10/7p+13/8+15/2p=909/56 i NEED THiS solving multi step equations w fractions and #8 PLEASE

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the equation

[tex]20+3\times(7+4)+5+2\times(7+9)[/tex]

In the order of operations parentheses go first so we get

[tex]20+3\times11+5+2\times16[/tex]

Next we do the multiplication

[tex]20+33+5+32\\[/tex]

And finally we add them all up

[tex]20+33+5+32=90\\[/tex]

Thus, 90 is the answer of [tex]20+3\times(7+4)+5+2\times(7+9)[/tex] or [tex]20+3(7+4)+5+2(7+9)[/tex]

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

2,8 to 4,12 has a rise of 4 and a run of 2.

4/2 = 2

The slope is 2.

Remember rise/run!

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

We take take two points and use the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

m = (12-8)/(4-2)

   = 4/2

   = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

your required answer is 60°.

Hello,

Here, in the figure;

angle 1= 120°

To find : m. of angle 2.

now,

angle 1 + angle 2= 180° { being linear pair}

or, 120° +angle 2 = 180°

or, angle 2= 180°-120°

Therefore, the measure of angle 2 is 60°.

Hope it helps you.....

Answer:

x1 = -4

x2 = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The 2 vertical lines are "absolute values" meaning whatever they contain has to be positive

For Example

|-3| = 3

So we can ignore if the answer we get is positive or negative because it will forced to be a positive

|3 x 4| = 12

|x - 2| = 4

x1 = 6

x2 = -2

Answer:

The probability is 2,010,580/13,378,456

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is a combination problem.

We want to 7 cards from a total of 52.

The number of ways to do this is 52C7 ways.

Also, we know there are 12 face cards in a standard deck of cards.

So we are selecting 3 face cards from this total of 12.

So also the number of cards which are not face cards are 52-12 = 40 cards

Out of all these 40, we shall be selecting exactly 4. The number of ways to do this 40C4

Thus, the required probability will be;

(40C4 * 12C3)/52C7 = (91,390 * 220)/133,784,560

= 20,105,800/133,784,560 = 2,010,580/13,378,456

Answer:

14 + 25l + 6l^2

Step-by-step explanation:

(7 + 2i) (2 + 3i)

=> 14 + 4l + 21l + 6l^2

=> 14 + 25l + 6l^2

This is the correct answer

Answer: The answer in a is No while the answer in b is Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the explanation in the attached file.

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\sf \bf \ \ -2i(6-7i)=-14-12i \ \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, please consider the following.

[tex]-2i(6-7i)=-12i+14i^2=-14-12i[/tex]

Hope this helps.

Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.

Thank you

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer = A

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Following the cardinal points as regards location of points, the sketch of Musah's movement can be as what is attached to this answer.

Answer:

x = 0.09

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {3}^{x + 2} = {2}^{3} [/tex]

Taking Logarith both sides, we get :

Using the properties of Logarithms:

[tex](x + 2) log(3) = 3 log(2) [/tex]

[tex](x + 2) = 1.91[/tex]

(taking log2= 0.3 and log3= 0.47)

x = 0.09

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

No the sample does not show that the average age  was different in 2010      

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The sample size is n =  50

    The  sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 38.5[/tex]

    The population mean is  [tex]\mu = 37[/tex]

     The standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 16[/tex]

     The level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 5 \% = 0.05[/tex]

 The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu = 37[/tex]

  The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : \mu \ne 37[/tex]

The critical value of the level of  significance obtained from the normal distribution table is  ([tex]Z_{\alpha } = 1.645[/tex] )

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

          [tex]t = \frac{ \= x - \mu }{ \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

substituting values

          [tex]t = \frac{ 38.5 - 37}{ \frac{16}{\sqrt{50} } }[/tex]        

         [tex]t = 0.663[/tex]

Now looking at the value  t and  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t < Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

This mean that there is no sufficient evidence to state that the sample shows that the average age was different in 2010      

Answer:

[tex] f(x) = 4x^2 - 3x + 6 [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Quadratic function is given as [tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]

Let's find a, b and c:

Substituting (0, 6):

[tex] 6 = a(0)^2 + b(0) + c [/tex]

[tex] 6 = 0 + 0 + c [/tex]

[tex] c = 6 [/tex]

Now that we know the value of c, let's derive 2 system of equations we would use to solve for a and b simultaneously as follows.

