4. When the difference between means is a greater multiple of the


MAD, does the dot plot show more or less visual overlap between


the data sets?

We have to find the ratio of Ms Seema's annual spending to her annual savings given that Ms. Seema's annual salary is Rs 288000 and her annual savings is Rs 72000.

The first step is to determine the annual spending of Ms. Seema.Subtracting the annual savings of Ms. Seema from her annual salary, we can determine her annual spending. Annual spending = Rs 288000 - Rs 72000 = Rs 216000We now know that Ms. Seema's annual spending is Rs 216000 per year and her annual savings is Rs 72000 per year.

We can now compute the ratio of her annual spending to her annual savings. Annual spending : Annual savings= 216000 : 72000= 3 : 1Therefore, the ratio of Ms. Seema's annual spending to her annual savings is 3 : 1. It implies that her annual spending is three times the annual savings.In conclusion, the ratio of Ms. Seema's annual spending to her annual savings is 3 : 1.

To know more about annual visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25842992

#SPJ11

The perimeter of the rectangle is 22 7/15 meters, and the area is 29 1/10 square meters.

To find the perimeter of a rectangle, we add the lengths of all four sides. In this case, the length of one side is 4 7/20 meters and the length of the adjacent side is 6 2/3 meters. To add these mixed numbers, we convert them to improper fractions. The first side becomes 87/20 meters and the second side becomes 20/3 meters. Adding the two lengths gives us a total of (87/20 + 20/3) meters. To add fractions with different denominators, we need to find a common denominator. The least common multiple of 20 and 3 is 60. Converting both fractions to have a denominator of 60, we get (261/60 + 400/60) meters, which simplifies to 661/60 meters. Finally, we can convert this improper fraction back to a mixed number, which is 11 1/60 meters. Since the perimeter of a rectangle is the sum of all four sides, the perimeter of this rectangle is 2 times 11 1/60 meters, which equals 22 2/60 meters or 22 7/15 meters.

To find the area of a rectangle, we multiply the length by the width. In this case, the length is 4 7/20 meters and the width is 6 2/3 meters. Converting both mixed numbers to improper fractions, we get a length of 87/20 meters and a width of 20/3 meters. Multiplying these two fractions gives us (87/20 * 20/3) square meters. Simplifying the fractions, we get (1740/60) square meters, which further simplifies to 29 square meters. Therefore, the area of this rectangle is 29 square meters.

Learn more about perimeter here:

https://brainly.com/question/7486523

#SPJ11

The mean train ride time for the week was 49.4 minutes, with a median of 48 minutes. The range of the train ride times was 3 minutes.

The mean, median, and range of Santos' train ride times for the week were as follows:

Mean: 49.4 minutes

The mean is calculated by adding up all the values and dividing the sum by the total number of values. In this case, the sum of the train ride times (48 + 51 + 48 + 48 + 50) is 245 minutes. Dividing this sum by the total number of days (5), we get the mean of 49.4 minutes.

Median: 48 minutes

The median is the middle value in a sorted list of numbers. To find the median, we arrange the train ride times in ascending order: 48, 48, 48, 50, 51. Since there is an odd number of values, the middle value is the median. In this case, the median is 48 minutes.

Range: 3 minutes

The range is the difference between the largest and smallest values in a set. To calculate the range, we subtract the smallest value (48 minutes) from the largest value (51 minutes). In this case, the range of the train ride times for the week is 3 minutes.

In summary, the mean train ride time for the week was 49.4 minutes, with a median of 48 minutes. The range of the train ride times was 3 minutes. These metrics provide insights into the average, central tendency, and variability of Santos' train rides throughout the week.

Learn more about mean here

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

Therefore, the answer rounding to the nearest tenth is d. 5.3.

To convert 1 gallon to liters, we multiply by the conversion factor of 3.79 L/gal.

1 gal. * 3.79 L/gal = 3.79 L

Now, to find the equivalent of 20 liters, we can set up a proportion:

1 gal / 3.79 L = x gal / 20 L

Cross-multiplying and solving for x, we get:

x = (1 gal / 3.79 L) * 20 L = 20 / 3.79 gal

Rounding to the nearest tenth, we have:

x ≈ 5.3

Therefore, the answer is d. 5.3.

To learn more about conversion factor visit:

brainly.com/question/28770698

#SPJ11

To find out how much wire will be needed to put a double fence around a square plot with 50m, we first need to calculate the perimeter of the square plot.

