2x+3y=8 2x+2y=−5 determine their vertical distance

The equation "a - 3x = 0" is correctly written because it follows the standard format of an algebraic equation.

Given that,

All the equations are,

1. a + 0.2x

2. 5b - 5x + 2

3. a - 3x = 0

Now, from equation ''a - 3x = 0'',

In this equation, the variable "a" subtracted from 3 times the variable "x" equals zero.

The equal sign (=) indicates that the expression on both sides of the equation is equivalent.

The equation is properly balanced and expresses equality between the two sides.

It accurately represents a relationship between the variables "a" and "x" where the value of "a" is dependent on the value of "x" in order to satisfy the equation.

So, The correctly written algebraic equation is:

a - 3x = 0

To learn more about the equation visit:

brainly.com/question/28871326

#SPJ4

Answer:

$325

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the regular price by dividing 247 by 0.76:

247/0.76:

= 325

So, the regular price was $325

Answer:

There are no shortcuts to scaling successfully. It takes just as much — or more — work as it did to start the company in the first place. Take control of the transition. Get organized with tools that support your employees in their day-to-day roles, making it easier for them to get more done as the company grows.

Answer: About 72%

Step-by-step explanation:

It's a conditional probability.

(Number of graduates on financial aid)/(Number of graduates)

[tex]\frac{1879}{2610} =0.7199[/tex]

0.7199 = 71.99% ≈ 72%

Answer:

£48

Step-by-step explanation:

£72 / 3 = £24

£24 x 2 = £48

Hope this helps c:

Answer:

162 t-shirts, 324 posters

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming they only sold t-shirts and posters, you can find the amount of t-shirts sold by dividing 486 by 3, or multiplying it by 1/3. This equals 162. This is because one third were t-shirts. To find the rest you just subtract 162 from the total of 486, or multiply 162 by 2. (since you already know the amount of 1/3, 2/3 is double that.)

Answer:

pixxer

Step-by-step explanation:

please pick inside please

Answer:

I dont now

Step-by-step explanation:

plz conprendation

Answer:

the answer is B. (0,0) (5,-3) (4,1)

please mark me brainlist

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Your answer is

Step-by-step explanation:

Your answer is B.(0, 0), (5, -3), (4, 1)

Answer:

a) The expression for the number of bacteria is [tex]P(t) = 100\cdot e^{1.131\cdot t}[/tex].

b) There are 2975 bacteria after 3 hours.

c) The rate of growth after 3 hours is about 3365.3 bacteria per hour.

d) A population of 10,000 will be reached after 4.072 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The population growth of the bacteria culture is described by this ordinary differential equation:

[tex]\frac{dP}{dt} = k\cdot P[/tex] (1)

Where:

[tex]k[/tex] - Rate of proportionality, in [tex]\frac{1}{h}[/tex].

[tex]P[/tex] - Population of the bacteria culture, no unit.

[tex]t[/tex] - Time, in hours.

The solution of this differential equation is:

[tex]P(t) = P_{o}\cdot e^{k\cdot t}[/tex] (2)

Where:

[tex]P_{o}[/tex] - Initial population, no unit.

[tex]P(t)[/tex] - Current population, no unit.

If we know that [tex]P_{o} = 100[/tex], [tex]t = 1\,h[/tex] and [tex]P(t) = 310[/tex], then the rate of proportionality is:

[tex]P(t) = P_{o}\cdot e^{k\cdot t}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{P(t)}{P_{o}} = e^{k\cdot t}[/tex]

[tex]k\cdot t = \ln \frac{P(t)}{P_{o}}[/tex]

[tex]k = \frac{1}{t}\cdot \ln \frac{P(t)}{P_{o}}[/tex]

[tex]k = \frac{1}{1}\cdot \ln \frac{310}{100}[/tex]

[tex]k\approx 1.131\,\frac{1}{h}[/tex]

Hence, the expression for the number of bacteria is [tex]P(t) = 100\cdot e^{1.131\cdot t}[/tex].

b) If we know that [tex]t = 3\,h[/tex], then the number of bacteria is:

[tex]P(t) = 100\cdot e^{1.131\cdot t}[/tex]

[tex]P(3) = 100\cdot e^{1.131\cdot (3)}[/tex]

[tex]P(3) \approx 2975.508[/tex]

There are 2975 bacteria after 3 hours.

c) The rate of growth of the population is represented by (1):

[tex]\frac{dP}{dt} = k\cdot P[/tex]

If we know that [tex]k\approx 1.131\,\frac{1}{h}[/tex] and [tex]P \approx 2975.508[/tex], then the rate of growth after 3 hours:

[tex]\frac{dP}{dt} = \left(1.131\,\frac{1}{h} \right)\cdot (2975.508)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dP}{dt} = 3365.3\,\frac{1}{h}[/tex]

