2. In what ways do Sources B and C
agree about Columbus?

One policy that has been discussed regarding federal educational control is the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, which was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002.

The NCLB Act aimed to improve the academic achievement of all students by setting high standards for schools and holding them accountable for their students' performance. Under NCLB, schools were required to administer annual standardized tests to all students in grades 3-8, and schools that failed to make adequate yearly progress (AYP) faced a series of escalating consequences.

The effectiveness of NCLB has been a topic of much debate. Supporters argue that the law brought much-needed accountability to the education system, highlighted achievement gaps among different student populations, and led to some improvements in student achievement. However, critics argue that NCLB led to a narrow focus on test preparation and a neglect of other important areas of education, such as the arts, social studies, and physical education. They also argue that the consequences for schools that failed to meet AYP were too harsh and often resulted in punitive measures, such as school closures or teacher firings, which hurt students and communities.

Learn more about education on:

https://brainly.com/question/919597

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Office of War Information (OWI) was a U.S. government agency created during World War II to promote patriotism, build support for the war effort, and counter enemy propaganda. Here are some potential SPICE outcomes at the end of the Office of War Information:

Social outcomes: The end of the Office of War Information may have had social implications, as Americans adjusted to a postwar society. The agency had played a role in shaping public opinion and creating a sense of national unity during the war, and its dissolution may have had an impact on how Americans viewed themselves and their country.

Political outcomes: The end of the Office of War Information may have had political implications, as well. The agency had been involved in shaping government messaging and propaganda during the war, and its dissolution may have signaled a shift in U.S. government priorities or strategies.

Intellectual outcomes: The end of the Office of War Information may have had intellectual implications, as Americans grappled with the legacy of wartime propaganda and the role of government in shaping public opinion. Some may have questioned the ethics of propaganda and its impact on democratic values, while others may have considered the challenges of communicating with a diverse and divided population.

Cultural outcomes: The end of the Office of War Information may have had cultural implications, as well. The agency had played a role in shaping American popular culture during the war, producing films, radio programs, and other media to promote patriotism and the war effort. The dissolution of the agency may have influenced American cultural production in the postwar years.

Economic outcomes: The Office of War Information was primarily a government agency, so its dissolution likely had limited economic consequences. However, some employees of the agency may have lost their jobs or had to find new employment after the war.

Answer:

One landmark court ruling during the Civil Rights movement was Brown v. Board of Education (1954). In this case, the United States Supreme Court declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). The Court held that segregation in education created a feeling of inferiority among African American students and violated their right to equal protection under the law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling marked a significant victory for the Civil Rights movement, and set the stage for further legal challenges to segregation and discrimination in other areas of society.

Explanation:

Answer:

B) The Philippines's attempt to gain independence after the U.S. annexed the islands.

Explanation:

The United States acquired the Philippines from Spain following the Spanish-American War in 1989. It is important to note that during this time, the Philipino's had already themselves been trying to fight for independence from Spanish rule. The acquisition of Philippines by the United States following the war without acknowledging the independence of the islands led to the Philippine-American War (1899-1902). The Philippine independence movement failed, and Philippine remained a US territory until 1935, when it gained autonomy, and 1946, when they gained full independence.

~

Learn more about the Spanish-American War, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2827989

England became the foremost colonial power in the globe. The Great Lakes were used to conquer French forts. The war was formally ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.

What was the French and Indian War's key turning point?

The conflict started to alter when William Pitt gained charge of the military operations. He believed that England's domination of the globe depended on North America. Pitt agreed to hand over management of recruiting and supplies in exchange for a promise to reimburse them.

In the French and Indian War, the British prevailed. They took control of the area over which France claimed possession. The French mainland came under American authority. All of the nations from the east coast of North America to the Mississippi River were now under British control. The French and Indian War was ended by the signing of the Treaty of Paris in February 1763. The Brits grabbed Canada from France and Florida from Spain while giving France the right to keep its West Indian sugar islands and giving Spain Louisiana.

Learn more about French and Indian War:

https://brainly.com/question/3223999

#SPJ1

Answer:I think it means England's government or the Law.

Explanation: As stated in the Washington post "The British government still faces a daunting economic challenge."

An unstated purpose of President Obama's speech is C to convince his audience to actively participate in government

An unstated purpose refers to a purpose or objective that is not explicitly mentioned or expressed in a particular statement or text. It is something that the speaker or writer intends to achieve through their words, but does not directly state.

From the text we can clearly see that Barack Obama was speaking to Americans about active participation in governance. He states that the constitution is nothing without citizen playing their active role. This speech is intended to motivate citizens to actively participate in governance.