Perimeter of a square = 4 x SideWhere Side = 50mPerimeter = 4 x 50m = 200mNow, since we need to put a double fence around the square plot, we will multiply the perimeter by 2. Therefore, the total length of wire needed for double fencing = 200m x 2 = 400m. Therefore, 400m of wire will be needed to put a double fence around a square plot with 50m.Long Answer:The given plot is a square with the side of the square being 50m. To find out the amount of wire needed to put a double fence around the square plot, we first need to calculate the perimeter of the square plot.A square is a 4 sided figure with all sides of equal length.

Therefore, the perimeter of a square can be calculated by multiplying the length of one side of the square with 4, as shown below.Perimeter of a square = 4 x SideWhere Side is the length of one side of the square plot.In this case, the side of the square plot is given as 50m. Therefore, the perimeter of the square plot can be calculated as shown below:Perimeter of a square = 4 x 50m = 200mTherefore, the perimeter of the square plot is 200m.Now, since we need to put a double fence around the square plot, we will multiply the perimeter by 2. This is because a double fence means that we will be putting two fences back to back around the perimeter of the square plot. Therefore, the total length of wire needed for double fencing can be calculated as shown below:Total length of wire needed for double fencing = 2 x Perimeter of the square plotTotal length of wire needed for double fencing = 2 x 200mTotal length of wire needed for double fencing = 400mTherefore, 400m of wire will be needed to put a double fence around a square plot with 50m.

To know more about square visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14198272

#SPJ11

The Apostle Paul demonstrates humility in Acts 15:36-39 and 2 Timothy 4:11 through his willingness to resolve differences. In these passages, Paul's actions and attitudes reflect his humility and his desire for reconciliation and unity among believers.


In Acts 15:36-39, Paul and Barnabas had a disagreement regarding taking John Mark on a missionary journey. Barnabas wanted to bring John Mark along, but Paul did not because John Mark had previously left them on a previous journey. Despite the disagreement, Paul shows humility by accepting Barnabas' decision and allowing him to take John Mark as his companion, while Paul chooses Silas as his own companion. This act demonstrates Paul's willingness to prioritize unity and reconciliation over personal preferences.

In 2 Timothy 4:11, Paul shows humility by reconciling with John Mark. He requests Timothy to bring Mark with him because Paul considers Mark to be helpful in his ministry. This shows a change in Paul's attitude towards Mark, indicating that he was willing to put aside any past differences and extend forgiveness and acceptance. Paul's willingness to reconcile and work alongside Mark reveals his humility and his understanding of the importance of resolving differences for the sake of the Gospel and the unity of believers.

Overall, both passages highlight Paul's humility through his willingness to resolve differences and prioritize unity, showcasing his desire for reconciliation and harmony among fellow believers.

Learn more about unity here : brainly.com/question/30075190

#SPJ11

The height of the tree is 12 meters.

To solve this problem, we can use similar triangles.

Let's denote the height of the tree as 'h'.

We have a right triangle formed by the hiker's line of sight, the mirror, and the reflected image of the top of the tree.

The vertical leg of this triangle is 'h', and the horizontal leg is the sum of the distance between the mirror and the base of the tree (20m) and the distance between the mirror and the hiker (4m).

So the horizontal leg is 20m + 4m = 24m.

Now, we can set up the proportion between the similar triangles:

(hiker's eye level)/(horizontal leg) = (reflected image height)/(vertical leg)

Plugging in the given values:

2 / 24 = 1 / h

Cross-multiplying:

2h = 24

Dividing both sides by 2:

h = 24 / 2

h = 12

Therefore, the height of the tree is 12 meters.

Learn more about similar triangles click;

https://brainly.com/question/29731302

#SPJ4

a) The gradient of the line passing through the points (0,6) and (3,0) is -2. b) The gradient of the line perpendicular to this line is 1/2. c) The equation for the line passing through point a and perpendicular to the line ab can be determined using the point-slope form of a linear equation.

a) To find the gradient (slope) of the line passing through (0,6) and (3,0), we use the formula: gradient = (change in y) / (change in x). Substituting the coordinates, we get (-6) / (3-0) = -2.

b) The gradient of a line perpendicular to another line is the negative reciprocal of the original gradient. Therefore, the gradient of the line perpendicular to the given line is 1/2.

c) To find the equation of the line passing through point a and perpendicular to line ab, we can use the point-slope form of a linear equation: y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is point a and m is the gradient of the perpendicular line. Substituting the values, we get y - 6 = (1/2)(x - 0), which simplifies to y = (1/2)x + 6.