Substituting (2, 16), and c = 6

[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]

[tex] 16 = a(2)^2 + b(2) + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 16 = 4a + 2b + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 16 - 6 = 4a + 2b + 6 - 6 [/tex]

[tex] 10 = 4a + 2b [/tex]

[tex] 10 = 2(2a + b) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{10}{2} = \frac{2(2a + b)}{2} [/tex]

[tex] 5 = 2a + b [/tex]

[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex] => (Equation 1)

Substituting (3, 33), and c = 6

[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + x [/tex]

[tex] 33 = a(3)^2 + b(3) + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 33 = 9a + 3b + 6 [/tex]

[tex] 33 - 6 = 9a + 3b + 6 - 6 [/tex]

[tex] 27 = 9a + 3b [/tex]

[tex] 27 = 3(3a + b) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{27}{3} = \frac{3(3a + b)}{3} [/tex]

[tex] 9 = 3a + b [/tex]

[tex] 3a + b = 9 [/tex] => (Equation 2)

Subtract equation 1 from equation 2 to solve simultaneously for a and b.

[tex] 3a + b = 9 [/tex]

[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] a = 4 [/tex]

Replace a with 4 in equation 2.

[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] 2(4) + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] 8 + b = 5 [/tex]

[tex] 8 + b - 8 = 5 - 8 [/tex]

[tex] b = -3 [/tex]

The quadratic function that represents the given 3 points would be as follows:

[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]

[tex] f(x) = (4)x^2 + (-3)x + 6 [/tex]

[tex] f(x) = 4x^2 - 3x + 6 [/tex]

Answer:

In the error term.

Step-by-step explanation:

A simple linear regression is a regression that has only one explanatory variable. It tries to establish the existing relationship between the variable of interest (dependent variable) and the explanatory variable (independent variable).

Since age is the only explanatory variable, other variables such as faminc would be in the error term. The error term exists because the explanatory variable is never able to on its own to predict the dependent variable perfectly.

Answer:

a) 5[tex]cm^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Bodies have three dimensions (width, height and depth). Measuring volume is calculating the number of cubic units that can fit inside.

When raising to 3, these dimensions are included and therefore  5[tex]cm^{3}[/tex] is a measure of volume.

Answer:

5cm^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume for a form will always be in cubic units.

Area of a shape will always be in squared units.

Length will not be in cubic or squared units.

Hence, the first option is a measure for volume.

The second option is equal to 5cm^2 which represents a measure for area, as does the fourth option.

The third option represents a measurement of length, for example the length of a line segment or the height of a figure.

Complete Question

In the nation of Gondor, the EPA requires that half the new cars sold will meet a certain particulate emission standard a year later. A sample of 64 one-year-old cars revealed that only 24 met the particulate emission standard. The test statistic to see whether the proportion is below the requirement is:

A -1.645

B -2.066

C -2.000

D-1.960

Answer:

The  correct option is C

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  population mean is  [tex]p = 0.50[/tex]

    The sample size is  [tex]n = 64[/tex]

     The  number that met the standard is  [tex]k = 24[/tex]

Generally the sample proportion is mathematically evaluated   as

             [tex]\r p = \frac{24}{64}[/tex]

             [tex]\r p =0.375[/tex]

Generally the standard error is mathematically evaluated as  

       [tex]SE = \sqrt{ \frac{p(1- p )}{n} }[/tex]

=>    [tex]SE = \sqrt{ \frac{0.5 (1- 0.5 )}{64} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]SE = 0.06525[/tex]

The  test statistics is evaluated as

        [tex]t = \frac{ \r p - p }{SE}[/tex]

        [tex]t = \frac{ 0.375 - 0.5 }{0.0625}[/tex]

        [tex]t = -2[/tex]

Answer:

C≈31.42

Step-by-step explanation:

C=2πr

C=2xπx5

C≈31.42

pls mark as brainliest

Answer: Check out the diagram below for the filled in boxes

14 goes in the first box (inside A, but outside B)

7 goes in the overlapping circle regions

5 goes in the third box (inside B, outside A)

3 goes in the box outside of the circles

==============================================================

Explanation:

[tex]n(A \cup B) = 26[/tex] means there are 26 items that are in A, B or both.

n(A) = 21 means there are 21 items in A

n(B) = 12 means there are 12 items in B

We don't know the value of [tex]n(A \cap B)[/tex] which is the number of items in both A and B at the same time. This is the intersecting or overlapping regions of the two circles. Let [tex]x = n(A \cap B)[/tex]

It turns out that adding n(A) to n(B), then subtracting off the stuff they have in common, leads to n(A u B) as shown below.

--------

[tex]n(A \cup B) = n(A) + n(B) - n(A \cap B)\\\\26 = 21+12 - x\\\\26 = 33 - x\\\\x+26 = 33\\\\x = 33-26\\\\x = 7\\\\n(A \cap B) = 7\\\\[/tex]

So there are 7 items in both regions.