The above answer is based on the question in the excerpt as stated below;

This excerpt is from President Barack Obama's 2017 farewell address.

Our democracy is threatened whenever we take it for granted.... When voting rates in America are some of the lowest among advanced democracies, we should be making it easier, not harder, to vote. When trust in our institutions is low, we should... insist on the principles of transparency and ethics in public service. When Congress is dysfunctional, we should draw our congressional districts to encourage politicians to cater to common sense and not rigid

extremes.

But remember, none of this happens on its own. All of this depends on...each of us accepting the responsibility of citizenship, regardless of which way the pendulum of power happens to be swinging.

Our Constitution is a remarkable, beautiful gift. But it's really just a piece of parchment. It has no power on its own. We, the people give it power. We, the people give it meaning.... Whether or not we stand up for our freedoms. Whether or not we respect and enforce the rule of law. That's up to us. America is no fragile thing. But the gains of our long journey to freedom are not assured.

Question:

Based on the excerpt, which phrase identifies an unstated purpose of President Obama's speech?

A. to encourage support for the incoming administration

B. to gain support for the newly elected members of Congress

C to convince his audience to actively participate in government

D. to convince his audience to be honest when dealing with the government

Find more information on unstated purposes;

https://brainly.com/question/30385634

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Office of Price Administration and Civilian Supply (OPACS) was an American federal agency that was responsible for regulating prices and rationing scarce goods and supplies during World War II.

The SPICE acronym stands for Social, Political, Intellectual, Cultural, and Economic outcomes, which are broad categories used to analyze historical events. Here are some potential SPICE outcomes at the end of the OPACS:

Social outcomes: The end of the OPACS meant that civilians had more freedom to purchase and consume goods without restrictions. This may have led to a sense of relief and gratitude among the American public, who no longer had to worry about rationing or price controls.

Political outcomes: The end of the OPACS signaled a shift away from government intervention in the economy, which was a controversial issue during World War II. Some Americans may have seen this as a victory for free market capitalism, while others may have been concerned about the potential for inflation or price gouging without government oversight.

Intellectual outcomes: The end of the OPACS may have sparked debates among economists and policymakers about the effectiveness of government intervention in the economy during wartime. Some may have argued that the OPACS was necessary to prevent hoarding and price gouging, while others may have criticized the agency for stifling innovation and market competition.

Cultural outcomes: The end of the OPACS may have affected American popular culture in subtle ways, such as through advertising and media. Companies may have used the lifting of price controls as a marketing strategy to promote their products, while filmmakers and writers may have incorporated themes of economic freedom or government intervention into their work.

Economic outcomes: The end of the OPACS had significant economic implications. With price controls lifted, some goods may have become more expensive or scarce, which could have impacted different sectors of the economy in various ways. Overall, the end of the OPACS signaled a transition to a post-war economy and the challenges that came with rebuilding after the war.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

A millennium =  1,000 years

Answer:

1. property that is or may be inherited; an inheritance

2. a special or individual possession; an allotted portion.

Explanation:

Sorry if this doesn't answer your question. Next time try to be more specific with your question.

Answer:

kdjhsifhai85wt84 . I am sure you have any

Answer: Both groups mostly lived in segregated areas of the city.

Explanation:

Answer:

"Weimar Republic" is the name given to the German government between the end of the Imperial period (1918) and the beginning of Nazi Germany (1933). Political turmoil and violence, economic hardship, and also new social freedoms and vibrant artistic movements characterized the complex Weimar period. Many of the challenges of this era set the stage for Adolf Hitler's rise to power.

KEY FACTS

Based on the concept of wood defect, the type of defect that affects the lumber grading, in this case, is Knot.

Knot defect is a term that is used to describe the defects in timber, which occur when branches die off and the bases become enclosed by a second layer of wood.

Generally, Knot is considered a natural defect in the wood, and can create an interesting visual sight which is commonly seen on hardwood floors.

In this case, the oval shape depicts a form of knot defects in the wood.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Knot.

Learn more about Wood defects here: https://brainly.com/question/3594552

#SPJ1

Question

What defect that affects lumber grading is illustrated in the photo below?

1. It intensified throughout much of the world, leading to widespread independence movements.

2. Political expedience

3. Zionism

3. A revolution should arise out of a people's history.

4. He did not focus on human welfare programs.

5. Mahatma Gandhi

6. Complete independence

7. Increased American arms for the Israelis

8. Children are in harm's way due to acts of violence.

9. Their member nations reduce tariffs to trade with each other.

10. It has its own currency.

11. Domestic suppliers or businesses

12. It accelerated it significantly.

13. Tariffs

Regional trade blocs, such as the European Union and USMCA, most directly decrease tariffs.