To know more about gradients here: brainly.com/question/13020257

#SPJ11

A manufacturing company has determined that the daily revenue R(n) in thousands of dollars is given by the formula R(n) = 12n - 0.6n where n represents the number of palettes of product sold (0 < n < 500).

If the company wishes to make a revenue of 45 thousand dollars, we are supposed to find the number of palettes of product sold .Solution :Let us substitute the value of R(n) = 45 in the given equation and solve for n45 = 12n - 0.6n45 = 11.4n, n = 3.9474Hence, the manufacturing company has to sell either 3 or 4 palettes of product to make $45.000.

To know more about manufacturing visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29489393

#SPJ11

The missing side lengths are x = 4 and y = 4.The correct answer choice is D) x = 4, y = 4.

To find the missing side lengths in a triangle, we can use trigonometric ratios. In this case, we are given the length of one side (8) and the measure of one angle (30 degrees), and we need to find the lengths of the other two sides (x and y).

In a right triangle, the trigonometric ratios can be used to relate the angles and side lengths. In this case, we are not given that the triangle is a right triangle, so we will assume it is not.

The sine ratio relates the ratio of the length of the side opposite an angle to the length of the hypotenuse. In this case, the side opposite the 30-degree angle is y, and the hypotenuse is 8. So we can write:

sin(30 degrees) = y/8

Using the known value of sin(30 degrees) = 1/2, we can solve for y:

1/2 = y/8

Cross-multiplying, we get:

y = 4

So we have found the length of side y to be 4.

To find the length of side x, we can use the law of sines. The law of sines states that the ratio of the length of a side to the sine of its opposite angle is constant for all sides and angles in a triangle.

Using the law of sines, we can write:

sin(30 degrees)/x = sin(angle opposite x)/8

Since we know the sine of 30 degrees is 1/2, we can rewrite the equation as:

(1/2)/x = sin(angle opposite x)/8

Since the angle opposite x is 180 degrees - 30 degrees = 150 degrees, we have:

(1/2)/x = sin(150 degrees)/8

Using the known value of sin(150 degrees) = 1/2, we can solve for x:

(1/2)/x = 1/2/8

Cross-multiplying, we get:

x = 4

So we have found the length of side x to be 4.

Therefore, the missing side lengths are x = 4 and y = 4.

The correct answer choice is D) x = 4, y = 4.

for more such question on lengths visit

https://brainly.com/question/28322552

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To enlarge a 4x6 photo with a ratio of 2:3, we can multiply the dimensions of the photo by the enlargement ratio to find the new dimensions.

Original photo dimensions: 4 inches x 6 inches

Enlargement ratio: 2:3

To find the new dimensions, we can multiply the original dimensions by the enlargement ratio:

New width = 4 inches x 2 = 8 inches

New height = 6 inches x 3 = 18 inches

Therefore, the new dimensions of the enlarged photo would be 8 inches x 18 inches.

Answer:

for 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

the formula is pir2h

This means that the expression 10x² + 2x - 8  completely factored as 2(5x - 2)(x + 2).

The correct factored form of the expression 10x² + 2x - 8 is:

2(5x - 2)(x + 2).

To factor the quadratic expression completely for common factors first that the coefficient 2 is a common factor in all three terms. After factoring out 2, left with (5x² + x - 4).

An factor the trinomial (5x² + x - 4). However, this trinomial cannot be factored further using integer coefficients.

So, the factored form of the expression is 2(5x - 2)(x + 2).

To know more about factored here

https://brainly.com/question/14452738

#SPJ4

To calculate the amount of sand Maija should order, we need to find the volume of the sandbox. The sandbox is in the shape of a cube, so its volume is determined by multiplying the length, width, and height.

Given that the sides of the square sandbox are 2 feet long and the desired depth of the sand is 1.55 feet, we can calculate the volume as follows:

[tex]\[ \text{Volume} = \text{Length} \times \text{Width} \times \text{Height} \][/tex]

Since all sides of the sandbox are equal in length (2 feet), the formula simplifies to:

[tex]\[ \text{Volume} = \text{Side}^3 \][/tex]

Substituting the values:

[tex]\[ \text{Volume} = 2 \, \text{ft} \times 2 \, \text{ft} \times 1.55 \, \text{ft} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \text{Volume} = 6.2 \, \text{cubic feet} \][/tex]

Therefore, Maija should order 6.2 cubic feet of sand for her sandbox.