This means there are [tex]n(A) - n(A \cap B) = 21 - 7 = 14[/tex] items that are in set A only. In other words, 14 items are in circle A, but not in circle B.

Notice how the values 14 and 7 add back up to 14+7 = 21, which represents everything in set A.

Similarly, there are [tex]n(B) - n(A \cap B) = 12 - 7 = 5[/tex] items that are in circle B, but not in circle A. The values 5 and 7 in circle B add to 5+7 = 12, matching with n(B) = 12.

The notation n(A') means the number of items that are not in set A. We're given n(A') = 8. We already know that 5 is outside circle A. So if 5+y = 8, then y = 3 must be the missing value for the box that is outside both circles.

Again the diagram is posted below with the filled in values.

A Venn diagram is an overlapping circle to describe the logical relationships between two or more sets of items.

The filled Venn diagram is given below.

A Venn diagram is an overlapping circle to describe the logical relationships between two or more sets of items.

We have,

n(A) = 21

This is the total of all the items included in Circle A.

n(B) = 12

This is the total of all the items included in Circle A.

n(A') = 8

The items that are not in circle A.

n(A U B ) = 26

The items that are in both circle A and circle B.

Now,

n (A U B) = n(A) + n(B) - n(A ∩ B)

26 = 21 + 12 - n(A ∩ B)

n(A ∩ B) = 33 - 26

n(A ∩ B) = 7

Thus,
The filled Venn diagram is given below.

Learn more about the Venn diagram here:

https://brainly.com/question/1605100

#SPJ2

Answer:

5/3

Step-by-step explanation:

on both sides we can see that the orginal length of 3 increased to five

therfore if we multiply 3 by 3/5 we get five which means the scale factor is 5/3

Answer:

y - 5 = -1/4(x - 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Point slope form is y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is a point on the line and m is the slope.

To find the point slope form, plug in the point given and the slope.

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

y - 5 = -1/4(x - 4)

Answer:

We conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the 190 children born to cocaine users had a mean of 7.3 and a standard deviation of 3.0 The 186 children not exposed to cocaine had a mean score of 8.2 with a standard deviation of 3.0.

Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = population mean score for children born to cocaine users.

[tex]\mu_2[/tex] = population mean score for children not exposed to cocaine.

So, Null Hypothesis, : = 490      {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is not associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

Alternate Hypothesis, : 490     {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;

                               T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean score of children born to cocaine users = 7.3

[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean score of children not exposed to cocaine = 8.2

[tex]s_1[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children born to cocaine users = 3

[tex]s_2[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children not exposed to cocaine = 3

[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of children born to cocaine users = 190

[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of children not exposed to cocaine = 186

Also, [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\times s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)\times s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex]  = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(190-1)\times 3^{2}+(186-1)\times 3^{2} }{190+186-2} }[/tex] = 3

So, the test statistics =   ~

                                     =  -2.908

The value of t-test statistics is -2.908.

Now, at a 0.05 level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -1.645 at 374 degrees of freedom for the left-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -2.908 < -1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.

In the null hypothesis, a test always forecasts no effect, while the alternate theory states the research expectation impact, and calculation as follows:

Calculating the pooled estimator of [tex]\sigma^2[/tex], denoted by [tex]S^2_p[/tex], is defined by

[tex]\to \bold{S^2_p= \frac{(n_1 - 1) S^2_1+ (n_2 - 1)S^2_2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}[/tex]

Null hypothesis:

[tex]\to H_0 : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = \Delta_0\\[/tex]

Test statistic:

[tex]\to T_0=\frac{\bar{X_1}- \bar{X_2} -\Delta_0}{S_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}} \\\\[/tex]

Alternative Hypothesis:

[tex]H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 \neq \Delta_0\\\\ H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 > \Delta_0\\\\H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 < \Delta_0\\\\[/tex]

Rejection Criterion

[tex]t_0 > t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2}\ \ \ or\ \ \ t_0 < - t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > -t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2}[/tex]

Given value:

[tex]\to S_p=9\\\\\to \Delta_0=0\\\\\to t_0=-\frac{0.9}{3(\sqrt{(\frac{1}{190}+\frac{1}{186})})}=-2.9\\\\\to t_{0.05,374}=1.645\\\\[/tex]

here

[tex]\to t_0 < -t_{0.05,374}[/tex]

hence rejecting the [tex]H_0[/tex]

Since there should be enough evidence that prenatal cocaine exposure is linked to inferior item assembly scores in 4-year-olds.