These blocs are agreements between countries that reduce or eliminate tariffs on goods traded between them. This creates a more open and free market within the bloc, promoting trade and economic growth among member nations.

By reducing tariffs, regional trade blocs also aim to reduce trade barriers and promote the free flow of goods, services, and capital within the bloc.

This can lead to increased competition among domestic suppliers, which can be challenging for some businesses but ultimately benefits consumers with lower prices and better products.

While regional trade blocs may impact other factors such as immigration and tax rates, the most direct impact is on tariffs and trade barriers.

Overall, regional trade blocs aim to promote economic integration and cooperation among member nations while stimulating economic growth and development.

Learn more about  World War II here

https://brainly.com/question/3434956

#SPJ5

The secret gentlemen's agreement that President Theodore Roosevelt worked out with the Japanese in 1907-1908 is known as the Root-Takahira Agreement.

The Root-Takahira Agreement was a secret agreement that was signed on November 30, 1908, between the United States and Japan. The agreement was signed by U.S. Secretary of State Elihu Root and Japanese Ambassador to the United States Takahira Kogorō.

The agreement was signed to improve the relationship between the two countries by resolving territorial disputes in Asia and the Pacific. It also allowed the United States to recognize Japan's dominance in Korea, while Japan agreed to respect American interests in the Philippines and the Open Door Policy in China.

The Root-Takahira Agreement was a significant diplomatic accomplishment that helped to reduce tensions between the United States and Japan. However, the agreement was controversial, as it allowed Japan to expand its influence in Asia at the expense of other countries.

For more such questions on Root-Takahira Agreement, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/31066833

#SPJ11

1.

The Roman victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars gave way to the establishment of the Roman Empire. Despite the great victories of Carthage during the wars, the Romans were able to outmaneuver and eventually conquer the remains of the African empire

2.

The Gracchi brothers attempted to address growing inequalities through land reforms and price controls.

3.

The Roman and Chinese had much similarities but also many differences. Their economies were both agrarian and monetized, but adopted different models of production organization. Their societies were both patriarchic, conservative and stratified.

4.

The Polos were likely shrewd, alert, and courageous; they traded with th

Answer:true

Explanation:

It is FALSE that Marcus Aurelius believed that if you work hard and never give up, only then can you experience great happiness at the end of your life.

While Marcus Aurelius emphasized the importance of hard work and perseverance, he did not believe that great happiness could only be experienced at the end of one's life. Instead, he believed that happiness and fulfillment could be found in the present moment, through acts of virtue and the pursuit of inner peace and tranquility. In his book "Meditations," he wrote extensively about the need to cultivate inner strength, resilience, and mindfulness in order to find meaning and purpose in life.

To know more about Marcus Aurelius

brainly.com/question/28280639

#SPJ4

Answer:

I think that the residents of beijing were very impressed and proud of the Forbidden City. It showed China's glory and capability of buidling. Although the residents weren't allowed to enter, they probably enjoyed the sight of it and loved the symbol of glory that it brought to them.

Answer:

Eric Foner's assertion that the consumer culture of the Progressive Era became the foundation for a new understanding of freedom as access to goods made available by modern capitalism has some validity. The rise of consumerism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries coincided with a period of significant social and economic change, including the growth of industrialization, urbanization, and mass production. As a result, Americans increasingly defined their identities through their consumption habits and the goods they owned.

The availability of consumer goods also became a symbol of progress and prosperity, as it provided access to a wider range of products and services. The desire for material wealth and comfort became a marker of success and an expression of individualism, which was central to the concept of freedom in American society.

However, it is important to note that this understanding of freedom was not universally accepted. Many critics of consumer culture argued that it promoted superficial values and undermined traditional values such as thrift, hard work, and self-reliance. They also argued that the emphasis on consumption perpetuated inequalities and encouraged people to define their worth based on their purchasing power, rather than on their inherent qualities as human beings.

Overall, while the consumer culture of the Progressive Era did contribute to a new understanding of freedom as access to goods made available by modern capitalism, this view was not universally accepted, and remains the subject of ongoing debate.

Explanation:

There is something to get you started ^^

I agree with Eric Foner's view that the consumer culture of the Progressive Era formed the basis for a new understanding of freedom as access to goods provided by modern capitalism. This reflects the shift from producer to consumer society, suggesting that access and consumption of goods has become a critical aspect of freedom.