To know more about values visit-

brainly.com/question/31197870

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

15 cups of water fill 1 1/2 pitchers. that is 3/2 pitchers.

in one pitcher we have then 1 / 3/2 the amount of water of the 3/2 pitchers.

that means

15 × 1 / 3/2 = 15/1 × 1/1 / 3/2 = 15/1 × 2/3 = 30/3 = 10

so, in one pitcher are 10 cups of water.

Mrs. Rodriguez sold 128.8 ounces of popcorn.We know that each bag of popcorn weighs 2.3 ounces. Therefore, to find out the total amount of popcorn Mrs. Rodriguez sold in 56 bags, we need to multiply 2.3 by 56. That is;2.3 × 56 = 128.8Therefore, there are 128.8 ounces of popcorn in 56 bags

We are given that Mrs. Rodriguez is selling popcorn at the snack stand. Each bag holds 2.3 ounces of popcorn. In one hour, she sold 56 bags of popcorn. Our task is to find out how many ounces of popcorn are in 56 bags.In order to find out how many ounces of popcorn are in 56 bags, we need to first find out the weight of one bag of popcorn. We are told that each bag holds 2.3 ounces of popcorn. So, we have:

Weight of one bag of popcorn = 2.3 ounces Now, we can use this information to calculate the total weight of popcorn Mrs. Rodriguez sold in 56 bags. To do this, we need to multiply the weight of one bag of popcorn (2.3 ounces) by the number of bags she sold (56). That is;Weight of 56 bags of popcorn = 2.3 × 56= 128.8Therefore, Mrs. Rodriguez sold 128.8 ounces of popcorn in one hour.

To know more about weighs visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14577832

#SPJ11

To find the ratio of the area of 11 million km² to the area of the Pacific Ocean (165 million km²), we can express it as a fraction:

Ratio = Area of 11 million km² / Area of the Pacific Ocean

Ratio = 11 million km² / 165 million km²

To simplify the fraction, we can divide both the numerator and the denominator by 11 million:

Ratio = (11 million km² / 11 million km²) / (165 million km² / 11 million km²)

Ratio = 1/15

Therefore, the ratio of the area of 11 million km² to the area of the Pacific Ocean is 1/15.

Learn more about ratio here

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ11

in triangle DEF with C as the centroid and DM = 15, we have DC = 10 and CM = 5.

In triangle DEF, if C is the centroid, it means that the centroid divides each median into segments in the ratio of 2:1. Let's use this property to find the lengths DC and CM.

Given that DM = 15, we can consider DM as the full length of the median. Using the ratio of 2:1, we can find DC and CM.

DC = (2/3) * DM

DC = (2/3) * 15

DC = 10

Therefore, DC is equal to 10.

CM = (1/3) * DM

CM = (1/3) * 15

CM = 5

Therefore, CM is equal to 5.

Hence, in triangle DEF with C as the centroid and DM = 15, we have DC = 10 and CM = 5.

Learn more about triangle here

https://brainly.com/question/17335144

#SPJ11

The box for the large pizza at Tony's Pizzeria is a rectangular prism that measures 141 inches in length and 141 inches in width. The large pizza itself is a circle with a diameter of 14 inches.

The rectangular prism serves as the container for the circular pizza. Its dimensions, 141 inches in length and 141 inches in width, indicate the size of the box that can accommodate the pizza. The box is designed to provide enough space to hold the circular pizza without any overlap or excess room.

By having a rectangular prism as the box, it ensures that the pizza is securely contained and protected during transportation or delivery. The dimensions of the box are specifically chosen to match the size of the pizza, allowing for a snug fit and efficient packaging.

To learn more about rectangular prism: -brainly.com/question/32444543

#SPJ11

The box for the large pizza at Tony's Pizzeria is a rectangular prism with dimensions of 141 inches in length, 141 inches in width, and an unspecified height.

The large pizza itself is a circle with a diameter of 14 inches. The given information provides the dimensions of the box and the diameter of the pizza. To calculate the volume of the box, we need the height of the rectangular prism.

Without the height value, we cannot determine the exact volume of the box. Similarly, knowing the diameter of the pizza allows us to calculate its area, but the information does not specify the thickness or depth of the pizza itself.