The rate of growth after 3 hours is about 3365.3 bacteria per hour.

d) If we know that [tex]P(t) = 10000[/tex], then the time associated with the size of the bacteria culture is:

[tex]P(t) = 100\cdot e^{1.131\cdot t}[/tex]

[tex]10000 = 100\cdot e^{1.131\cdot t}[/tex]

[tex]100 = e^{1.131\cdot t}[/tex]

[tex]\ln 100 = 1.131\cdot t[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{\ln 100}{1.131}[/tex]

[tex]t \approx 4.072\,h[/tex]

A population of 10,000 will be reached after 4.072 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

I am sorry question samajh Nahin a Raha question dijiye

Answer:

It would take 10 hours for Casey to paint the room by himself.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Casey and Malik can paint a room in 6 hours if they work together, and if Malik were to work by himself, it would take him 4 hours longer than it would take Casey working by himself, to determine how long would it take Casey to paint the room by himself if Malik calls in sick the following calculation must be performed:

6 x 2 = 12

12 x 2 = 24

(24 - 4) / 2 = 10

Therefore, it would take 10 hours for Casey to paint the room by himself.

Answer:

4 over 3

because is in side the bracket is part of inequalities

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

59 / 71

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data :

A B C Total

Male 20 10 13 43

Female 15 2 11 28

Total 35 12 24 71

The probability of randomly selecting a Student that got B ;

Probability = required outcome / Total possible outcomes

P(getting B) = number of students who got B / total number of students

P(getting B) = 12 / 71

Probability of getting B = 12 /71

Probability of not getting B = P(getting B)' = 1 - P(getting B)

Probability that student did not get "B" = 1 - 12/71 = 59 / 71

Answer:

Calculating p-value from excel  

p-value = 0.144458 (From excel  =T.DIST.RT(1.091,19))  

p-value = 0.144458 > 0.05  

So, we failed to reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that they pay not more than the national average of $4172.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the given de4tails are,

Hypothesized mean = 4172

Sample Standard deviation = 1590

Sample mean = 4560

Sample size n = 20

Formulation of hypothesis

Answer:

a. See the attached excel file for the frequency distribution table, and the attached photo for the histogram.

b. We have:

Mean = 16.7

Median = 15

Note: See the attached photo for the locations of Mean and Median on the histogram.

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Construct a frequency distribution of these days and display it as a histogram.

Note: See the attached excel file for the frequency distribution table, and the attached photo for the histogram.

b. Determine the mean and the median of the dad and mark their locations on the histogram.

From the attached excel file, we have:

Total of F = 10

Total of FX = 167

Therefore, we have:

Mean = 167 / 10 = 16.7

Median is the middle number after arranged the data in ascending or descending order. Using the ascending order, we have:

13 13 14 14 15 15 16 20 21 26

Since 15 and 15 are in the middle, their average are the median which is calculated as follows:

Median = (15 + 15) / 2 = 15

Note: See the attached photo for the locations of Mean and Median on the histogram.

Answer:

0.9802 = 98.02% probability that the proportion of defective bottles in a sample of 602 bottles would differ from the population proportion by less than 4%

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

A bottle maker believes that 23% of his bottles are defective.

This means that [tex]p = 0.23[/tex]

Sample of 602 bottles

This means that [tex]n = 602[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = p = 0.23[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.23*0.77}{602}} = 0.0172[/tex]

What is the probability that the proportion of defective bottles in a sample of 602 bottles would differ from the population proportion by less than 4%?

p-value of Z when X = 0.23 + 0.04 = 0.27 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 0.23 - 0.04 = 0.19.

X = 0.27

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.27 - 0.23}{0.0172}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.33[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.33[/tex] has a p-value of 0.9901

X = 0.19

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.19 - 0.23}{0.0172}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.33[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.33[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0099

0.9901 - 0.0099 = 0.9802

0.9802 = 98.02% probability that the proportion of defective bottles in a sample of 602 bottles would differ from the population proportion by less than 4%

Answer:

7% probability that the next 2 cards are hearts.

Step-by-step explanation:

Cards are chosen without replacement, which means that the hypergeometric distribution is used to solve this question.

Hypergeometric distribution:

The probability of x successes is given by the following formula:

[tex]P(X = x) = h(x,N,n,k) = \frac{C_{k,x}*C_{N-k,n-x}}{C_{N,n}}[/tex]

In which:

x is the number of successes.

N is the size of the population.

n is the size of the sample.

k is the total number of desired outcomes.