Yes, I would agree with Eric Foner's assertion that the consumer culture of the Progressive Era laid the groundwork for a new interpretation of freedom as access to the bounty of goods supplied by modern capitalism. This alternative concept of liberty reflects the shift from a society dominated by producers to one dominated by consumers. It suggests that the ability to access and consume goods and services has become an important aspect of freedom.

This aligns with the broader societal shifts that took place during the Progressive Era, a time of rapid industrialization and urbanization. The rise of mass production and advertising during this period, coupled with increased purchasing power, effectively transformed the relationship between citizens and the economy. As a result, people’s access to created goods and services, their choice, and their ability to participate in the market became markers of liberty.

https://brainly.com/question/33499140

#SPJ2

Answer:

Documentary is actual evets that happened, Drama is a made up story that could have happened during that historical time. The documentary is a record of factual events. It is the story of 'something' or the process of 'something'. On the other hand, drama is the imitation of life—a contrived story.

Explanation:

In a documentary, the truth is the story. A historical drama may take a nuanced approach to the truth. It might use a historical period as a backdrop for a story in which historical characters appear and act out fictionalized events.

Answer: Dramas often overexaggerate the facts

while documentaries include all the true and full facts without taking sides

Explanation:

A documentary says it how it is.

Answer:

D) All people deserve equal respect.

Explanation:

While Americans may hold differing beliefs on a wide range of issues, one fundamental belief that is often cited as a cornerstone of American values is the belief in the equal dignity and worth of every individual. This belief is enshrined in the United States Declaration of Independence, which states that "all men are created equal" and endowed with certain unalienable rights. This belief in equal respect for all people is often seen as a guiding principle in the fight against discrimination and inequality, and is a common thread that runs through many aspects of American culture and society.

Answer:

So you see, never judge a book by its cover.

Explanation:

The book is wrong.

Its that dude called Joseph Fourier

The majority joined on the side of the Allies, including Serbia, Russia, France, Britain, Italy and the United States. They were opposed by Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire, who together formed the Central Powers.

What are the reasons of WW1?

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary was the direct cause of World War I, bringing into play the alliances, imperialism, militarism, and nationalism stated above. The Archduke was assassinated in June 1914 by a Serbian nationalist terrorist organization known as the Black Hand.

Germany has received responsibility for invading Belgium in August 1914 despite Britain's assurances that it would be protected. Nonetheless, historians have the idea that the decision was popular based on the public festivities that followed the British and French declaration of war, and politicians are known to follow popular opinion.

The three days leading up to July 28th, 1914, saw the Russian Empire progressively enlist in World War I. This started when Serbia, a Russian ally, was declared at war by Austria-Hungary.

Learn more about WW1:

https://brainly.com/question/29766007

#SPJ1

The United States' involvement in the Korean War marked the beginning of its long-term commitment to containing communism in Asia. The war, fought between communist North Korea and non-communist South Korea, was seen as a test of the U.S.'s commitment to its allies and its ability to resist communist aggression. The U.S. ultimately intervened to support South Korea, sending troops and military aid. Although the war ended in a stalemate, the U.S. maintained a significant military presence in South Korea and other countries in the region as part of its containment strategy. This commitment to containing communism in Asia was reinforced by subsequent events, including the Vietnam War and the Cold War more broadly, and continues to shape U.S. foreign policy to this day.

The United States' involvement in the Korean War, according to the Containment Policy, set a precedent for US's readiness to engage in armed conflict to stop the spread of communism. The division between North and South Korea affirmed the communist threat and led the U.S. to maintain a military presence in South Korea and extend containment efforts to other Asian countries, most notably Vietnam.

The United States' involvement in the Korean War indeed set the stage for its continued involvement in Asia to contain communism. This notion is rooted in the US's adoption of the Containment Policy, aimed at stopping the spread of communism globally. The Korean War was one of the first significant conflicts under this policy, and the subsequent military commitment demonstrated U.S.'s readiness to engage in armed conflict to achieve this goal.

The outcome of the Korean War didn't decisively quell communism in the region but rather affirmed the division between communist North Korea and democratic South Korea. Bearing witness to this division, and the ongoing threat of communism, the U.S. retained a significant military presence in South Korea and continued its containment efforts in other Asian countries, most notably Vietnam. This continued involvement in Asia in the name of preventing communism expansion is direct sequel to the stand it took during the Korean War.

https://brainly.com/question/32943872

#SPJ11

The similarities and the differences that exist in the Ronald Takaki reading and the OWI film are stated below.