Learn more about rectangular prism here: brainly.com/question/32444543
#SPJ11

Leo would need to score at least 99 on the 5th test to achieve at least a B in the course. The likelihood of Leo making a B would depend on his individual abilities, preparation, and performance on the 5th test.

To determine what score Leo would need on the 5th test to achieve at least a B in the course, we first need to know the grading scale or criteria for the course. Different educational institutions and instructors may use different grading scales, so without that information, it is not possible to provide an exact answer.

However, assuming a common grading scale where:

A: 90-100

B: 80-89

C: 70-79

D: 60-69

F: Below 60

We can calculate the average score Leo needs to achieve a B. To find the average, we sum up the scores and divide by the total number of tests:

(69 + 84 + 67 + 81 + x) / 5 >= 80

Simplifying the equation:

301 + x >= 400

x >= 400 - 301

x >= 99

Therefore, Leo would need to score at least 99 on the 5th test to achieve at least a B in the course.

As for whether it is likely that Leo will make a B, it depends on various factors. If Leo has consistently performed well in the course and has a history of earning high scores on tests, it is possible that he can achieve a score of 99 or higher on the 5th test. However, if Leo has struggled in the course or has not performed well on previous tests, it may be challenging for him to score high enough on the 5th test to reach a B. The likelihood of Leo making a B would depend on his individual abilities, preparation, and performance on the 5th test.

Learn more about average here:

https://brainly.com/question/32814572

#SPJ11

The inverse operation used to solve the equation x/7 = 5 is multiplication

Inverse operations are mathematical operations that reverse or undo each other. To isolate the variable, inverse operations are used. For example, addition and subtraction are inverse operations, as are multiplication and division.

In an equation, inverse operations can be used to solve for a variable. In order to solve the equation x/7 = 5, we will use inverse operations.The inverse operation of division is multiplication. So, we can isolate x by multiplying both sides of the equation by 7.x/7 = 5Multiplying both sides by 7 gives:x = 7 × 5x = 35Therefore, x = 35 is the solution to the equation.

To know more about inverse operation visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/1210406

#SPJ11

The correct answer is D. No; the correct distance is 1 1/12 miles, because 1/4 + 2/3 = 4/12 + 8/12 = 12/12 = 1 1/12.

To solve this problem, we first need to convert the mixed numbers to fractions. 1 4 = 4 12 and 2 3 = 8 12. Then, we can add the fractions together. 4 12 + 8 12 = 12 12 = 1 1 12.

Therefore, Brandon is incorrect. He walks a total of 1 1/12 miles, not 11 1/2 miles.

The original price of the refurbished phone before the 35% discount was £120. If a refurbished phone is sold at a 35% discount with a final price of £78.

To find the original price of a refurbished phone before the discount of 35%, let's use the following formula:

discount = original price - discounted price

35% of the original price can be represented as 0.35 times the original price. This will result in the equation below:

0.35x = original price - 78

Where x is the original price. So, to find the value of x, we can rearrange the equation to get:

0.35x + 78 = original price

Now we substitute the given values into the equation above:

0.35x + 78 = original price

0.35x + 78 = x - 44.1 (if x represents the original price)

Let's subtract 0.35x from both sides to isolate the x variable:

78 = 0.65x

Then, let's divide both sides by 0.65 to solve for x (the original price):

x = £120

To learn more about original price, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/731526

#SPJ11

The recursive formula for the sequence is a(n) = a(n - 1) + 2 and the next term is 18

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

8, 10, 12, 14, 16,.

In the above sequence, we have

First term, a(1) = 8

And we have the common difference to be

d = 2

So, we have

a(n) = a(n - 1) + 2

The next term of the sequence is

Next = 16 + 2

Evaluate

Next = 18

Hence, the recursive formula for the sequence is a(n) = a(n - 1) + 2

Read more about sequence at

https://brainly.com/question/30499691

#SPJ4

The inequality that represents the largest number of food Sammy can buy, given her budget, is 2.75x ≤ 43.75 - 9.25, where x represents the number of food items she can purchase.

To find the inequality representing the largest number of food items Sammy can buy, we need to consider her budget and the cost of admission and food. Let x be the number of food items she can purchase.

The cost of admission is $9.25, which needs to be subtracted from her total budget. The remaining amount can be used to purchase food. Each food item costs $2.75.

Therefore, the inequality can be written as 2.75x ≤ 43.75 - 9.25, where the left side represents the cost of the food (2.75x), and the right side represents the remaining budget after deducting the admission fee (43.75 - 9.25).