Combinations formula:

[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

In this question:

10 cards, which means that [tex]N = 10[/tex]

3 are hearts, which means that [tex]k = 3[/tex]

Probability that the next 2 cards are hearts:

This is P(X = 2) when n = 2. So

[tex]P(X = x) = h(x,N,n,k) = \frac{C_{k,x}*C_{N-k,n-x}}{C_{N,n}}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 2) = h(2,10,2,3) = \frac{C_{3,2}*C_{7,0}}{C_{10,2}} = 0.0667[/tex]

0.0667*100% = 6.67%

Rounded to the nearest whole number, 7% probability that the next 2 cards are hearts.

Answer:

A = 16 ft^2

P = 20 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

P = perimeter

A = area

STEP 1: divide the shape into rectangles

Rectangle 1: 2ft*3ft

Rectangle 2: 2ft*5ft

STEP 2: Find the area of each rectangle

Equation for area of a rectangle = bh

Rectangle 1: b = 2, h = 3

Rectangle 2: b = 2, h = 5

(2 * 3) + (2 * 5)

6 + 10

16 ft^2

Now, we have to find the perimeter

STEP 1:  Find the unknown side lengths.

To find the lengths of the sides not labeled, you have to use the lengths of the sides we already know.

The length of one parallel side is 5, and the length of another parallel side is 2. The length of the unknown side starts at the same place as the top of the side length that is 5, and ends at the top of the side length that is 2. This means that we have to subtract 2 from 5 in order to find the unknown side length.

STEP 2: Add up all the side lengths

P = 2 + 5 + 5 + 2 + 3 + 3

P = 20 ft

Don't forget to label your answers!!

I hope this made sense, it's is a little hard to explain in simple terms without being able to draw, but I hope it helped.

Answer:

5 Minutes

take 10 and add 12 for each minute until you pass 60

Step-by-step explanation:

You can conclude that 82% of all shoppers will do business with any retailer of any size aslong as they are on the internet.

82% of 2700 = 0.82 * 2700 =2214

which makes the other responder correct.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let 'a' represent the number of pounds of Arabian Mocha in the mix. Then the number of pounds of Costa Rican blend is (100-a). The cost of the mix will be ...

  9.10(100 -a) +13.10(a) = 11.58(100)

  4a = 248 . . . . . . . . . . . . . collect terms, subtract 910

  a = 62 . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 4

62 pounds of Arabian Mocha and 38 pounds of Costa Rican blend should be mixed.

Answer:

240

Step-by-step explanation:

minus how much u sold them and how much it cost to make

3-1=2

times 2 and 120

2(120)

240

Answer:

0.38 = 38% probability that it is neither red nor blue​.

Step-by-step explanation:

A probability is the number of desired outcomes divided by the number of total outcomes.

In this question:

100 cars.

Of those, 28 + 34 = 62 are either blue or red.

100 - 62 = 38 are neither blue of red.

What is the probability that it is neither red nor blue​?

38 out of 100, so:

[tex]p = \frac{38}{100} = 0.38[/tex]

0.38 = 38% probability that it is neither red nor blue​.

Answer:

[tex]y= -x^{2} -2x+15[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]y= -x^{2} -2x+15[/tex]

Answer:

This looks like the graph of [tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{x}[/tex] ! That's a reciprocal graph.

Answer:

annualy=$3689.62

semiannually=$3695.27

monthly=$3700.06

weekly=$3700.81

daily=$3701.00

Continuously=$3701.03

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

P=3000

r=3%

t=7 years

Formula used:

Where,

A represents Accumulated amount

P represents (or) invested amount

r represents interest rate

t represents time in years

n represents accumulated or compounded number of times per year

Solution:

(i)annually

n=1 time per year

[tex]A=3000[1+\frac{0.03}{1} ]^1^(^7^)\\ =3000(1.03)^7\\ =3689.621596\\[/tex]

On approximating the values,

A=$3689.62

(ii)semiannually

n=2 times per year

[tex]A=3000[1+\frac{0.03}{2}^{2(4)} ]\\ =3000[1+0.815]^14\\ =3695.267192[/tex]

On approximating the values,

A=$3695.27

(iii)monthly

n=12 times per year

[tex]A=3000[1+\frac{0.03}{12}^{12(7)} \\ =3000[1+0.0025]^84\\ =3700.0644[/tex]

On approximating,

A=$3700.06

(iv) weekly

n=52 times per year

[tex]A=3000[1+\frac{0.03}{52}]^3^6 \\ =3000(1.23360336)\\ =3700.81003[/tex]

On approximating,

A=$3700.81

(v) daily

n=365 time per year

[tex]A=3000[1+\frac{0.03}{365}]^{365(7)} \\ =3000[1.000082192]^{2555}\\ =3701.002234[/tex]

On approximating the values,

A=$3701.00

(vi) Continuously

[tex]A=Pe^r^t\\ =3000e^{\frac{0.03}{1}(7) }\\ =3000e^{0.21} \\ =3000(1.23367806)\\ =3701.03418\\[/tex]

On approximating the value,

A=$3701.03