Find out more about the alternative hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/18831983

[tex]x-1=\dfrac{6}{x}\qquad(x\not=0)\\\\x^2-x=6\\x^2-x-6=0\\x^2+2x-3x-6=0\\x(x+2)-3(x+2)=0\\(x-3)(x+2)=0\\x=3 \vee x=-2[/tex]

Answer:

63 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

If Chubby ran his wheel, which has a diameter of 20cm, we want to find its circumference - this will tell us how far Chubby has ran one one full rotation of the wheel.

The formula for the circumference of a circle is [tex]2\pi r[/tex], where r is the radius. We know the diameter is 20, which is double the radius, so the radius is [tex]20\div2=10[/tex] cm.

We can know substitute inside the formula:

[tex]2\cdot \pi \cdot10\\\\2\cdot 3.14 \cdot10\\\\ 6.28\cdot10\\\\62.8[/tex]

62.8 rounded to the nearest cm is 63.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

6280

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is "[tex]\bold{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex]"

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]\ S_1 = k \\\\ S_{n+1} = \sqrt{4S_n -1}[/tex]   [tex]_{where} \ \ n \geq 1[/tex]

In the above-given value, [tex]S_n[/tex] is required for the monotone decreasing so, [tex]S_2 :[/tex]

[tex]\to \sqrt{4k-1} \leq \ k=S_1\\\\[/tex]

square the above value:

[tex]\to k^2-4k+1 \leq 0\\\\\to k \leq 2+\sqrt{3} \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ 4k+1 >0\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\bold{\boxed{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}}[/tex]

Lila will need to start the hike at 11: 55 a.m. to be back at exactly 6: 05 p.m. or at 11: 54 a.m. to be before 6: 05 p.m (6: 04 p.m.)

Explanation:

To solve this question, the first step is to calculate how much time does hiking to the lake, go fishing, and go back takes in total. This can be calculated by adding the time of the three activities. This means 1 hour 10 minutes + 3 hours 10 minutes + 1 hour 50 minutes which is equal to 6 hours 10 minutes. The detailed process is shown below.

Add the hours: 1 + 3 + 1 = 5

Add the minutes: 10+50 +10 = 70

Also, because the total of minutes is above 60 (each hour has 60 minutes) it is necessary to subtract 60 minutes and add 1 hour.

5 hours + 1 hour and 70 minutes - 60 minutes = 6 hours and 10 minutes

Now, to solve the question subtract the time of the activities to the time Lila needs to complete all the activities.

6: 05 p.m.  -  6 hours and 10 minutes = 11: 55 a.m

You can get this result by substracting first the hours and then the minutes

6: 05 p.m. - 6 hours = 12: 05 p.m.

12: 05 - 10 minutes = 11: 55 a.m.

According to this, Lila will need to start the hike at 11: 55 a.m. to be back at exactly 6: 05 p.m. or at 11: 54 a.m. to be before 6: 05 a.m because if she starts at 11: 54 a.m. she will be back at 6:04, which is a minute before 6:05 p.m.

Answer:

6.5

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of all angles in a triangle are 180 degrees.

=> 10x -10 + 8x + 10x + 8 = 180

=> 28x -2 = 180

=> 28x = 182

=> x = 6.5

So, Angle A = 10 x 6.5 -10 = 65 - 10 = 55 degrees

     Angle B = 8 x 6.5 = 52 degrees

     Angle C = 10 x 6.5 + 8 = 65 + 8 = 73 degrees.

55 + 52 + 73 = 55 + 125 = 180 degrees

Answer5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

36 - 20 - 32 x 1/4

=> 36 - 20 - 32/4

=> 36 - 20 - 8

=> 36 - 28

=> 6

Answer:

maximum --> 62

median --> 46.5

upper quartile --> 60

lower quartile --> 37

minimum --> 32

Step-by-step explanation:

Forgive me on the explanation as I'm a bit rusty on these types of problems.

First, we need to put the set of numbers in order -->

from: 34, 37, 39, 32, 48, 45, 53, 62, 58, 61, 60, 41 -->

to: 32, 34, 37, 39, 41, 45, 48, 53, 58, 60, 61, 62

maximum = biggest number => thus, 62

median = middle number in a sense => (45+48)/2 => thus, 46.5

upper quartile = median over the median => thus, 60

lower quartile = median under the median => thus, 37

minimum = lowest number => thus, 32

And there we have our 5 answers.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

10,9.75,9.5,9.25,9, 8.75 , 8.5, 8.25, 8...

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 0.25 from each to find the next number

Answer:

8.25

Step-by-step explanation:

If you substract .25 from each number until you get to a8 you will get 8.25