By solving this inequality, Sammy can determine the largest number of food items (represented by x) that she can afford to buy within her budget.

Learn more about Inequality here: brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ11

To find which fractions are equivalent, we need to simplify each fraction. the fractions that are equivalent are 12/24 and 1/2.

The fractions 26/12 and 14/36 cannot be simplified since both already are in their simplest form. Hence 26/12 and 14/36 are not equivalent.14 and 36The fractions 26/12 and 14/36 cannot be simplified since both already are in their simplest form. Hence 26/12 and 14/36 are not equivalent.26 and 14The fractions 26/12 and 14/36 cannot be simplified since both already are in their simplest form.

Two fractions are equivalent if they represent the same part of a whole. To find which fractions are equivalent, we can simplify each fraction by dividing the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor. The simplified fractions will represent the same part of a whole as the original fraction and will be equivalent fractions.

To know more about fractions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ11

To determine the measure of angle DAB, we need to use the congruence of quadrilaterals ABCD and AMCG.

Quadrilateral ABCD is congruent to quadrilateral AMCG.

Since the two quadrilaterals are congruent, their corresponding angles are equal. Therefore, we can write:

m∠DAB = m∠MAC

However, the measure of angle MAC is not given in the given information. Therefore, without additional information, we cannot determine the exact measure of angle DAB.

The options provided in the question do not correspond to the measure of angle DAB. Therefore, the correct answer cannot be determined based on the given information.

It is important to have additional information about the measures of angles or the side lengths in order to determine the measure of angle DAB accurately.

Learn more about quadrilaterals here

https://brainly.com/question/23935806

#SPJ11

Cindy has scores of 72, 82, 83 and 89 on her Biology tests. Cindy must score between 68 and 89 on her final exam to earn a C in Biology.

Cindy's current average score in Biology is:

(72 + 82 + 83 + 89) / 4 = 81.5

Since the final exam counts as two tests, we can calculate the total number of points Cindy can earn in the course as follows:

Total points = 4 tests + 2 tests = 6 tests

To earn a C in the course, her average score must be between 77 and 84. Let's assume she needs to score x on her final exam to achieve a C. Then her total points would be:

Total points = 72 + 82 + 83 + 89 + x + x

Simplifying this equation, we get:

Total points = 326 + 2x

To earn a C, Cindy's average score must be between 77 and 84. Therefore, we can set up an inequality:

77 <= (326 + 2x) / 6 <= 84

Multiplying both sides by 6, we get:

462 <= 326 + 2x <= 504

Subtracting 326 from all sides, we get:

136 <= 2x <= 178

Dividing by 2, we get:

68 <= x <= 89

Therefore, Cindy must score between 68 and 89 on her final exam to earn a C in Biology.

To know more about average, visit:
brainly.com/question/24057012
#SPJ11

Emily can walk 3/4 of a mile in 1/4 of an hour. At the same rate, time taken to walk 1 mile =1/3 of an hour.

Mathematical representation

We know that, Emily can walk 3/4 of a mile in 1/4 of an hour.

Meaning,

Time taken to walk 3/4 of a mile = 1/4 of an hour

Distance covered = 3/4 mile

We need to find the time taken by Emily to walk 1 mile.

The rate is defined as the distance covered in unit time. So,

                        Rate = Distance / Time

We know that Rate of Emily = 3/4 ÷ 1/4

                                              = 3/4 × 4/1

                                              = 3 miles/hour

The rate of walking is 3 miles/hour.

Now we can find the time taken to walk 1 mile using rate formula.

             Distance = Rate × Time

We have to walk 1 mile and the rate of walking is 3 miles/hour.

             Time = Distance / Rate

Time taken to walk 1 mile = 1 / 3 = 1/3 hour.

So, the answer is option C.

To know more about mile, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12665145

#SPJ11

The team's time on their final run, given the decrease in speed, would be 4. 33 minutes

On the next run, the time that the bobsled team would take is :

= 4. 85 - ( 4. 85 x 5. 5 % )

= 4. 85 - 0.26675

= 4. 58325 minutes

The run after that would see a time of :

= 4. 58325 - ( 4. 58325 x 5. 5 %)

= 4. 58325 - 0.25207875

= 4. 33 minutes

In conclusion, the  team's time on their final run, would be 4. 33 minutes.

Find out more on team runs at https://brainly.com/question/13584836

#SPJ4

.

The question is:

What was the team's time on their final run?