbers as a product of primes

The number 7 is a prime number, which means it is only divisible by 1 and itself.

Therefore, the prime factorization of 7 is simply 7 itself.

Hence, the prime factorization of number 7 is 7.

To learn more on Number system click:

https://brainly.com/question/22046046

#SPJ2

Answer:

The Confidence Interval = (0.172, 0.228)

Where:

The lower limit = 0.172

The upper limit = 0.228

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula to be applied or used to solve this question is :

Confidence Interval formula for proportion.

The formula is given as :

p ± z × √[p(1 - p)/n]

n = Total number of red candies = 550 red candles

p = proportion = Number of red candies counted/ Total number of red candies

= 110/550 = 1/5 = 0.2

z = z score for the given confidence interval.

We are given a confidence interval of 90%. Therefore, the z score = 1.6449

Confidence Interval = p ± z × √[p(1 - p)/n]

Confidence Interval = 0.2 ± 1.6449 × √[0.2(1 - 0.2)/550]

= 0.2 ± 1.6449 √0.2 × 0.8/550

= 0.2 ± 1.6449 × 0.0170560573

= 0.2 ± 0.0280555087

Hence, the Confidence Interval = 0.2 ± 0.0280555087

0.2 - 0.0280555087 = 0.1719444913

Approximately = 0.172

0.2 + 0.0280555087 = 0.2280555087

Approximately = 0.228

Therefore, the Confidence Interval = (0.172, 0.228)

Where:

The lower limit = 0.172

The upper limit = 0.228

Answer:

Lower Limit: 0.172

Upper Limit: 0.228

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

13/3 / 2/11 = 13/3 * 11/2 = 143/6 = 23 and 5/6

23 and 5/6 is closest to 24.

Answer:

23 5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A) Null Hypothesis; H0: μ = $41,500

Alternative hypothesis; H1: μ > $41,500

B) Reject H0 is t > 2.821433

C) t = 1.79

D) there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that residents of Wilmington, Delaware have more income than the national average

Step-by-step explanation:

A) The hypotheses is given as;

Null Hypothesis; H0: μ = $41,500

Alternative hypothesis; H1: μ > $41,500

B) From online t-score calculator attached using significance level of 0.01 and DF = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9, we have;

t = 2.821433

Normally, when the absolute value of the t-value is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. However, when the absolute value of the t-value is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, if t > 2.821433, we will reject the null hypothesis H0.

C) Formula for the test statistic is;

t = (x' - μ)/(s/√n)

We have, μ = 41500, x' = 47500, s = 10600, n = 10

t = (47500 - 41500)/(10600/√10)

t = 1.79

D) So, 1.79 is less than the t-critical value of 2.821433. Thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that residents of Wilmington, Delaware have more income than the national average

1: 8 faces and 9 with the base 9 vertices and 16 edges

2: 3 faces and 5 with the bases 6 vertices and 9 edges

3: 3 faces and 4 with the base 4 vertices and 6 edges

Hope this can help you.

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's prove that cos^2(O) = 1+ cos(2O)/2

We khow that cos(2O) = 2 cos^2-1

● cos(2O) = 2 cos^2-1

Add one to both sides:

● cos(2O) +1 = 2 cos^2-1+1

● cos(2O) +1 = 2 cos ^2

Divide both sides by 2

● [cos(2O)+1]/2 = cos^2

Answer:

500,000

Step-by-step explanation:

(2.1 * 10^8)/(4.2 * 10^2) =

= 2.1/4.2 * 10^8/10^2

= 0.5 * 10^6

= 500,000

The division of 2.1 × 10⁸ and 4.2 × 10² thus the exponent 2.1 × 10⁸ is 500000 times the exponent 4.2 × 10².

The number system is a way to represent or express numbers.

Since the decimal number system employs ten digits from 0 to 9, it has a base of 10.

Any of the multiple sets of symbols and the guidelines for utilizing them to represent numbers are included in the Number System.

As per the given exponents 2.1 × 10⁸

Let's assume 2.1 × 10⁸ is x times 4.2 × 10².

2.1 × 10⁸ = x (4.2 × 10²)

x = 2.1 × 10⁸/4.2 × 10²

x = 500000

Hence "The division of 2.1 × 10⁸ and 4.2 × 10² thus the exponent 2.1 × 10⁸ is 500000 times the exponent 4.2 × 10²".

For more about the number system,

https://brainly.com/question/22046046

#SPJ2

Answer:

70%

Step-by-step explanation:

The method to find out percentage increase is by subtracting the original price from the increased price and making it into a fractional form with the denominator as 10 (out of 100%). So it results to this.

(original price - increased price) / 10

(17 - 10) / 10 = 7/10

7/10 can be converted from its fractional form to 70% i.e.its percentage.

Hope this helps and please mark as the brainliest.