Similarities to OWI film:

Both the Ronald Takaki reading and the OWI film discuss the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.

Both sources highlight the racism and discrimination faced by Japanese Americans during this time period.

They both mention the Executive Order 9066, which authorized the forced relocation and incarceration of Japanese Americans.

Both sources also touch on the impact that the internment had on Japanese American communities, including the loss of property, jobs, and personal freedoms.

Differences from OWI film:

The Ronald Takaki reading goes into more detail about the historical context of anti-Asian racism in the United States, tracing it back to the 19th century and the arrival of Chinese immigrants.

The reading also examines the legal framework behind the internment, specifically the Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States, which upheld the constitutionality of the internment.

While the OWI film briefly mentions the resistance of some Japanese Americans to the internment, the Takaki reading provides more information on this topic, including the formation of the Fair Play Committee and the resistance at the Heart Mountain internment camp.

The reading also discusses the impact of the internment on the children of Japanese American families, who were often forced to attend segregated schools and faced discrimination even after the war.

learn more about Ronald Takaki reading: https://brainly.com/question/30768612

#SPJ1

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954 was a landmark decision in the fight for civil rights in the United States. The ruling declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. While the ruling was a victory for the civil rights movement, it was met with mixed reactions from different segments of society, as reflected in the excerpted newspaper editorials.

One editorial in The Richmond News Leader from May 18, 1954, argued that the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was an overreach of federal power and would lead to chaos and conflict. The editorial claimed that the ruling went against established legal precedent and would disrupt the long-held practice of separate but equal. The editorial stated, "This is not the first time that the Supreme Court has been deluded by the false theory that it has the power to reshape the Constitution."

In contrast, an editorial in The New York Times from the same day praised the Brown v. Board of Education ruling as a significant step towards ending segregation and achieving racial equality. The editorial declared, "The Supreme Court has taken a courageous step in affirming the principles of democracy." The editorial also acknowledged that the ruling would face resistance and that it would take time for it to be fully implemented, but it was a necessary step in the struggle for civil rights.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling had significant effects on the larger civil rights movement. It paved the way for the desegregation of schools and other public spaces and challenged the legal basis of segregation. The ruling also inspired other civil rights activists to fight for their rights and encouraged them to use the legal system to do so.

However, the ruling also faced backlash from those who opposed desegregation and the civil rights movement as a whole. Some states even defied the ruling and refused to integrate their schools, leading to further legal battles and tensions between federal and state governments.

In conclusion, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a significant moment in the history of the civil rights movement in the United States. While it was met with mixed reactions, it marked a turning point in the fight against segregation and discrimination. The ruling's effects were far-reaching, impacting not only the education system but also other areas of society.

Answer:

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1954 that declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional. This ruling was a critical moment in the civil rights movement, and it had a significant impact on American society as a whole. While some newspaper editorials praised the decision, others were critical. This essay will examine the events that led to the ruling, as well as the effects of the ruling on the larger civil rights movement.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling was the result of a legal challenge brought by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1951. The NAACP argued that segregation in public schools violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case was consolidated with several other cases from across the country that also challenged segregation in public schools. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in 1952, and the case was re-argued in 1953.

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional because it violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The Court reasoned that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and that segregation had a detrimental effect on the education and development of black children.

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling had a profound impact on the larger civil rights movement. The ruling was a critical victory for the NAACP and other civil rights organizations that had been fighting segregation for decades. The decision also gave a significant boost to the growing civil rights movement, which was gaining momentum in the 1950s.

One of the newspaper editorials that praised the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was published in The New York Times. The editorial argued that the decision was a victory for American democracy and that it would help to strengthen the nation's commitment to equal rights. The editorial also acknowledged that the ruling would be difficult to implement, but it called on Americans to work together to ensure that the decision was fully enforced.

Another editorial that took a different view was published in The Daily Oklahoman. The editorial argued that the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was an example of judicial activism and that it undermined the authority of state and local governments. The editorial also claimed that the decision would lead to chaos and conflict in the South.

Despite these criticisms, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling had a profound and lasting impact on American society. The decision paved the way for other civil rights victories, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It also helped to inspire a new generation of civil rights leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., who would go on to lead the movement in the 1960s.

In conclusion, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a critical moment in the civil rights movement, and it had a significant impact on American society. The ruling was the result of years of hard work by civil rights organizations, and it marked a turning point in the struggle for equal rights. While some newspaper editorials praised the decision, others were critical, but the ruling's impact was undeniable. It helped to pave the way for other civil rights victories and inspired a new generation of leaders to continue the fight for equality.